Depropaniser Train 100 – 24-VE-107

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 2 Traditional Advanced Control Approaches – Feedforward, Cascade and Selected Control.
Advertisements

Implementation of MPC in a deethanizer at the Kårstø Gas plant
Chapter 22. Variable Structure and Constraint Control
The control hierarchy based on “time scale separation” MPC (slower advanced and multivariable control) PID (fast “regulatory” control) PROCESS setpoints.
Dynamic modeling, optimization and control of a CO 2 stripper Marie Solvik Supervisors : Sigurd Skogestad and Marius Støre Govatsmark.
Forget Laplace Transforms….  Industrial process control involves a lot more than just Laplace transforms and loop tuning  Combination of both theory.
San Francisco Refinery, Rodeo
Plant-wide Control for Economic Operation of a Recycle Process
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS PID CONTROL APPLIED TO MIMO PROCESSES.
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies
Chapter 18 Control Case Studies. Control Systems Considered Temperature control for a heat exchanger Temperature control of a CSTR Composition control.
Cascade, Ratio, and Feedforward Control
Energy Use in Distillation Operation: Nonlinear Economic Effects IETC 2010 Spring Meeting.
TC 1022 LP condensate LP steam 24 LC PC TI LC HA-103 A/B 24-VA PA-102A/B.
Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down
1 Self-Optimizing Control HDA case study S. Skogestad, May 2006 Thanks to Antonio Araújo.
1 Active constraint regions for economically optimal operation of distillation columns Sigurd Skogestad and Magnus G. Jacobsen Department of Chemical Engineering.
Implementation of Coordinator MPC on a Large-Scale Gas Plant
PID CONTROLLERS By Harshal Inamdar.
PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM (KNC3213) FEEDFORWARD AND RATIO CONTROL MOHAMED AFIZAL BIN MOHAMED AMIN FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, UNIMAS MOHAMED AFIZAL BIN MOHAMED.
Topic 5 Enhanced Regulatory Control Strategies. In the last lecture  Feedforward Control –Measured Vs Unmeasured Loads –Purpose of feedforward control.
MPC in Statoil. 2 In-house tool Septic, Statoil Estimation and Prediction Tool for Identification and Control Developed and maintained by the process.
MPC in Statoil Stig Strand, specialist MPC Statoil Research Center 93  SINTEF Automatic Control Dr. ing 1991: Dynamic Optimisation in State Space.
1 II. Bottom-up Determine secondary controlled variables and structure (configuration) of control system (pairing) A good control configuration is insensitive.
LOGO Plantwide Control Structure Design of Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) Process Thitima Tapaneeyapong and Montree Wongsri Department of Chemical Engineering.
1 ChE / MET Apr 12 Cascade Control: Ch 09 Ratio Control: Ch 10 Advanced control schemes.
CSE 425: Industrial Process Control 1. About the course Lect.TuTotal Semester work 80Final 125Total Grading Scheme Course webpage:
MISS. RAHIMAH BINTI OTHMAN
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits Process Control & Safety Symposium November Houston, Texas USA.
Control of Distillation Column (精馏塔控制)
Control of Distillation Column (精馏塔控制) Dai Lian-Kui Shen Guo-jiang Institute of Industrial Control, Zhejiang University.
Cascade Control Systems (串级控制系统)
1 Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step S1: Define operational objective (cost) and constraints Step S2: Identify degrees.
Feedforward Control ( 前馈控制 ) Liankui DAI Institute of Industrial Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, P. R. China 2009/04/22.
Multi-Variable Control
ERT 321 – Process Control & Dynamics Feedforward & Ratio Control Ms Anis Atikah Ahmad
Chapter 20 Model Predictive Control (MPC) from Seborg, Edgar, Mellichamp, Process Dynamics and Control, 2nd Ed 1 rev. 2.1 of May 4, 2016.
Coordinator MPC with focus on maximizing throughput
Implementation of a MPC on a deethanizer
Part 5: Advanced control + case studies
ERT 321 – Process Control & Dynamics Feedforward & Ratio Control
John Edwards, P&I Design Ltd
Name: Marius Støre Govatsmark
Natural Gas Processing I Chapter 9 Fractionation
MPC in Statoil Stig Strand, specialist MPC Statoil Research Center 93  SINTEF Automatic Control Dr. ing 1991: Dynamic Optimisation in State.
Implementation of a MPC on a deethanizer
Overall Objectives of Model Predictive Control
Process Operability Class Materials Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013
Chemical Engineering 3P04
Process Control Engineering
Depropaniser Train 100 – 24-VE-107
Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies
MPC in Statoil Stig Strand, specialist MPC Statoil Research Center 93  SINTEF Automatic Control Dr. ing 1991: Dynamic Optimisation in State.
Example regulatory control: Distillation
MPC i Statoil Stig Strand, spesialist MPC Statoil Forskningssenter 93  SINTEF Reguleringsteknikk Dr. ing 1991: Dynamic Optimisation in State.
PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering
Implementation of a MPC on a deethanizer
Nordic Process Control workshop, Telemark, 2009
Example : Optimal blending of gasoline
MPC in Statoil.
Implementation of MPC in a deethanizer at the Kårstø Gas plant
Implementation of MPC in a deethanizer at the Kårstø Gas plant
MPC i Statoil Stig Strand, spesialist MPC Statoil Forskningssenter 93  SINTEF Reguleringsteknikk Dr. ing 1991: Dynamic Optimisation in State.
Plant-wide Control- Part2
Implementation of a MPC on a deethanizer
Example regulatory control: Distillation
Example “stabilizing” control: Distillation
FeedForward Prof. Ing. Michele MICCIO
Feedforward Control Prof. Ing. Michele MICCIO
Presentation transcript:

