Coking Process Coking is the Most Widely Used Resid Conversion Approach Worldwide! Delayed Coking – Furnace & Drum, Batch Process, Coke Pits FLEXICOKING™

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Advertisements

Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
Activity & Stability of [Emim] 2 ZnBr 2 Cl 2 & [Bu 4 N] 2 ZnBr 2 Cl 2 Catalysts due to Weight Ratio of Substrate/Catalyst & Temperature Variations Ethylene.
September Wood to Warmth – Bioenergy Appliances Michael Beech TV Energy.
1 1  1 =.
Valorisation of Low-Grade Waste Heat
1Revision 5 BUSH POWER GROUP LLC The Woodlands, Texas Presentation to.
Introduction to Alternative Heating Systems South West Chicken Association, April 2013.

Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC)
For Steam Boilers & Hot Air, Fresh Air, et al.. Thermostat Demand Analysis over time resets burner fire time for steam boiler. This will remove the leads.
Alternative Fuel Burner Applications
Main Steam Cycle Let the fun begin….
ENERGY SAVING IN STEAM GENERATION AND TRANSPORT IN FOOD INDUSTRY
Aston University Bioenergy Research Group (BERG) Dr Daniel J
Furnaces also called Fired Heaters
Decomposition of fossil fuels for hydrogen production
Energy- and exergy efficiencies of stationary LT and HT – fuel cell systems Summer school on electrochemical engineering, Palic, Republic of Serbia Prof.
Coal Gasification Characteristics: Focus on high ash Indian Coal Presented by Dr. Kalyan Sen Former Director, Central Fuel Research Institute (CFRI) and.
EnvironmentEnvironnementCanada Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia September 5 – 7, Part 4: LFG Utilization.
10 CHAPTER Refrigeration Cycles.
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) IGCC is basically the combination of the gasification unit and the combined cycle. It has high efficiency.
BioAsia Presents Coal to Diesel Conversion Local - Environmental - Profitable.
Developing Coal Tar/ Petroleum Pitches
True-false questions. ( A point not previously introduced will occasionally be made.) ● That a petroleum liquid approximates in composition to CH 2 is.
Convert Bottom-of-the-Barrel to Diesel and Light Olefins
30 th ISTC Japan Workshop on Advanced Catalysis Technologies in Russia Fluidized bed catalytic pyrolysis and gasification of biomass for production of.
EGEE 102 – Energy Conservation And Environmental Protection Energy Efficiency.
BURNING FUELS Noadswood Science, Burning Fuels To know the processes involved with burning fuels Monday, May 11, 2015.
Boiler FGT HRSG Coal Air To CO 2 - extraction Ash Power.
Coal Gasification : A PRB Overview Mark Davies – Kennecott Energy Outline Background – Our Interest History – Development of IGCC Current status – Commercial.
COAL IS GOOOOOD!!!!! GOOD COAL GOOD COAL IS GOOOOOD!!!!!
Catalytic cracking Catalytic cracking
Petroleum The Refining Process.
Advanced Biomass-based Combined Heat and Power System Combined Heat & Power in the Pacific Northwest October 15, 2002 Nathan E. Carpenter Manager, Energy.
Group 6: Jacob Hebert, Michael McCutchen, Eric Powell, Jacob Reinhart
Combustion AND Emissions Performance of syngas fuels derived from palm shell and POLYETHYLENE (PE) WASTE VIA CATALYTIC STEAM GASIFICATION Chaouki Ghenai.
COAL GASIFICATION GASIFICATION ONLY REASONABLE WHEN PLANT IS INTEGRATED SOME PROCESSES ARE COMMERCIAL H 2 S REMOVAL BY THE CLAUS PROCESS H 2 S + O 2 =
Özgül AYYILDIZ.  Thermal Processing of Solid Wastes  Combustion Systems  Pyrolysis  Gasification  Case Studies  Conclusion.
Title: Coal Cowboy Duration: 00:12:51 Link: engr
SynGas Gasifier ALTERNATIVE ENERGY Technology Presentation.
Next Generation OBIGGS: Developments at Phyre Technologies
Mississippi Power Kemper County IGCC Plant
TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Dr. V. K. Sethi, Research Adviser CENTRE FOR ENERGY TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING OSMANIA UNIVERSITY.
Gasifier/Feedstock Effect on Syngas Composition Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University 1.
INVESTIGATION OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF LAFIA-OBI COAL IN A FLUIDIZED BED COMBUSTION CHAMBER O.T. POPOOLA and A. A. ASERE Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Two-fluid models for fluidized bed reactors: Latest trends and challenges Yassir Makkawi Chemical Engineering.
PRESENTED BY: S.Neelakandan, R.S.Karthikeyan, P.Ashok, GUIDED BY: V.S.Venkatesan, Prof. S.Vijayaraj Final Year Mechanical, (HOD/MECH) A.V.C College of.
Refinery Processes Muhammad Fahad Ansari.
Lecture Objectives: Continue with power generation Learn basics about boilers and furnaces.
DEVELOPMENT OF A FLUIDIZED BED COAL GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Ansaldo Ricerche S.p.A. Carbon Dioxide capture Berlin, March 2008.
XtL – the Topsøe Approach. 2 Presentation outline  General introduction –Haldor Topsøe –What is XtL? –Focus of this presentation  Building blocks –Gasification.
Agenda 1.Quiz on Chapter 4 (5% added to Test 1) 2.Discuss anaerobic digestion and gasification 3.Watch video(s) on “Future of Bioenergy” 4.Example on gaseous.
Coal By: J.J. O’Bannon and James Pease. What is coal used for?
1 Tallahassee Plant Design Gasifier OLGA Prime movers.
“ The Solution to Future Fuel”. The Fischer Cats Ali Al Musabeh Auto-Thermal Reactor Specialist Faraj Almarri Auto-Thermal Reactor Specialist Mohammed.
HEAT-GENERATING EQUIPMENT INTRODUCTION SELECTION EFFICIENCY FURNACES BOILERS CENTRAL HVAC SYSTEMS.
EGEE 102 – Energy Conservation And Environmental Protection Energy Efficiency.
HOSTED BY: SUPPORTED BY:.
PRIMARY ENERGY SOURCES
The oil industry Wan Chi Chao (Jessie) 12F.
Making Hydrogen with Nuclear Energy for Liquid Fuels
Conversion Process: Catalytic cracking Hydrocracking Thermal cracking
Furnace Heat Transfer & Steam Generation
Trends, Challenges, Opportunities Presentation to PEMEX Refining,
Conversion Processes: Cracking
Chapter Seven: Solvent Deasphalting and Thermal Cracking (Bottom of the Barrel) Processes.
Conversion Processes: Cracking
Conversion Processes: Cracking
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Girish Chitnis Ms. Marie Wright Mr. Glen Phillips Economically Attractive and Environmentally Friendly FLEXICOKING™ Resid Upgrading Technology Dr. Girish Chitnis Ms. Marie Wright Mr. Glen Phillips International Conference on “Refining Challenges - Way Forward' 16-17 April, 2012 New Delhi

