What is OAL? The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) ensures that agency regulations are clear, necessary, legally valid, and available to the public. OAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Katherine Hayes The George Washington University, SPHHS Department of Health Policy July 9,
Advertisements

S.L Part 1, Section 3.(b) G.S. 150B-21.3A: PERIODIC REVIEW AND EXPIRATION OF EXISTING RULES.
Ventura County Mobile Home Park Rent Review Board Hearing February 26, 2014 Proposed Amendments to Mobile Home Park Rent Control Ordinance Project No.
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Interim measures in Russian courts in support of international arbitration: principles, procedure and the range of remedies available BRLA seminar 25 January.
Washington Headquarters Services Executive Services Directorate Information Management Division OMB Collection Number Paperwork Reduction Act – DoD Public.
An Overview of Federal Agency Rulemaking Meeting of The Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October 27, 2008 Christian C. Mahler,
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
The Name Equality Act of 2007 AB 102 (Chapter 567, Statutes of 2007)
Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act Final Rule Joseph Baressi June 3, 2009.
Administrative law research April 1, 2008 Melanie Dunshee.
Legislative Rule-Making Process. Three Different Processes Higher Education 29A-3A-1 et seq State Board of Education 29A-3B-1 et seq All other state agencies.
Coping with Electronic Records Setting Standards for Private Sector E-records Retention.
MODEL IMPLEMENTING IDERA REGULATION SUMMARY POWERPOINT FIRST EDITION NOVEMBER 2014.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
FDA shall issue a certification for those FDA licensed establishments applying for amendment during the validity of their Licenses to Operate. This certification.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Regulatory Primer 101 Patrick Kennelly, Chief Food Safety Section California Department of Public Health March 11, 2014.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast David Peterson – La. AG’s Office – Asst. Attorney General - AG Designee to CPRA Ken Ortego – Vilar and Elliott.
2010 Florida Building Code: I nterpretation P rocess O verview.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Proposed Regulation for the Measurement of Agricultural Water Deliveries Department of Water Resources Water Use and Efficiency PUBLIC.
1 Ensuring the protection of bidders’ rights.  The Federal Law of № 94-FZ "On placing orders for goods, works and services for state and municipal.
Summary of Rulemaking in California for the Forensic Alcohol Laboratories Regulation Review Committee Cathy L. Ruebusch, RN, MSN Office of Regulations.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
Implementing the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 2 Background The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612) requires Federal agencies to— –Consider the.
Thirtysomething: EMS in California 30 Years After SB 125 Workshop Presentation by Emergency Medical Services Administrators’ Association of California.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges ­– Leadership Institute 2008 Basics for Effective Senates Shaaron Vogel Wheeler North Academic Senate.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
REGULATION DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURE USF OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL.
LAW OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY FALL 2015 © 2015 MICHAEL I. SHAMOS Regulatory Law Michael I. Shamos, Ph.D., J.D. Institute for Software Research School of.
Introduction to the Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
Policy for Maintaining Instream Flows in Northern California Coastal Streams Monitoring and Reporting Provisions for Water Rights Victoria Whitney Deputy.
The Public Records Act As Applied To FCERA Presentation to the FCERA Board of Retirement October 20, 2010 Jeffrey R. Rieger Reed Smith, LLP.
Rule-Making Louisiana Style. Administrative Procedure Act (APA) This attempts to set standards under which agencies will act, standards related to fairness.
Changes to Contested Case Hearing Requirements and Procedures Janis Hudson Environmental Law Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
 Section (2), Florida Statutes, requires each local government to maintain a comprehensive plan of the type and in the manner set out in this.
Overview of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act and Designation Process County of San Luis Obispo Office of the County Counsel January 8, 2015.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
1 Roles of the State and Regional Boards in the basin Plan Amendment Process.
Researching Recent California Regulations
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
An Overview of the Small Business Advocacy Review Panel Process
Wyoming Statutes §§ through
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
U.S. Coast Guard Regulatory Development
Division of Waste Management
Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Federal Rulemaking Process for Significant Regulatory Actions
Chapter 6 Powers and Functions of Administrative Agencies.
The Office of Open Records webinar will begin soon
Contract Support Costs
Contract Support Costs
Wyoming Administrative Procedure Act
Appeal Code Changes Delynn Coldiron, City Clerk; Brad Yatabe, Legal
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) & the Administrative Procedures Act (APA)

What is OAL? The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) ensures that agency regulations are clear, necessary, legally valid, and available to the public. OAL is responsible for: Reviewing administrative regulations proposed by state agencies for compliance with the standards set forth in APA Transmitting these regulations to the Secretary of State Publishing regulations in the California Code of Regulations.

APA and Basin Planning Special Procedures for Waterboards Plans and Policies (Gov’t. Code § 11353) Any policy, plan, or guideline, or any revision must be submitted to OAL 11353. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), this chapter doesnot apply to the adoption or revision of state policy for waterquality control and the adoption or revision of water quality controlplans and guidelines pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section13000) of the Water Code. (b) (1) Any policy, plan, or guideline, or any revision thereof,that the State Water Resources Control Board has adopted or that acourt determines is subject to this part, after June 1, 1992, shallbe submitted to the office.