Depropaniser Train 100 – 24-VE-107 HC 1015 24 PC 1020 24 PDC 1021 24 PI 1014 Flare 24 TI 1020 24 AR 1008 B = C2 C = C3 D = iC4 24-HA-103 A/B 24 TI 1021 24-VA-102 24 LC 1010 21 1 5 6 17 20 33 34 39 48 35 40 18 24 TI 1011 Cooling water 24 TI 1017 24 FC 1008 24 24 TI LC 1005 1001 24 TI 1038 25 FI 1003 24-PA-102A/B 24 FC 1009 24 TI 1013 Propane Bottoms from deetaniser 24 PD 1009 24 TI 1012 Normally 0 flow, used for start-ups to remove inerts 24 TC 1022 24 AR 1005 C = C3 E = nC4 F = C5+ 24 PC 1010 24-VE-107 24 LC 1009 LP steam 24 LC 1026 Debutaniser 24-VE-108 LP condensate 24 TI 1018

Controlled variables (CV) = Product qualities, column deltaP ++ Depropaniser Train 100 – 24-VE-107 24 HC 1015 24 PC 1020 24 PDC 1021 24 PI 1014 Flare 24 TI 1020 24 AR B = C2 C = C3 D = iC4 1008 24-HA-103 A/B 24 TI 1021 24-VA-102 24 LC 1010 21 1 5 6 17 20 33 34 39 48 35 40 18 24 TI 1011 Kjølevann 24 TI 1017 24 FC 24 TI 1005 LC 1001 24LC1001.VYA 1008 24 TI 1038 25 FI 1003 24-PA-102A/B 24 FC 1009 24 TI 1013 Propane Bottoms from deetaniser 24 PD 1009 24 TI 1012 Normally 0 flow, used for start-ups to remove inerts Controlled variables (CV) = Product qualities, column deltaP ++ 24 TC 1022 Manipulated variables (MV) = Set points to DCS controllers Disturbance variables (DV) = Feedforward 24 AR C = C3 E = nC4 F = C5+ 1005 24 PC 1010 24-VE-107 24 LC 1009 LP steam 24 LC 1026 Debutaniser 24-VE-108 LP condensate 24 TI 1018

Depropaniser Train100 step testing 3 days – normal operation during night Analyser responses are delayed – temperature measurements respond 20 min earlier

