Structure Acquisition of the T1 Domain of Kv1.3 during Biogenesis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fabio Trovato, Edward P. O’Brien  Biophysical Journal 
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
YidC and Oxa1 Form Dimeric Insertion Pores on the Translating Ribosome
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 102, Issue 12, Pages (June 2012)
Structure Acquisition of the T1 Domain of Kv1.3 during Biogenesis
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 Complex Assembled on DNA and Its Implications for DNA DSB Repair  Laura Spagnolo, Angel Rivera-Calzada,
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Interaction of Era with the 30S Ribosomal Subunit
Functional Interactions at the Interface between Voltage-Sensing and Pore Domains in the Shaker Kv Channel  Gilberto J. Soler-Llavina, Tsg-Hui Chang,
Closing In on the Resting State of the Shaker K+ Channel
Sudha Chakrapani, Luis G. Cuello, D. Marien Cortes, Eduardo Perozo 
B.Alexander Yi, Yu-Fung Lin, Yuh Nung Jan, Lily Yeh Jan  Neuron 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Cotranslational Protein Folding inside the Ribosome Exit Tunnel
John M. Robinson, Carol Deutsch  Neuron 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Investigating How Peptide Length and a Pathogenic Mutation Modify the Structural Ensemble of Amyloid Beta Monomer  Yu-Shan Lin, Gregory R. Bowman, Kyle A.
Chimeras Reveal a Single Lipid-Interface Residue that Controls MscL Channel Kinetics as well as Mechanosensitivity  Li-Min Yang, Dalian Zhong, Paul Blount 
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Shinobu Chiba, Koreaki Ito  Molecular Cell 
Functional Interactions at the Interface between Voltage-Sensing and Pore Domains in the Shaker Kv Channel  Gilberto J. Soler-Llavina, Tsg-Hui Chang,
Einav Gross, David B Kastner, Chris A Kaiser, Deborah Fass  Cell 
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
RRNA Modifications in an Intersubunit Bridge of the Ribosome Strongly Affect Both Ribosome Biogenesis and Activity  Xue-hai Liang, Qing Liu, Maurille.
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
More Than One Glycan Is Needed for ER Glucosidase II to Allow Entry of Glycoproteins into the Calnexin/Calreticulin Cycle  Paola Deprez, Matthias Gautschi,
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Closing In on the Resting State of the Shaker K+ Channel
Alvaro Villarroel, M.Paz Regalado, Juan Lerma  Neuron 
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Engineered Domain Swapping as an On/Off Switch for Protein Function
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Sex-Linked period Genes in the Silkmoth, Antheraea pernyi
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Anne Dallas, Harry F Noller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Structural Flexibility of CaV1. 2 and CaV2
Structure of an RNA Silencing Complex of the CRISPR-Cas Immune System
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Fredrik Elinder, Michael Madeja, Hugo Zeberg, Peter Århem 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Ligand-Driven Vectorial Folding of Ribosome-Bound Human CFTR NBD1
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
The AXH Domain Adopts Alternative Folds
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (November 2005)
Calibrated Measurement of Gating-Charge Arginine Displacement in the KvAP Voltage- Dependent K+ Channel  Vanessa Ruta, Jiayun Chen, Roderick MacKinnon 
Extent of Voltage Sensor Movement during Gating of Shaker K+ Channels
Fine Details of IGF-1R Activation, Inhibition, and Asymmetry Determined by Associated Hydrogen /Deuterium-Exchange and Peptide Mass Mapping  Damian Houde,
Galen E Flynn, William N Zagotta  Neuron 
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Cotranslational Folding Increases GFP Folding Yield
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Structure Acquisition of the T1 Domain of Kv1.3 during Biogenesis Andrey Kosolapov, LiWei Tu, Jing Wang, Carol Deutsch  Neuron  Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 295-307 (October 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.011

