Fundamental Characteristics of Single-Cell Aging in Diploid Yeast

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 22, Issue 15, Pages (August 2012)
Advertisements

Xiao-yu Zheng, Erin K. O’Shea  Cell Reports 
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Transcriptional Timers Regulating Mitosis in Early Drosophila Embryos
Bacterial Autoimmunity Due to a Restriction-Modification System
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
With Age Comes Representational Wisdom in Social Signals
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Local Oxidative Damage in the Soma and Dendrites Quarantines Neuronal Mitochondria at the Site of Insult  Amandine Grimm, Nadia Cummins, Jürgen Götz 
Chimeras Reveal a Single Lipid-Interface Residue that Controls MscL Channel Kinetics as well as Mechanosensitivity  Li-Min Yang, Dalian Zhong, Paul Blount 
Decoupling of Nuclear Division Cycles and Cell Size during the Coenocytic Growth of the Ichthyosporean Sphaeroforma arctica  Andrej Ondracka, Omaya Dudin,
Grid Cells Encode Local Positional Information
Monitoring Actin Cortex Thickness in Live Cells
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
Volume 20, Issue 16, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Suzanne Komili, Natalie G. Farny, Frederick P. Roth, Pamela A. Silver 
Volume 8, Pages (October 2018)
Fuqing Wu, David J. Menn, Xiao Wang  Chemistry & Biology 
Yeast Replicator: A High-Throughput Multiplexed Microfluidics Platform for Automated Measurements of Single-Cell Aging  Ping Liu, Thomas Z. Young, Murat.
Volume 27, Issue 21, Pages e7 (November 2017)
Hiromasa Tanaka, Tau-Mu Yi  Biophysical Journal 
Is Aggregate-Dependent Yeast Aging Fortuitous
Live-Cell Imaging of Chromatin Condensation Dynamics by CRISPR
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Actin Cytoskeleton-Dependent Dynamics of the Human Serotonin1A Receptor Correlates with Receptor Signaling  Sourav Ganguly, Thomas J. Pucadyil, Amitabha.
Volume 23, Issue 19, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 6, Pages (August 2018) Infection Dynamics of a Bloom-Forming Alga and Its Virus Determine Airborne Coccolith Emission from Seawater  Miri.
Stephanie C. Weber, Clifford P. Brangwynne  Current Biology 
Grid Cells Encode Local Positional Information
Laurenz Muessig, Jonas Hauser, Thomas Joseph Wills, Francesca Cacucci 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Martin Mikl, Carrie R. Cowan  Cell Reports 
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Rapid Assembly of Presynaptic Materials behind the Growth Cone in Dopaminergic Neurons Is Mediated by Precise Regulation of Axonal Transport  David M.
Giulia Varsano, Yuedi Wang, Min Wu  Cell Reports 
Synergy between Multiple Microtubule-Generating Pathways Confers Robustness to Centrosome-Driven Mitotic Spindle Formation  Daniel Hayward, Jeremy Metz,
Kevin Takaki, Christine L. Cosma, Mark A. Troll, Lalita Ramakrishnan 
Volume 7, Pages (September 2018)
Cohesin Can Remain Associated with Chromosomes during DNA Replication
Live Imaging Reveals that the First Division of Differentiating Human Embryonic Stem Cells Often Yields Asymmetric Fates  Katharine Brown, Kyle M. Loh,
Sumathi Sekaran, Russell G. Foster, Robert J. Lucas, Mark W. Hankins 
Directional Persistence of Cell Migration Coincides with Stability of Asymmetric Intracellular Signaling  Michael C. Weiger, Shoeb Ahmed, Erik S. Welf,
Chien-Jung Lo, Mark C. Leake, Richard M. Berry  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
The Systems Biology of Single-Cell Aging
Injectable Peptide Hydrogel Enables Integrated Tandem Enzymes' Superactivity for Cancer Therapy  Qingcong Wei, Shan Jiang, Rongrong Zhu, Xia Wang, Shilong.
Monitoring Actin Cortex Thickness in Live Cells
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
Volume 27, Issue 21, Pages e7 (November 2017)
Ruth D. Taylor, Martin Heine, Nigel J. Emptage, Laura C. Andreae 
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Rapid Disruption of Dishevelled Activity Uncovers an Intercellular Role in Maintenance of Prickle in Core Planar Polarity Protein Complexes  Margarida.
