User Experience with New Solar PV Models California ISO

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enoch Davies Associate Engineer Composite Load Model Implementation January 19, 2012 Salt Lake City, UT.
Advertisements

ERCOT VRT Study, Phase I ERCOT ROS Meeting December 10, 2009.
1 July 2001 SMES Modeling and Simulation Benchmarking Paulo F.Ribeiro Calvin College / BWX Technologies, Inc.
Presented by: Bikram Choudhury Regd. No. : Department of Electrical And Electronics Engineering FACTS Devices For Smart Grid 2 July 2015.
Aidan Tuohy Technical Leader/Project Manager, EPRI ERCOT Emerging Technology Working Group (ETWG) 09/24/2014 Transmission System Considerations for Integrating.
Power Systems Consulting and Software 4 March 2004 BWEA Conference: UK Offshore Wind 2004 Integration of Offshore Wind Farms into the Local Distribution.
User Experience with New Solar PV Models California ISO
California Energy Commission Workshop Nuclear Power Plant Issues
Stability analysis on WECC Systems with Wind Penetration and Composite Load Model Hyungdon Joo and Melissa Yuan Mentor Yidan Lu Professor Kevin Tomsovic.
Solid State Electricity Metrology
WECC Load Model Sensitivity Study “ An Analysis of the Sensitivity of WECC Grid Planning Models to Assumptions Regarding the Composition of Loads ” Task.
1. Introduction 2. E-On Guidelines 3. Modelling 4. Controller Design 5. Simulation Results 6. Conclusion Voltage Regulator for Reactive Power Control on.
Observations using cmpldw WECC MVWG Meeting June 2015 Eric Bakie.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 Lecture 22:Load Models.
DS2 – Grid Integration Dynamic Modelling of Wind Generation in Ireland
Stability Analysis on WECC Systems with Wind Penetration and Composite Load Model Introduction The growing complexity of generation and load pattern in.
Buck Regulator Architectures 4.5 Current/Emulated Current Mode Buck Regulators.
TECHNICAL PAPER ON SIMULTANEOUS AC-DC POWER TRANSMISSION
Power Quality By Using FACTS. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHAT IS FACTS? FOR WHAT PURPOSE FACTS ARE USED? BASIC TYPES OF FACTS CONTROLLERS BENEFITS OF UTILISING.
Planning the Networked Grid Transmission Planning J.E.(Jeff) Billinton Manager, Regional Transmission - North Building the Networked Electricity Grid –
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 Lecture 21: Load Models.
Study of Line-used Magnetically Controlled Reactor(MCR) Zhanfeng Deng China Electrical Power Research Institute.
Project WECC-0100 Standards Briefing WECC-0100 SDT April 7, 2016 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
 The common type of wind power generators are squirrel cage induction generator (SCIG),doubly fed induction generator (DFIG)  For more secure and.
Announcements Please read Chapter 6
Modeling DER in Transmission Planning CAISO Experience
Minnesota Renewable Energy Integration and Transmission
Components Motors and Generators.
RENEWABLES AND RELIABILITY
Components Motors and Generators.
I. CVETKOVIC, D. BOROYEVICH, R. BURGOS, C. LI, P. MATTAVELLI
Siemens Wind Turbine Weak Grid Option Modeling in PSSE WECC library Hongtao Ma, Siemens Wind Power Joergen Nielsen, Siemens Wind Power Good morning,
IG BASED WINDFARMS USING STATCOM
ECE 476 Power System Analysis
PSCAD models.
ChE 391, Spring 2012 Power Systems Control.
WECC Load Modeling and Validation Group Meeting
Analysis of the Amplitude and Frequencies of the Voltage Magnification Transients in Distribution Networks due to Capacitor Switching Mohamed Saied Electrical.
Western Electricity Coordinating Council Renewable Energy Modeling Task Force REMTF Report to MVWG Abraham Ellis, Sandia March 18, 2015 Salt Lake.
PMU Emulator for Power System Dynamics Simulators
Next Steps in Load Modeling
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
Presented by: LADWP November 14, 2017
Passive Shunt Compensation
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
DEC System Voltage Planning - June 2018
Dynamic Load Modelling
Protective Relaying Conference
WECC REMTF Workshop Spencer Tacke
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
CMPLDWG Composite Model with Distributed Generation Approval
Exercise 7 Power systems.
Grid integration and stability of 600MW windfarm at Kriegers Flak
ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Composite Load Model with Distributed Generation (CMPLDWG)
Siemens Power Technologies International
Western Electricity Coordinating Council Renewable Energy Modeling Task Force REMTF Report to MVWG Abraham Ellis, Sandia March 18, 2015 Salt Lake.
CMPLDWG Composite Model with Distributed Generation Approval
Western Wind and Solar Integration Study - Phase 3
WECC Load Modeling and Validation Group Meeting
Donald Davies Chief Senior Engineer
TONBRIDGE POWER GREEN LINE
Model Validation for Large Scale PV Plants
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
WECC REMTF Workshop Spencer Tacke
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
ECEN 667 Power System Stability
WECC REMTF Workshop Spencer Tacke
Exercise 6 Power systems.
Presentation transcript:

