Cheating lessons: Learning from Academic dishonesty

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Advertisements

What is… Learner-Centered Instruction. What Is The Goal For A Learner-Centered Course? Making the student more responsible for his/her learning. 1.
Thursday 1 assignment 1 assignment Information literacy learning objectives Information literacy learning objectives Behavior or product Behavior or product.
Human Resources ‘Designing out’ ‘designing in’ in the Open University: strategies for dealing with student plagiarism Jude Carroll 19 January 2005.
What Does Research Tell Us About the Teaching and Learning of Writing? Writing Resources Center UNC Charlotte 1.
What should teachers do in order to maximize learning outcomes for their students?
The Scintillating Syllabus What Does Best Practice Research Tell Us About How to Construct Effective Syllabi?
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
New Faculty Syllabus Workshop Session 1 Activity #1: Why Syllabi? Take five minutes to complete a brief journal entry in response to the following prompt:
Academic Integrity at Brandeis Erika Lamarre Director of Academic Integrity The policies Education and Prevention Reporting an incident.
Course and Syllabus Development Presented by Claire Major Assistant Professor, Higher Education Administration.
1 CS 381 Introduction to Discrete Structures Lecture #1 Syllabus Week 1.
Welcome to EP299 Unit 3 Seminar Reflective Learning Looking back and going forward.
What Is This Intentional Learning Thing?
Rachel Glazener, Assistant Professor Natural and Behavioral Sciences
Patient Participation meeting Monday 11 February 2013
Cheating lessons: Learning from Academic dishonesty
Course Overview - Database Systems
Using Canvas Resources to manage REC, RSI, LDA, SLO
What is Learner- Centred Education?
STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT LEARNING :
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Proceed to Slide 2 to begin
Going Beyond Course Design: Implementing Online Delivery Standards
Are Your Educational Programs Learning-Centered? Can You Measure This?
Mini-Portfolio: a brief overview
ACADEMICS: The “study” in study abroad!
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
Becoming a More Effective Classroom Teacher
Moving Beyond “Don’t Do It:”
Multi Rater Feedback Surveys FAQs for Participants
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide Q & A Session Social Studies
What Does Research Tell Us About the Teaching and Learning of Writing
Your Inquiry Project
Putting your intentions into action Janelle Pass
Course Overview - Database Systems
common expectations (5)
The purposes of grading student work
College of Engineering
recommendations for new teachers
Student Engagement Student engagement is important in and out of the classroom Engaged students are more likely to remain in college and complete their.
Raising student achievement by promoting a Growth Mindset
6th grade English Language Arts Curriculum Night
Mr Provost Rm 2403 Physical Science Welcome.
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Henry Street High School
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Good morning-thanks for being here
To Give Retakes or Not To Give Retakes, That is the Question
Walsingham Academy Mrs. McArthur Room 111
Faculty Peer Review of Teaching
The Heart of Student Success
English 101 To be successful: Areas of Study 20% 30% 10% 40%
Online Teaching & Learning Online Instructor
Session 1, Program Introduction and Overview
Academic Integrity.
Faculty Peer Review of Teaching
Student Overview.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
Ms. Gallen Room 346 English II Ms. Gallen Room 346.
Can E-learning Replace the Traditional Classroom
Understanding By Design.
FLIPPED CLASSROOM PRESENTED BY Dr.R.JEYANTHI Asst.Professor,
Seven Principles of Good Teaching
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Endless Possibilities for Learning
An approach to assessment for learning
Service Learning Orientation
Mastery Based Learning and Grading 101
Dr. Jillian Hartley Arkansas Northeastern College
Presentation transcript:

Cheating lessons: Learning from Academic dishonesty James M. Lang @LangOnCourse

The Evolution of Cheating “Here in Silicon Valley, there are also smart pens, and are or will soon be smart spectacles less obtrusive than Google Glass.  They call them ‘wearable computers.’ Hard to imagine telling students that pens and glasses (and watches and jewelry and belts and shoes and on and on) are not allowed in the exam room.  It's time for us to rethink our assessments.” Patrick Morris Foothill College

“Resource” Sharing Sites

Is Cheating on the Rise?

Why do students cheat?

Failure of Human Nature?

Failure of Individuals and Groups? Specific demographic groups? Particular disciplines? Certain types of classes?