Coking Process Coking is the Most Widely Used Resid Conversion Approach Worldwide! Delayed Coking – Furnace & Drum, Batch Process, Coke Pits FLEXICOKING™ – Fluidized Bed, Continuous, Coke Silos and Closed System – Environmental considerations important for both Coke by-product Yield Typically 1/3 of Feed Similar amount for other resid conversion processes Product: (a) Yield (wt%) Fuel Gas & LPG 10 C5+ Liquids 55 Coke 35 Total 100 Delayed Coking (several providers) FLEXICOKINGTM (ExxonMobil) Heavy Crudes Resids FLEXICOKING Eliminates the Coke!

FLEXICOKING Technology: Simple Air + Steam Integrated Gasifier Design Products to Fractionator Feed FLEXIGAS to Coke‑Fines, Water & Sour Component Removal Heater Hot Coke FLEXIGAS Gasifier Reactor Air from Blower Cold Coke Steam Purge coke

FLEXICOKING Schematic Steam

FLEXICOKING Products Same Liquid Yields as Delayed Coking Coke Gasified in a Simple Integrated Steam + Air Gasifier Produces Clean CO/H2 Fuel Gas (FLEXIGAS) Product Instead of Coke FLEXSORB® Hindered Amine Reduces H2S to Low Level Low SOX Nitrogen Diluent Reduces BTU Content, But Low NOX FLEXIGAS Burned in Refinery, Third Party Furnaces / Boilers or for Power Steam Research and Engineering 4

FLEXIGAS Gives Positive Margin Over Delayed Coke as Fuel Shaded Region: FLEXICOKING becomes More Attractive Delayed Coking Becomes Less Attractive Delayed Coke Price 3 4 5 6 7 150.0 90.0 60.0 30.0 0.0 -30.0 120.0 FLEXIGAS at Parity with NG Price, $/mm Btu $20 / tonne FLEXIGAS Margin over Delayed Coke M$/Year $100 / tonne Achieve Higher Margins over Delayed Coking

FLEXICOKING Gasification & POX Comparison Partial Oxidation Product Fuel Gas Syngas / H2 / Fuel Gas Components CO/ H2 / N2 CO / H2 Heat Content, kJ/kg 5250 9375 Process Gases Steam / Air Oxygen (a) Temperature, °C 870 - 980 1090 - 1370 Pressure, barg 2 – 4 20 – 70 Slag Avoid formation Disposal is an Issue Materials Refractory Lined Carbon Steel Simple Inlet Distributor Brick Lined Complex Alloy Nozzles Cycle Length, months 36-48 <6 (b) Capex $ $$$ a. Typically Requires air separation plant b. Per Gasifier. Overall reliability improves with spares