Figure 1 T1 Domain Constructs (A) Amino acid sequence of the T1 domain of Kv1.3 with secondary structure assignments derived from the highly identical Kv1.1a and Kv1.2 isoforms (Kreusch et al., 1998; Minor et al., 2000) shown below. The NcoI restriction site is indicated above the sequence. (B) Ribbon representation of the T1 domain of Kv1.2 taken from the crystal structure of Minor et al. (2000). One of the four subunits is colored blue. Residues Q72 and G114 in Kv1.3, equivalent to Q53 and G95, respectively, at the folded T1 monomer interface in Kv1.2, are depicted as space-filling residues in one of the four subunits. These analogous residues in Kv1.3 were mutated to cysteines for the folding assay. (C) Schematic of biogenic intermediates. Intermediates were generated by restriction enzymes shown to the left. The boxes represent transmembrane segments S1-S6, and the closed circles represent engineered cysteines Q72C and G114C. The region between the dashed lines represents the T1 domain. In the NcoI intermediate, the C terminus of T1 is directly attached to the PTC inside the ribosome. The number of amino acids from the PTC attachment site (restriction site) to the C-terminal residue in T1 is given in parentheses. Neuron 2004 44, 295-307DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.011)

Figure 2 Folding Assay for BstEII- and NcoI-Cut Intermediates (Top row) Crosslinking of BstEII-cut nascent peptides. Leftmost gel depicts a folding assay carried out on Q72C/G114C under nondenaturing conditions. The second gel from the left depicts a folding assay carried out on Q72C/G114C after SDS pretreatment to unfold the protein. The two rightmost gels depict folding assays for the single cysteine constructs, Q72C and G114C, respectively. In all cases, nascent peptide was treated with PEG-MAL (lane 1), or first with PDM and then PEG-MAL (lane 2), or first with PDM and then PEG-SH (lane 3). (Bottom row) Crosslinking of NcoI-cut nascent peptides. The same procedures were carried out as described for the BstEII-cut peptides. For each gel, numbers on the left are molecular weight standards, and numbers on the right indicate singly pegylated (1), doubly pegylated (2), and unpegylated (0) protein. This applies to all pegylation gels. Neuron 2004 44, 295-307DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.011)

Figure 3 Length-Dependent Pxlink For each nascent Q72C/G114C/Kv1.3 peptide, mRNA was translated and samples treated as described in Figure 2. Pxlink plotted as mean ± SEM for n = 3 (except BstEII, n = 2) were obtained using the equation Pxlink = 1 − (2F3,AB)/(F3,A + F3,B), as derived in Analysis of Pegylation Ladders in the Experimental Procedures (filled circles). Negative controls (open circles, single measurements) were obtained using SDS pretreatment of Q72C/G114C constructs. The x axis is the number of amino acids from the PTC attachment site (restriction site) to the C-terminal residue in T1. Neuron 2004 44, 295-307DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.011)

Figure 4 Pxlink of Released Nascent Peptide Nascent Q72C/G114C/EcoNI-cut Kv1.3 was translated and isolated as described in the Experimental Procedures. Samples were treated with RNase (10 μg/ml) to release the peptide and then centrifuged. Pellet and supernatant fractions were isolated and assayed for folding. Solid gray bars represent Q72C/G114C/EconI-cut Kv1.3 samples assayed for folding after treatment with RNase, ribosome-attached (pellet, n = 4), and released (supernatant, n = 4). Solid white bars represent Q72C/G114C/XbaI-cut Kv1.3 control samples assayed for folding after treatment with RNase, ribosome-attached (pellet), and released (supernatant). The striped bar represents the pelleted, ribosome-attached Q72C/G114C/XbaI-cut Kv1.3 control that was not treated with RNase (n = 3). Supernatants show no evidence of contamination from ribosome-attached protein. Data are mean ± SEM. Neuron 2004 44, 295-307DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.011)

