RNA interference is essential for cellular quiescence

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Direct Binding of CoREST1 to SUMO-2/3 Contributes to Gene-Specific Repression by the LSD1/CoREST1/HDAC Complex  Jian Ouyang, Yujiang Shi, Alvaro Valin,
Advertisements

Quantitative Genetic Interactions Reveal Biological Modularity
WT Segregant * Ds * * Figure S1. Fatty acid methyl esters of seed triacylglycerols for a wild-type segregant (WT Segregant) and transposon-tagged line.
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Cut8, essential for anaphase, controls localization of 26S proteasome, facilitating destruction of cyclin and Cut2  Hisashi Tatebe, Mitsuhiro Yanagida 
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Supplementary Fig. S1 1st ChIP 2nd ChIP Pol II Snf1 *
The hsv operon is required for virulence and suppresses defense responses. The hsv operon is required for virulence and suppresses defense responses. (A)
SAGA Is a General Cofactor for RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 117, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Vivek S. Chopra, Joung-Woo Hong, Michael Levine  Current Biology 
by Kentson Lam, Alexander Muselman, Randal Du, Yuka Harada, Amanda G
P63 Transcription Factor Regulates Nuclear Shape and Expression of Nuclear Envelope-Associated Genes in Epidermal Keratinocytes  Valentina Rapisarda,
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
A Role for H2B Ubiquitylation in DNA Replication
G34 induces a transcriptional program linked to forebrain development and self-renewal. G34 induces a transcriptional program linked to forebrain development.
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
RNA interference is essential for cellular quiescence
The histone H3.3K36M mutation reprograms the epigenome of chondroblastomas by Dong Fang, Haiyun Gan, Jeong-Heon Lee, Jing Han, Zhiquan Wang, Scott M. Riester,
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Pei-Yun Jenny Wu, Paul Nurse  Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Ruchi Jain, Nahid Iglesias, Danesh Moazed  Molecular Cell 
Direct Binding of CoREST1 to SUMO-2/3 Contributes to Gene-Specific Repression by the LSD1/CoREST1/HDAC Complex  Jian Ouyang, Yujiang Shi, Alvaro Valin,
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Systematic mapping of functional enhancer-promoter connections with CRISPR interference by Charles P. Fulco, Mathias Munschauer, Rockwell Anyoha, Glen.
Interplay between Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay and DNA Damage Response Pathways Reveals that Stn1 and Ten1 Are the Key CST Telomere-Cap Components  Eva-Maria.
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages e7 (May 2017)
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
A Role for H2B Ubiquitylation in DNA Replication
S-Adenosylmethionine Synthetase Is Required for Cell Growth, Maintenance of G0 Phase, and Termination of Quiescence in Fission Yeast  Takeshi Hayashi,
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Martin Zofall, Shiv I.S. Grewal  Molecular Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (May 2007)
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
A Major Role for Capsule-Independent Phagocytosis-Inhibitory Mechanisms in Mammalian Infection by Cryptococcus neoformans  Cheryl D. Chun, Jessica C.S.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Identification of the uvh6-4 mutation.
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Junko Kanoh, Mahito Sadaie, Takeshi Urano, Fuyuki Ishikawa 
H4K44 Acetylation Facilitates Chromatin Accessibility during Meiosis
Protection of Germline Gene Expression by the C
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
The transcriptional activation activity of PIFs is higher in the cop1-4hfr1 background compared with the cop1-4 background. The transcriptional activation.
Roles of Defense Hormones in the Regulation of Ozone-Induced Changes in Gene Expression and Cell Death  Enjun Xu, Lauri Vaahtera, Mikael Brosché  Molecular.
Analysis of PHO1 Expression by RT-qPCR in the pru1 Mutant, Complementation Lines (COM5 and COM7), and Wild-type Plants during Pi Starvation. Analysis of.
MTB1 to MTB3 Are Direct Transcriptional Targets of MYC2.
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Presentation transcript:

RNA interference is essential for cellular quiescence by B. Roche, B. Arcangioli, and R. A. Martienssen Science Volume ():aah5651 October 13, 2016 Published by AAAS

