Impacts of the New Boiler MACT Rules Les Oakes King & Spalding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.
1 Section 112J: The HAMMER Clause & Title V (CAAPP) What has Illinois been doing about the PART 2; May 15, 2003 Deadline???? Hank Naour ILLINOIS EPA.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
Duke Power Clean Smokestacks & Mercury Efforts April, 2004.
Insights on Economic Impacts of Utility Mercury and CO 2 Controls Anne Smith Charles River Associates North Carolina DENR/DAQ Workshop on Mercury and CO.
EPAs Information Collection Request (ICR) Programs Lessons learned from a Brick up side the head.
CUSTOMIZED ENVIRONMENTAL
Tim Davis NJDEP – Air C&E
IDEM Update June 8, 2011 Office of Pollution Prevention & Technical Assistance.
United States Experience: Hazardous Waste Combustion US Standards Controls Emissions.
Healthcare and Air Quality H2E Conference - Dec 6, 2007 K-State Pollution Prevention Institute Ryan Hamel.
Part 63 Boiler Rule for Area Sources AWMA Conference September 11-14, 2012 Biloxi, MS Lee Page Air Toxics Assessment and Implementation Section U.S. Environmental.
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world Proposed Area and Major Source Boiler NESHAP Overview David Dunn Environmental Resources Management.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Air Pollution Control Program: Proposed Changes Presented to the Air Pollution Control Board April 2009.
Adjustments to the Air Toxics Standards for Major and Area Source Boilers 40 CFR Part 63, Subparts DDDDD and JJJJJJ Summary of Final Changes, Key Highlights.
ECMPS Reporting Requirements under the MATS Rule
Boiler GACT Update Georgia AWMA Conference
Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Definition: How it Relates to Boiler MACT and CISWI Rules Biloxi, MS ♦ September 13, 2012 Melissa Hillman Justin Fickas.
Rick Soucy GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
North Carolina Division of Air Quality - Mercury Regulations, Emissions, and Deposition Modeling in North Carolina Presented for 6th Annual Unifour Air.
Managing Air Quality Data 101 Presented by: Chris Bellusci (GeoEngineers) & Claire Lund, PE (Sanborn Head) International Conference for Environmental Data.
Attachment 5. Environmental Compliance EPA Regulations March
NSR Regulations Update November 14, 2012 Atlanta, GA Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority EPA – Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
Richard (Rick) Goertz, P. E
Harmonization of Part 60 and Part 75 CEM Requirements Robert Vollaro
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
KEEA Conference October 2013 Carbon Pollution Standards for Power Plants under Section 111 of the CAA: How Energy Efficiency Can Help States Comply 1 Jackson.
Identification of Non- Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Wastes EPA Proposed Rule April 30, 2010 Osman Environmental Solutions Harrisburg, PA.
RICE MACT and Oil Analysis
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
MCIC Workshop 2012 Complying with NC Air Quality Regulations Boiler MACT/GACT and 112j Steve Schliesser Division of Air Quality Environmental Engineer.
Wes Thornhill, Chief Industrial Chemicals Section Air Division
Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern Section AWMA Conference Callaway Gardens, GA Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern.
Division of Air Quality Update on EPA Boiler MACT Rules Steve Schliesser Environmental Engineer March 2012.
April 15, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
1 Year in Review: Clean Air Act Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8, 2010 Things Are Getting Really Complicated.
EPA Regulations On Electric Utility Generating Units (EGU)
Compliance Update NCMA 2015.
Texas Lignite Industry. Texas Lignite  Because >95% of lignite mining operations in Texas are in support of electric generation…..whatever impacts the.
INDUSTRIAL BOILER MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD)
HAPs To Be Regulated: Mercury Only Electric utility steam generating units are uniquely regulated by Congress under 112(n)(1)(A) EPA was required to study.
December 4, Utility MACT Air & Waste Management Association/EPA Information Exchange December 4, 2002 William H. Maxwell Combustion Group/ESD.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Reducing Toxic Pollution from Power Plants April 13, 2011 EPA’s Proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards.
Particulate Matter Monitoring Required by the Utility MATS Eric Swisher| | ext. 17 August 22, 2012 Presented to ARIPPA.
UTILITY MACT WORKING GROUP STATE AND LOCAL STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS.
Industrial Sources of Mercury in the Atmosphere Jim Orgeron Staff Environmental Scientist, Environmental Planning Division.
Fuels For Schools General Air Quality Considerations Diane R. Lorenzen, P.E. Montana Department of Environmental Quality October 17, 2007.
NACAA Fall Meeting October 2012 Innovative and Replicable Initiatives - The Colorado Clean Air/Clean Jobs Act Will Allison, Director CDPHE Air Pollution.
Georgia’s 112(g) Experiences Eric Cornwell Acting Manager Permitting Program.
Control of Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide – LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 Dustin Duhon Air Permits Division Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality March 23,
1 Permit Exemptions Rule Revisions North Carolina Division of Air Quality Permit Exemptions Rule Revisions North Carolina Division of Air Quality Air Quality.
Navajo Nation Air Quality Control Program Operating Permit Program Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency Route 112 North/Bldg Fort Defiance,
Rules and Exceptions - The Costs of “Cheap” Coal.
Air Pollution Challenges Kentucky Coal Association April 29, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Larry S. Monroe, Ph.D. Senior Research Consultant Southern Company Birmingham, Alabama October 22, 2010 Coal-Fired Power Plants Environmental Control Technology.
Portland Cement NESHAPs & NSPS, and Related Solid Waste Combustion Rules David L. Jones Eastern Kern APCD November 4, 2011 California Desert Air Working.
© 2015 Haynes and Boone, LLP Overview of the EPA Clean Power Plan Suzanne Beaudette Murray February 19, 2016 Tulane Environmental Law Summit.
APPA Conference Call on EGU MACT Rule January 20, 2011.
The Clean Power Plan.  Standards of Performance for GHG Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources (111(b)).  Carbon Pollution.
Regulatory Roadmap: Power sector environmental rules
Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee August 4, 2016 Harrisburg, PA
Clean Air Act Glossary.
What is the Boiler NESHAP?
Air Pollutants 200 Air pollutants are recognized and assessed by the USEPA Listed in the Clean Air Act.
NACAA Response to EGU MACT Vacatur
Presentation transcript:

Impacts of the New Boiler MACT Rules Les Oakes King & Spalding

Industrial Boiler MACT USEPA proposed MACT regulations for industrial boilers (IB) in May The proposed regulations drew thousands of comments. USEPA published final MACT regulations for industrial boilers on March 21, CFR 63, Subpart DDDDD. The final regulations were in some respects more stringent than the controversial proposals.

Industrial Boiler MACT The IB MACT standards apply to new and existing boilers with heat inputs greater that 10 million BTU per hour (MMBtu/Hr) at major sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). A major source has the potential to emit 10 or more tons per year of a single HAP or 25 or more tons per year of all HAPs. This means all HAPs not just those emitted from the boiler(s).

Industrial Boiler MACT The IB MACT standards for new boilers at major sources regulate emissions of particulate matter (PM), hydrogen chloride (HCl), mercury (Hg), carbon monoxide (CO) and dioxins/furans. The IB MACT standards for existing boilers at major sources regulate emissions of the same pollutants. The most stringent standards apply to boilers that fire coal. Boilers greater than 250 MMBtu/Hr will also need continuous emission monitors for certain pollutants.

Industrial Boiler MACT On March 21, 2011, USEPA also published a final rule applicable to certain industrial boilers located at area sources. 40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJ. Area sources are not major sources. 40 CFR § The area source regulations apply to units with heat inputs greater than 10 MMBtu/Hr. Separate standards for boilers between 10 and 30 MMBtu/Hr and boilers greater than 30 MMBtu/Hr located at area sources.

Industrial Boiler MACT For industrial boilers at areas sources: standards apply to fewer types of sources (e.g., new or existing coal-fired boilers or new oil- fired boilers); and regulate fewer pollutants (e.g., new coal-fired boilers only subject to emission limits for PM, Hg and CO); fewer monitoring requirements apply; but the tune-up work practice standard applies within 12 months.

Industrial Boiler MACT IB MACT standards do not apply to recovery boilers or to electric steam generating units (i.e., power plants - EGUs). On March 16, 2011, USEPA proposed a MACT standard for EGUs. Some of the proposed emission limits for EGU boilers are less stringent that the corresponding pollutant limits for IBs.

Industrial Boiler MACT New or modified sources must comply with the applicable MACT standards at the time of start up. Existing sources have three years (i.e., March 2014) to comply. Some notification requirements may apply sooner.

Industrial Boiler MACT The rules they are a-changing (and the clock she is a-ticking?).... On March 21, 2011, USEPA also published a notice that it intended to re-consider the emission limits for IBs at booth major and area sources. USEPA had requested more time to finalize the IB MACT standards, but the federal court refused to honor the request. Issue to consider: if USEPA modifies the IB MACT standards, will it grant three more years to comply, or only for those provisions which change?

Industrial Boiler MACT Questions?