Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP )

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCIENCE,SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE E.U.
Advertisements

Rural Development Policy
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development.
The political framework
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Addressing challenges in a changing world: -The future Cohesion Policy- Wolfgang.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Towards the Romania of PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania EU projects represent a.
RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES IN BULGARIA Nedka Ivanova UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Rural Development Programme 2014 – 2020 Local Government Practioners Workshop 12 th February Lorraine Lynas RDP Managing Authority.
The EU rural development plan and the international context Sabine LARUELLE Ministre des Classes Moyennes et de l’Agriculture FSAGx – November.
CAP Second Pillar: From structural policies to rural development Lecture 15. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Ⓒ Olof S. Evaluating agricultural and rural policies: an EU Commission perspective for CAP2020 Tassos Haniotis, Director Economic Analysis, Perspectives.
April The Common Agricultural Policy State of play Franz Fischler.
Nic Lampkin Institute of Rural Sciences
PART I - RURAL DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS Chapter II - NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES Paul Fensom Department for Environment, Food and.
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
The cohesion policy of the European Union Pelle Anita University of Szeged Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
Aid for Trade Needs Assessment – Georgia United Nations Development Programme.
1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) IHC Seoul 2006 FAO-MAF Korea Joint Workshop Enhancing Production and Consumption of Safe.
Ⓒ Olof S. Future directions of EU agricultural policies The CAP towards 2020 Tassos Haniotis, Director Economic Analysis, Perspectives and Evaluations.
Antonis Constantinou Director, Rural Development Programmes II DG Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission DEVELOPING A VISION ON THE FUTURE.
Common policy, common budget? Péter Halmai Professor of Economics Szent Isván University Budapest, The future of the EU budget.
RURAL REGENERATION RURAL REGENERATION according to Andrea Fugaro Responsible for Development Policies.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Enver AKSOY, MSc Head of Strategy Development Board of MoFAL Policy approaches of Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock to pasture management in.
Inclusion of small producers in the food chain The case of Romania.
Stjepan Tanic Agribusiness and Infrastructure Officer Subregional Office for Central and Eastern Europe Annual meeting 2006 Round Table 2 Ukraine: IFIs/donors’
PARTNERSHIPS IN SUPPORT OF CAADP Progress Report Brief Progress Report AUC Page 1 of 14.
European Commission Opportunities for Conservation Agriculture in the EU Common Agricultural Policy Gottlieb Basch González-Sánchez, E.; Gómez.
The Common Agricultural Policy - the UK View Claire Wilding British Embassy Paris.
EIN Working Group 2, Seminar: Sustainable Farming and Food Safety Brussels 19 th June 2003 Sustainable use of land resources – policies and economics Allan.
Ⓒ Olof S. Communication on the future of the CAP “The CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future” DG.
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
Leading the way in Agriculture and Rural Research, Education and Consulting The impacts of CAP reform on Scottish farms Shailesh Shrestha, Bouda Vosough.
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
07/02/2011Rural Development in the CAP post RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CAP POST 2013 Attila JAMBOR Assistant Professor Corvinus University of Budapest.
EU RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY Half of the population of the 25 EU member states live in rural areas Therefore rural development is a very important policy.
European Commission Agriculture and Rural Development Rural Development Policy in the period and in the Future Financial Perspectives Pedro.
EU Rural Development Policy Budapest, September 2006
Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP )
Food and Nutrition Security and Agriculture
Introduction to the New Extensionist
Climate Change Elements of the SADC Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP)
Luciano Gutierrez*, Maria Sassi**
Social economy as an opportunity to deal with local problems
What does the Community want?
THE MACRO-MICRO APPROACH FOR THE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC POLICIES
1University of Pavia, Dipartimento di Ricerche Aziendali, Pavia, Italy
Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP )
Evaluation of the quality of the European rural policy and its reforms
for sustainable growth »
Session 1 “Gender differentiated patterns of work”
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Directore General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Private sector development and SDGs in Albania
Francesco PECCI University of Verona Maria SASSI University of Pavia
Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP )
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture - A2
Sergiu Didicescu, Unit H1 DG Agriculture and Rural Development
THE MACRO-MICRO APPROACH FOR THE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC POLICIES
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
Purpose of the CSF and Staff Working Document
The EU-added value of the CAP
Climate Change Elements of the SADC Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP)
A quick word on water and rural development policy after 2013
The CAP post-2013: statistical needs in the field of rural development
Regional Co-operation Factsheet 2016
Position of the European Farmers on the changes and news within the new CAP François GUERIN | Second National Farmers meeting in Bulgaria 6 February.
Presentation transcript:

Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP6-502184) Rural Development Policy: Possible Impact on Agricultural Productivity in Old and New Member States Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP6-502184) Elisa Montresor Univeristy of Verona – Italy Francesco Pecci University of Verona - Italy Maria Sassi University of Pavia - Italy

Importance of the analysis Fostering and enabling policy and institutional environment Encouraging agricultural productivity and competitiveness Rural Development Policy (2007-13) Strategic priorities Encouraging non-farm growth activity Improving social well-being, gender equity, managing risk, reducing vulnerability The rural development policy for the programming period 2007-2013 has stated five strategic priorities: Encouraging sustainable management of natural resources

Importance of the analysis Relationship between local agricultural systems and local socio-economic systems The analysis of the territorial systems Impact of policy sensitive socio-economic and environmental variables on agriculture productivity Policy making process Within this framework the agricultural sector is called to strongly interact with local socio-economic and environmental factor for rural development and its competitiveness (one of the main objective of the CAP reform) is going to be affected by the policy action on the policy sensitive socio-economic and environmental variable. In this context today there is the need for territorial analysis aimed at understanding the relationship between the local agricultural systems and the local socio-economic systems and in the light of this relationship it is relevant the understanding of the impact of …. A key analysis for the policy making process required to both the old and new Member States by the new rural development policy and the modulation and cross-compliance introduced by the CAP reform. Importance for the old and new Member States The Rural Development Policy, Modulation and Cross-compliance

The CAP regionalization? Impact of policy sensitive socio-economic environmental variables on agriculture productivity Agricultural territorial systems within homogeneous socio-economic systems 1. Importance of the analysis 2. Object of the analysis The CAP regionalization? Object of the analysis Spatial stationary and non-stationary parameters Insights for territorial and decentralised intervention policymaking Groups of homogeneous regions

Data processing chain 4. Adjustment 5. Initial data 1. Initial data 1. Importance of the analysis 4. Adjustment and integration 5. Initial data set 2. Object of the analysis 1. Initial data set 3. Data processing chain 6. AIC + multicollinearity 7. Indicators for mixed GWRs 2. PCA 3. Local agricultural and socio-economic systems 8a. Spatial Stationary parameters 8b. Spatial Non-stationary parameters 10. Regionalization results 9.Kohonen SOM classification

Indicators: analytical framework 1. Importance of the analysis Common 2. Object of the analysis Environmental, food safety and animal welfare standards Cross-compliance and good practices 3. Data processing chain - Competitiveness - Environment and Country side - Quality of life and Diversification of Rural areas 4. Indicators: analytical framework - Competitiveness - Multifunctionality - Sustainability Farmers: free to produce what the market needs Rural development Consumers Taxpayers Decoupling Single farm payments Modulation Agricultural Policy

Agricultural productivity Indicators 1. Importance of the analysis 205 regions EU-25 2. Object of the analysis Demographic features Innovation and diversification 3. Data processing chain 4. Indicators Agricultural productivity Socio-economic context Efficiency and competitiveness Environmental sustainability

Results: Spatial Non-stationary Parameters 1. Importance of the analysis The variables affecting only locally the agricultural productivity are not only agricultural but also socio-economic and environmental variables 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain 4. Indicators Farmers age structure Agricultural environmental sustainability 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters Overall Economic development Overall and rural labour market Infrastructure Demographic features

Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 1. Importance of the analysis 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain 4. Indicators 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters Cluster 1: Mediterranean system: average development + intensive agriculture 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 Cluster 1 (14) – Labour market and infrastructure

Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 1. Importance of the analysis Cluster 2 (20) – economic development, demographic structure, infrastructure, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain Cluster 2: Largest gap in development 4. Indicators 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 Cluster 1 (14) – Labour market and infrastructure

Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 1. Importance of the analysis Cluster 2 (20) – economic development, demographic structure, infrastructure, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain Cluster 3 (58) – Farmer age structure 4. Indicators 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 Cluster 3a: Continental System: average development, intensive agirc. (UK) Cluster 3b: Continental System: high development, intensive & extensive agirc. (BE,DE,NL) Cluster 1 (14) – Labour market and infrastructure

Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 1. Importance of the analysis Cluster 2 (20) – economic development, demographic structure, infrastructure, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain Cluster 3 (58) – Farmer age structure 4. Indicators 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters Cluster 4 (18) – Infrastructures, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability Cluster 4: Large gap in development 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 Cluster 1 (14) – Labour market and infrastructure

Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 1. Importance of the analysis Cluster 5 (11) – Economic development, demographic structure, social infrastructure, rural labour market Cluster 2 (20) – economic development, demographic structure, infrastructure, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain Cluster 3 (58) – Farmer age structure 4. Indicators 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters Cluster 4 (18) – Infrastructures, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 Continental System: average development, intensive agirc. Cluster 1 (14) – Labour market and infrastructure

Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 1. Importance of the analysis Cluster 5 (11) – Economic development, demographic structure, social infrastructure, rural labour market Cluster 2 (20) – economic development, demographic structure, infrastructure, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain Cluster 3 (58) – Farmer age structure 4. Indicators Cluster 6 (21) – Part-time labour and farmers age structure 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters Cluster 4 (18) – Infrastructures, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 Custer 6: Continental System: average development, extensive agirc. Cluster 1 (14) – Labour market and infrastructure

Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 1. Importance of the analysis Cluster 5 (11) – Economic development, demographic structure, social infrastructure, rural labour market Cluster 2 (20) – economic development, demographic structure, infrastructure, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain Cluster 3 (58) – Farmer age structure Cluster 7b: Highest development (AT) Cluster 7a: Continental System: average development, extensive agirc. (FR) 4. Indicators Cluster 6 (21) – Part-time labour and farmers age structure Cluster 7c: Continental System: high development, intensive & extensive agirc. (IT) 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters Cluster 4 (18) – Infrastructures, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 Cluster 1 (14) – Labour market and infrastructure Cluster 7 (44) – Labour market

Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 1. Importance of the analysis Cluster 5 (11) – Economic development, demographic structure, social infrastructure, rural labour market Cluster 2 (20) – economic development, demographic structure, infrastructure, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain Cluster 3 (58) – Farmer age structure 4. Indicators Cluster 6 (21) – Part-time labour and farmers age structure Continental System: average development, extensive agirc. 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters Cluster 4 (18) – Infrastructures, rural labour market and agricultural environmental sustainability 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 Cluster 8 (21) – Economic development, labour market, agricultural environmental sustainability Mediterranean system: low development, key or intensive agriculture Cluster 1 (14) – Labour market and infrastructure Cluster 7 (44) – Labour market

Conclusions Regionalization Variables affecting 1. Importance of the analysis Relationship between local agricultural systems and local socio-economic systems Variables affecting locally the agricultural productivity are not only agricultural but also socio-economic and environmental 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain Regions and Member States competitiveness capacity 4. Indicators Spatial coherence among groups of regions sharing geographic borders and sometime coincident with the reference State borders Great diversity between clusters in terms of profile 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters Regionalization Financial resources 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 6. Conclusions