Figure 2. Ectopic expression of PLZF modulates H3K27ac at enhancer regions in myeloid cells. (A) Box plots showing ... Figure 2. Ectopic expression of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1. Unified models predicting gene regulation based on landscapes of gene-regulating factors. For each gene, position specific combinatorial patterns.
Advertisements

Figure 1. Annotation and characterization of genomic target of p63 in mouse keratinocytes (MK) based on ChIP-Seq. (A) Scatterplot representing high degree.
Figure 1. Distinct chromatin regions isolated by the N-ChroP strategy
Figure 1. Complete work-flow of the Scasat
Figure 2. Workflow of MethMotif Batch Query
Figure 1. (A) Number of 8-oxodGs per million of dGs (8-oxodg/106 dG) measured by LC-MS/MS in untreated (NT), UV-irradiated (UV) and NAC-treated.
Figure 4. (A) Scatterplot of RPC4 T statistic (between TP0 and TP36) for the indicated groups of isolated tRNA genes (RPC4 peak only, n = 35; RPC4 + H3K4me3.
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Figure 1. (A) The VEGF promoter PQS and scheme of G oxidation to OG, as well as (B) the proposed APE1-dependent pathway ... Figure 1. (A) The VEGF promoter.
Figure 1. A CRISPR/Cas9 synthetic lethal screen with PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ in H2171 cell line. (A) A pie chart ... Figure 1. A CRISPR/Cas9 synthetic.
Figure 1. Sgs1 binds to RPA-coated ssDNA
Figure 1. An example of a thioviridamide-like molecule, thioalbamide, and inset, a proposed biochemical route to ... Figure 1. An example of a thioviridamide-like.
Figure 1. A novel image analysis tool to monitor epigenetic changes in spatiotemporal distribution of chromatin in live ... Figure 1. A novel image analysis.
Figure 1. Biased distribution of different SV classes
Figure 1. Apparent translational control of ribi genes in the Yeast Metabolic Cycle and meiosis. (A) Harvesting scheme ... Figure 1. Apparent translational.
Figure 1. Overview of the workflow of NetworkAnalyst 3.0.
Figure 1. (A) Diagram of artificial microDNA creation by LAMA
Figure 1. DYRK1A and DCAF7 form a nuclear complex that promotes stability of both proteins. (A) Analysis by mass ... Figure 1. DYRK1A and DCAF7 form a.
Figure 7. Primary cells from prostate tumours are more sensitive to ML than adjacent non-cancerous cells from the ... Figure 7. Primary cells from.
Figure 4. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlap of peaks differentially changed in DHT as compared to NT with peaks ... Figure 4. (A) Venn diagram showing.
Figure 1. AML containing the t(8:21) are extremely sensitive to CDK inhibitors. (A–C) Alamar blue assays were used to ... Figure 1. AML containing the.
Figure 1. Effect of random T/A→dU/A substitutions on transcription by T7 RNAP using a 321 bp DNA transcription template ... Figure 1. Effect of random.
Figure 1. Site-specific replication fork stalling at Tus/Ter barriers causes localized mutagenesis. (A) Schematic ... Figure 1. Site-specific replication.
Figure 1. Position and number of NLS improves genome editing by AsCas12a, LbCas12a and FnoCas12a. (A) General schematic ... Figure 1. Position and number.
Figure 1. Domain organization of IMP1
Figure 6. HU sensitivity is due to the failure to process multiple consecutive ribonucleotides. 10-fold serial ... Figure 6. HU sensitivity is due to the.
Figure 1. BRCA1-associated R-Loop accumulation at a non-coding region upstream of ESR1 locus. (A) Alignment of DRIP-seq ... Figure 1. BRCA1-associated.
Figure 1. Designing a cell-specific Cas-ON switch based on miRNA-regulated anti-CRISPR genes. (A) Schematic of the ... Figure 1. Designing a cell-specific.
