Pilot Goals Focus Consistency Response

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Advertisements

October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 1. LAHC 2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 All Accreditation Commission recommendations successfully.
TEACHING EFFECTIVENES AND ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE ALISON ANTES JENNIFER STANSBURY KOENIG STEPHANIE KLATZKE CHRIS LAWRENCE LILI MA PHIL MCCARTNEY KENNETH.
Students Course and Teacher Evaluation Please refer to notes at the bottom of this slide.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FACULTY COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Report to Faculty Senate November 5, 2013.
Course Evaluation Project - Update Presentation to Senate October 19, 2015 Mark Seasons.
Spring,  STEP ONE: Core Services Matrix  Each administrative and student support department (including division offices) will complete a core.
PATHS TOWARD EQUITY Melissa R. Gilbert Associate Professor Department of Geography and Urban Studies Temple University Achieving Equity: Women, the Workplace.
Cañada College Professional Development Committee Determining Participants.
ESET Timing Close Study Results Stefani Dawn, PhD Assistant Director of Assessment.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report
Cheryl aschenbach, north representative
CAÑADA COLLEGE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
Outcomes Assessment Committee
The assessment process For Administrative units
Standard I Systematic Planning.
California Science Test (CAST)
Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment
Program Review Update. Monthly Superintendents Webcast May 18, 2011 Kentucky Department of Education.
Academic Affairs Update Monday, October 17, 2016
Msjc’s adoption of canvas
California Science Test
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
RTP For new faculty A brief introduction.
CORE CURRICULUM MEETING
of Teaching: Challenges
Strategic Planning Council December 8, 2006
Administrative Review Process
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Critical Infrastructure Assessment Follow-Up Meeting
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
EVC Accreditation Update Fall 2017 PDD Thursday, 3/31/17
The Buggy Before the Horse
Undergraduate – Entering Students Survey Fall 2011
Updates on Next-Generation MCAS and Planning for the High School Competency Determination Standard Meeting of the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Sam Houston State University
Spring Assessment “Workshop”
Salem State University’s Pilot Civic Learning Study
Program Review and Accreditation
Yuba Community College District Board of Trustees Meeting
What We Do, Where We’re Going Data-wize
Administrative Review
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Collaboration, Not Competition:
Public Spaces Master Plan Update
Provost Guidelines for Submission of Tenure on Hire Requests to the University Promotion and Tenure Committee.
Faculty Senate Budget Committee
California Science Test (CAST)
Putting It All Together
Grade 5 Instructional Support in Mathematics
Accreditation & Institution Set Standards
Grade 4 Instructional Support in Mathematics
Completing your Program Review
Sam Houston State University
Faculty Senate President’s Report
District discipline lead spring meeting agenda
Administrative Review Committee
Accreditation follow-up report
Curriculum Coordinator: Pamela Quinn Date of Presentation: 1/19/18
SLO Assessment and Program Review
Faculty Evaluation Policy
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Fall 2016/Spring 2017 Administrative Review Process Update
COURSE EVALUATION Spring 2019 Pilot August 27, 2019.
Re-Envisioning the Undergraduate Experience
Presentation transcript:

Course Learning Evaluation Committee Report and Recommendation October 18, 2018

Pilot Goals Focus Consistency Response learning assessment vs. instructor assessment Focus Consistency one instrument for all Response improve response rate

Pilot CLE Timeline 2015 Request to address bias, evaluation variety, and instructor vs learning focus. Faculty survey, development of pilot CLE Departments pilot CLE (spring), pilot CLE revised and more pilot data collected (fall) Pilot faculty surveyed, pilot CLE revised (twice) 2016 2017 2018

Pilot Summary Focus Consistency Response learning assessment prioritized over instructor assessment Focus Consistency achieved one instrument Response improved response rate by approximately 7 percent

Recommendation Vote Tally The Committee recommends that Faculty Senate approve the implementation of the new CLE instrument for Fall 2018. Vote Tally Yay (9), Nay (1), Abs (0)

CLE Moving Forward RTP Education Assessment Communicating to stakeholders the changes in the CLE and how they may affect rank and promotion cases Education Educating students, faculty, and administration on the new CLE Ongoing and continual review of the CLE effectiveness The Committee identified 3 areas for work as we move forward: How the CLE may affect RTP cases, Assessment