Transient Sister Chromatid Separation and Elastic Deformation of Chromosomes during Mitosis in Budding Yeast  Xiangwei He, Saurabh Asthana, Peter K. Sorger 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Advertisements

Volume 89, Issue 7, Pages (June 1997)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Spindle Position Is Coordinated with Cell-Cycle Progression through Establishment of Mitotic Exit-Activating and -Inhibitory Zones  Leon Y. Chan, Angelika.
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages e6 (October 2017)
Dynamics of interphase microtubules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Caenorhabditis elegans TAC-1 and ZYG-9 Form a Complex that Is Essential for Long Astral and Spindle Microtubules  Martin Srayko, Sophie Quintin, Anne.
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Cell Cycle Control of Kinesin-Mediated Transport of Bik1 (CLIP-170) Regulates Microtubule Stability and Dynein Activation  Pedro Carvalho, Mohan L Gupta,
Inhibition of Aurora B Kinase Blocks Chromosome Segregation, Overrides the Spindle Checkpoint, and Perturbs Microtubule Dynamics in Mitosis  Marko J.
Andres Laan, Tamar Gutnick, Michael J. Kuba, Gilles Laurent 
Volume 27, Issue 15, Pages e8 (August 2017)
Asymmetric Microtubule Pushing Forces in Nuclear Centering
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Role of bud6p and tea1p in the interaction between actin and microtubules for the establishment of cell polarity in fission yeast  Jonathan M. Glynn,
Volume 154, Issue 5, Pages (August 2013)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 20, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2003)
Xiangwei He, Daniel R Rines, Christopher W Espelin, Peter K Sorger 
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Volume 19, Issue 17, Pages (September 2009)
Christine Michaelis, Rafal Ciosk, Kim Nasmyth  Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Marko Kaksonen, Christopher P. Toret, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Functional Comparison of H1 Histones in Xenopus Reveals Isoform-Specific Regulation by Cdk1 and RanGTP  Benjamin S. Freedman, Rebecca Heald  Current Biology 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2002)
Stefano Di Talia, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Determinants of S. cerevisiae Dynein Localization and Activation
Gilad Yaakov, Kurt Thorn, David O. Morgan  Developmental Cell 
Juan Guan, Harrison Liu, Xiaoyu Shi, Siyu Feng, Bo Huang 
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
A Change in the Selective Translocation of the Kinesin-1 Motor Domain Marks the Initial Specification of the Axon  Catherine Jacobson, Bruce Schnapp,
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
A Role for the FEAR Pathway in Nuclear Positioning during Anaphase
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Hong-Guo Yu, Douglas Koshland  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Viktoriya Syrovatkina, Chuanhai Fu, Phong T. Tran  Current Biology 
M phase–specific kinetochore proteins in fission yeast
Anaphase B Precedes Anaphase A in the Mouse Egg
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Volume 14, Issue 13, Pages (July 2004)
RECQL4 is a MAP with a spindle function.
Jean-François Maure, Etsushi Kitamura, Tomoyuki U. Tanaka 
Rsp1p, a J Domain Protein Required for Disassembly and Assembly of Microtubule Organizing Centers during the Fission Yeast Cell Cycle  Sabina Zimmerman,
Analysis of centromere and kinetochore function after depletion of DmSMC4. Analysis of centromere and kinetochore function after depletion of DmSMC4. (A)
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e6 (December 2017)
Yuri G. Strukov, A.S. Belmont  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Brian H. Lee, Brendan M. Kiburz, Angelika Amon  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Transient Sister Chromatid Separation and Elastic Deformation of Chromosomes during Mitosis in Budding Yeast  Xiangwei He, Saurabh Asthana, Peter K. Sorger  Cell  Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages 763-775 (June 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80888-0

Figure 1 Experimental Approach (A) Structures of TetO/TetR-GFP chromosome tags. Arrays of 224 50 bp TetO repeats (11.2 kb) were integrated as indicated into chromosomes IV and V. For CENIV, bp “0” is SGD bp 449,707, and for CENV it is 151,960. (The −2ChIVS tag comprises only 40 TetO repeats. Note 1, see Michaelis et al. 1997. Note 2, see Ciosk 1998. (B) Image of a mitotic nucleus in a cell carrying an Spc42p-GFP tag marking the two spindle pole bodies and a −38ChV tag marking the chromatids. Our software distinguishes spindle poles from chromosome tags by assuming that pole to pole distances are greater than pole–chromosome distances—an assumption that is valid for tags 38 kb or less from the centromere. (C) Schematic of the yeast nucleus in (B) overlaid with a cylindrical coordinate system. The axial and radial distances (l and r) are determined from the orientation of the spindle and the position of the chromosome tag. In our experiments, the azimuthal position φ is indeterminate, and, for simplicity, we assume radial symmetry. Cell 2000 101, 763-775DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80888-0)

Figure 2 Transient Sister Separation in Metaphase Cells (A) Single optical slice from a 3D image set of chromosomes undergoing transient sister separation when tagged at −2ChIV or −38ChV. Distances between sister chromatids are indicated. (B) Stills at selected intervals of a live cell carrying a −2ChIV tag as plotted in (C). Each panel is a projection of optical slices from a 3D data set. The reference spindle pole (distance “0”) is indicated by a yellow arrow. (C) Plot of distance between each sister chromatid and the reference spindle pole body. A single green line is shown when the sisters are together and two lines when they are separated. Spindle length is shown in blue. Based on spindle length, this movie ends approximately 10 min prior to anaphase. Cell 2000 101, 763-775DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80888-0)

