san Bernardino valley regional Urban water management plan

Advantages Cost Effective Improved Coordination Spirit of Cooperation Developing the document together Builds on the spirit of cooperation Results in improved coordination Is more cost-effective ($23K -> 46K) Less than 10,000 connections $23,000 10,000 > connections < 15,000 $35,000 Greater than 15,000 connections   $46,000 The approach we have taken in our regional document provides Flexibility Accountability Spirit of Cooperation

Agency Cost Savings (63.5%) RPU = $85,000 San Bernardino = $31,000

1983 Urban Water Management Planning Act 2002 Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Act 2009 Water Conservation Act, SBX7-7 (10% by 2015) (20% by 2020) 2015 Emergency Order (EO): reduce 25% statewide, ends 1/2017 1980 1990 2000 2010 Legislative Timeline 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA)

UWMP IRWMP SBX7-7 SGMA EO (Water) (Multiple Discipline) Overlap: Water budget, reliability, urban development, conservation, recycling

Overall Purpose of an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) “…ensure adequate water supplies are available to meet existing and future water demands”

General Requirements UWMP 8 UWMP Larger Water Agencies 3,000 connections or acre-feet/yr Make it thru Drought (single and multiple years) Reduce Use 20% by 2020 (SBX7-7) Shortage Contingency Plan Who has to prepare? Water agencies with 3,000 connections or 3,000 acre-ft per year (retail or wholesale) Main focus: Identify gaps between supply and demand over a 20-year period Verify compliance with 20% by 2020 Update: every five years (years ending in 5 and 0), 2015 plans due July 1, 2016 Penalty for not filing: Ineligible for State grant and loan programs and drought assistance. EO

Catastrophic interruption General Flowchart Supplies Demands Analysis Checks: Draft UWMP Public Review Final UWMP (July 1, 2016) 10% (2015); 20% (2020) Drought Catastrophic interruption

Catastrophic interruption General Flowchart Supplies Demands Analysis Checks: Draft UWMP Public Review Final UWMP (July 1, 2016) 10% (2015); 20% (2020) Drought Catastrophic interruption

Chapter(s): Regional Information Retail Agency DMMs SB7x7 To our knowledge, our approach to the document is unique Regional information that applies to all agencies will be included in the front of the document. Each retail agency will have their own chapter in the document. Demands, Supplies, and conservation (DMMs) Specific direction for each agency Provides flexibility for each agency. If a council or board asks for “our” UWMP, the chapter could be handed to the person. METHOD 1: 80% of base year (Most of the agencies) METHOD 4: Some of the agencies Base Water use: 280 (YVWD) to 333 gpcpd

Supplies

Current Water Supplies 1414 Percentages different because there is now less water (does not include Plaintiffs) 2010 2015

1515 Future Water Supplies Does not include Rubber Dam 2030 2040

Analysis: Normal Year Single Dry Year Multiple Dry Year Wet Year

Normal Year Does not include Plaintiffs, revised water budget 2/7/12

Single Dry Year Does not include Plaintiffs, revised water budget 2/7/12

Multiple Dry Years Does not include Plaintiffs, revised water budget 2/7/12

Wet Year Does not include Plaintiffs, revised water budget 2/7/12

Assumptions Unreliable Reliable 10% by 2020 Less rain Less import Infrastructure ($) Unreliable Reliable 20% by 2020 Rain Import Infrastructure ($$$) Reiterates why conservation and local supplies are important, along with other supplies This slide is animated. The bubbles at the top are the results. So, the scale tips toward reliable if all, or a combination, of the things occur The first animation shows what happens if we invest and conserve – emphasize bottom two blocks (conservation and local supplies,rain) The second animation shows what happens if do not invest or conserve – emphasize bottom two blocks

Catastrophic interruption General Flowchart Supplies Demands Analysis Checks: Draft UWMP Public Review Final UWMP (July 1, 2016) 10% (2015); 20% (2020) Drought Catastrophic interruption