HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 7 Exercise Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users.
Advertisements

HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop Exercise IV – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross – Group Exercise - Session #8 8-1.
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
Narcoossee Roadway Corridor Analysis Osceola County Board of County Commissioners Meeting December 4, 2006
9-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise C – Session #9.
HSM Applications to Two-Lane Rural Highways Predicting Crash Frequency and Applying CMF’s for Two-Lane Rural Highway Intersections - Session #6 6-1.
Enhanced Safety Prediction Methodology and Analysis Tool for Freeways and Interchanges James A. Bonneson August 2012 NCHRP Project
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
13 th Street and Dayton Avenue – Ames, IA Intersection Study ByungOck Kim Greg Karssen.
Uses of Safety Performance Functions and Potential for Safety Improvement Values David L. Piper, P.E. Illinois Department of Transportation.
Role of SPFs in the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Mike Dimaiuta LENDIS Corporation.
May 1, 2014 East Gude Drive Pedestrian Road Safety Audit Stakeholder Pedestrian Safety Meeting.
9-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise C – Session #9.
N C H R P Project PI: Malcolm H. Ray, P.E., PhD RoadSafe LLC Presented by Team Member: Karen K. Dixon, P.E., PhD.
Tab 9 Case Studies. Minor Accident Single Vehicle Accident.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
Katy and Ron’s Wedding Maps and Directions to the venues.
6-Answers-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise – Part A – Session #6.
April 18, 2013 Luke Lortie, EIT Jerry Auge, PE
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Calibrating Highway Safety Manual Equations for Application in Florida Dr. Siva Srinivasan, Phillip Haas, Nagendra Dhakar, and Ryan Hormel (UF) Doug Harwood.
NCHRP Crash Reduction Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements UNC HSRC VHB Ryerson University (Bhagwant and Craig)
Fall  Crashes are “independent” and “random” events (probabilistic events)  Estimate a relationship between crashes and covariates (or explanatory.
Impact of Intersection Angle on Safety HSIS Annual Liaison Meeting David Harkey, Bo Lan, Daniel Carter, Raghavan Srinivasan, Anusha Patel Nujjetty May.
MAINE Highway Safety Information System Liaison Meeting Chapel Hill, North Carolina September , 2015 Darryl Belz, P.E. Maine Department of Transportation.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
HSM Applications to Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections Prediction of Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections - Session #9.
University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
6-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise IX – Session #6.
Exercise I – Prediction of Safety Performance for Rural Multilane Highway and Comparison to Substantive Safety Performance - Session #4 HSM Applications.
HSM Applications to Rural Multilane Intersections
Impact of Intersection Angle on Safety
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Predicting Crash Frequency and CMFs for Rural Divided Multilane Highways - Session.
Creating and Using an Intersection Inventory
HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL APPLICATIONS
Data Driven Safety Analysis in the Project Development Process: State Practices Integrating Safety Performance into ALL Highway Investment Decisions.
District 3 Complete Streets Projects
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
HSM Applications to Two-Lane Rural Highways
Per the UGA Traffic Safety Research and Evaluation group:
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Highway Safety Manual DAY 2 - HSM Practitioners Guide for Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Cover Slide for the one-day NHI format 2010.
NDOT HSM Nevda Transportation Conference
Prediction of Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Multilane Streets
Using CMF’s in Benefit/Cost Analysis and Project Prioritization
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
Using CMFs in Planning for Virginia’s Project Funding Prioritization
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Prediction of Crash Frequency and CMF’s for Undivided Rural Multilane Highways.
Motorcycle AADT, Safety Analysis, and Intersection Treatments
Results and Status of State Crash Analyses
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Transportation Engineering Basic safety methods April 8, 2011
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Worked Example: Highway Safety Modeling
HW 7b: HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Contributing Factors for Focus Crash Types and Facility Types Raghavan Srinivasan University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center (UNC HSRC)
Presentation transcript:

HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Exercise III – Prediction of Crash Frequency Performance for Multilane Intersections and Comparison to Substantive Crash Performance - Session #09 Instructor: Session #09 – Exercise III –– Prediction of Crash Frequency and application of CMFs for Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections and Comparison to Substantive Safety Performance Session 7 –Exercise III

Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Learning Outcomes: Apply Multilane Intersection Crash Prediction models Compare predicted Crash Frequency performance to Substantive safety performance Instructor: review the Learning Objectives for Session #11 Exercise III Applying multilane intersection Crash Frequency prediction SPF’s and CMF’s. Session 7 –Exercise III

Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Intersection Information: MINOR ROADS: Three Signalized intersections with single left turn lanes (no right turn lanes): Bloomingdale Road 16,100 AADT Shopping Center (north and south) 2,400 AADT Main Street-Glen Ellyn 16,700 AADT MAJOR ROAD: IL 64 North Avenue is 37,000 AADT Instructor: IL 64 North Avenue major intersection traffic information Session 7 –Exercise III

Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Unsignalized T- Intersections w/o left turn lanes: Mildred 700 AADT Virginia 700 AADT Bernice 700 AADT Western 700 AADT Pearl 1,500 AADT Diane 700 AADT Evergreen 700 AADT Amy 700 AADT Newton 700 AADT Signalized 4-Approach Intersections with left turn lanes: Bloomingdale Road 16,100 AADT Shopping Center (north and south) 2,400 AADT Main Street-Glen Ellyn 16,700 AADT Instructor: North Avenue IL 64 intersection information for the mile segment from Bloomingdale Road on the west to Glen Ellyn Road on the east Session 7 –Exercise III

Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Crash data for 1986, 1987, 1988 – 3 years Intersections: Total Injury Day Night Mildred 9 2 6 3 Virginia 12 3 9 3 Bernice 16 3 11 5 Western 11 4 7 4 Pearl 22 6 16 6 Diane 16 5 11 5 Evergreen 11 4 7 4 Amy 7 4 4 3 Newton 12 5 8 4 Bloomingdale Rd 170 68 122 48 Shopping Center 18 5 13 5 Main St-Glen Ellyn 146 45 100 46 Totals: 450 154 314 136 Instructor: “Before” crash data from IDOT Safety Section from the Phase I study for North Avenue IL 64 project Total Crashes for the 12 intersections = 450 crashes Injury Crashes for the 12 intersections = 154 crashes Session 7 –Exercise III

Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn April 2009 Study Section: Crash data for 1986, 1987, 1988 – 3 years Total Injury Crashes Crashes Day Night Rdwy Segment 84 26 57 27 12 Intersections 450 154 314 136 Totals: 534 180 371 163 Instructor: “Before” crash data from IDOT Safety Section from the Phase I study for North Avenue IL 64 project Session 7 –Exercise III

Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn April 2009 Predict the Crash Frequency Performance for the intersections using the Rural Multilane intersection models for the following: Bloomingdale Road (signalized) Shopping Center (signalized) Main Street-Glen Ellyn (signalized) Eight “T” non-signalized intersections (700 ADT) One “T” non-signalized intersection (1,500 ADT) Instructor: Task 1 with the five sub tasks for the three major intersections, the eight minor intersections of 700 adt and one intersection of 1,500 adt for the “before” condition as a “rural” multilane highway Use Worksheet Exercise III Session 7 –Exercise III

Nspf int = exp(a + b ln(AADTmaj) + c ln(AADTmin)) Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Predict the Crash Frequency Performance for the intersections using the Rural Multilane intersection models for the following: Bloomingdale Road (signalized) Nspf int = exp(a + b ln(AADTmaj) + c ln(AADTmin)) = exp(-7.182 + 0.722ln(37,000) + 0.337ln(16,100) Instructor: presentation of task 1 subtask a prediction as a multilane RURAL intersection = exp(-7.182 + 7.594 + 3.264) = exp(3.676) = 39.5 crashes per year Session 7 –Exercise III

Nspf int = exp(a + b ln(AADTmaj) + c ln(AADTmin)) Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Predict the Crash Frequency Performance for the intersections using the Rural Multilane intersection models for the following: Shopping Center (signalized) Nspf int = exp(a + b ln(AADTmaj) + c ln(AADTmin)) = exp(-7.182 + 0.722ln(37,000) + 0.337ln(2,400) Instructor: presentation of task 1 subtask a prediction as a multilane RURAL intersection = exp(-7.182 + 7.594 + 2.623) = exp(3.035) = 20.8 crashes per year Session 7 –Exercise III