Figure 3 Cell Cycle Regulation of Transient Sister Separation (A) Synchrony release experiment. Cells carrying a −2ChIV tag were arrested in α factor, released into fresh medium, and grown at 24°C. Samples were withdrawn every 10 min, fixed in formaldehyde, and 100–200 cells were then examined for sister separation, spindle length, and anaphase morphology. The histogram shows the fraction of preanaphase cells with separated sisters at spindle lengths from 0.6 to 2.2 μm. The “all” column is the fraction of all preanaphase cells with separated sisters, regardless of spindle length (i.e., the sum of columns to the left). Plotted to the right is the fraction of cells in anaphase (bars), a measure of cell-cycle synchrony, and the average metaphase spindle length (red line). (B and C) Plots of distance between each sister chromatid and a reference spindle pole body over a 10 min time-lapse movie of two unsynchronized cells. The cell in (B) is completing spindle pole body separation (SPB sep) during the first 3 min. This corresponds to a cell cycle point 50–60 min after α factor release, as judged by spindle length (see red line in [A]). The cell in (C) is later in the cell cycle, corresponding to approximately 70 min after α factor release. Cell 2000 101, 763-775DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80888-0)

Figure 4 CEN, Arm, and Telomeric Chromatin Occupy Discrete Nuclear Domains (A) Mapping the centromere-proximal elastic chromatin domain. The fraction of cells with separated sister chromatids as assayed using tags 1 to 284 kb from CENV is shown. Cells were arrested with α factor and released into fresh medium for 70 min prior to fixation and analysis. Each data point is derived from 50–100 cells. Anaphase cells (less than 5% of the total) were excluded from the analysis. (B) Typical images of fixed and live cells carrying chromosome tags at −2ChIV (CEN tag) or +284ChV (telomere tag). Projections of 3D data sets are shown, as are the centroids of the chromosome (yellow target) and spindle tags (red target) as determined by automated image analysis. (C) Scatter plot of the radial and axial positions (see Figure 1A) of a −2ChIV tag obtained from 20 time-lapse 3D movies of live preanaphase cells. To combine data from a total of 400 stills, distances are normalized to spindle length, which varied from 0.8 to 1.8 μm. Red dots denote separated sisters and blue dots unseparated chromatids. The green line shows the path of a single chromosome over time. (D) Scatter plot for a −38ChV tag. Note that the fraction of cells with separated sisters is much lower than in (C). (E) Scatter plot for a +284ChV tag. The horizontal and vertical scales are expanded relative to the plots in (C) and (D). Telomere tags can lie outside the normalized range of 0–1 because the spindle is usually shorter than the diameter of the nucleus. Cell 2000 101, 763-775DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80888-0)

Figure 5 Centromere Tag and Kinetochore Protein Distribution (A) Centromere distribution as a probability density plot based on the positions of −2ChIV tags with spindles 1.3 to 2.0 μm. (B) Typical images from cells carrying Spc42p-CFP (cyan fluorescent protein) and Slk19p-GFP. Bar equals 1 μm. (C) Images at selected intervals of living cells carrying Mtw1p-GFP and Spc42p-YFP (yellow fluorescent protein). Bar equals 1 μm. A GFP filter set was used during imaging to permit a small amount of Spc42-YFP signal to leak-through and mark the spindle poles without obscuring the weak Mtw1p-GFP signal. (D) Transient separation of two independent chromosome tags present in a single cell. Diploid cells carrying both −2ChIV and +1ChV tags as well as Spc42-GFP were fixed and scored for sister chromatid separation. Only cells in which the two chromosomes were on opposite sides of the spindle were analyzed (n = 37, representing about 1% of all images; see text for details). Cell 2000 101, 763-775DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80888-0)

Figure 6 Centromere-Proximal DNA Can Become Highly Stretched Gallery of images from fixed cells showing highly elongated GFP signals. The image to the left is unprocessed, the second image has low-intensity signals enhanced, and the third image is annotated to indicate various structures. To the right of each set is an interpretive drawing. (A) Metaphase cells carrying a −2ChIV tag. (B) Anaphase cells carrying a −2ChIV tag. (C) Anaphase cells carrying −38ChV and +284ChV tags. Cell 2000 101, 763-775DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80888-0)

Figure 7 Model for Centromeric Tensiometer and Yeast Spindle (A) A model of a hypothetical 1.5 μm spindle showing the kinetochore microtubules in pink and core microtubules in red. The paths of kinetochore microtubules (average length of 0.9 μm) as inferred from the positions of 5–100 −2ChIV tags (Figure 5B); note that each haploid cell has only 32 kinetochore microtubules. The paths for core microtubules are derived from EM tomography (O'Toole et al. 1999) extrapolated to a spindle length of 1.5 μm. The mean density of microtubules is estimated to be 200 μm polymer × μm−3 nucleoplasm within the region occupied by the core microtubules and 12-fold lower in the region occupied by the kinetochore microtubules. This difference in density is schematized by the use of thick red and thin pink lines and probably accounts for the bar-like appearance of the yeast spindle by immunofluorescence. (B) Schematic of the centromeric domain subject to dynamic sister separation. Cell 2000 101, 763-775DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80888-0)