Discussion of the Draft Questionnaire IMPRESS Kick-off Meeting

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Objectives of the Workshop.

Advertisements

European Inventory on Validation of Non-formal and Informal Learning 2010 Jo Hawley, Project Manager Brussels, 12 December 2011.

STAFF BRIEFING PERFORMANCE REPORT AND ACTION PLAN 2012.

Transportation Estimators Association Conference Saratoga Springs, New York October 4, 2008 Procedures Guide for Right of Way Cost Estimation and Cost.

Next Steps in Ecological Impact Assessment IEMA QMark Series 1 Dawn Phythian CEnv MCIEEM Ecology Team North October 2014.

UGDIE KICK-OFF MEETING F-MAN 1 ΑΝΝΕΧ 1-A by UGDIE.

MONITORING PROJECTS: QUALITY AND RESULTS. DAY ONE ASSESSMENT DAY TWO DESIGN DAY THREE MONITORING MORNING Intro. Training Intro. Assessment Intro. DesignIntro.

Water.europa.eu Indepth assessment economic analysis progress report SCG meeting May 2008 Maria Brättemark, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.

Trade Facilitation Self-Assessment: Guide and Process WTO Negotiations on Trade Facilitation.

INTEGRATED INFORMATION E & H Action Plan Implementation.

Anna Donald Marine Planning and Strategy Marine Scotland

Mapping Employability enabling partnership Billy Lynch Manager Open Door Fife Veronica MacMillan Capacity Building Coordinator Wise Move.

Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.

UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water 1 |1 | Water Country Briefs diagnostic workshop 9-10 December 2010 Geneva UN-Water GLAAS.

Capacity Building in Analytical Tools for Estimating and Comparing Costs and Benefits of Adaptation Projects in Africa.

Exec/Board Paris February 2008 WP3.1 Infrastructure Roadmap: Progress Report.

Aberdeenshire Land Use Strategy Pilot James Davidson, Aberdeenshire Council NESAAG, Woodhill House, 05/11/14.

Questionnaire on Water and Climate adaptation Jos G. Timmerman Rijkswaterstaat Centre for Water Management.

Water Framework Directive Implementation and Risk Analysis John Sadlier Water Quality Section.

WFD Characterisation Report Dr Tom Leatherland Environmental Quality Manager 29 October 2003.

© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.

Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.

Overview of Impact Testing Plan. 2 Purpose and Concept Goal: Model the likely result of a revised rule and examine the implications for the population.

The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.

Creating the environment for business Streamlining industrial emissions legislation Caspar Corden (Entec) Andrew Farmer (IEEP) IPPC Review Advisory Group.

European Commission DG Environment Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Progress with Art. 12 assessment WG.

Discuss how researchers analyze data obtained in observational research.

RESEARCH REPORT WRITING Assoc. Prof Dr. Nik Maheran Nik Muhammad UiTM Kelantan.

PEFA FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Module 9: Comparisons over time & between countries.

European Precious Metals Federation Conflict Minerals-Implications for the European Precious Metals Industry 24 September 2017 | Vicenza, Italy.

Technical Report Writing

Literature review Methods

General Meeting cern, 10-12/10/2017 CREATIONS Demonstrators

Indepth assessment economic analysis progress report SCG meeting May 2008 Maria Brättemark, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

Project Objectives, Workplan and Timescales

Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit

Economic and social analyses in HOLAS II

Daughter Groundwater Directive

Online Session 4.2: Designing Methodologies and Data Collection

ILM Assignment Criteria

Online Session 4.1: Designing Methodologies and Data Collection

Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD

CIS-Workshop on River Basin Management Plans

Pierce County Performance Audit Committee

Technical review of Commission Decision 2010/477/EU concerning MSFD criteria for assessing GES Work flow and progress 20/21 October th WG GES.

RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team

Initial Assessment: reflections on structure and contents

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)

2009 European Water conference SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Maria

Preparing a River Basin Management Plan WFD Characterisation Manager

Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes

Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring

European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit

Working group Ecological Flows

Meeting of Water Directors 2/3 December 2004

EEAs assessments of the status of Europe’s waters

Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011

IMPRESS Guidance and Policy Summary Water Directors Copenhagen, 21-22nd November 2002 Working Group leaders: Volker Mohaupt, Umwelt Bundes Amt Isobel.

THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD)

NatSIP-CRIDE Feasibility Study

Eutrophication activity

Marine Strategy Framework Directive reporting: progress and next steps

WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

Étienne Saint-Pierre, Statistics Canada

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels

Bridging the ITSM Information Gap

Presentation transcript:

Discussion of the Draft Questionnaire IMPRESS Kick-off Meeting 23 October 2001, Brussels Isobel Austin/Dave Foster Environment Agency Water Framework Directive Team

Aims of the Questionnaire Overview of current best practice: significant anthropogenic pressures methodologies/tools to assess potential impacts methodologies/tools to fill gaps

Discussion Points Is the content right? are the right questions asked? too little or too much information? how will the output be used?

Are the right questions asked? What are pressures? (categorisation) What is ‘significance’? Scale implications Baseline and trends Sources of data and information Estimating impacts (single pressure and overall) What tools are available?

Summary of Draft Questionnaire S1: Pressures on water bodies - 1.1 Info availability in 2004 and 2013 (categories and tools) - 1.2 Further categorisation of pressures S2: Impacts on water bodies - methodologies and tools S3: Definition of “significant” pressures - existing criteria S4:Guidance on “analysis of pressures and impacts”

Emerging issues not covered Scale implications Baseline and trends estimating impacts

Other issues Too little or too much detail? How will the information be used? - links with issues groups - timescale for return. December 2001. Who will fill out the questionnaire? - practitioners - need practical information and views

Conclusions Content Detail of information required Who will complete the questionnaire How will the output be used