Marijn T.M. van Jaarsveld, Difan Deng, Erik A.C. Wiemer, Zhike Zi 
Contributions of Turgor Pressure, the Contractile Ring, and Septum Assembly to Forces in Cytokinesis in Fission Yeast  Stephen A. Proctor, Nicolas Minc,
Volume 6, Pages (August 2018) Understanding How Wnt Influences Destruction Complex Activity and β-Catenin Dynamics  Abhirup Mukherjee, Neha Dhar,
Mathematical Modeling Highlights the Complex Role of AKT in TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis of Colorectal Carcinoma Cells  Matthew W. Anderson, Joanna J. Moss,
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
The generational scalability of single-cell replicative aging
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Matching Mitochondrial DNA Haplotypes for Circumventing Tissue-Specific Segregation Bias  Jianxin Pan, Li Wang, Charles Lu, Yanming Zhu, Zhunyuan Min,
MicroRNA-124 Regulates Fatty Acid and Triglyceride Homeostasis
Yuki Hara, Christoph A. Merten  Developmental Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (September 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Fundamental Characteristics of Single-Cell Aging in Diploid Yeast Ethan A. Sarnoski, Ruijie Song, Ege Ertekin, Noelle Koonce, Murat Acar  iScience  Volume 7, Pages 96-109 (September 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.011 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

iScience 2018 7, 96-109DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.011) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Duplicator (A) A schematic representation of the Duplicator assembly. Media is supplied via a pressure-driven pump, whereas cells are loaded using a syringe pump. Liquid flows through the Duplicator apparatus into a collection tube. Images are collected using an automated microscope. (B) Representative time-lapse images at 10-min intervals for a single cell budding into a Duplicator trap. Scale bar, 4.95 μm. (C) Representative time-lapse images for a single cell at specified generations (G) throughout its lifespan. This cell lived to 33 generations. Scale bar, 4.95 μm. (D) A viability curve composed of 150 cells from 3 replicate experiments performed in the Duplicator for the BY4743 wild-type background. (E) The histogram version of the RLS data plotted in (D). See also Figure S1 and Table S1. iScience 2018 7, 96-109DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.011) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Fundamental Characteristics of Aging Cells (A) A schematic demonstrating the principle of cell alignment at birth (left) or to death (right). Individual cells' generational age is displayed within their representation. (B) Mean division time as a function of age, with cells aligned to birth. (C) Mean division time as a function of age, with cells aligned at death. (D) Mean volume of cells as a function of age, with cells aligned to birth. The best-fit line from linear regression is shown. (E) Mean volume of cells as a function of age, with cells aligned at death. N = 50 cells for all subfigures, with data points where less than 10 cells remained alive omitted. Error bars are SEM. iScience 2018 7, 96-109DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.011) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Loss of Heterozygosity Is a Rare Event in the Yeast Lifespan (A) Fluorescence intensity versus time after blocking translation with cycloheximide for cells expressing EGFP, destabilized GFP (dsGFP), or semi-stable GFP (ssGFP). (B) ssGFP intensity over time for a representative cell for which fluorescence intensity fell below the 25% threshold, defining the first criteria for LOH. (C) ssGFP intensity over time for the only cell that exhibited a decline below the 25% threshold and did not subsequently recover. iScience 2018 7, 96-109DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.011) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Short-Lived Reporter Dynamics in Aging Cells (A and B) Mean ssGFP intensity, a measure of protein concentration, over generations for cells aligned to birth (A) or death (B). (C and D) Whole-cell ssGFP intensity, a measure of protein abundance, over generations for cells aligned to birth (C) or death (D). (E and F) Intercellular variability, defined as the SD divided by the mean for mean ssGFP intensity across measurements of all cells in the population at each generation. In (E), cells are aligned at birth, and in (F), cells are aligned at death. (G and H) Mean intracellular variability, defined as the SD/mean of mean ssGFP intensity for 8 contiguous generations, over generations for cells aligned to birth (G) or death (H). All data represent measurements from a single experiment with ssGFP integrated in a heterozygous fashion at the SAM2 locus under the PTEF1 promoter. N = 50 cells for all subfigures, with data points where less than 10 cells remained alive omitted. Error bars are SEM. See also