CROSS-EXAMINATION Adam Constable QC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXPERT EVIDENCE: GETTING IT RIGHT Presentation to HICFG by Alistair Webster Q.C Elizabeth Nicholls.
Advertisements

Use of Prior Statements, Depositions and Corollary Proceedings: Searing Impeachment and Effective Rehabilitation FITZPATRICK,
WINNING YOUR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE HEARING Presented By D DeGROOT M MANAGEMENT S SERVICES, INC
Chapter 8.  A civil action relates to an act or omission that infringes the rights of a person, group or government instrumentality and seeks to return.
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 3 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 3 Litigation and.
Law 12 MUNDY Civil Trials – Introduction Civil lawsuit involves disputes between two individuals, groups or corporations/organizations called =
R OLES & R ESPONSIBILITIES From Speaking With A Purpose: Jo Thornton & Jessica Pegis.
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Interviewing & Investigation LAW-123 Introduction to Interviewing and Investigating.
Section 10.2.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 29 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 26, 2002.
PPA 503 – The Public Policy- Making Process Lecture 9c – How to Deliver Oral Testimony Based on a Written Statement.
Writing a report Request for a report can come from: Employer, coroner, solicitor, Gardai, or patients employer Clarify your role in writing the report.
Adrian Mueller Senior Lawyer JS Mueller & Co
MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond.
The Case Police vs. Jack Jones
PREVENTIVE LAW WORKSHOP Investigating Employee Misconduct Mary Elizabeth Kurz, Vice Chancellor and General Counsel Dianne Sortini, Director, Employee Relations.
The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.
1 Agenda for 12th Class Admin –Handouts –Name plates –Writing groups on web –Welcome to Shakay Amirkhanyan prospective student Experts (continued) Sanctions.
Telling the Story The factual basis and “facts beyond change” By: Margaret Flynt, Esq.
Justice Robert Beaudoin November 16 th,  Most disputes are solved as a result of the negotiation process.  Our rules prepare every case for an.
SERN/EHRC Conference 2015 Running the case – a practical guide to preparing a discrimination case for the Employment Tribunal Presented by Peter O’Donnell.
Brown: Legal Terminology, 5 th ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Legal Terminology Fifth Edition by Gordon.
Civil Law U.S. Government Chapter 15 Section 2.  Why would someone bring a lawsuit against another person, a business, or an organization? List 2-3 reasons.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
The Dispute Resolution Surprise John Bishop Partner.
Charles University – Law Faculty October 2012 © Peter Kolker 2012 Class III
Week Nine Seminar 1.  By the time that the pleadings have been settled, discovery has been completed, and motions have been resolved, everyone has a.
Help! I’ve been called to give evidence in Court…  The doctor’s survivor guide for preparing for and attending court Sofia Papachristos, Special Counsel,
Victorian Courts Mapping the Court Process
Don’t assume agreement—always support claims with evidence
Conscience.
How to be an Expert Witness
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
Closing Addresses Andrew J See October 2011.
CROSS EXAMINATION HINTS AND TIPS Frances Heaton QC
The Art of Persuasion Written and Oral Advocacy
The Role of Experts in Construction Arbitration
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Testifying in Administrative and Criminal Proceedings
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Trial Procedures
Questions STL.
Mentor Orientation Richard Linn Inn American Inn of Court
Arbitration Process Arbitrator G C Kabi
Civil Law U.S. Government Chapter 15 Section 2.
Civil Law U.S. Government Chapter 15 Section 2.
Chapter 3 Alternative, Judicial, and Online Dispute Resolution
Mark Pollitt Associate Professor
OBJECTIONS.
Agenda for 10th Class Admin Handouts Slides SJ in a Civil Action
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Civil Law: Trial Procedures
E145/STS173 Case Study Tips Professors Tom Byers and Randy Komisar
Civil Litigation Practice Basics 2016: Pre-Trials and Settlements
TIPS FOR IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF YOUR DEPOSITIONS
Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration
Review Lecture 12.
Law Record Keeping and Documentaion
Agenda for 12th Class Admin Name plates Handouts Slides
Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND PRACTICE IN THE MAGISTRATES’ COURTS:PRELIMINARY ENQUIRIES Mag. A. Mohamed 17 Jan 2019.
Test Taking Strategies
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases.
« Use of Experts: Strategic & Procedural Aspects »
Agenda for 10th Class Admin Handouts Slides SJ in a Civil Action
MPT CLINIC Summer 2019 MPT SESSION
The Expert Valuation Witness and the Different Procedural Models in European Court Proceedings . Associate Prof. (Dr. hab. Magdalena Habdas.
Presentation transcript:

