Hole Spin Decoherence in Quantum Dots

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Int. Conf. II-VI 2007 Coherent Raman spectroscopy of Cd 1-x Mn x Te quantum wells Lowenna Smith, Daniel Wolverson, Stephen Bingham and J. John Davies Department.

Advertisements

Quantum Information Processing with Semiconductors Martin Eberl, TU Munich JASS 2008, St. Petersburg.

Gate Control of Spin Transport in Multilayer Graphene

Density Matrix Tomography, Contextuality, Future Spin Architectures T. S. Mahesh Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune.

Searching for Majorana fermions in semiconducting nano-wires Pedram Roushan Peter O’Malley John Martinis Department of Physics, UC Santa Barbara Borzoyeh.

Coherence between spin singlet and triplet states in a coupled quantum dot University College London Jeroen Elzerman Kathi Weiss Yves Delley Javier Miguel-Sanchez.

Chernogolovka, September 2012 Cavity-coupled strongly correlated nanodevices Gergely Zaránd TU Budapest Experiment: J. Basset, A.Yu. Kasumov, H. Bouchiat,

Long-lived spin coherence in silicon with electrical readout

Dynamics and thermodynamics of quantum spins at low temperature Andrea Morello Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory Leiden University UBC Physics & Astronomy TRIUMF.

 From a single molecule to an ensemble of molecules at T ~0 : Both tunneling rate and decoherence increase  LZ probability: P LZ = 1 – exp[-  (  /ħ)

Quantum Control in Semiconductor Quantum Dots Yan-Ten Lu Physics, NCKU.

LPS Quantum computing lunchtime seminar Friday Oct. 22, 1999.

David Gershoni The Physics Department, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel and Joint Quantum Institute, NIST and University of.

Spin transport in spin-orbit coupled bands

Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )

Optically Driven Quantum Dot Based Quantum Computation NSF Workshop on Quantum Information Processing and Nanoscale Systems. Duncan Steel, Univ. Michigan.

Image courtesy of Keith Schwab.

“Quantum computation with quantum dots and terahertz cavity quantum electrodynamics” Sherwin, et al. Phys. Rev A. 60, 3508 (1999) Norm Moulton LPS.

Optical spin transfer in GaAs:Mn Joaquin Fernandez-Rossier, Department of Applied Physics, University of Alicante (SPAIN) CECAM June 2003, Lyon (FR) cond-mat/

Experimental observation of the Spin-Hall Effect in InGaN/GaN superlattices Student : Hsiu-Ju, Chang Advisor ： Yang Fang, Chen.

Quantum Dots and Spin Based Quantum Computing Matt Dietrich 2/2/2007 University of Washington.

Image courtesy of Keith Schwab.

Coherent Manipulation and Decoherence of S=10 Fe8 Single- Molecule Magnets Susumu Takahashi Physics Department University of California Santa Barbara S.

Optical control of electrons in single quantum dots Semion K. Saikin University of California, San Diego.

Symmetry Issues E NRIQUE DEL B ARCO, C HRISTOPHER R AMSEY (UCF) S TEPHEN H ILL ( NHMFL and Physics Department, FSU – Tallahassee ) S ONALI J. S HAH, C.

Theory of Optically Induced Magnetization Switching in GaAs:Mn J. Fernandez-Rossier, A. Núñez, M. Abolfath and A. H. MacDonald Department of Physics, University.

IWCE, Purdue, Oct , 2004 Seungwon Lee Exchange Coupling in Si-Quantum-Dot-Based Quantum Computer Seungwon Lee 1, Paul von Allmen 1, Susan N. Coppersmith.

Quantum Devices (or, How to Build Your Own Quantum Computer)

Dynamical decoupling in solids

Spin-dependent transport in the presence of spin-orbit interaction L.Y. Wang a ( 王律堯 ), C.S. Tang b and C.S. Chu a a Department of Electrophysics, NCTU.

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Physics Department and Solid State Institute Eilon Poem, Stanislav Khatsevich, Yael Benny, Illia Marderfeld and.

On Measuring Coherence in Coupled Dangling-Bond Pair Dynamics Zahra Shaterzadeh-Yazdi International Iran Conference on Quantum Information September.

QIC 890/891: A tutorial on Nanowires in Quantum Information Processing QIC 890/891: A tutorial on Nanowires in Quantum Information Processing Daryoush.

Wigner-Mott scaling of transport near the two-dimensional metal-insulator transition Milos Radonjic, D. Tanaskovic, V. Dobrosavljevic, K. Haule, G. Kotliar.

Wigner molecules in carbon-nanotube quantum dots Massimo Rontani and Andrea Secchi S3, Istituto di Nanoscienze – CNR, Modena, Italy.

12/8/2015A. Ali Yanik, Purdue University1 Spin Dependent Electron Transport in Nanostructures A. Ali Yanik † Dissertation † Department of Physics & Network.

Gang Shu  Basic concepts  QC with Optical Driven Excitens  Spin-based QDQC with Optical Methods  Conclusions.

Seung Hyun Park Hyperfine Mapping of Donor Wave Function Deformations in Si:P based Quantum Devices Seung Hyun Park Advisors: Prof. Gerhard Klimeck Prof.

