Vocabulary Activity Interrogate Self Incrimination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Maine Law Court & the Criminal Law DAG Bill Stokes, Chief, Criminal Division AAG Don Macomber, Criminal Division.
Advertisements

Christina Ascolillo.  Who was involved: Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.  When:  Where: Phoenix, Arizona  Why: Arrested and charged.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. BUTLER 19 Ohio St.2d 55, 249 N.E.2d 818 (1969) Case Brief.
CJ305: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Welcome to Unit 6! Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings.
Miranda Warning Law Enforcement I.
AP Government 2001 Glenn deMarrais. Question A. Brown vs. Board of Education Provision: Equal protection Clause Significance: required each state to.
Chapter Five Interrogation & Identification Procedures All Images © Microsoft Corporation Written by Karmel Tanner May 2010.
AJ 104 Chapter 14 Self-Incrimination.
Order granting a motion to dismiss under 12(b)(1) – lack of subject matter jurisdiction? Order granting a motion to dismiss under 12(b)(2) – lack of personal.
Unit 6 Miranda, Interviews & Interrogations. Interviewing The essential elements of an interview. Who What Where When Why How.
“A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS” “No Surprises, The Videotape Speaks and Shows, for Itself.” Major George Cadavid City of Miami Police Department.
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?
BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Miranda vs. Arizona 1966.
Daniel Moody PD. 3 3/25/10 Miranda VS. Arizona 1966.
False Confessions and the Death Penalty
Chapter 1 Distinctions between interviews And interrogations.
Forensic Victimology 2nd Edition
Nicholas Cowerdy QC, DPP Was pioneered in Australia by state Forensic Science Laboratory and introduced into casework in July 1989 As a result the following.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Seven: Confessions and the 5 th Amendment This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
Chapter 11(b) False Confessions Talbot Kellogg Community College
Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F Government 4 th Hour Mr. Baker.
Social Injustice: The problem with eye witness testimony by Chauncey Michael Murch III.
Crime and Due Process. There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.
Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.
Journal 1.Can a police officer “stop and frisk” you? 2.True or False - The 4th amendment protects us against all searches and seizures 3.Do the police.
 Most cases are handled by state courts  Arrest: When a person suspected of a crime is taken into custody Arrest warrant v. probable cause  A judge.
Supreme Court Cases Criminal Rights 1960’s. Gideon vs. Wainwright 1963 state courts are required under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Criminal Psychology Chapter 11(b) False Confessions Talbot Kellogg Community College.
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
*Most cases are handled by state courts Analyze Figure 12.1 on page 127 to see an overview of the entire criminal justice process.
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 6 (Chapter 8 – Admissions & Confessions)
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
Supreme Court Cases on Self Incrimination Sarah Claypoole.
Interrogation Class 15. Confession and Immaturity Haley v Ohio –15 year old “lad” interrogated starting at midnight, denied him access to counsel, confronted.
Know Your Rights Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda Rights.
Miranda Warning Law Enforcement I.
Miranda Rights Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F
Rights when arrested.
Defining the meaning of the terms in the warning
Tori Roupe and Haley Leavines
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
Lesson 6- Copy the following
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966.
Vocabulary Review Topic.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) The Warren Court.
Miranda v. Arizona 5th Amendment
Ch. 3-2 The Fifth Amendment Right to Remain Silent
Interrogations and Confessions
Criminal Procedure: Theory and Practice, 2d.
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
Innocence Project Recap
by Marcos Cardona-7th period
Judicial Branch.
Week of November 14, 2016.
Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.
By: Michaela Hull and Elena Butler
Ch 15: Social Psych in Court
Presentation transcript:

Vocabulary Activity Interrogate Self Incrimination Copy the definition of the following terms into your notes: Interrogate Self Incrimination

Interrogations and Confessions

Interrogations and Confessions

Interrogations and Confessions Interrogations often result in confessions or admissions of guilt Confessions are later used as evidence at trial Confessions are not admissible if they are not voluntary

Interrogations and Confessions

Interrogations and Confessions Miranda Rights https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ7ooBJ_DEU (5:00)

False Confessions More than 1 out of 4 people wrongfully convicted but later exonerated by DNA evidence made a false confession or incriminating statement. https://www.innocenceproject.org/causes/false-confessions- admissions/ (2:00)