Structural and Functional Studies of the 252 kDa Nucleoporin ELYS Reveal Distinct Roles for Its Three Tethered Domains  Silvija Bilokapic, Thomas U. Schwartz 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Advertisements

Structural Basis for Substrate Selectivity of the E3 Ligase COP1
Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Chen-Chou Wu, William J. Rice, David L. Stokes  Structure 
Decoy Strategies: The Structure of TL1A:DcR3 Complex
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structural Basis for Regulation of ESCRT-III Complexes by Lgd
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Structural Insights into the Inhibition of Wnt Signaling by Cancer Antigen 5T4/Wnt- Activated Inhibitory Factor 1  Yuguang Zhao, Tomas Malinauskas, Karl.
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Structure of DDB1 in Complex with a Paramyxovirus V Protein: Viral Hijack of a Propeller Cluster in Ubiquitin Ligase  Ti Li, Xiujuan Chen, Kenneth C.
Structural Basis for Endosomal Targeting by the Bro1 Domain
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e4 (February 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e4 (May 2017)
The Unmasking of Telomerase
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Structural Basis for Substrate Selectivity of the E3 Ligase COP1
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Ethan B. Butler, Yong Xiong, Jimin Wang, Scott A. Strobel 
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Crystal structures of Nova-1 and Nova-2 K-homology RNA-binding domains
Nina C. Leksa, Stephen G. Brohawn, Thomas U. Schwartz  Structure 
Clemens C. Heikaus, Jayvardhan Pandit, Rachel E. Klevit  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
STK40 Is a Pseudokinase that Binds the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase COP1
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Structural Basis for the Recognition of a Nucleoporin FG Repeat by the NTF2-like Domain of the TAP/p15 mRNA Nuclear Export Factor  Sébastien Fribourg,
Presentation transcript:

Structural and Functional Studies of the 252 kDa Nucleoporin ELYS Reveal Distinct Roles for Its Three Tethered Domains  Silvija Bilokapic, Thomas U. Schwartz  Structure  Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 572-580 (April 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.02.006 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Domain Organization of ELYS Secondary structure prediction methods suggest three domains in higher eukaryotes, with an N-terminal β-stranded domain (NTD), a central α-helical domain (CHD), and a disordered C-terminal region (CTR). In unicellular eukaryotes, i.e., S. pombe, only the CHD is conserved in ELYS homologs. The constructs used for crystallization are denoted with black bars. The residue numbering is based on UniProt entries Q8CJF7 (M. musculus), Q8WYP5 (H. sapiens), and O94384 (S. pombe). Structure 2013 21, 572-580DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.02.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 In Vivo Localization of Metazoan ELYS Domains (A) Domain organization of the GFP-labeled mELYS constructs and their localization in HeLa cells. Full-length mELYS (residues 1–2243) shows nuclear rim staining and intranuclear puncta. The construct containing both structured domains (NTD and CHD, residues 1–1018) also localizes to the nuclear rim, whereas the disordered region (CTR, residues 1019–2243) shows a diffuse nuclear GFP signal. (B) Domain organization of the GFP-labeled hELYS constructs and their localization in HeLa cells. The constructs containing only the NTD (residues 1–494) or the CHD (residues 495–1018) fail to localize to the nuclear rim in HeLa cells, showing that in metazoa both domains (residues 1–1018) are required for interaction with the NPC. (C) Fusion of the classical SV40 NLS to the C terminus of the hELYS NTD induces nuclear translocation, but the domain does not concentrate at the nuclear rim. Structure 2013 21, 572-580DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.02.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structural Analysis of mELYS NTD (A) Cartoon representation of the mELYS β-propeller domain with the blades labeled from 1 to 7. As a reference, the strands of blade 3 are labeled A–D, with the noncanonical fifth strand labeled D’. The β-propeller blades are colored in blue, loops are in white, and the secondary structure insertions within the loops are shown in orange. (B) Comparison of the β-propeller blades reveals long loops that decorate the structural core and contribute about 40% of the total mass of the 494 residue mELYS NTD. See also Figure S1. Structure 2013 21, 572-580DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.02.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Conserved Features of the mELYS β-Propeller (A) Cartoon representation of mELYS NTD from three different perspectives, related by rotation around the vertical axis as indicated. Conservation within the mELYS NTD is gradient-colored from gray (not conserved) to dark orange (most conserved) based on the alignment in Figure S3. The majority of conserved residues are structurally important as they build the core scaffold of the β-propeller. (B) Surface representation showing conservation of residues on the β-propeller periphery. Color scheme as in (A). The two conserved loops building the NPC binding interface are outlined with a black dotted line. See also Figure S3. Structure 2013 21, 572-580DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.02.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mutations in the Conserved β-Propeller Loops Abolish Proper NPC Localization of mELYS (A) Cartoon representation of mELYS NTD with the residues in the conserved loops shown as sticks. Loop1 residues are highlighted in yellow, and loop2 residues are in pink. Residues forming a hydrophobic pocket beneath loop2 are shown in gray. (B) Domain organization of the GFP-tagged mELYS mutants with the positions of the mutations indicated by red bars (loop deletions or multiple mutations) or red arrowheads (single mutations). (C) Confocal fluorescence microscopy of HeLa cells expressing GFP-tagged mELYS proteins. Wild-type mELYS properly localizes to the nuclear envelope. Deletion of the disordered loop3 (control, residues 458–476), as well as milder mutations within the binding region, show nuclear rim staining. The mELYSΔloop1/Y284S and mELYSloop2mut mutants abolish nuclear rim localization. See also Figure S4. Structure 2013 21, 572-580DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.02.006) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions