Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Repression by Groucho/TLE/Grg Proteins: Genomic Site Recruitment Generates Compacted Chromatin In Vitro and Impairs Activator Binding In Vivo  Takashi.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Nucleosome Sliding via TBP DNA Binding In Vivo
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Origin recognition complex binding to a metazoan replication origin
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
A Specialized Nucleosome Modulates Transcription Factor Access to a C
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Regulation of CSF1 Promoter by the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Distinct Strategies to Make Nucleosomal DNA Accessible
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
ChIC and ChEC Molecular Cell
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Chromatin Remodeling In Vivo
Yingqun Huang, Joan A. Steitz  Molecular Cell 
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
NAD+-Dependent Modulation of Chromatin Structure and Transcription by Nucleosome Binding Properties of PARP-1  Mi Young Kim, Steven Mauro, Nicolas Gévry,
Ahmed H. Hassan, Kristen E. Neely, Jerry L. Workman  Cell 
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (November 2004)
Joshua C. Black, Janet E. Choi, Sarah R. Lombardo, Michael Carey 
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Barbara S Nikolajczyk, J.Aquiles Sanchez, Ranjan Sen  Immunity 
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Jongbum Kwon, Anthony N Imbalzano, Adam Matthews, Marjorie A Oettinger 
A Transient Histone Hyperacetylation Signal Marks Nucleosomes for Remodeling at the PHO8 Promoter In Vivo  Hans Reinke, Philip D. Gregory, Wolfram Hörz 
Nucleosomes Unfold Completely at a Transcriptionally Active Promoter
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Amanda O'Donnell, Shen-Hsi Yang, Andrew D. Sharrocks  Molecular Cell 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Replication-Coupled Nucleosome Assembly and Positioning by ATP-Dependent Chromatin-Remodeling Enzymes  Tejas Yadav, Iestyn Whitehouse  Cell Reports  Volume.
Pantelis Hatzis, Iannis Talianidis  Molecular Cell 
SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Polycomb Silencing Blocks Transcription Initiation
Ping Hu, Kalpana Samudre, Si Wu, Yuling Sun, Nouria Hernandez 
The Human DiGeorge Syndrome Critical Region Gene 8 and Its D
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (March 1998)
A SWI/SNF–Related Chromatin Remodeling Complex, E-RC1, Is Required for Tissue- Specific Transcriptional Regulation by EKLF In Vitro  Jennifer A Armstrong,
Presentation transcript:

A Positioned Nucleosome on the Human U6 Promoter Allows Recruitment of SNAPc by the Oct-1 POU Domain  Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell  Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 539-549 (March 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00201-5

Figure 1 SNAPc and Oct-1 Are Localized on U6 and U1 Promoter Sequences In Vivo (A) Rapidly growing HeLa cells were treated with formaldehyde. Cross-linked chromatin was extracted, sonicated, and used as starting material for immunoprecipitations with beads coated with the antibodies indicated above the lanes or with just beads alone (lanes 13, 14, 21, 22). The immunoprecipitated material was analyzed by PCR with test (T) primers specific for the U6 promoter or control (C) primers hybridizing to a unique region 4 kb upstream of the U6 snRNA gene. (B) The experiment was as in (A) except that test (T) primers specific for the U1 promoter or control (C) primers hybridizing to a unique region 7 kb upstream of the U1 gene within the 45 kb U1 repeat (Bernstein et al., 1985) were used in the PCR. Different sets of test primers were used in lanes 1–16 and lanes 17–24 Molecular Cell 2001 7, 539-549DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00201-5)

Figure 2 The DNA between the Octamer and the PSE in the U6 and U1 Promoters Is Resistant to MNase Digestion in Exponentially Growing Cells (A) Naked DNA (lane 1) or chromatin (lanes 2 and 3) was subjected to partial digestion with MNase. Double-strand cleavage sites were then mapped by ligation-mediated PCR with primers specific for the human U6 promoter. The main cleavage sites are indicated with arrowheads. The location of the PSE and octamer sequence relative to the labeled end of the primer (B) as well as the location of a putative nucleosome is indicated on the right. (B) Schematic representation of the U6 snRNA promoter. The hatched box on the left represents the unidirectional linker, and the small arrow represents the primer used in the second round of PCR. The label on the lower strand radioactive primer is marked with an asterisk. The distances separating the label end of the primer from the 5′ and 3′ edges of the octamer sequence and PSE are indicated. Major double-strand MNase cuts are indicated by arrowheads. (C) Naked DNA (lane 1) or chromatin (lane 2) was subjected to partial MNase digestion and analyzed as in (A) except that primers specific for the human U1 promoters were used. (D) Schematic representation of the U1 promoter. Symbols are the same as in (B) Molecular Cell 2001 7, 539-549DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00201-5)

Figure 3 The Oct-1 POU Domain Binds to the Octamer Sequence in Chromatin Templates, but This Does Not Change the Nucleosome Pattern in the U6 Promoter Region (A) The U6 template pU6/Hae/RA.2 (lanes 1–4) or the same template containing a mutated octamer sequence (pU6/Hae/DSE−) (lanes 5–8) was assembled into chromatin (chrom) with S-190 extract from D. melanogaster postblastoderm embryos either without or with the Oct-1 POU domain derivatives indicated above the lanes. In lanes 9 and 10, naked (N) DNA template was used. The octamer sequence is indicated by a bracket. (B) pU6/Hae/RA.2 was assembled into chromatin with S-190 extract either without (lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6) or with (lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8) the Oct-1 POU domain. The chromatin was then subjected to partial MNase digestion for increasing amounts of time, fractionated on an agarose gel, transferred to a membrane, and visualized with a probe hybridizing to the U6 promoter (lanes 1–4) or to the β-lactamase gene in the plasmid (lanes 5–8). The lower panel shows the location of the probes, which are symbolized by short black bars and are separated by 1.7 kb Molecular Cell 2001 7, 539-549DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00201-5)

Figure 4 The DNA between the Octamer and the PSE in pU6/Hae/RA.2 Assembled into Chromatin Is Resistant to MNase Digestion, Both with and without the Oct-1 POU Domain (A) Naked DNA (lane 5) or chromatin assembled without (lanes 1 and 2) or with (lanes 3 and 4) the Oct-1 POU domain was partially digested with MNase. Double-strand cleavage sites were then mapped by ligation-mediated PCR. The main cleavage sites are indicated with arrowheads. The location of the PSE and octamer sequence relative to the labeled end of the primer (B) as well as the location of a putative nucleosome are indicated on the right. (B) Schematic representation of the U6 snRNA promoter. Symbols are the same as in Figure 2B Molecular Cell 2001 7, 539-549DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00201-5)

Figure 5 The Oct-1 POU Domain and SNAPc Bind Cooperatively to the Natural U6 Promoter When It Is Wrapped into Chromatin (A) A human U6 promoter probe was either assembled into a mononucleosome (lanes 1–4) or used as naked DNA (lanes 5–8) and incubated with the factors indicated above the lanes. The positions of free DNA, the mononucleosome (Nuc), the mononucleosome/Oct-1 POU domain complex (Nuc/POU), the mononucleosome/SNAPc complex (Nuc/SNAPc), the mononucleosome/Oct-1 POU domain/SNAPc complex (Nuc/POU/SNAPc), the naked DNA/SNAPc complex (SNAPc), and the naked DNA/Oct-1 POU domain/SNAPc (POU/SNAPc) complex are indicated. The bands labeled with a black dot correspond to naked DNA probe bound to one or more Oct-1 POU domains. These complexes were observed only when the naked DNA probe was limiting with respect to the Oct-1 POU domain. For lanes 5–8, a panel shows a low exposure of the bottom of the gel. (B) A mononucleosome probe as in (A) was either left untreated (lanes 1–4) or treated with the restriction enzyme Mse I (lanes 5–8). The probe was then incubated with the factors indicated above the lanes. The positions of the various complexes are indicated as in (A). (C) Schematic of the probe showing the location of Mse I cleavage sites Molecular Cell 2001 7, 539-549DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00201-5)

Figure 6 Cooperative Binding on a Nucleosomal Template Requires the Same Protein–Protein Contacts as Cooperative Binding to Closely Spaced Octamer and PSE Sequences on Naked DNA A wild-type probe (lanes 1–16) or probes with a mutated PSE (lanes 17–20) or octamer sequence (lanes 21–24) were assembled into mononucleosomes and incubated with increasing amounts of the factors indicated above the lanes. E7R refers to the Oct-1 POU domain carrying the E7R mutation, and K900E refers to SNAPc carrying the K900E mutation in SNAP190. The complexes are labeled as in Figure 5A Molecular Cell 2001 7, 539-549DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00201-5)

Figure 7 The Oct-1 POU Domain Activates U6 Transcription on a Chromatin Template (A) pU6/Hae/RA.2 (lanes 1–4) or the U6 template with a mutated octamer (construct pU6/Hae/DSE−, lanes 5–8) was mixed with S-190 extract without added histones and immediately incubated (as naked DNA template) in a HeLa cell extract depleted of endogenous Oct-1. The bands corresponding to U6 transcription (U6) or to the internal control (IC) are indicated. The numbers in the bracket below the lanes indicate amounts of U6 specific signal (normalized to the IC signal) relative to the signal obtained with the pU6/Hae/DSE− construct in the absence of the Oct-1 POU domain, which was set at 1 (lane 5). (B) pU6/Hae/RA.2 was assembled into chromatin with increasing amounts of the Oct-1 POU domains indicated above the lanes and then incubated with a HeLa cell extract depleted of endogenous Oct-1. The numbers in the bracket below the lanes indicate amounts of U6 specific signal (normalized to the IC signal) relative to the signal obtained in the absence of the Oct-1 POU domain, which was set at 1 (lane 1). (C) The pU6/Hae/DSE− (lanes 1–4) or pU6/Hae/RA.2 (lanes 5 and 6) constructs were assembled into chromatin with the Oct-1 POU domains indicated above the lanes and transcribed as in (B) Molecular Cell 2001 7, 539-549DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00201-5)

Figure 8 A Positioned Nucleosome Mediates Cooperative Binding of the Oct-1 POU Domain and SNAPc on the Natural U6 Promoter The POUS and POUH subdomains of the Oct-1 POU domain are shown (details are discussed in the text) Molecular Cell 2001 7, 539-549DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00201-5)