Figure 5 Accessibility of Engineered T1 Cysteines (A) The path through the ribosome. The large ribosomal subunit is shown in blue; the small subunit is in magenta. The nascent peptide is red; the PTC is black. The ribosomal exit tunnel is ∼100 × 20 Å, according to cryo-EM structures (Ban et al., 2000; Beckmann et al., 2001; Menetret et al., 2000; Nissen et al., 2000). (B) Pegylation time course of single T1 cysteines 72 and 114 in BstEII-cut (top) and NcoI-cut (bottom) Kv1.3 nascent peptide. Translation products were incubated with PEG-MAL (1 mM), quenched, and assayed on a gel (two leftmost panels, top and bottom rows), as described previously (Lu and Deutsch, 2001). (Far right panels) Pegylation data shown in the left gel panels were calculated as cpm in the upper band (1) divided by the sum of the cpm in both upper and lower bands (0, 1), plotted at the indicated times as fraction of peptide pegylated (Q72C, circle; G114C, triangle), and fit to a double exponential function. In the longer BstEII construct, Q72C has modification rate constants of 9.3 ± 3.5 and 0.5 ± 0.2 M−1s−1(n = 2), whereas G114C has rate constants of 12.7 ± 3.1 and 0.8 ± 0.1 M−1s−1 (n = 3). In the shorter NcoI construct, Q72C rate constants are 14.0 ± 2.6 and 2.2 ± 0.2 M−1s−1 (n = 2). Rate constants are means ± SEM for n = 3 or average error for n = 2. (C) Extent of pegylation of single T1 cysteines 72, 83, 114, and 136 in NcoI-cut nascent peptide. Duplicate lanes for each residue show samples incubated with PEG-MAL (20 mM) for 4 and 6 hr. Gels were 12% NUPAGE Bis-Tris with MOPS running buffer. Numbers to the left of the gels are MW standards; numbers to the right indicate unpegylated (0) and singly pegylated (1) protein. Neuron 2004 44, 295-307DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.011)

Figure 6 Accessibility of G114C (A) Extent of pegylation of G114C in successively longer nascent peptides. Nascent peptides attached to the PTC at the indicated restriction sites were treated with 20 mM PEG-MAL for 4 hr and 20 hr (pair of lanes for each construct) at 4°C and fractionated on a 4%–12% LDS-NUPAGE Bis-Tris gel with MOPS running buffer. The upper band in each lane represents pegylated peptide; the lower band in each lane represents unpegylated peptide. Numbers to the left are molecular weight standards. See Table 1 for total length (# of amino acids) and distance between PTC and 114C (# of amino acids). (B) Length-dependent fraction of modified peptide for G114C. The fraction of singly pegylated peptide (black circles) was calculated as described in Figure 5B. Reactivity of G114C is indicated for each peptide by the fraction of peptide modified by PDM (triangles), obtained from experiments similar to those described in Figure 2 (calculated from lanes 1 and 2). Maximal pegylation of G114C for each peptide (inverted triangles) was determined from samples obtained from experiments similar to those described in Figure 2, lane 1. A control, Q72C, that is always outside the ribosome in all constructs, is included (red circles, top x axis in red) for comparison with G114C. Data are mean ± SEM (n ≥ 3 for 20 of the 24 data points shown, see Table 1 for details). (C) Rationale for secondary structure determination. A cysteine (yellow circle) located in a helical region of peptide (left, red line) inside the ribosomal tunnel (large oval, ∼100 Å length) will be relatively inaccessible to PEG-MAL, whereas if that same cysteine is located in an extended region of peptide (right, red line), it will reside outside the ribosome and be relatively accessible to PEG-MAL. (D) Fraction of peptide modified for Q112C/EcoNI-cut and R116C/EcoNI-cut constructs. The solid gray bars represent extent of pegylation (n = 3). Bars with upward (left-to-right) diagonal lines are the fraction labeled with PDM (n = 2 for Q72C, 1 for R116C and Q112C), a measure of the reactivity of the cysteine. Bars with downward diagonal lines are derived from SDS pretreatment followed by pegylation (n = 2 for Q72C, 1 for R116C and Q112C), a measure of maximal fractional pegylation. The unfilled bar is a BstEII pegylation control (n = 3 for Q72C, 2 for R116C and Q112C), representing long chain peptides in which the cysteine is outside of the ribosomal tunnel and accessible. Q72C/EcoNI-cut data are included for comparison; Q72C is outside of the ribosome and accessible in all-length nascent peptides (NcoI to BstEII). Data are mean ± SEM (n ≥ 3) or average deviation where applicable (n = 2). Neuron 2004 44, 295-307DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.011)