Failure of Communication? "Professors’ conceptions of plagiarism and correct paraphrasing can range widely from a very lax set of criteria for determining plagiarism to criteria that can be even more rigorous than those prescribed by traditional definitions . . . Even within groups of academic specialties, respondents appeared to have a fairly wide range of criteria for plagiarism.” Ethics and Behavior (2001)

Failure in the environment

Dan Ariely’s Fudge Factor Ariely: The amount of dishonesty in which people are willing to engage “depends on the structure of our daily environment.” Our Thesis: The amount of cheating in which students are willing to engage depends (in part) on the structure of the learning environment.

Learning Environments that Produce Cheating Motivation is Extrinsic Orientation toward Performance Infrequent, High-Stakes Assessments Low Self-Efficacy Cheating Perceived as Common

New Findings from Australia Contract Cheating and Assessment Design a) Student Surveys b) Teaching and Support Staff Surveys b) Academic Integrity Violations https://cheatingandassessment.edu.au/resources/

Motivation is Extrinsic Orientation toward Performance Complete Findings Motivation is Extrinsic Orientation toward Performance Infrequent, High- Stakes Assessments Low Self-Efficacy Lack of Understanding of Assignment Requirements Receiving Insufficient Feedback Unapproachability of Faculty Pause here: What factors have we left out?

The Meaningful Writing Project “Opportunities for agency”; “Engagement with instructors, peers, and materials”; “Learning that connects to previous experiences and passions and to future aspirations and identities.” (2016)

Opportunities for agency

Autonomous Learning “One important rule for helping people learn is to help the learner feel she is in control.” James Zull “Where possible, allow students to choose among options and make choices that are consistent with their goals and the activities that they value.” How Learning Works

The Blank Syllabus “In a 4-page essay, discuss a selection of your own choosing . . . from the Oxford Book of War Poetry. This poem will be added to the syllabus, and on the day it appears you will recite at least 80 words of it for the class, and you will help me lead discussion of it. The working claim for this essay may well be an answer to the question, ‘Why should we as a class read this poem?’”

Class Constitutions “You might hand out a draft syllabus on the first day of class, and then present the areas in which you want students to help you establish certain class rules. (You can obviously set limits and define certain rules that are nonnegotiable for you.) You could invite students to comment on the course website and/or have them discuss these issues in groups.”

Toni Weiss’s Economics Grading Choices Grading: In order to give you more control over your education, you may determine the weight of each assessment category as a percentage of your semester grade. The guidelines are as follows: Clicker points: 5% - 10% Journal Entries: 3% - 7% Myeconlab: 12% - 16% In-class projects: 12% - 16% Midterm #1: 15% - 20% Midterm #2: 17% - 22% Final Exam: 20% - 25% You need to submit your grading plan to me, via Canvas, by Friday October 6th. By that time, you will have seen examples of each type of assessment. If you don’t submit one, or if the one you submit doesn’t add up to 100%, then the midpoint of each range will be used.

Student-Generated Exam Questions Revision and Re-Take Opportunities Everyday Autonomy Student-Generated Exam Questions Revision and Re-Take Opportunities Choices Among Questions or Problems Plus-One Assignment Design

More Information and Resources . . . International Center for Academic Integrity Academic Integrity in the 21st Century (Bertram-Gallant) https://cheatingandassessment. edu.au/ @LangOnCourse

Taking cheating seriously

Learning Academic Integrity Knowledge Skill Value Your students were terrified about what constituted plagiarism, and about the prospect of cheating inadvertently

“Teaching” Academic Integrity Student Handbooks Syllabus Statements Presentations at Orientation Faculty or Assessment Reminders Delivering Content

On the One Hand . . . “We have no incontrovertible evidence that harsh penalties deter cheating. Some surveys seems to suggest that they might, and some actually suggest the possibility that cheating happens more frequently on campuses with harsh penalties . . . we should not construct policies on cheating based on the notion that extremely severe penalties will deter it; we simply do not have the evidence to support that idea.” Cheating Lessons: Learning from Academic Dishonesty

On the Other . . . “We should not view a single act of dishonesty as just one petty act. We tend to forgive people for their first offense with the idea that it is just the first time and everyone makes mistakes. And although this may be true, we should also realize that the first act of dishonesty might be particularly important in shaping the way a person looks at himself and his actions from that point on.” Dan Ariely

The Essential Role of Students Persistent Research Finding: Cheating rates are higher when students perceive cheating as common and approved of by their peers.

Our Final (Difficult) Question How can we enlist students collaborate with us and each other in the process of building a culture of academic integrity in courses, cohorts, and campuses?