CROSS-EXAMINATION Adam Constable QC

1. Preparation Judgment: Feb 18. Coulson J’s last hurrah JCT contract: S&T engaged to design and construct a Premier Inn at Heathrow. 3 Adjudications between parties. 3rd adjudication decision: Grove’s PLN in response to interim application 22 was invalid: S&T prima facie entitled to £14m. S&T sought to enforce. Grove issued Part 8 proceedings seeking various declarations. 4 issues for court to determine (A– D). Most important for the industry: Issue C. Take this case at some length because it is a long, detailed judgment which is important to have a feel for in future disputes. 15/04/2019

Preparation contd… “If you confront anyone who has lied with the truth, he will usually admit it - often out of sheer surprise. It is only necessary to guess right to produce your effect.”  ― Agatha Christie, Murder on the Orient Express Sadly only partly true… Don’t guess. Judgment: Feb 18. Coulson J’s last hurrah JCT contract: S&T engaged to design and construct a Premier Inn at Heathrow. 3 Adjudications between parties. 3rd adjudication decision: Grove’s PLN in response to interim application 22 was invalid: S&T prima facie entitled to £14m. S&T sought to enforce. Grove issued Part 8 proceedings seeking various declarations. 4 issues for court to determine (A– D). Most important for the industry: Issue C. Take this case at some length because it is a long, detailed judgment which is important to have a feel for in future disputes. 15/04/2019

2. Case Theory Start (and end) with case theory What evidence do you want to quote in the closing submission? Cross examine only insofar as necessary to advance your case theory Don’t ask ANY question unless your case theory demands it. Reasons 1 and 2: context to the meat of Coulson J’s analysis 15/04/2019

3. Putting your case You must ‘put your case’. ‘Your case’ is the key aspects required by your case theory It is NOT every pleaded issue/issue on the evidence It is NOT governed by the evidence your witnesses have given (unless it coincides with your case theory) YOU can choose who to put your case to. Generally, don’t have to put every point to everyone, but don’t avoid obviously relevant witnesses. Prepare with flexibility Reason 4: words specific to that JCT contract: will not always be the case 15/04/2019

4. Documents are your (only) weapon of choice Delay cases: fully on top of chronological bundle is key BEFORE starting XX prep, note up bundle Excel, Tables, Notes etc. Searchable document [Start with bundle index?] Which witnesses relate to which document? Cross ref documents to the reply to the document Which (other) witness might you put the document to (take care)? Reason 4: words specific to that JCT contract: will not always be the case 15/04/2019

5. Witness handling generally Everyone develops their own style but…. Are you likely to ‘win’ the XX? Bad points which you have to challenge – get in and out asap; Don’t be aggressive on points you are (probably) wrong about; Be aware of your tribunal Court v arbitration Common law v civil law Fact v expert Different styles get different results: BE FLEXIBLE Reason 4: words specific to that JCT contract: will not always be the case 15/04/2019

6. Witnesses – preparing the shape of the XX Which witnesses? Do I need to ask anything? You are in charge of the agenda; the statement/report is not the agenda. A witnesses’ real contribution to the case may come from the documents but be ignored in the statement/report What do I need to challenge in the statement/report? What evidence do I want to extract through XX on documents? Reason 4: words specific to that JCT contract: will not always be the case 15/04/2019

7. Witnesses – next level of preparation “Cross-examination is the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth. You can do anything with a bayonet except sit on it. A lawyer can do anything with cross-examination if he is skillful enough not to impale his own cause upon it.” John Henry Wigmore The ORDER of TOPICS can be important: Start strong v leave best to last. Chronological? The ORDER of QUESTIONS can be critical: Documents then statement, or statement then documents? ‘Ringfence’ Do you want the statement to be the truth, or the document? [Case Theory] NO right answer, but you must PLAN YOUR STRATEGY. Reason 4: words specific to that JCT contract: will not always be the case 15/04/2019

7. Witnesses – granular preparation and execution Writing out questions in full v direction of travel/x-ref? Writing out questions in full is sometimes essential. Think about written closing submissions Precision can be key Flexibility is always essential Listen to the answers Did you get quite enough…? Are you going to WIN the point if you pursue it? Reason 4: words specific to that JCT contract: will not always be the case 15/04/2019

8. Particularities of Expert Witnesses Qualifications/experience (be careful) Instructions Do you have them? Have the instructions led to the answer? Challenge the expert on their factual assumptions… What factual assertions/assumptions have been made? Change the assumption, change the facts Think about your XX of the expert when preparing the XX of the factual witness Make sure you take the Tribunal with you (start with the basics…) Credibility v Substance….? A Reason 4: words specific to that JCT contract: will not always be the case 15/04/2019

9. Know when to stop That’s it…. You won’t always get it right… but you’ll know when you have got it wrong Generally less is more Reason 4: words specific to that JCT contract: will not always be the case 15/04/2019

Thanks for listening…. 15/04/2019

Thanks for listening Adam Constable QC Please contact the Practice Management Teams for further information T +44 (0)20 7544 2600 E clerks@keatingchambers.com www.keatingchambers.com