In vitro culture of individual mouse preimplantation embryos: the role of embryo density, microwells, oxygen, timing and conditioned media  Rebecca L.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A tilting embryo culture system increases the number of high-grade human blastocysts with high implantation competence  Tetsuaki Hara, Koji Matsuura,
Advertisements

Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated  Baris Ata, Brian Kaplan, Hal Danzer, Michael Glassner, Michael.
Human blastocyst morphological quality is significantly improved in embryos classified as fast on day 3 (≥10 cells), bringing into question current embryological.
First births with a simplified culture system for clinical IVF and embryo transfer  Jonathan Van Blerkom, Willem Ombelet, Elke Klerkx, Mia Janssen, Nathalie.
Time-lapse culture with morphokinetic embryo selection improves pregnancy and live birth chances and reduces early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis  Csaba.
Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in women with high oestradiol concentrations: randomized controlled trial  Eman A. Elgindy, Ahmed.
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in granulosa lutein cells
Norbert Gleicher, Andrea Weghofer, David H. Barad 
Complete zona pellucida removal from vitrified-warmed human blastocysts facilitates earlier in-vitro attachment and outgrowth  Satoshi Ueno, Kenji Ezoe,
Transfer of blastocysts with deviant morphological and morphokinetic parameters at early stages of in-vitro development: a case series  Astrid Stecher,
Xiao Zhang, Krinos M Trokoudes, Constantinos Pavlides 
Spatial and temporal distribution of Oct-4 and acetylated H4K5 in rabbit embryos  Chien-Hong Chen, Wei-Fang Chang, Chia-Chia Liu, Hwa-Yun Su, Song-Kun.
Group culture of human zygotes is superior to individual culture in terms of blastulation, implantation and life birth  T. Ebner, O. Shebl, M. Moser,
Telomere length in human blastocysts
Effect of cryotop vitrification on preimplantation developmental competence of murine morula and blastocyst stage embryos  Xiu Feng Ling, Jun Qiang Zhang,
Reduction in exposure of human embryos outside the incubator enhances embryo quality and blastulation rate  Jun Qiang Zhang, Xiu Ling Li, Yuzhu Peng,
Alterations in mouse embryo intracellular pH by DMO during culture impair implantation and fetal growth  Deirdre L. Zander-Fox, Megan Mitchell, Jeremy.
A Tale of Division and Polarization in the Mammalian Embryo
Trophectoderm grade predicts outcomes of single-blastocyst transfers
Role of PAFAH1B1 in human spermatogenesis, fertilization and early embryonic development  Gui-Dong Yao, Sen-Lin Shi, Wen-Yan Song, Hai-Xia Jin, Zhao-Feng.
Pregnancy achieved by transfer of a single blastocyst selected by time-lapse monitoring  Csaba Pribenszky, Szabolcs Mátyás, Péter Kovács, Eszter Losonczi,
Extended culture of vitrified–warmed embryos in day-3 embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled pilot study  Rentao Jin, Xianhong Tong, Limin Wu,
Factors affecting embryo viability and uterine receptivity: insights from an analysis of the UK registry data  Stephen A. Roberts, Mark Hann, Daniel R.
Semra Kahraman, Zafer Nihat Candan  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
A tilting embryo culture system increases the number of high-grade human blastocysts with high implantation competence  Tetsuaki Hara, Koji Matsuura,
Selecting the ‘best’ embryos: prospects for improvement
Effect of Hsp27 on early embryonic development in the mouse
Katja Knez, Tomaz Tomazevic, Eda Vrtacnik-Bokal, Irma Virant-Klun 
Why are reproductive cancers more common in nulliparous women?
