Report on SEC Data Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I Directors Conference Sept 2007 Carol Diedrichsen Gwen Pollock Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum for English.
Advertisements

Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
ESOL Science 2 at BHS Richard Meyer Suzy King. Rationale To prepare targeted students for further science courses – Provide background knowledge – Provide.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What is program success? Wendy Tackett, Ph.D., Evaluator Valerie L. Mills, Project Director Adele Sobania, STEM Oakland Schools MSP, Michigan.
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Louisiana Math & Science Teacher Institute (LaMSTI) Overview of External Evaluation and Development of Self-Report Measures of Instructional Leadership.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
Michigan MSPs June 2007 Wendy Tackett, PhD, iEval
Table of Contents Professional Development School Pilot Study.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
Professional Development is aligned to your district’s initiatives and tailored to your districts current needs. Our modules are designed to  Deepen.
Professional Development in Challenged Environments Project: Making Mathematics Matter (PM³) A Model for Effective PD Conversations Among Colleagues March.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
Dates: Thursday, Oct. 17 Time: 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm Location: Victor Scott School Aspiring for Teacher Leadership.
Supporting Your Child Through the Transition to Common Core Mathematics What Parents Need to Know.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Peer Coaching Program Monica Gardelli Franco
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Table 1. Alignment of Assessment Domains with CEC and ACEI Standards Sheilah M. Paul et al. From Conceptualization to Reflection: Ensuring Robust Clinical.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant (DPI)
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Education Leaders Conference: Using Data to Improve Instruction
Partnership for Practice
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
Pat Conole (315) My Showcase Portfolio Pat Conole (315) t687.
Educate Alabama PLP Development.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM. A school district shall ensure that all teachers are provided with an orientation of the Professional Development.
Competency Assessment
Study Questions To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject content specified in state academic standards and.
Teacher Voice Represented in District Level Decision Making
Introduction to the SEC
LESSON DESIGN WORKSHOP
Maria Aguirre, Ph.D. Milagros Bravo, Ph.D. AlACiMa
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Exploring Relationships between Professional Development,
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

Report on SEC Data Analysis Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP

Missouri PRISM Project Goals Goal 1: Increase the quality and quantity of teachers' content knowledge in science to improve ability to create and lead inquiry-based lessons fostering reasoning and problem solving in 4-8 students.   Goal 2: Increase teachers' knowledge of the state and national science standards to enable them to align their curricula and instruction in order to increase student achievement. Goal 3: Increase teachers' involvement as leaders in their profession. Goal 4: Increase the use of inquiry-based teaching strategies by project participants. Goal 5: Increase the appropriate use of technology as a teaching and learning tool. Goal 6: Increase teachers' use of high quality, authentic assessment strategies and their abilities to make targeted, real-world connections between and within science and mathematics. Goal 7: Enhance teachers' abilities to reflect on their performance and how they impact student learning. Goal 8: Increase collaboration between and among teachers, and between teachers and university faculty. Goal 9: Improve student performance on science MAP (Missouri Assessment Program) examinations.

Missouri PRISM Project Goals Goal 1: Increase the quality and quantity of teachers' content knowledge in science to improve ability to create and lead inquiry-based lessons fostering reasoning and problem solving in 4-8 students.   Goal 2: Increase teachers' knowledge of the state and national science standards to enable them to align their curricula and instruction in order to increase student achievement. Goal 3: Increase teachers' involvement as leaders in their profession. Goal 4: Increase the use of inquiry-based teaching strategies by project participants. Goal 5: Increase the appropriate use of technology as a teaching and learning tool. Goal 6: Increase teachers' use of high quality, authentic assessment strategies and their abilities to make targeted, real-world connections between and within science and mathematics. Goal 7: Enhance teachers' abilities to reflect on their performance and how they impact student learning. Goal 8: Increase collaboration between and among teachers, and between teachers and university faculty. Goal 9: Improve student performance on science MAP (Missouri Assessment Program) examinations.

Missouri PRISM Project Highlights Graduate course-work throughout the year Teacher collaboration with colleague not in program PD & Admin. of Formative Assessments Teacher Content Knowledge Assessments Develop criteria and protocols for observing inquiry-based lessons Administrator Training & Observations Teachers given PDA’s for planning/ organizing assignments Training in simulations and probe-ware

Missouri PRISM Project Data Assessments (Teacher & Students) Classroom Observations & Walk-thru Evaluations Video-taped classroom instruction Student-work Teacher-work Coach/Mentor field notes Teacher (SEC) Surveys

The SEC Data-set SUMMARY MEASURES Content Practice Climate Prof. Dev. Instructional Content Instr. Activities Tchr. Char./Opinions/Beliefs Professional Development Mathematics English Language Arts & Reading Science Social Studies (coming soon) SUMMARY MEASURES Content Practice Climate Prof. Dev. /

Comparison Groups MO-PRISM Group Teachers participating in the MO-PRISM project for 2 (n=51) or 3 (n=47) years Other MSP Groups Teachers participating in other state MSP projects for 2 (n=606) or 3 (n=174) years Non-MSP Groups Teachers participating in school/district-based school improvement initiatives for 2 (n = 73) or 3 (n=6) years.

Participation in Formal Course-work & Institutes

SEC Indicators of Quality Professional Development

SEC Indicators of Quality Professional Development

SEC Reports of Instructional Practice

SEC Reports of Instructional Practice

SEC Reports of Instructional Practice

Two Strategies for Improving Alignment

MO-PRISM Student (Classroom) Assessments

Measuring the Learned Curriculum

SEC Longitudinal Data Patterns

SEC Longitudinal Data Patterns The ‘Lag’ Effect

SEC Longitudinal Data Patterns The ‘Negative Growth’ Effect

SEC Longitudinal Data Patterns The ‘Sustainability’ Effect