Figure 1. Glc-TOR signaling is compromised in prr579 mutant
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of CSN and NDM construction and our statistic model. (A) CSN and NDM construction. (i) ... Figure 1. Schematic illustration.
Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected numbers of exon boundaries aligning to boundaries of domain and disorder ... Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected.
Figure 1. The 12 species in this study and details of the improved G4-seq method. (A) Phylogenetic representation of ... Figure 1. The 12 species in this.
Figure 2. ChvR expression is controlled by the ChvI-ChvG TCS
Figure 1. Nanopore methylation calls are consistent with expected results and established technologies. (A) Metaplot of ... Figure 1. Nanopore methylation.
Figure 5. Set1-catalyzed H3K4me3 regulates histone gene transcription
Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot of cumulative incidence of cancer onset following dermatomyositis diagnosis stratified ... Anti-TIF1-Ab: anti-transcriptional.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of DNA and tc-DNA
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
FIGURE 1 Participant flow diagram. Exercise Counseling Clinic (ECC).
Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α protein with Blast-Search and PhyML+SMS ‘One click’ workflow. (A) NGPhylogeny.fr ... Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α.
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (February 2016)
FIGURE 1 Study consort diagram
Figure 1. Illustration of DGR systems and their prediction using myDGR
Figure 1. The pipeline of Aggrescan3D 2.0 server.
Figure 1. Summary of experimental conditions and data normalization
Figure 1. The workflow of Cistrome-GO
Figure 1. EBOV VP35 has NTP-binding and NTPase activities
Figure 1. Using Voronoi tessellation to define contacts
Figure 1. Designed cotranscriptional RNA structures
Figure 4. RLS spectra of (A) TMPipEOPP and (B) OMHEPzEOPP in the presence of different concentrations of KRAS. The RLS ... Figure 4. RLS spectra of (A)
Figure 1. PaintOmics 3 workflow diagram
Figure 1. Denr knockdown engenders ribosome redistribution from CDS to 5′ UTR. (A) Experimental approach of the study. ... Figure 1. Denr knockdown engenders.
Figure 1. Uncertainty reduction, value creation, and appropriation in two case studies. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1. The configuration menu allows the user to choose among the main visualization/processing options of the ... Figure 1. The configuration menu.
Figure 1. ULS1 deletion causes sensitivity to ACF due Top2 activity
Figure 1. (A) Architecture of Doc2Hpo. (B) Interactive user interface
Figure 1. Yvis platform overview
Figure 1. The framework of NetGO with seven steps
Figure 1. Overview of features that can be assessed in a single RegulationSpotter VCF analysis run. Depending upon a ... Figure 1. Overview of features.
Figure 1. Genome-wide analyses of mammary-specific super-enhancers at L1 and L10. (A) Coverage plots of the mammary ... Figure 1. Genome-wide analyses.
Figure 1. Accumulation kinetics of TC-NER factors reveal a CSA independent UVSSA recruitment. (A) Representative images ... Figure 1. Accumulation kinetics.
Figure 4. MTase JHP1050 inactivation causes phenotypic effects that vary between strains: growth, viability and ... Figure 4. MTase JHP1050 inactivation.
Figure 1. Analysis of ERV expression dynamics in early embryogenesis by WGCNA. (A) Principal component analysis of ... Figure 1. Analysis of ERV expression.
Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and SEN1 genes in rpb4Δ and isogenic wild type cells. (A) Schematic ... Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and.
Figure 1. CSB does not affect the recruitment of OGG1 to oxidative DNA damage. (A) Representative stills of time-lapse ... Figure 1. CSB does not affect.
Figure 1. Prevalence of parasitic infection and anemia among the children. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations for coronary artery disease plotted across all chromosomes. Associations added ... Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations.
Figure 1 The workflow of CAR development from a hybridoma
Figure 1 Mechanisms of mitral regurgitation.