Sara D. M. Valckx, Jessie De Bie, Ellen D. Michiels, Ilse G
Contrasting effects of G1. 2/G2
Shi Ying Jin, Ph. D. , Lei Lei, Ph. D. , Ariella Shikanov, Ph. D
S Munné, E Fragouli, P Colls, MG Katz-Jaffe, WB Schoolcraft, D Wells 
Pregnancy and live birth following the transfer of vitrified–warmed blastocysts derived from zona- and corona-cell-free oocytes  Yimin Shu, Wenlin Peng,
Does early morphology provide additional selection power to blastocyst selection for transfer?  F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, J. Leger, R. Bidault, V. Cadoret,
The effect of blastomere biopsy on preimplantation mouse embryo development and global gene expression  Francesca E. Duncan, Ph.D., Paula Stein, Ph.D.,
Fertility preservation consultation for women with cancer: are we helping patients make high-quality decisions?  Jayeon Kim, Allison M. Deal, Ursula Balthazar,
Prognostic factors influencing fresh and frozen IVF outcomes: an analysis of the UK national database  W. Mark Hirst, Andy Vail, Daniel R. Brison, Stephen.
Cumulative live-birth delivery after IVF/ICSI since the progressive introduction of single- embryo transfer  D. De Neubourg, C. Daels, M. Elseviers, K.
Individual demands of human embryos on IVF culture medium: influence on blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome  B. Wirleitner, P. Vanderzwalmen,
Non-conservation of mammalian preimplantation methylation dynamics
Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence
The oviduct: a neglected organ due for re-assessment in IVF
Improved development of mouse and human embryos using a tilting embryo culture system  Koji Matsuura, Nobuyoshi Hayashi, Yuka Kuroda, Chisato Takiue,
Prediction of in-vitro developmental competence of early cleavage-stage mouse embryos with compact time-lapse equipment  Csaba Pribenszky, Eszter Losonczi,
Mid-luteal serum progesterone concentrations govern implantation rates for cryopreserved embryo transfers conducted under hormone replacement  John L.
S. T. Yang, J. X. Shi, F. Gong, S. P. Zhang, C. F. Lu, K. Tan, L. Z
Alexis Adler, Hsaio-Ling Lee, David H
No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal.
Intra-cycle variation of the uterine cavity indentation assessed with three-dimensional ultrasound in natural and stimulated cycles  Sotirios H. Saravelos,
Epigenetic effects on the embryo as a result of periconceptional environment and assisted reproduction technology  Emma Lucas  Reproductive BioMedicine.
Morphokinetic parameters in chromosomal translocation carriers undergoing preimplantation genetic testing  Jenna Lammers, Arnaud Reignier, Carole Splingart,
Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?
Stephen C. Collins, Esther Chan  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Pietro Gambadauro, Ramesan Navaratnarajah 
Tetsuya Ishii  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
The Alpha Consensus Meeting on the professional status of the clinical embryologist: proceedings of an expert meeting    Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Response: time-lapse systems for ART
Time-lapse analysis of mouse embryo development in oxygen gradients
Laser-assisted hatching improves clinical outcomes of vitrified–warmed blastocysts developed from low-grade cleavage-stage embryos: a prospective randomized.
New approaches to embryo selection
Christopher W. Stamatkin, Reumen G. Roussev, Mike Stout, Carolyn B
Microdrop preparation factors influence culture-media osmolality, which can impair mouse embryo preimplantation development  J.E. Swain, L. Cabrera, X.
Assessing the true incidence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos
Ovarian reserve screening before contraception?
Live birth following early follicular phase oocyte collection and vitrified-warmed embryo transfer 8 days later  Safak Hatırnaz, Ebru Hatırnaz, Baris.
Implantation of fresh and thawed–warmed embryos in single embryo transfer cycles: interpreting the initial beta-HCG  Cynthia K. Sites, Peter St Marie,
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Comparison of the efficacy of two commercially available media for culturing one-cell embryos in the in vitro fertilization mouse model  Paulo Marcelo.