Administrative Procedures Act (cont.) Submittals must include: Clear, Concise Summary of Regulatory Provisions Administrative Record Summary of Necessity OCC Certification Form 400 (2) The State Water Resources Control Board shall include in itssubmittal to the office all of the following: A clear and concise summary of any regulatory provisionsadopted or approved as part of that action, for publication in theCalifornia Code of Regulations. The administrative record for the proceeding. Proposedadditions to a policy, plan, or guideline shall be indicated byunderlined text and proposed deletions shall be indicated bystrike-through text in documents submitted as part of theadministrative record for the proceeding. A summary of the necessity for the regulatory provision. A certification by the chief legal officer of the State WaterResources Control Board that the action was taken in compliance withall applicable procedural requirements of Division 7 (commencing withSection 13000) of the Water Code.

Administrative Procedures Act (cont.) Limited OAL Review Necessity Authority Clarity, Consistency Reference Nonduplication Compliance with Federal Public Participation Requirements (3) Paragraph (2) does not limit the authority of the office to review any regulatory provision which is part of the policy, plan, or guideline submitted by the State Water Resources Control Board. (4) The office shall review the regulatory provisions to determine compliance with the standards of necessity, authority, clarity, consistency, reference, and nonduplication set forth in subdivision (a) of Section 11349.1. The office shall also review the responses to public comments prepared by the State Water Resources Control Board or the appropriate regional water quality control board to determine compliance with the public participation requirements of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.). The office shall restrict its review to the regulatory provisions and the administrative record of the proceeding. Sections11349.3, 11349.4, 11349.5, and 11350.3 shall apply to the review by the office to the extent that those sections are consistent with this section. Government Code Section 11349. Standards The following definitions govern the interpretation of this chapter: (a) "Necessity" means the record of the rulemaking proceeding demonstrates by substantial evidence the need for a regulation to effectuate the purpose of the statute, court decision, or other provision of law that the regulation implements, interprets, or makes, taking into account the totality of the record. For purposes of this standard, evidence includes, but is not limited to, facts, studies, and expert opinion. (b) "Authority" means the provision of law which permits or obligates the agency to adopt, amend, or repeal a regulation. (c) "Clarity" means written or displayed so that the meaning of regulations will be easily understood by those persons directly affected by them. (d) "Consistency" means being in harmony with, and not in conflict with or contradictory to, existing statutes, court decisions, or other provisions of law. (e) "Reference" means the statute, court decision, or other provision of law which the agency implements, interprets, or makes specific by adopting, amending, or repealing a regulation. (f) "Nonduplication" means that a regulation does not serve the same purpose as a state or federal statute or another regulation. This standard requires that an agency proposing to amend or adopt a regulation must identify any state or federal statute or regulation which is overlapped or duplicated by the proposed regulation and justify any overlap or duplication. This standard is not intended to prohibit state agencies from printing relevant portions of enabling legislation in regulations when the duplication is necessary to satisfy the clarity standard in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 11349.1. This standard is intended to prevent the indiscriminate incorporation of statutory language in a regulation.

Administrative Procedures Act (cont.) Effective Dates under California Law: OAL Approval Payment of Fish and Game Fee No Effect Determination (5) The policy, plan, guideline, or revision shall not become effective unless and until the regulatory provisions are approved by the office in accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 11349.3. (6) Upon approval of the regulatory provisions, the office shall transmit to the Secretary of State for filing the clear and concise summary of the regulatory provisions submitted by the State Water Resources Control Board. (7) Any proceedings before the State Water Resources Control Board or a California regional water quality control board to take any action subject to this subdivision shall be conducted in accordance with the procedural requirements of Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code, together with any applicable requirements of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the requirements of this chapter, other than the requirement for review by the office in accordance with this subdivision, shall not apply. (8) This subdivision shall not provide a basis for review by the office under this subdivision or Article 6 (commencing with Section 11349) of any such policy, plan, or guideline adopted or revised prior to June 1, 1992. (c) Subdivision (a) does not apply to a provision of any policy, plan, guideline, or revision, as applied to any person who, as of June 1, 1992, was a party to a civil action challenging that provision on the grounds that it has not been adopted as a regulation pursuant to this chapter. (d) Copies of the policies, plans, and guidelines to which subdivision (a) applies shall be maintained at central locations for inspection by the public. The State Water Resources Control Board shall maintain, at its headquarters in Sacramento, a current copy of each policy, plan, or guideline in effect. Each regional water quality control board shall maintain at its headquarters a current copy of each policy, plan, or guideline in effect in its respective region. Any revision of a policy, plan, or guideline shall be made available for inspection by the public within 30 days of its effective date.

OAL Decisions and Timeframe 30 Working Days (about six weeks) Approve Disapprove Withdraw