Debrief of Learning Seminar on Youth Employment Initiative

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Draft guidance on monitoring and evaluation : Concepts and recommendations.
Advertisements

Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.
Monitoring and Indicators in WORKSHOP 30 APRIL 2013 Ines Hartwig Impact Assessment & Evaluation Unit DG EMPL 1.
1 W ORKSHOP ON S TRATEGIC P ROGRAMMING, M ONITORING AND EVALUATION F OCUSING ON P ERFORMANCE AND RE SULTS Madrid, 22 February 2013 Ines Hartwig DG Employment,
Regional Policy Draft Implementing Act Consistent approach to determine the milestones and targets in the performance framework and to assess the attainment.
Guidance on Evaluation of Youth Employment Initiative
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal Marko Prijatelj Directorate General for Regional.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 February 2011 How to apply: Legal Framework – Beneficiaries – Application and Selection Procedure.
State of play of OP negotiations and OP implementation ESF Technical Working Group Luxembourg, 2 December
National Agencies’ contribution to the evaluation of Grundtvig Action and to the National Evaluation Report on Socrates Programme Socrates - Grundtvig.
Results orientation: audit perspective Jiri Plecity, Head of Unit H1, Relations with Control Authorities, Legal Procedures, Audit of Direct Management.
Regional Policy Guidance on monitoring TÓTH Gábor DG EMPL – Impact Assessment, Evaluation Unit ESF Evaluation Partnership meeting, Rome, 26 November 2014.
Simplified Cost Options: DG EMPL audit approach
Workshop on Strategic Programming, Monitoring and evaluation Focusing on Performance and REsults Madrid, 22 February 2013 Ines Hartwig DG Employment,
Draft Guidance on ex-ante conditionalities
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance
ESF Data Support Centre Data collection and validation support for the management of the ESF Andy Fuller ESF Support Centre Alphametrics Ltd.
Expert Hearing on Data Protection Legislation and ESF Reporting
Ex-ante conditionality
Presentation ESF performance report AIR 2016 ESF Technical Working Group 9 February 2018 Brussels Costanza Pagnini.
Draft Guidance Document (ERDF/ESF)
Overview performance report AIR2016
Performance framework review and reserve
Study on the monitoring and evaluation systems of the ESF [Contract VC/2017/0131] 4 online surveys + selection of 53 EPs based on several criteria: all.
Use of SCOs in the ESI funds: Survey of OPs 2017
ESF evaluation plans Jeannette Monier, Impact Assessment and Evaluation Unit, DG EMPL ESF EVALUATION PARTNERSHIP MEETING 13 March 2015.
Evaluation network DG REGIO 14th April 2011
Ex-ante evaluation: major points and state of play
Ex-ante conditionality and macroeconomic conditionality
Household situation indicators – french approach (DGEFP)
ESF Performance reports and Thematic reports
Youth Employment Initiative
Data reported and data quality in AIR 2017
Daniele Vidoni European Commission - DG Regional and Urban Policy
Update of Practical guidance (Annex D) & FAQ Guide
Financial Instruments under the ESF State of Play & Implementation
ESF Support Centre Alphametrics Ltd. & Applica Sprl.
Amending the Performance Framework
Update on the MIS risk assessment notes
Youth Employment Initiative implementation: state of play
State of play of OP negotiations
Progress of the negotiations on the CPR and ESF regulations
How the ESF supports implementation of the New Skills Agenda?
Survey on representative sampling
Guidance on Evaluation of Youth Employment Initiative
Monitoring & evaluation in
Data collection, Indicators and Evaluation ESF TWG Sevilla, 17 March 2010 Unit 03 Evaluation and Impact Assessment, DG EMPL.
Annual Implementation Reports 2018
Costas VOYIATZIS DG EMPL - Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
Item 11 – Conclusions – ETS 2018 WG meeting
Representative sampling Overview of the questions received by the ESF Data Support Centre Alphametrics Ltd. & Applica Sprl. Brussels, 13 March 2015.
Tour de table ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels, 7 December 2017
Guidance document on ex ante evaluation
YEI reporting: state of play
Findings of the MIS survey and work programme for 2015
FEAD evaluation requirements for Member States and the Commission
ESF EVALUATION PARTNERSHIP
Data collection and validation support for the management of the ESF
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
Representative sampling
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
State of play of Youth Employment Initiative Evaluation
Youth Employment Initiative: State of play of evaluation and reporting
ESF Performance reports and Thematic reports
Debrief of the workshop on indicators
ESF evaluation partnership
Proposed changes in ESF monitoring – Omnibus Regulation
Evaluation of Youth Employment Initiative
Jeannette Monier and Louise Reid
Presentation transcript:

Debrief of Learning Seminar on Youth Employment Initiative TÓTH Gábor and Costas VOYIATZIS DG EMPL - Impact Assessment and Evaluation Unit ESF Evaluation Partnership meeting, Brussels, 12-13 March, 2015

State of play in YEI reporting What can be expected in the April structured data submission? Quantitative data: 4 MS Implementation started in 2014 though MC approval missing Report to reflect the reality Possibility to change the report following the MC meeting Implementation did not start in 2014: only qualitative info reported

What is required in the April report? Structured data Partially or fully implemented operations Content: Annex I and II and programme specific indicators Financial data Issues affecting the performance of the programme and measures taken Citizen's summary Optional: actions taken to fulfil ex-ante conditionalities

To what extent are administrative records used? Large variation Number and type of indicators from registers Number of registers used Preparations for getting access to registers in progress Problem: mismatch between common and national definitions

What are the main problems? Data on household situation FR example, direct applicability of the ESF Regulation Difference in ESF and national definitions Further guidance to beneficiaries Timeliness of data in administrative registers

State of play in YEI evaluation Most Member States have included the 2015 YEI evaluation in their evaluation plan Currently MS are working on the ToRs Majority of the YEI evaluations will be procured One MS is in the tendering procedure Main reason of delay: Late adoption of OPs (or still at the negotiation phase)

What are the main evaluation questions covered and methodology used? Cover a wide range of aspects for MS who have selected evaluation questions One MS has selected tasks instead of question In another case, the bidders will have to propose them YEI evaluation 2015: Mainly theory based (and process evaluation) Keen on taking up CIE (especially for 2018 evaluation)

YEI workshop – France on Household situation Obligatory for all participants to answer questionnaire/questions in system Consent of participants is not needed because no data has been deemed as sensitive with the exception of data on minorities Direct application of the ESF Regulation

YEI workshop – France on Household situation Validation checks at the aggregate level are responsibility of MA No problem to combine data sets from different MIS Updating results for participants who re-enter an operation after having left Data collection from minors

YEI workshop – Use of registers by Sweden Criteria for the application of the definition for qualifications are missing Problem with output indicators referring to the situation of participants exactly on entry Compatibility between definitions used in national registers and the EC guidance has been assessed by Statistics Sweden Data on minorities and disabled will not be collected

YEI workshop – Use of registers by Sweden If individuals are not in the PES register, they are considered as inactive Immediate result indicators will be collected by beneficiaries via a questionnaire