Figures S2 and S7, and Tables S2–S4. iScience 2018 7, 96-109DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.011) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Dynamics of Homozygous PTEF1-ssGFP at the SAM2 Locus (A and B) Mean ssGFP intensity, a measure of protein concentration, over generations for cells aligned to birth (A) or death (B). (C and D) Whole-cell ssGFP intensity, a measure of protein abundance, over generations for cells aligned to birth (C) or death (D). (E and F) Intercellular variability, defined as the SD divided by the mean of mean ssGFP intensity across measurements of all cells in the population at each generation. In (E), cells are aligned at birth, and in (F), cells are aligned at death. (G and H) Mean intracellular variability, defined as the SD/mean of mean ssGFP intensity for 8 contiguous generations, over generations for cells aligned to birth (G) or death (H). All data represent measurements from a single experiment with ssGFP integrated in a homozygous fashion at the SAM2 locus under the PTEF1 promoter. N = 50 cells for all subfigures, with data points where less than 10 cells remained alive omitted. Error bars are SEM. See also Figures S3 and S7, and Tables S2–S4. iScience 2018 7, 96-109DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.011) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Dynamics of Homozygous PTEF1-ssGFP at the HIS3 Locus (A and B) Mean ssGFP intensity, a measure of protein concentration, over generations for cells aligned to birth (A) or death (B). (C and D) Whole-cell ssGFP intensity, a measure of protein abundance, over generations for cells aligned to birth (C) or death (D). (E and F) Intercellular variability, defined as the SD divided by the mean of mean ssGFP intensity across measurements of all cells in the population at each generation. In (E), cells are aligned at birth, and in (F), cells are aligned at death. (G and H) Mean intracellular variability, defined as the SD/mean of mean ssGFP intensity for 8 contiguous generations, over generations for cells aligned to birth (G) or death (H). All data represent measurements from a single experiment with ssGFP integrated in a homozygous fashion at the HIS3 locus under the PTEF1 promoter. N = 50 cells for all subfigures, with data points where less than 10 cells remained alive omitted. Error bars are SEM. See also Figures S4 and S7, and Tables S2, S3, and S5. iScience 2018 7, 96-109DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.011) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Dynamics of Homozygous PPGK1-ssGFP at the HIS3 Locus (A and B) Mean ssGFP intensity, a measure of protein concentration, over generations for cells aligned to birth (A) or death (B). (C and D) Whole-cell ssGFP intensity, a measure of protein abundance, over generations for cells aligned to birth (C) or death (D). (E and F) Intercellular variability, defined as the SD divided by the mean for mean ssGFP intensity across measurements of all cells in the population at each generation. In (E), cells are aligned at birth, and in (F), cells are aligned at death. (G and H) Mean intracellular variability, defined as the SD/mean of mean ssGFP intensity for 8 contiguous generations, over generations for cells aligned to birth (G) or death (H). All data represent measurements from a single experiment with ssGFP integrated in a homozygous fashion at the HIS3 locus under the PPGK1 promoter. N = 50 cells for all subfigures, with data points where less than 10 cells remained alive omitted. Error bars are SEM. See also Figures S6 and S7, and Tables S2, S3, and S7. iScience 2018 7, 96-109DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.011) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Dynamics of Homozygous PTEF1-EGFP at the HIS3 Locus (A and B) Mean EGFP intensity, a measure of protein concentration, over generations for cells aligned to birth (A) or death (B). (C and D) Whole-cell EGFP intensity, a measure of protein abundance, over generations for cells aligned to birth (C) or death (D). (E and F) Intercellular variability, defined as the SD divided by the mean for mean EGFP intensity across measurements of all cells in the population at each generation. In (E), cells are aligned at birth, and in (F), cells are aligned at death. (G and H) Mean intracellular variability, defined as the SD/mean of mean EGFP intensity for 8 contiguous generations, over generations for cells aligned to birth (G) or death (H). All data represent measurements from a single experiment with EGFP integrated in a homozygous fashion at the HIS3 locus under the PTEF1 promoter. N = 50 cells for all subfigures, with data points where less than 10 cells remained alive omitted. Error bars are SEM. See also Figures S5 and S7, and Tables S2, S3, S5, and S6. iScience 2018 7, 96-109DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.011) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions