Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule
Advertisements

Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)
The open conformation of a Pseudomonas lipase
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Symmetry Recognizing Asymmetry
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Structure of bacteriophage T4 fibritin: a segmented coiled coil and the role of the C- terminal domain  Yizhi Tao, Sergei V Strelkov, Vadim V Mesyanzhinov,
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Structure of mammalian ornithine decarboxylase at 1
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 5-8 (April 1998)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Core Structure of gp41 from the HIV Envelope Glycoprotein
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Solution Structure of the RAIDD CARD and Model for CARD/CARD Interaction in Caspase-2 and Caspase-9 Recruitment  James J Chou, Hiroshi Matsuo, Hanjun.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (July 1997)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Structure of the Kinesin13-Microtubule Ring Complex
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
A model of the microtubule–kinesin complex based on electron cryomicroscopy and X- ray crystallography  Frank Kozielski, Isabelle Arnal, Richard H. Wade 
Atomic Structure of Scallop Myosin Subfragment S1 Complexed with MgADP
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Yong Xiong, Fang Li, Jimin Wang, Alan M. Weiner, Thomas A. Steitz 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Crystal Structure of the Human Neuropilin-1 b1 Domain
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Molecular motors: Kinesin’s dynamically dockable neck
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages 985-994 (December 1997) The Crystal Structure of Dimeric Kinesin and Implications for Microtubule-Dependent Motility  F Kozielski, S Sack, A Marx, M Thormählen, E Schönbrunn, V Biou, A Thompson, E.-M Mandelkow, E Mandelkow  Cell  Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages 985-994 (December 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80489-4

Figure 1 Bar Diagram of Whole Kinesin (Top) and Magnified Head and Neck Domain (Below) Highlighting Structure Elements Kinesin contains a motor domain (head), a rod domain (shaded in top diagram, coiled-coil neck, stalk 1, stalk 2, interrupted by nonhelical regions around residues 390 and 580), and a tail. The middle diagram shows the head and neck. Helical regions are dark gray, the main helices are numbered below (α0–α7, α7 being the neck helix). The β-strands are light gray (β0–β10). Some of the intervening loops are labeled inside the bar (L4, L11, and L12). Residues numbers are indicated above the bar, as well as regions implicated in nucleotide and microtubule binding (N1-N4, MT1, and MT2; nomenclature followingKull et al. 1996). The bottom line shows the enlarged neck sequence. Residues that fit the heptad repeats typical of coiled-coils are labeled a and d; hydrophobic ones are highlighted. Note that the hydrophobic nature of the interface is more pronounced in the second half of the neck (Leu-356 and following). The coiled-coil structure is observed from Ala-339 onward. Cell 1997 91, 985-994DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80489-4)

Figure 2 Different Views of Dimeric Kinesin (A) Structure of dimeric kinesin in ribbon representation, viewing the core β sheet of the upper head (A) roughly face-on. β-strands are light blue, and α helices are pink. Regions thought to be involved in microtubule binding are colored green (on the back, loop L7-β5-L8a = MT1, L12 = MT2), and regions involved in nucleotide binding are purple (loops at the upper end of strands β1, β3, β7, and β6, containing motifs N4, N1, N3 = switch II, and N2 = switch I). The nucleotide (ADP) is shown as a space-filling model (orange = base and ribose, and yellow = phosphates). In the upper head, the α helices α1–α3 are in front and α4–α6 are behind the core sheet, and the neck helix α7 runs to the left roughly in the plane of the paper. The lower head B presents a tilted view roughly onto the back side (only a few elements are labeled). Note also that the neck of head A (pink) lies in front of neck B (red). The model includes residues 2–240 and 256–370; residue 1 is missing due to bacterial processing, and residues 241–255 (loop L11) and 371–379 are not visible due to disorder. (B) Symmetric view of the dimer, down the rotation axis (perpendicular to the plane of the paper indicated by the triangle near the beginning of neck A). The structure is rotated about 65° with respect to (A) about a vertical axis in the plane of the paper. Thus, the upper head A is seen roughly as in the view of Kull et al. 1996 (core β sheet seen roughly edge-on in head A, as if viewed from the right side of Figure 2A; neck helices pointing away from the observer). Notice that the two heads are related by a rotation of 120°. The angle between the rotation axis and the axis of the coiled-coil is about 25°. Cell 1997 91, 985-994DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80489-4)

Figure 3 Head Conformations of Kinesin and the Coiled-Coil Helix (A) Comparison of head conformations in the kinesin dimer and monomer (stereo diagram). The backbone trace of head A (blue) is superimposed on head B (red) and the monomer RK354 (green). Note the remarkably good agreement for most of the chain. The most visible differences occur from β-strand β10 (Asn-334) onward, generating somewhat different directions for the neck helices. Relative to the direction of neck helix A, the helix of head B is rotated by about 30°. (B) Stereo diagram of the coiled-coil in the neck domain. The side chains in positions a and d are colored red. The structural elements of head A appear in yellow and those of head B in green. The position of Trp-370 is uncertain but shown here for completeness. Asn-334 at the start of strand β10 is the point where the necks of head A and B begin to diverge in orientation relative to their heads (A). Cell 1997 91, 985-994DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80489-4)

Figure 4 Surface Potential Map of Kinesin Shown is the symmetric view, as in Figure 2B (negative charges red, positive charges blue). Note the negatively charged saddle lining the surface across the two heads, formed by the acidic residues on helices α2, α3, loop L6, and loop L10. Drawing by GRASP (Nicholls et al. 1991). Cell 1997 91, 985-994DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80489-4)

Figure 5 Models of Arrangements of Kinesin Heads on a Microtubule Surface The tubulin subunits are shown as ellipses of height 4 nm and width 5 nm (α tubulin, black; β tubulin, blue); the microtubule axis is vertical. Kinesin ribbon diagrams were generated to scale and overlayed over the tubulin lattice in the background. (A) shows three kinesin heads (black, green, and blue), which could be paired up hypothetically into dimers in three ways: side-by-side on neighboring protofilaments (black–green), one above the other on one protofilament (black–blue), or diagonally across two protofilaments (green–blue). The orientation of the heads is the same, that is, standard view as head A in Figure 2A so that the back surface (containing the conserved regions MT1 and MT2) faces toward the microtubule, and the neck runs tangentially to the left. Comparison with Figure 2 shows that none of these arrangements are compatible with the observed structure of the kinesin dimer. Linking two heads into a dimer could be achieved only if the neck helices were uncoiled. (B) The two heads of a dimer shown in the standard view (as in Figure 2A; head A at the top is in the same orientation as in [A]). (C) The two heads of a dimer are shown in the symmetric view to match the appearance of the image reconstructions (Hirose et al. 1996; Arnal et al. 1996). One head (top) points down in the 6 o'clock direction, and the other (bottom) up and to the right (angle 120°, about 2 o'clock direction); the neck helices point toward the observer. Notice that in this model, the microtubule-binding loops of kinesin do not face the microtubule. Cell 1997 91, 985-994DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80489-4)