Backward Compatible PHY Feasibility

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0071r1 Submission January 2004 Aleksandar Purkovic, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 LDPC vs. Convolutional Codes for n Applications:
Advertisements

Forward Error Correcting Codes for Forward Error Correcting Codes for Optical Communication Systems University of Technology Dept. of computer Engineering.
Inserting Turbo Code Technology into the DVB Satellite Broadcasting System Matthew Valenti Assistant Professor West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Doc.: IEEE /1387 r0 Submission November 2014 Packet Encoding Solution for 45GHz Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Liguang.
Channel Coding Part 1: Block Coding
1 University of Canberra Advanced Communications Topics Television Broadcasting into the Digital Era by: Neil Pickford Lecture 5 DTTB Transmission Error.
Doc.: IEEE /0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:
Channel Coding Binit Mohanty Ketan Rajawat. Recap…  Information is transmitted through channels (eg. Wires, optical fibres and even air)  Channels are.
Doc.: IEEE /536r0 Submission September 2001 A. Soomro and S. Choi, Philips Research, USASlide 1 Proposal to Add Link Margin Field in IEEE h.
March 2002 Jie Liang, et al, Texas Instruments Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /0207r0 Submission Simplifying MAC FEC Implementation and Related Issues Jie.
Doc.: IEEE 11-04/0304r0 Submission March 2004 John S. Sadowsky, Intel PER Prediction for n MAC Simulation John S. Sadowsky (
WUR Link Budget Analysis Follow-up: Data Rates and SIG Bits Protection
Wireless Networking Business Unit
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
Packet Appending for BICM-ID
Q. Wang [USTB], B. Rolfe [BCA]
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
SC 64-QAM in clause 21 PHY Date: Authors: November 2015
Rate 7/8 LDPC Code for 11ay Date: Authors:
Rate 7/8 (1344,1176) LDPC code Date: Authors:
July 12, 2000 doc.: IEEE <00210> March 2001
Full Duplex Benefits and Challenges
July 12, 2000 doc.: IEEE <00210> March 2001
Discussion on detection schemes and thresholds
July 2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suitability Evaluation of FEC Schemes] Date.
7-May-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
NGV SG Use Cases (Next Generation V2X Study Group)
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Packet Appending for BICM-ID
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
<doc.: IEEE −doc>
WUR Dual SYNC Design Follow-up: SYNC bit Duration
HARQ Gain Studies Date: Authors: November 2018 Name
Multi-channel interference mitigation
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
May 2015 Bandwidth and Packet Type Detection Schemes for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: Frank Hsu, et. al. (MediaTek)
July 2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suitability Evaluation of FEC Schemes] Date.
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Experimental Study of NOMA/SOMA in Wi-Fi
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
7-July-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Unequal Error Protection for Video Transmission over Wireless Channels
VHT Packet Length Calculation
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
Considerations on NGV PHY design
mmW for V2X use cases Date: Authors: July 2018
NGV Backward Interoperability: Follow-up
Interoperable NGV PHY Improvements
Full Duplex Benefits and Challenges
High-level requirements of NGV
802.11ac preamble for VHT auto-detection
Duration in L-SIG Date: Authors: May 2010 Month Year
9-July-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Upper Layer Operation of Adjacent Channel Detector
Performance Analysis of Outer RS Coding Scheme
NGV PHY Performance Results
NGV PHY Performance Results
Indicating NGV Capabilities in MAC Header
NGV Terminology Date: Authors: July 2018
Preamble Autodetection for 11be
NGV PPDU with Hierarchical MCS
Forward Compatibility for WiFi Preamble Design
Additional SC MCSs in clause 20 (DMG PHY)
PHY Signaling for Adaptive Repetition of 11p PPDU
Presentation transcript:

Backward Compatible PHY Feasibility May 2018 doc.: IEEE 802.11-18/0933r0 July 2018 Backward Compatible PHY Feasibility Date: 2018-07-06 Authors: Onn Haran (Autotalks) Onn Haran (Autotalks)

Backward Compatibility PHY Enhancements July 2018 Backward Compatibility PHY Enhancements PHY enhancement is considered backward compatible if a legacy device can decode the data Packet modification isn’t possible Adding post-packet data is a potential change Shouldn’t harm legacy device operation and access to the network Onn Haran (Autotalks)

Concatenated Error Protection July 2018 Concatenated Error Protection Outer error correction code can be appended to packet, protecting it without changing it Outer code (enc.) Inner code (conv.) 802.11p data 802.11p data Parity 802.11p packet Coded parity Channel Outer code (dec.) Inner code (Viterbi) 802.11p data 802.11p data Parity 802.11p packet Coded parity Onn Haran (Autotalks)

Adding Parity Bytes Without Harming Backward Compatibility July 2018 Adding Parity Bytes Without Harming Backward Compatibility Parity bytes can be appended to packet till SIFS Using 802.11 5GHz SIFS (16us) and not the unnecessary long 802.11p SIFS (32us) Parity bytes are ignored by DIFS state machine Caveat: very close vehicles might exceed -62dBm energy detect threshold Legacy device receives packet while ignoring parity bytes NGV device benefits from coding gain 802.11p packet Parity 16uS SIFS 58uS 11p DIFS Onn Haran (Autotalks)

Outer Error Correction Code May 2018 doc.: IEEE 802.11-18/0933r0 July 2018 Outer Error Correction Code Reed-Solomon (RS) is commonly used as outer code Can correct (N-K)/2 bytes by adding (N-K) parity bytes to N bytes block Low complexity decoding Packet is divided to blocks where each block is encoded / decoded independently. Last block may be shorter Validation of parity bytes existence isn’t needed Decoding isn’t performed on packets with good CRC When CRC is bad, and parity bytes are missing, RS decoding may introduce more errors, but packet isn’t good anyhow, so no harm is done 802.11p packet Parity P1 P2 P3 Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Onn Haran (Autotalks) Onn Haran (Autotalks)

Outer Code Construction July 2018 Outer Code Construction Entire parity bytes should fit 5 symbols (58-16=42us) Avoiding tailing bits is recommended Increases number of available parity bytes, but complicates coding Code can be selected per packet according to packet length Code Max. decoded length MCS Tail bits RS(86, 80) 400 1 No RS(166, 160) 800 RS(250, 244) 1220 RS(248, 244) 1708 Opt. 2440 3 Onn Haran (Autotalks)

Outer Code Gain MCS=1, 239 bytes packet, 1RX July 2018 Outer Code Gain MCS=1, 239 bytes packet, 1RX ~3dB gain [C2C_highway_NLOS_enhanced (Doppler=2352Hz)] ~0.5dB gain [AWGN] ~1.5dB [C2C_highway_LOS_enhanced (Doppler = 1176Hz)] Onn Haran (Autotalks)

July 2018 Summary Enhanced PHY messages are received by 802.11p devices and increase NGV devices communication range Not impacting legacy IEEE802.11p reception, network access and fairness Forward looking solution, supporting high network load Utilizing long DIFS period for outer error correction code bytes High gain (~3dB) is achieved on complex channels, where range increase is desired Simple channels have low gain (~1dB) but communication range already surpasses requirements by far Onn Haran (Autotalks)