Fig. 1 RNAi mutants lose viability in G0. RNAi mutants lose viability in G0. (A) Loss of viability at both G0-entry and during quiescence maintenance in prototroph dcr1Δ, rdp1Δ and ago1Δ mutants (n = 5 biological replicates for wild-type, n = 6 for dcr1Δ and rdp1Δ, n=7 for ago1Δ). ** indicates a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01, t test) between each mutant and wt for all time-points, and between time-points 24h and 15 days (B) Microscopic observation of DAPI-stained RNAi mutants reveals an increased proportion of cells retaining a rod-shape in early G0 (24h). After 15 days, while wild-type G0 cells look uniform, RNAi mutants display a variety of morphological defects and many dead refraction-negative and/or DAPI-negative cells. Upon G0-entry (C) RNAi mutants have a reduction in the increase in cell number found in wild type cells during the initial two divisions (24h G0; n = 2; **P < 0.01), and (D) an increase in the number of cells staying rod-shaped (24h G0; n = 2; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). All error bars indicate standard deviation; n indicates biological replicates. B. Roche et al. Science 2016;science.aah5651 Published by AAAS

Fig. 2 Design of a G0 suppressor screen. Design of a G0 suppressor screen. (A) Experimental design of the suppressor screen: a dcr1Δ population is alternated between the cell cycle (in rich medium, YES) and quiescence (in nitrogen-deprived medium, EMM-N) every 1 to 3 days. Spontaneous suppressors, by their relative fitness advantage compared to the parental strain, get enriched during the alternations. After up to 20 alternations, individual clones are isolated and re-assayed in G0 to check for suppression. (B) Summary of mutations present in 13 isolated dcr1Δ G0 suppressors showing three classes of mutants, in chromosome segregation, the CLRC/Rik1 complex and Swi6HP1, and RNA polymerase-associated factors. Each mutation in the list arose as an independent suppressor. B. Roche et al. Science 2016;science.aah5651 Published by AAAS

Fig. 3 Quiescence maintenance of dcr1Δ results in rDNA heterochromatinization by H3K9me. Quiescence maintenance of dcr1Δ results in rDNA heterochromatinization by H3K9me. (A) H3K9me2 ChIP-seq enrichment in dcr1Δ vs. wt cells. In G0 cells, but not cycling cells, dcr1Δ strongly accumulates H3K9me2 at the rDNA locus (n = 2 biological replicates, cycling cell data from (30)). (B) Validation by H3K9me2 ChIP-qPCR in wild-type and dcr1Δ cycling and G0 cells shows a stronger rDNA H3K9me2 increase in G0 cells in dcr1Δ as compared to wild-type G0 cells (n ≥ 3 biological replicates; **P < 0.01, t test). B. Roche et al. Science 2016;science.aah5651 Published by AAAS

Fig. 4 dcr1Δ mutants are defective in RNA polymerase I release in quiescence maintenance. dcr1Δ mutants are defective in RNA polymerase I release in quiescence maintenance. (A) The main subunit of RNA polymerase I Nuc1RPA190 was tagged with a (Gly)6 linker and 3xFLAG. (B) Probe location for ChIP-qPCRs: 1: rDNA promoter, 2: 5′ETS, 3: 18S, 4: 3′ETS. (C) RNA polymerase I enrichment at the rDNA was assayed by ChIP-qPCR using anti-FLAG antibody in the nuc1-(Gly)6-FLAG background, showing an higher occupancy in wild-type than dcr1Δ mutants in cycling cells, due to the reduced growth rate of dcr1Δ, and (D) a similar occupancy in early G0 cells (n = 2 biological replicates). (E and F) RNA polymerase I enrichment at 18S rDNA over time spent in G0 (2 to 8 days) shows a reduction in wild-type cells, but dcr1Δ cells fail to release RNA pol I (n ≥ 2 biological replicates). (G) The class (iii) suppressors, dcr1Δ tbp1-D156Y and dcr1Δmed31-ins, but not the class (ii) suppressor dcr1Δclr4Δ, significantly decrease RNA polymerase I occupancy at rDNA in 8 days G0 cells. (n = 2 biological replicates, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, t test) (H) The accumulation of H3K9me2 at rDNA repeats, assayed by ChIP-qPCR, is significantly reduced in class (iii) suppressors (n ≥ 3 biological replicates, **P < 0.01, t test). B. Roche et al. Science 2016;science.aah5651 Published by AAAS