User Experience with New Solar PV Models California ISO Irina Green Regional Transmission Engineering Lead California ISO WECC Renewable Energy Modeling Workshop June 17, 2014

Solar PV Plant Representation Power Flow Transient Stability

Transient Stability Models. Large Solar PV Plant REGC_A  module - Generator/Converter interface with the grid. Typical parameters from the WECC Guidelines   REEC_B module - Electrical Controls of the inverters. Typical parameters from the WECC Guidelines except for Integral Gain (Kvi) and Transducer Time Constant (Trv). Reduced Kvi from 100 to 40 to avoid oscillations. Kvi=40 typical for the PV1E model. Was a typo in the Trv, changed from 0.2 to 0.02 REPC_A module - Plant Controller. It processes voltage and reactive power output to emulate Volt/Var control at the plant level. Typical parameters from the WECC Guidelines

3-Phase Fault on the Solar Switching Station 3-Phase Fault on the Solar Switching Station. Voltage on the equivalent PV generator terminals Trv = 0.2, Kvi = 100 - BLUE Trv = 0.02, Kvi = 100 - RED Trv = 0.02, Kvi = 40 - GREEN

Study Example 2023 Heavy Summer Case. 800 MW Solar PV Plant Study Example 2023 Heavy Summer Case. 800 MW Solar PV Plant. Composite Load Model for all WECC Three-phase 6 cycles fault at the Switching Station 230 kV, double-line outage Switching Station – Morro Bay

Study Example. Surrounding Area

Study Scenarios Same as 5), but A/C stalling enabled. Solar PV with 0.95 lead/lag power factor. Reactive power and voltage control; priority is reactive power. Plant controller controls voltage. Stalling of the single-phase air conditioners disabled.  Same as 1), but A/C stalling enabled. Solar PV with unity power factor. No reactive support or voltage regulation. Priority is real power. Stalling of the single-phase air conditioner motor load disabled.  Same as 3), but A/C stalling enabled. The Solar PV plant is replaced by a fictitious combined-cycle plant. Stalling of the single-phase air conditioner motor load components is disabled.  Same as 5), but A/C stalling enabled.

Study Results. Switching Station Voltage Voltage recovered to the pre-fault values. Solar PV with unity power factor voltage recovered to a slightly lower value. Solar PV showed faster recovery than the combined-cycle plant. Single-phase air conditioners stalling did not have almost any impact on the voltage on this bus.

Study Results. Switching Station Frequency Inverter-based generators had better damping than conventional generators No impact from the air-conditioner stalling Higher frequency in the first 0.5 second after the fault with solar PV

Study Results. Voltage on Equivalent Generator Terminals Voltage recovered to the pre-fault values, except for solar PV with unity power factor, especially with A/C stalling Faster voltage recovery and better damping with solar PV Voltage spike in the first 0.5 sec after the fault with solar PV with voltage regulation Only slight impact of A/C stalling in PV scenario with unity power factor

Study Results. Frequency on Equivalent Generator Terminals Inverter-based generation has better damping than conventional generation Slow frequency recovery with solar PV that has voltage regulation May appear as a criteria violation in transient stability studies, but this may be a numerical issue No impact of A/C stalling

Study Results. Real Power Output from Equivalent Generator Solar PV generators have better damping than the thermal unit Solar PV units have slower recovery A/C stalling doesn’t have any impact

Study Results. Reactive Power Output from Equivalent Generator Solar PV generators have better damping than the thermal unit As expected, solar PV with unity power factor did not respond A/C stalling has very slight impact by increased reactive output, except for the unit with unity power factor

Study Results. Adjacent Load Bus Generator type doesn’t have any impact on voltage, very slight impact on frequency Delayed voltage recovery due to stalled air-conditioners

Loss of Load Scenario 1: PV with voltage regulation, A/C stalling disabled – 66 MW Scenario 2: PV with voltage regulation, A/C stalling enabled – 91MW Scenario 3: PV with unity power factor, A/C stalling disabled – 67 MW Scenario 4: PV with unity power factor, A/C stalling enabled – 96 MW Scenario 5: Combined cycle plant, A/C stalling disabled – 69 MW Scenario 6: Combined cycle plant, A/C stalling enabled – 97MW

Conclusions Scenario Transient voltage on generator terminals Post-fault steady state voltage Slow voltage recovery on adjacent load buses 1 Solar PV, voltage control, induction motors don’t stall High Normal No 2 Solar PV, voltage control, induction motors stall Yes 3 Solar PV, no vlt and Q control, induction motors don’t stall Low 4 Solar PV, no vlt and Q control, induction motors stall 5 Thermal, induction motors don’t stall 6 Thermal, induction motors stall

Questions? Comments?