Quantum Computing: An Overview for non-specialists Mikio Nakahara Department of Physics & Research Centre for Quantum Computing Kinki University, Japan.

Figure 12.1: (a) Schematic of a quantum dot embedded in a host. The electron wavefunction is largely confined to the dot material, but does penetrate into.

Quasi-1D antiferromagnets in a magnetic field a DMRG study Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Lausanne Switzerland G. Fath.

Electrical control over single hole spins in nanowire quantum dots

Optical pure spin current injection in graphene Julien Rioux * and Guido Burkard Department of Physics, University of Konstanz, D Konstanz, Germany.

M.M. Asmar & S.E. Ulloa Ohio University. Outline Motivation. The studied system and the mathematical approach. Results and analysis. Conclusions.

Unbiased Numerical Studies of Realistic Hamiltonians for Diluted Magnetic Semiconductors. Adriana Moreo Dept. of Physics and ORNL University of Tennessee,

Electron-nuclear spin dynamics in optically pumped semiconductor quantum dots K.V.Kavokin A.F.Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute, St.Petersburg, Russia.

Single Electron Spin Resonance with Quantum Dots Using a Micro-magnet Induced Slanting Zeeman Field S. Tarucha Dep. of Appl. Phys. The Univ. of Tokyo ICORP.

1 Quantum Computation with coupled quantum dots. 2 Two sides of a coin Two different polarization of a photon Alignment of a nuclear spin in a uniform.

1 Department of Physics ， University at Buffalo, SUNY APS March Meeting 2015 Phonon mediated spin relaxation in a moving quantum dot: Doppler shift, Cherenkov.

Denis Bulaev Department of Physics University of Basel, Switzerland Spectral Properties of a 2D Spin-Orbit Hamiltonian.

On Decoherence in Solid-State Qubits Josephson charge qubits Classification of noise, relaxation/decoherence Josephson qubits as noise spectrometers Decoherence.

Spin-orbit interaction in semiconductor quantum dots systems

Universität Karlsruhe Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, (2006)

Suggestion for Optical Implementation of Hadamard Gate Amir Feizpour Physics Department Sharif University of Technology.

1 August 27, 2012 Tailoring Light-Matter Interaction in Nanophotonic Environments Petru Tighineanu Quantum Photonics group.

TC, U. Dorner, P. Zoller C. Williams, P. Julienne

Spin-orbit interaction in a dual gated InAs/GaSb quantum well

Coherent interactions at a distance provide a powerful tool for quantum simulation and computation. The most common approach to realize an effective long-distance.

Gauge structure and effective dynamics in semiconductor energy bands

On the collapses and revivals in the Rabi Hamiltonian

FAM Mirko Rehmann March

Coupled atom-cavity system

Optimal Interesting Quantum Gates with Quantum Dot Qubits David DiVincenzo Spinqubits summer school, Konstanz Hall Effect Gyrators and Circulators.

Leon Camenzind 11/08/17.

Strong Coupling of a Spin Ensemble to a Superconducting Resonator

T1 spin lifetimes in n-doped quantum wells and dots

Dynamics and decoherence of a qubit coupled to a two-level system

Physical layout of the donor-based surface code quantum computer

Dynamics of a superconducting qubit coupled to quantum two-level systems in its environment Robert Johansson (RIKEN, The Institute of Physical and Chemical.

Presentation transcript:

Hole Spin Decoherence in Quantum Dots Denis Bulaev and Daniel Loss Department of Physics University of Basel, Switzerland

Motivation Pros of heavy hole Cons of heavy hole Quantum computing Qubit with long coherence time Pros of heavy hole Weak hyperfine interactions with nuclei (p-symmetry) Cons of heavy hole Strong spin-orbit interactions with light holes Difficulties in coherent spin manipulation ...

Motivation Pros of heavy hole Cons of heavy hole Quantum computing Qubit with long coherence time Pros of heavy hole Weak hyperfine interactions with nuclei (p-symmetry) Weak spin-orbit interactions with light holes in 2D QDs Cons of heavy hole Difficulties in coherent spin manipulation ...

Motivation Pros of heavy hole Cons of heavy hole Quantum computing Qubit with long coherence time Pros of heavy hole Weak hyperfine interactions with nuclei (p-symmetry) Weak spin-orbit interactions with light holes in 2D QDs Possibilities for coherent spin manipulation via EDSR Cons of heavy hole ...

Effective Hamiltonian of Heavy Holes [R. Winkler, PRB 62, 4245 (2000)] [DB & D. Loss, PRL 95, 076805 (2006)] g(GaAs) = 2.5, g(InAs) = -2.2. [H.W. van Kestern, et al., PRB 41, 5283 (1990)] [M.Bayer,et al., PRL 82, 1748 (1999)]

Spin Relaxation Rates GaAs Quantum Dot (g = 2.5) InAs Quantum Dot (g = -2.2) [DB & D. Loss, PRL 95, 076805 (2006)]

B-field Dependence of Rates Electrons phonons Hso Heavy holes Dresselhaus SO coupling Rashba SO coupling

Summary Anticrossing and spin mixing (GaAs QD) T2 = 2T1 at low temperatures Peaks on the spin relaxation decay curve (GaAs QD) Rashba Dresselhaus Spin relaxation time for heavy holes CAN BE longer than for electrons