Fig. 1. A graphical representation of the GGDNA workflow used to identify each single expressed TE transcript from ... Fig. 1. A graphical representation.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 2. Ectopic expression of PLZF modulates H3K27ac at enhancer regions in myeloid cells. (A) Box plots showing ... Figure 2. Ectopic expression of PLZF modulates H3K27ac at enhancer regions in myeloid cells. (A) Box plots showing H3K27ac enrichment (% H3K27ac bound/Input) in Empty vector and PLZF-Flag conditions at promoter, enhancer and active enhancer regions. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (Welch's t.test); NS not significant. (B) Venn diagrams showing the overlap of active enhancers (Active) between Empty vector and PLZF-Flag conditions. ***P < 0.001 (hypergeometric test). (C) Venn diagrams showing the overlap between PLZF peaks and active enhancers (Active) in PLZF-Flag condition. ***P < 0.001 (hypergeometric test). (D) Density plot profiles of H3K27ac normalized signal at PLZF-bound active enhancers in PLZF-Flag and Empty vector conditions. ***P < 0.001 (paired Welch's t test). (E) Spike-in ChIP-qPCR validation of H3K27ac variation at Cd47, Furin and Mef2c enhancers. Hoxd10 is used as a negative control. Percentage of bound DNA over input are shown as a mean ±SD of two independent experiments (n = 3, for each experiment). *P < 0.05 (Mann–Whitney test), NS not significant. (F) Venn diagrams showing the overlap between PLZF peaks and active enhancers with decreased H3K27ac level (K27ac Down Active) in PLZF-Flag condition. PBDA: PLZF-Bound Down Active. In figures B and E, ***P < 0.001 (hypergeometric test); NS not significant. (G) Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis on PBDA (intersect Figure E) using g:Profiler. Red scale indicates the P-value (–log<sub>10</sub>) and grey scale represents gene % (i.e. % of genes observed/total number of genes within each GO term). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Res, gkz174, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz174 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 1. PLZF restricts active epigenetic marks in myeloid cells Figure 1. PLZF restricts active epigenetic marks in myeloid cells. (A) Experimental protocol design for engineering ... Figure 1. PLZF restricts active epigenetic marks in myeloid cells. (A) Experimental protocol design for engineering PLZF-Flag 416b cell line and immunoblot showing PLZF expression (using anti-Flag or anti-PLZF antibodies). Alpha-Tubulin was used as loading control. (B) Genomic distribution of PLZF obtained from PLZF-Flag transduced 416b cell line (TSS: transcription start site defined from -1kb to +100bp; TES: transcription ending site defined from –100 bp to +1 kb; UTR: untranslated region. (C) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis using GREAT tools of PLZF-peaks nearby genes (CC: cell cycle; DD: DNA damage; EP: epigenetics; CM: chemical modifications; IM: immunology). Gray scale values illustrate gene enrichment (i.e. number of genes observed/expected) for each GO term. (D) Venn diagrams showing the overlap between PLZF and histone marks.***P < 0.001 (hypergeometric test); NS not significant. (E) Scatter plots showing histone mark profiles in PLZF-Flag versus Empty vector conditions. (F) Venn diagrams showing the percentage of H3K27ac (upper) and H3K4me3 (lower) peaks modulated and/or bound by PLZF. (G) Integrative Genomic Viewer (IGV) screenshots of PLZF and H3K27ac in PLZF-Flag (PLZF) and Empty vector conditions (Empty). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Res, gkz174, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz174 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 3. PLZF binding restrains enhancer activity Figure 3. PLZF binding restrains enhancer activity. (A) Density plot profiles illustrating ATAC-seq normalized signal ... Figure 3. PLZF binding restrains enhancer activity. (A) Density plot profiles illustrating ATAC-seq normalized signal on PLZF-bound active enhancers in absence (Empty vector) or presence of PLZF (PLZF-Flag). ***P < 0.001 (paired Welch's t test). (B) Representative Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) tracks of ATAC-seq, PLZF, signals