Depropaniser Train100 step testing – inferential models Combined process measurements  predicts product qualities well Calculated by 24TI1011 (tray 39) Calculated by 24TC1022 (t5), 24TI1018 (bottom), 24TI1012 (t17) and 24TI1011 (t39)

Depropaniser Train100 step testing – CV choice Product quality predictors, with slow corrections from analyser Can control even if the analyser is out of service, automatic analyser fault detection Removes a 20 min feedback delay

Depropaniser Train100 step testing – Dynamic responses/models The dynamic models (red) are step responses, made from step-test data Models from 24FC1008VWA show the 3 CV responses to a reflux set point increase of 1 kg/h Models from 24TC1022VWA show the CV responses to a temperature set point increase of 1 degree C Models from 24LC1001VYA (DV) show the CV responses to an output increase of 1%. 3 t 20 min etter spranget

Depropaniser Train100 step testing – Dynamic responses/models Match between measured CV’s (pink) and modelled step responses (blue) fairly good, green is model error. Assumed linear responses, i.e. a reflux change of 1 kg/h gives the same product quality response whether the impurity is 0.1% or 2%. This is not correct, and the application will use logarithmic product quality transformations to compensate for the nonlinearities.

Depropaniser Train100 MPC – controller activation Starts with 1 MV and 1 CV – CV set point changes, controller tuning, model verification and corrections Shifts to another MV/CV pair, same procedure Interactions verified – controls 2x2 system (2 MV + 2 CV) Expects 3 – 5 days tuning with set point changes to achieve satisfactory performance

Depropaniser Train100 MPC – further development Commissions product quality control January 2004, i.e. MPC manipulates reflux and tray 5 temperature SP to control top and bottoms product quality. Product quality predictors will be evaluated and recalibrated if necessary. If boil-up constraints: MV: steam pressure SP 24PC1010.VWA, CV: boiler level SP 24LC1026.VWA with high/low limits. If limited LP steam (plant-wide): Specify max acceptable impurity in both ends (CV SP) (10-15% reduced steam consumption) Marginal: MV: column pressure (24PC1020.VWA), CV: pressure controller output (24PC1020.VYA) with high/low limits. Low MV ideal value that decreases pressure against output limitation (1-3% reduced steam consumption) If Train 100 capacity test gives column flooding: CV: column differential pressure, with high limit. Specify max acceptable impurity in both ends (10-15% increased capacity compared to normal product purity) Adjust feed flow (by adjusting Train 100 feed) against differential pressure high limit (see below) 2005/2006: Capacity control for Train 100 to push feed continuously against one or more processing constraints. Resources for continuous MPC maintenance important

Controlled variables (CV) = Product qualities, column deltaP ++ Depropaniser Train 100 – 24-VE-107 24 HC 1015 24 24 PI 1014 24PC1020.VYA 24 PDC 1021 PC 1020 Fakkel 24 AY 24 TI 1020 1008D slow update 24 AR B = C2 C = C3 D = iC4 1008 MPCCAP Train 100 24-HA-103 A/B 24 TI 1021 24-VA-102 24 LC 1010 21 1 5 6 17 20 33 34 39 48 35 40 18 24 TI 1011 One of the constraints that MPCCAP must respect Kjølevann 24 TI 1017 24 FC 24 TI 1005 LC 1001 24LC1001.VYA 1008 24 TI 1038 25 FI 1003 24-PA-102A/B 24 FC 1009 24 TI 1013 Propan Bunn ut deetaniser 24 PD 1009 24 TI 1012 Normally 0 flow, used for start-ups to remove inerts Controlled variables (CV) = Product qualities, column deltaP ++ 24 TC 1022 Manipulated variables (MV) = Set points to DCS controllers Disturbance variables (DV) = Feedforward 24 AR C = C3 E = nC4 F = C5+ 1005 24 24 PC 24-VE-107 AY slow update 1010 1005C 24 LC 1009 LP Damp 24 LC 1026 Debutaniser 24-VE-108 LP Kondensat 24 TI 1018