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Presentation transcript:

In vitro culture of individual mouse preimplantation embryos: the role of embryo density, microwells, oxygen, timing and conditioned media  Rebecca L. Kelley, David K. Gardner  Reproductive BioMedicine Online  Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 441-454 (May 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.001 Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Microwells in (A) well-of-the-well (Primo Vision) and (B) single microwell (EmbryoScope) format. Not to scale. The Primo Vision dish is shown here in 9-well format, but the 16-well format was also tested. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2017 34, 441-454DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.001) Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effect of single culture during precompaction or postcompaction stages. Between 90 and 120 embryos were cultured per treatment, from five independent biological replicates. (A) Bars represent the proportion of embryos that reached the nominated developmental stage or beyond on each day of culture (70, 94 and 118 h after HCG). No significant differences were found between treatments. (B) Bars represent cells per blastocyst (mean ± SEM). Embryos were stained at 118 h after HCG. Different letters represent significant differences between treatments in total cell number (Group versus Single/Group: P < 0.05; others: P < 0.01); trophectoderm cells (P < 0.05); inner cell mass (Group versus Single: P < 0.05; others P < 0.01). ICM, inner cell mass; TE, trophectoderm. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2017 34, 441-454DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.001) Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Effect of embryo density and oxygen on single embryo development. Between 92 and 101 embryos were cultured per treatment, individually, from four independent biological replicates. (A) Bars represent the proportion of embryos that reached the nominated developmental stage or beyond on each day of culture (70, 94 and 118 h after HCG). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments within each time point (day 4: oxygen: P < 0.01; density: P > 0.05; interaction between oxygen and density: P < 0.05. Day 5: oxygen: P < 0.001; density: P > 0.05; interaction: P > 0.05). (B) Bars represent cells per blastocyst (mean ± SEM). Embryos were stained at 118 h after HCG. Different letters represent significant differences between treatments in total cell number (a–b: P < 0.05; ab–c: P < 0.001), trophectoderm cells (d–e: P < 0.01; de–f: P < 0.001) or inner cell mass (g–h: P < 0.01). No significant differences in percent inner cell mass. ICM, inner cell mass; TE, trophectoderm. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2017 34, 441-454DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.001) Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure  4 Effect of culture in microwell dishes on morphokinetics, relative to single culture in a 2 µl drop. Data from Table 2 are represented here as (mean cleavage time) – (mean control cleavage time) ± SEM. This is for graphical representation only, and statistics have are described in the Materials and methods section. Notation of cleavage events are described in the Materials and methods section. All cultures were performed in a MCOK-5M[RC] time-lapse incubator (Sanyo Electric). Between 88 and 96% of embryos developed to the hatching blastocyst stage in all treatments. Between 23 and 48 embryos were cultured per treatment, from three independent biological replicates. *indicates significantly different to control 2 µl drop; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2017 34, 441-454DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.001) Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure  5 Effect of culture in microwell dishes on cell numbers. Bars represent cells per blastocyst (mean ± SEM); n = 71–116 embryos per treatment, from five independent biological replicates. Embryos were stained at 124 h after HCG. All cultures took place in a MCOK-5M[RC] time-lapse incubator (Sanyo Electric). *indicates significantly different to control 2 µl drop; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. ICM, inner cell mass; TE, trophectoderm. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2017 34, 441-454DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.001) Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effect of embryo-conditioned media on individual embryos. Embryos were cultured individually in conditioned media (obtained from the culture of grouped embryos; n = 10 per group; total = 560) or individually or grouped in control media (media incubated without embryos); n = 56–57 per treatment, from three independent biological replicates. (A) Bars represent the proportion of embryos that reached the nominated developmental stage or beyond on each day of culture (70, 94 and 118 h after HCG). *indicates significantly different to other treatments (P < 0.05). (B) Bars represent cells per blastocyst (mean ± SEM). Embryos were stained at 118 h after HCG. Different letters represent significant differences between treatments (P < 0.01). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2017 34, 441-454DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.001) Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions