DAU Section 804 Middle Tier Acquisition Discussion B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement Program (CERP) Abbigail Pogorzelski AFLCMC/WWD 3 April 2019

Section 804 Middle Tier Acquisition Rapid Prototyping & Fielding FY16 National Defense Authorization Act Section 804 Authority Rapid Prototyping—fielded demo within 5 years Rapid Fielding—production in 6 months, fielding in 5 years Can be combined and applied to any program What does Section 804 allow us to do? Shave years off programs Streamline metrics, decisions, and reporting to match the program Take risk and explore options in prototyping to limit risk in fielding What we will NOT do with Section 804 Sacrifice quality or discipline Speed will require even greater rigor Skip essential reviews We are accountable for these programs Keep information to ourselves Will generate tri-annual reports to congress for all 804s CERP executing under Rapid Prototyping Authority

Sec. 804 Middle Tier Applicability SEC. 804. MIDDLE TIER OF ACQUISITION FOR RAPID PROTOTYPING AND RAPID FIELDING (b) Acquisition Pathways (1) Rapid Prototyping The rapid prototyping pathway shall provide for the use of innovative technologies to rapidly develop fieldable prototypes to demonstrate new capabilities and meet emerging military needs. The objective of an acquisition program under this pathway shall be to field a prototype that can be demonstrated in an operational environment and provide for a residual operational capability within five years of the development of an approved requirement. 21st century technology Improved Fuel Efficiency, Power Generation & B-52 fleet sustainment to 2050+ Deliver virtual and physical prototypes Demonstration through M&S and physical testing with test report modified AFGSC A/C on 20th century a/c Engine Reliability virtual DE model & virtual Prototype: 2 years physical Prototype: 4.5 years Section 804 is applicable to the B-52 CERP

Program Overview System Description B52 Re-Engine Overview Digital Engine Controls & Displays Compatible, nuclear hardened electronics Higher reliability Significantly reduced sustainment cost Enhanced mission and trouble- shooting capability Quick Start Capability On-Aircraft power generation Redesigned Engine Pod New strut Modified nacelle Modern, Commercially-Based Engine Similar size, thrust, weight High reliability Commercially-based Higher bypass Maintain quick starting capability Reduced ground support equipment Minimal airframe modifications Maintain weapons separation Simplified engine change Gearbox New electrical power generator More reliable pumps Reduced cost Existing supply chain Reduced fuel consumption, noise and emission Modified Pneumatics System Higher efficiency precoolers Accommodate future electrical needs Lowered support cost Increased cooling capacity & flow Legend Feature Benefit

Prototype Definitions virtual Power Pod Prototype (vPPP) virtual System Prototype (vSP) vPPP MBSE SUBSYSTEM MODELS DIGITAL VISUALIZATION Digital visual representation of the physical characteristics of the CERP power pod based on engineering modeling and other analysis Digital visual representation of the physical and functional characteristics of the CERP modification based on mathematical and physical modeling, simulations and other analysis UPDATE physical System Prototype (pSP) B-52H aircraft with the CERP modification installed

Program Deliverables “The objective of an acquisition program under this pathway shall be to field a prototype that can be demonstrated in an operational environment and provide for a residual operational capability within five years of the development of an approved requirement.” Phase Rapid virtual Prototype (RP Spiral 1) Rapid physical Prototype (RP Spiral 2) Fielding Deliverable virtual Power Pod Prototype virtual System Prototype Prototype modified B-52 aircraft (physical System Prototype) Production configuration modified B-52 aircraft Demonstration Method IT-1 (Modeling and Simulation) IT-4 (initial flight test, includes operational assessment) IT-5 (performance flight test) and IOT&E demonstration Residual Operational Capability Start training planning MX procedures planning Populate LCOM Sustaining Engineering Reusable MBSE AFGSC can perform some missions (Partially Mission Capable) AFGSC can perform all missions (Fully Mission Capable) UPDATE Prototyping delivers incremental operational capability to warfighter

& Engine Contract (FAR 12) Engine Analysis & Engine Contract (FAR 12) Government Lead Source Selection Engine Analysis 2nd Step Informed by 1st Step Step 1 Step 2 Propulsion Directorate Other Transactional Agreement (OTA) Consortium Entrance Criteria Size, Weight, Thrust New In-production Exit Criteria Integration Analysis Report Virtual Power POD Prototype (vPPP) NOTE: Engine Vendors partner with Boeing Multiple Agreement Awards (FFP) Best Value Evaluation (FAR 12) Evaluation Factors Price Technical Technical Integration Risk waive Past Performance Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP) Engine Production Contract with 1 Vendor 20 RP engines + production ordering periods (Up to 8 lots) New Single-Award ID/IQ (FPEPA) 17 year PoP Engine Selection Candidate Engines Selected vendor Detailed Proposal LP OTA contract type rationale (FFP): project yields virtual prototypes against a well-defined requirement (existing commercial engines) Engine production contract type rationale (FPEPA): buying long-term commercial engines (supplies) against a well-defined requirement. Includes basic order + production ordering periods (no termination liability)

Program Phases Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Sub-System Prototyping Rapid virtual Prototype (RvP) Phase (2 yrs) Rapid physical Prototype (RpP) Phase (4 ½ yrs) Fielding Phase  Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Sub-System Prototyping (S2P) Physical System Prototype (PSP) Physical Prototype Delivery (PD) Initial Production (IP) Achievement Indicators: Affordability and market research complete Approved acquisition strategy using 804 Requirements adequately defined to begin design/prototyping Ready to enter engine source selection Design is mature enough to begin modification of prototype aircraft The prototype successfully demonstrated a residual operational capability in an operational environment The program is ready for initial production Risk Burn-down Actions: Perform candidate engines analysis Identify technical risks Create digital fit/form CATIA™ model of one dual high bypass engine pod + nacelle (virtual fly-off) Early test strategy planning Government-led engine source selection:downselect to 1 engine Subsystem design/test Create digital fit/form CATIA™ system model* *Deliver virtual system prototype (end of RvP phase) Buy H/W for test aircraft Full-scale pod testing Modify AFGSC Operational aircraft for physical Prototype testing Perform ground and initial logistics and integrated flight testing (focus on safety of flight) Complete integrated flight testing on prototype aircraft Purchase long-lead items for first production lot Modify the first eight production aircraft Conduct Operational Test & Evaluation

Test Strategy Aligned to Program Phases Rapid virtual Prototype (RvP) Phase (2 yrs) Rapid physical Prototype (RpP) Phase (4 ½ yrs) Fielding Phase  ASP Sub-System Prototype Physical Prototype Physical Prototype Delivery Initial Production Test Planning Initiate Integrated Test Team and approve ITT Charter Support engine source selection & evaluation Refine test strategy based on engine selection Begin Integrated Test Master Plan (ITMP) Identify major test risks IT #1: DE Model CFD - distortion patterns Table-top assessment of performance, HSI, R&M Wind tunnel (5% model) IT#2: Full-scale Pod Test Dual high bypass engine pod testing (w/full scale wind tunnel testing) Installed engine performance, maintenance & fuel consumption Validate CFD (nacelle/pylon correlation) Other Test Activities System integration System instrumentation Cybersecurity IT#3: Ground Testing Instrumentation check-out, systems integration, ground handling and taxi, EMIC M-demo Suitability (R&M) CVPA IT#4: Safety of Flight Phase 1 Flight Testing - safety, airworthiness, nominal system functions Suitability (R&M, training, etc) Mix of test pilots and operational test pilots Test report to support completion of Rapid physical prototype phase IT#5: Performance Characterization Phase 2 Flight Testing - envelope expansion & performance data Complete airworthiness All-weather testing Suitability (R&M, training) Operational representative sorties Enroute operations, mission planning & OPS analysis Full scale validation of CFD & other digital models Updated Test Report prior to Lot 1 modification IOT&E (notional COIs) COI 1: Global Mission Employment Long/Short duration Training/Nuclear/ Conventional Quick start/Cold weather ops Unprepared field a/c turn COI 2: Suitability Training TOs Mission Planning Maintainability Deployability Successful IT will make IOT&E an operational demonstration

Notional Program Schedule ASP: Acquisition Strategy Panel H/W: Hardware ITMP: Integrated Test Master Plan PDR: Preliminary Design Review SRR: System Requirements Review DE: Digital Engineering IOC: Initial Operational Capability ITT: Integrated Test Team PRR: Production Readiness Review SVR: System Verification Review FCA: Cull Configuration Audit IOT&E: Initial Operational Test & Evaluation MDD: Materiel Development Decision pSP: Phsycial System Prototype TRR: Test Readiness Review FOC: Full Operational Capability IT: Integrated Test PCA: Physical Configuration Audit SFR: System Functional Review vPPP: Virtual Power Pod Prototype vSP: Virtual System Prototype FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 In-Progress Reviews Technical Reviews Prototypes Testing MDD 804/ASP H/W Buy IOC FOC Airframe Sys Req RP Dev 1 Rapid Prototype Dev 2 Engines Analysis 20 Engine Contract Deliveries Installs Production ICS SRR SFR PDR CDR TRR/SVR/FCA PRR PCA 1 Install pSP1 vPPP vSP A/C Kits 1 Install pSP2 Test Planning Phase Integrated Test Phase – Ctr/Gov DT & OT ITTs  Kick-Off ITMP ITMP IOT&E Test Reports IT#1: DE Model IT#2 IT#3 IT#4 IT#5 Sub-System Testing, Integration & Instrumentation Ground Flight (Safety) Flight (Performance) Rapid virtual Prototype Rapid physical Prototype Rapid Fielding/Production & Deployment Phase

Schedule Comparison Traditional MDAP vs. Rapid Prototyping FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Milestones Contracts T&E IOC MDD MS-A DRFPRD MS-B MS-C Engine Spec Dev LRIP FRP Integ Contract (PDR) EMD Integrator Contract Ph1 SS Engine SS Engine Contract (20 EMD/Prod Ordering Periods) 2366 cert (+ 9 mos) Prot. (+ 24 mos) 1 2 Test (+6 mos) DT/OT ASP: Acquisition Strategy Panel OTA: Other Transaction Authority PDR: Preliminary Design Review vPPP: Virtual Power Pod Prototype pSP: Physical System Prototype MDD: Materiel Development Decision SS: Source Selection SFR: System Functional Review vSP: Virtual System Prototype FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 In Progress Reviews Prototypes Contracts T&E 2366 certification (+9 mo): MDAP requirement; requires SecDef approval prior to MS-A per NDAA FY16 requirement for any program entering any acquisition phase after Oct 17, must complete Title 10 certification Prototype (+18 mo): Savings from iterative design process concurrent with engine source selection Test (+6 mo): Savings from breaking up flight test program into two blocks; first block focused on airworthiness to demonstrate operational capability in relevant environment and second block to certify weapons and envelope release MDD H/W Buy Decision IOC FOC 804/ASP vPPP vSP pSP1 pSP2 Sys Reqt RP 1 Rapid Prototype Dev 2 LRIP FRP (trade space available for Rapid Fielding) SS Ph1 Engine SS Engines (20 RP) LRIP FRP Test Planning Phase Integrated Test Phase – Ctr/Gov DT & OT