Nspf int = exp(a + b ln(AADTmaj) + c ln(AADTmin)) Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Predict the Crash Frequency Performance for the intersections using the Rural Multilane intersection models for the following: Main Street-Glen Ellyn (signalized) Nspf int = exp(a + b ln(AADTmaj) + c ln(AADTmin)) = exp(-7.182 + 0.722ln(37,000) + 0.337ln(16,700) Instructor: presentation of task 1 subtask a prediction as a multilane RURAL intersection = exp(-7.182 + 7.594 + 3.277) = exp(3.689) = 40.0 crashes per year Session 7 –Exercise III

Nspf int = exp(a + b ln(AADTmaj) + c ln(AADTmin)) Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Predict the Crash Frequency for the intersections using the Rural Multilane intersection models for the following: Eight “T” stop control of approach at 700 AADT Nspf int = exp(a + b ln(AADTmaj) + c ln(AADTmin)) = exp(-12.526 + 1.204ln(37,000) + 0.236ln(700) Instructor: presentation of task 1 subtask a prediction as a multilane RURAL intersection = exp(-12.526 + 12.664 + 1.546) = exp(1.684) = 5.39 crashes per year Session 7 –Exercise III

Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn April 2009 Predict the Crash Frequency for the intersections using the Rural Multilane intersection models for the following: Eight “T” stop control of approach at 700 ADT For eight locations: N = 8 x 5.39 Instructor: presentation of task 1 subtask a prediction as a multilane RURAL intersection = 43.1 crashes per year Session 7 –Exercise III

Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Predict the Crash Frequency Performance for the intersections using the Rural Multilane intersection models for the following: one “T” stop control of approach at 1,500 ADT Nrural = exp(a + b LN(AADTmajor)+ c (AADTminor)) = exp(-12.526 + 1.204ln(37,000) + 0.236ln(1,500) Instructor: presentation of task 1 subtask a prediction as a multilane RURAL intersection = exp(-12.526 + 12.664 + 1.726) = exp(1.864) = 6.5 crashes per year Session 7 –Exercise III

Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Total the Predicted Crash Frequency performance for all intersections Bloomingdale Road (signalized) Shopping Center (signalized) Main Street-Glen Ellyn (signalized) Eight “T” non-signalized intersections (700 AADT) One “T” non-signalized intersection (1,500 AADT) 39.5 20.8 40.0 Instructor: presentation of task 2 summing the individual major and minor intersections 43.1 6.4 Total 149.9 Session 7 –Exercise III

Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Compare the Substantive Intersection Crash Frequency Performance to the Predicted Crash Frequency Performance: Substantive Safety Performance = 450 in 3 yrs 150 per year Predicted Crash Frequency Performance = Instructor: task 3 The IL 64 crash data does not break out the individual intersection crash info for the non-signalized intersections; only the signalized intersections. The non-signalized intersection crash data is included in the 3-years of segment crash data, it’s difficult to determine the actual safety performance. 149.9 per year Substantive Safety Performance less than Predicted Crash Frequency? About Same Session 7 –Exercise III

Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Comparison of the Total Predicted Crash Frequency to Actual performance for all intersections: Predicted Actual Bloomingdale Road (signalized) Shopping Center (signalized) Main Street-Glen Ellyn (signalized) Eight “T” non-signalized intersections (700 AADT) One “T” non-signalized intersection (1,500 AADT) 39.5 56.7 20.8 6.0 40.0 48.7 Instructor: presentation of task 2 summing the individual major and minor intersections 43.1 31.3 6.4 7.3 Total 149.9 150.0 Session 7 –Exercise III

Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Learning Outcomes: Applied Multilane Intersection Crash Frequency Prediction models Compared predicted Crash Frequency performance to Substantive Safety performance Instructor: review the Learning Outcomes for Session #11 Exercise III Session 7 –Exercise III

Questions and Discussion Exercise III – IL 64 North Avenue from Bloomingdale Road to Main Street-Glen Ellyn Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop April 2009 Questions and Discussion Session 7 –Exercise III