Beam Propagation for bKAGRA Phase 1 with flat ETMs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hiro Yamamoto LLO April 3, 2014 LIGO-G Core Optics related loss hierarchy of aLIGO Hiro Yamamoto LIGO/Caltech Introduction Loss related to geometry.
Advertisements

KAGRA ISC Electrical Components Layout Yuta Michimura Ando Group Department of Physics, University of Tokyo April 17, 2015.
BS and Mirrors for the LCGT Norikatsu Mio, PSC Univ. of Tokyo Eiichi Hirose, ICRR Univ. of Tokyo December 13, 2011 CSIRO, Lindfield Australia.
KAGRA Vacuum System Items of vacuum sub-group 1 1. Overview VAC (YS) Required Pressure “uhv (ultra-high-vacuum)” in the order of Pa, or lower.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
Summary of Suspension Configurations Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo March 18, 2015.
LIGO- G R Telecon on June, Mach-Zender interferometer to eliminate sidebands of sidebands for Advanced LIGO Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
LIGO- G R Sensing and control, SPIE conference, June Sensing and control of the Advanced LIGO optical configuration SPIE conference at.
Optical Levers Layout and Cabling Yuta Michimura, Yuya Kuwahara Ando Group Department of Physics, University of Tokyo November 19, 2015.
Intensity Stabilization Servo Plan Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo November 23, 2015.
40m AOS DRD, G R1 40m Auxiliary Optics Support Design Requirements Document & Conceptual Design Michael Smith 10/18/01 Stray Light Control Initial.
New iKAGRA Configuration Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo 11th KAGRA F2F (University of Tokyo) Feb 6, 2015.
KAGRA ISC Electrical Components Layout Yuta Michimura Ando Group Department of Physics, University of Tokyo December 8, 2015.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
KAGRA Domestic Meeting Mirror 17 April, 2013 Norikatsu Mio Eiichi Hirose 1.
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo April 12, 2016JGW-T
IKAGRA 初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo July 5, 2016JGW-T
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Apr 11-25, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo May 9, 2016JGW-T
bKAGRA PSL Design Study
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Main Interferometer Meeting
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Apr 11-25, 2016
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
KAGRA Control Room Appearance (tentative)
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
Vibration Isolation Systems
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
Possibility of Upgrading KAGRA
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Cartoon of the optical layout around IMC, IFI and IMM
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
Progress report from 40m team for the Advanced LIGO
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Intensity Stabilization Servo Plan
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1
Intensity Stabilization Servo Plan
KAGRA ISC Electrical Components Layout
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
KAGRA ISC Electrical Components Layout
Presentation transcript:

Beam Propagation for bKAGRA Phase 1 with flat ETMs KAGRA Chief Meeting Feb 20, 2017 Beam Propagation for bKAGRA Phase 1 with flat ETMs Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo

Summary Real ETM mirrors might not be available on time coating was to start in February, but will start in April at best case We might have to use flat ETMs If flat ETMs are used, beam radius at BS/PR3/SR3 will be ~171 mm, which is ~31% loss at BS (φ370mm, 45 deg) ~44% loss at PR3/SR3 (φ220mm, 0.686 deg) also, note that GVs in arms have φ100mm or φ150 mm for comparison, in iKAGRA, returning beam at BS (φ74 mm CA) had 76 mm radius, which is ~ 62% loss Beam radius at AS port will be ~ 8 mm we will need 3 inch in-vac mirror for steering AS beam to in-air optical table

bKAGRA Phase1 Layout 3 km cryogenic Michelson GW signal ETMY RoC 1.9 km Φ 220 mm PR2 RoC -3.0764 m Φ 250 mm IMMT2 RoC 14.005 ± 0.238 m Φ 99.75 mm 3023.335 m PRM RoC 458.1285 m Φ 250 mm BS RoC flat Φ 370 mm ETMX RoC 1.9 km Φ 220 mm IMC 5.017 m 14.7615 m 3.105 m PSL 11.0661 m 0.5 m 3026.665 m 6.290 m PR3 RoC 24.9165 m Φ 250 mm 15.7638 m SR2 RoC -2.9872 m Φ 250 mm IMMT1 RoC -8.910 ± 0.0029 m Φ 99.77 mm 15.7386 m 11.1115 m SR3 RoC 24.9165 m Φ 250 mm GW signal

Beam Radii with RoC1.9 km ETMs radii to arm / from arm ETMY RoC 1.9 km Φ 220 mm 68.04 mm PR2 RoC -3.0764 m Φ 250 mm 4.61 / 5.91 mm IMMT2 RoC 14.005 ± 0.238 m Φ 99.75 mm 4.53 / 4.74 mm PRM RoC 458.1285 m Φ 250 mm 4.49 / 4.99 mm BS RoC flat Φ 370 mm 37.44 / 48.56 mm ETMX RoC 1.9 km Φ 220 mm 68.15 mm IMC PSL REFL ~ 13.20 mm PR3 RoC 24.9165 m Φ 250 mm 37.96 / 49.15 mm SR2 RoC -2.9872 m Φ 250 mm 5.91 mm IMMT1 RoC -8.910 ± 0.0029 m Φ 99.77 mm 2.56 / 4.47 mm SR3 RoC 24.9165 m Φ 250 mm 49.15 mm GW signal ~ 5.21 mm

Beam Radii with Flat ETMs radii to arm / from arm ETMY RoC flat Φ 220 mm 68.04 mm PR2 RoC -3.0764 m Φ 250 mm 4.61 / 19.55 mm IMMT2 RoC 14.005 ± 0.238 m Φ 99.75 mm 4.53 / 0.83 mm PRM RoC 458.1285 m Φ 250 mm 4.49 / 4.39 mm BS RoC flat Φ 370 mm 37.44 / 171.02 mm ETMX RoC flat Φ 220 mm 68.15 mm IMC PSL REFL ~ 31.41 mm PR3 RoC 24.9165 m Φ 250 mm 37.96 / 171.56 mm SR2 RoC -2.9872 m Φ 250 mm 19.55 mm IMMT1 RoC -8.910 ± 0.0029 m Φ 99.77 mm 2.56 / 7.21 mm SR3 RoC 24.9165 m Φ 250 mm 171.56 mm GW signal ~ 8.18 mm

Input Stage

Arm (RoC1.9km ETM)

Arm (Flat ETM)

Output Stage (RoC1.9km ETM)

Output Stage (Flat ETM)