at Cd47, Furin and Mef2c enhancers in PLZF-Flag versus Empty vector conditions. The grey box underlines the enhancers. (C) Box plots showing gene expression in PLZF-Flag condition of all genes and genes associated with PBDA with low (PLZF low) or strong PLZF (PLZF high) signals. PBDA: PLZF-Bound Down Active. *P < 0.05 (Welch's t test), NS not significant. (D) MA plot showing gene expression (RNA-seq) fold changes in PLZF-Flag versus Empty vector conditions (grey dots). Blue dots represent genes associated with PBDA. Yellow dots represent genes associated with PBDA with strong PLZF binding. (E) Luciferase assay performed in 416b cells in absence (Empty vector) or presence of PLZF (PLZF-Flag) with control-LUC (Mock) or with CD47-enhancer-LUC (CD47 Enhancer) reporters. Luciferase activity (FIREFLY: FF) was measured 8 h after transfection. FF values are normalized to RENILLA and expressed as a mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05 (Mann–Whitney test), NS not significant. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Res, gkz174, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz174 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 4. PLZF-mutation induced H3K27ac at enhancer regions in GMPs Figure 4. PLZF-mutation induced H3K27ac at enhancer regions in GMPs. (A) Experimental design used for generating ... Figure 4. PLZF-mutation induced H3K27ac at enhancer regions in GMPs. (A) Experimental design used for generating histone mark ChIP-seq in wild type (WT) and PLZF mutant (Zbtb16<sup>lu/lu</sup>) Granulocyte-Monocyte Progenitors (GMPs). Lin-: Lineage negative, LK: Lin-, c-kit<sup>+</sup> and Sca-1<sup>−</sup>. (B) Scatter plots showing H3K27ac, H3K27me3, H3K4me1 and H3K4me3 signal in Zbtb16<sup>lu/lu</sup> versus WT GMP. (C) Box plots showing H3K27ac enrichment (% H3K27ac bound/input) in WT and Zbtb16<sup>lu/lu</sup> GMPs at promoter, enhancer and active enhancer regions. **P < 0.01 (Welch's t test), NS not significant. (D) Venn diagrams showing the numbers of active enhancers in the Zbtb16<sup>lu/lu</sup> GMPs. K27ac Up: upregulated compared to the WT condition, K27ac de novo: not detected in the WT condition. (E) Volcano plot representing differential gene expression (RNA-seq) in Zbtb16<sup>lu/lu</sup>compared to WT. Yellow dots represent genes significantly modulated (false discovery rate (FDR) < 8%, fold change (FC) > 1 or < 1). Up Active enhancers are highlighted in blue. The 12 Up-Active associated genes with FDR <8% that appear in blue are circled in blue. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Res, gkz174, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz174 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 5. Aging of GMPs is marked by an accumulation of H3K27ac at enhancer regions. (A) Scatter plots showing H3K27ac ... Figure 5. Aging of GMPs is marked by an accumulation of H3K27ac at enhancer regions. (A) Scatter plots showing H3K27ac profiles in Old versus Young GMPs. (B) Box plot showing H3K27ac level at active enhancers in Old versus Young GMPs. ***P < 0.001 (Welch's t test). (C) Venn diagrams showing the numbers of active enhancers in Old WT GMPs. K27ac Up: upregulated compared to the Young condition, K27ac de novo: not detected in the Young condition. (D) Venn diagram showing the overlap (common) between genes associated with active enhancers upregulated during aging (Old Up Active associated genes) and genes associated with active enhancers upregulated in Zbtb16<sup>lu/lu</sup> GMPs (Zbtb16<sup>lu/lu</sup> Up Active associated genes) ***P < 0.001 (hypergeometric test). (E) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and associated human phenotype of ‘common’ enhancers that change in aged and Zbtb16<sup>lu/lu</sup> conditions (intersect Figure D) using g:Profiler. Red scale indicates the P-value (–log<sub>10</sub>) and grey scale represents gene % (i.e. % of genes observed /total number of genes within each GO/KEGG term). (F) De novo binding motif analysis at ‘common’ enhancers associated with metabolic processes. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Res, gkz174, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz174 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.