First “Full-Physics” Reactor Simulations Show Potential of Advanced Tokamak as Basis for a Compact-AT Pilot Plant Park/Buttery FIP P3/26 (“CAT”) FASTRAN.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Physics Basis of FIRE Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant.

Advertisements

Comments on Progress Toward and Opportunities for Attractive Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi FPA workshop Jan 23-25, 1999 Marina Del Rey,

Who will save the tokamak – Harry Potter, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Shaquille O’Neal or Donald Trump? J. P. Freidberg, F. Mangiarotti, J. Minervini MIT Plasma.

Conceptual design of a demonstration reactor for electric power generation Y. Asaoka 1), R. Hiwatari 1), K. Okano 1), Y. Ogawa 2), H. Ise 3), Y. Nomoto.

Introduction to Spherical Tokamak

National Fusion Power Plant Studies Program Achievements and Recent Results Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego FESAC Meeting March 4-5,

Contributions of Burning Plasma Physics Experiment to Fusion Energy Goals Farrokh Najmabadi Dept. of Electrical & Computer Eng. And Center for Energy Research.

Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.

21-1 Physics I Class 21 Thinking About Electric Fields and Electric Potential.

Characteristics of Commercial Fusion Power Plants Results from ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting & Symposium July.

Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.

US-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies High Temperature Plasma Center, the University of Tokyo Yuichi OGAWA, Takuya.

DEMO Parameters – Preliminary Considerations David Ward Culham Science Centre This work was jointly funded by the EPSRC and by EURATOM.

Physics Issues and Trade-offs in Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA APS April 2002 Meeting.

S. Coda, 46 th APS-DPP meeting, Savannah, 19 Nov S. Coda, 34 th EPS Conf. on Plasma Physics, Warsaw, 5 July 2007 S. Coda, MHD workshop, PPPL, 22.

Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi MFE-IFE Workshop Sept 14-16, 1998 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.

Highlights of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi For the ARIES Team VLT Conference call July 12, 2000 ARIES Web Site:

ARIES Project Meeting, L. M. Waganer, 3-4 April 2007 Page 1 Groundrules, Bases, and Definitions to Scope “The Next Step” L. Waganer The Boeing Company.

Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,

Pilot Plant: Volt-seconds Needed for Flexible Operation. John Sheffield, ISSE – University of Tennessee – Knoxville October 25, 2010.

Summary Session October 10, 2008 The Joint Meeting of 4th IAEA Technical Meeting on Spherical Tori and 14th International Workshop on Spherical Torus.

Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.

Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.

Developing a Vendor Base for Fusion Commercialization Stan Milora, Director Fusion Energy Division Virtual Laboratory of Technology Martin Peng Fusion.

Status and Prospects of Nuclear Fusion Using Magnetic Confinement Hartmut Zohm Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany Invited Talk given.

The Fission-Fusion Hybrid At last! A solution that has found a problem Jeff Freidberg MIT.

A Perspective on the NASA Space Power and Energy Storage Roadmap National Research Council Panel Power Workshop March 21, 2011 H. Sterling Bailey, Ph.

CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Assumptions, Options and Risks for an MFE DEMO D J Ward CCFE Culham Science.

AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.

Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.

9.4 Mathematical Induction

ELECTRIC PROPULSION Introduction Classification of Electric Thrusters Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Pisa, Italy Chairman.

1 1 by Dr. John Parmentola Senior Vice President Energy and Advanced Concepts Presented at the American Security Project Fusion Event June 5, 2012 The.

ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.

Fusion Fire Powers the Sun Can we make Fusion Fire on earth? National FIRE Collaboration AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT,

Physics of fusion power Lecture 12: Diagnostics / heating.

ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.

European Fusion Power Plant Conceptual Study - Parameters For Near-term and Advanced Models David Ward Culham Science Centre (Presented by Ian Cook) This.

Confinement & Transport Plan Classical theory of confinement and transport. o Diffusion equation Particle diffusion in a magnetic field.

Comments on Fusion Development Strategy for the US S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory FPA Symposium.

Advanced Tokamak Modeling for FIRE C. Kessel, PPPL NSO/PAC Meeting, University of Wisconsin, July 10-11, 2001.

For the NSTX Five-Year Research Program 2009 – 2013 M.G. Bell Facility and Diagnostic Plans.

Mathematical Induction. The Principle of Mathematical Induction Let S n be a statement involving the positive integer n. If 1.S 1 is true, and 2.the truth.

The tritium breeding blanket in Tokamak fusion reactors T. Onjun1), S. Sangaroon2), J. Prasongkit3), A. Wisitsorasak4), R. Picha5), J. Promping5) 1) Thammasat.

Impact Aimil Aimil Today Defining Instrumentation since 1932.

To ‘B’ or not to ‘B’ That is the question

Panel Discussion: Discussion on Trends in Multi-Physics Simulation

Future of EDIPO Meeting

AN INTEGRAL PWR, “CAREM”, IS BEING DEVELOPED BY CNEA, ARGENTINA

Construction and Status of Versatile Experiment Spherical Torus at SNU

BANKING INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Pilot Plant Study Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting 19 May 2010.

Fusion power: Visions and the Development Path in the ITER Era

WHY DOES FRESH NUCLEATION OCCUR IN A DUSTY PLASMA VOID?

EU DEMO Design Point Studies

Historical Perspectives and Pathways to an Attractive Power Plant

A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John

Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering

Comments on ARIES-ACT 10/20/2010 Pre-Strawman

So Many Engineering Majors…How Do I Choose?

Panel Session 3 Small Modular Reactors Chairman: Prof Johan Slabber.

US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies

Summary slide for Conceptual Design Study for Heat Exhaust Management in the ARC Fusion Pilot Plant, E.A. Tolman et al., IAEA- FIP-P1-22 Introduction ARC,

XGC simulation of CMOD edge plasmas

Who We Are A national laboratory within the Minerals and Metals Sector of Natural Resources Canada Manage a national user facility for materials and manufacturing.

TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime

Modelling of pulsed and steady-state DEMO scenarios G. Giruzzi et al

Stellarator Program Update: Status of NCSX & QPS

ACT-1 design point definition

No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios

Presentation transcript:

First “Full-Physics” Reactor Simulations Show Potential of Advanced Tokamak as Basis for a Compact-AT Pilot Plant Park/Buttery FIP P3/26 (“CAT”) FASTRAN self-consistent solutions with state of the art models for transport, pedestal, stability, current drive Routinely used & validated on DIII-D Apply ‘true’ Advanced Tokamak principles High b leads to 90% bootstrap, reducing need for current drive & thus recirculating power Density highly levering to bootstrap & performance Current drive efficiency & field important Leads to ~200MW net electric options at 4m & 6 – 7T Highlights science & technology research mission to enable a decision to proceed: Prove core physics, resolve transients, current drive & divertor, pursue nuclear materials & engineering PH/CD (MW) PNET~200MWe PH/CD PNET (bN=3.5) MW FASTRAN 4m 7T fully non-inductive stationary TGLF-EPED-CD-EFIT solutions Higher density reduces CD need Higher bN raises net electric JHelicon Bootstrap JNBI r MWe Higher efficiencies raise PNET Aligned currents Cool CAT Potential to consolidate proof of principle electricity production with nuclear science & breeding development mission