FLEXIGAS as a REFINERY FUEL

FLEXIGAS Use in Commercial FLEXICOKING Units Significant Fraction of FLEXIGAS Consumed within Refineries Excess FLEXIGAS Used for Fuel in Nearby Power Plants Rotterdam Exports Higher BTU Content Fuel Gas SITE FLEXIGAS (MW) FLEXIGAS Used in Refinery (%) Off Site Consumers 1 PDVSA, Venezuela 600 28 Large boiler / power plant consumes majority of Flexigas 2 ExxonMobil Baytown 430 100 Flexigas used on site Very large/ complex refinery with large number of on site fuel users 3 ExxonMobil Rotterdam 450 82 Burn majority of FLEXIGAS onsite Sell ~270 MW high BTU fuel gas offsite 4 Shell California ~300 ~100 Primarily use FLEXIGAS in refinery 5 Showa Shell Japan 300 50 Large nearby power plant consumes ~50% of FLEXIGAS in boilers

FLEXICOKING Low Joule Gas Firing RHJG Burner Dual Fuel Burner Assembly LJG Burner Pilot Burner (HNJG)

Rotterdam Refinery Fuel Gas & Energy Grid Details

FLEXICOKING Rotterdam Refinery Environmental Dutch Refineries XOM Refinery Emission SO2 kt/jr 30,3 3,0 NOx kt/jr 9,9 1,0 Dust kt/jr 2,7 0,09 Capacity mt/jr 61 10 Low Sulphur Products kt/jr 35-45

FLEXIGAS for Power Generation Using Steam Cycle

TOA Oil FLEXICOKING Unit Started up in 1976 (21 kb/SD) Current Capacity: 27 kb/SD Fluid Solids Vessels: Gasifier on Left Heater in Center Reactor on Right Earthquake-Proof Structure FLEXIGAS Users Refinery Furnaces 50% Power Plant Boilers 50%

TOA Power Generation using FLEXIGAS Operation Began in 2003 in Cooperation with Electric Power Company LCG is Supplied as Fuel for Steam-Generating Boiler Steam is Used for Power Generation and also by Refineries Stable Supply of Electricity and Steam Power Plant Demand Outpaces FLEXIGAS Production TOA OIL Keihin Refinery Genex (Power-Generating Plant) Vacuum Residue Fraction Products Steam Boiler 37 % Low Calorie Gas (LCG) 21 % Frac. L/E High Calorie Gas Waste Heat Boiler (C1, C2) 33 % FCC HCG Gas LPG (C3, C4) Gas Turbine 9 % Refinery furnaces 100 % G R H Gas Turbine: ~80 MW Steam Turbine: ~190 MW Total ~ 270 MW Air & Steam

FLEXIGAS for Power Generation Using Combined Cycle

FLEXICOKING and GTCC: A Case Study FLEXICOKING Unit Material reproduced with permission from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI). All rights reserved

MHI’s Equipment Layout Approx. 200 m Approx. 60 m Gas Cooler Gas Compressor BFG Gas Mixer CO G E.P. Steam Turbine Generator Gas Turbine HRSG Stack Inlet Air Filter Transformer Material reproduced with permission from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI). All rights reserved 17

Capex for Power Generation Using Steam or Combined Cycle

Relative Total Investment Cost (TIC) Add a Simple Gasifier for Only 30% More Capex than Delayed Coker

Simple Payout versus Electricity Price Shorter Payout with FLEXICOKING and Power Generation

FLEXIGAS for H2, N2, CO2, Ammonia and Urea Production

Flexibility of H2, CO2, NH3, Urea and Power Production From FLEXIGAS Excess FLEXIGAS used as refinery fuel Power Generation Combined Cycle Rankine Cycle MW-hr PSA Offgas Purge Gas Heater Overhead and FLEXSORB® FLEXIGAS Compression Hydrogen Shift CO2 Removal Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Ammonia Production Ammonia Urea Production Urea CO2

FLEXICOKING: Operating Commercially for 35+ Years TOA Oil - First Commercial Unit S/U in 1976, Expanded in 2002 Currently 5 Units Operating With a Total Capacity of ~200 kB/D Hellenic Petroleum Unit under construction PetroPeru Unit under design Rosneft is latest unit and also under design COMPANY LOCATION FEED RATE, kB/D TOA Oil Japan 27 PDVSA Venezuela 65 Shell California 22 ExxonMobil Netherlands 42 Texas Hellenic Greece 21 PetroPeru Peru Rosneft Russia 50 23

SUMMARY FLEXICOKING Technology is Well Proven Eliminates Coke Production Coke Upgraded into a Clean FLEXIGAS by Gasification Gasification using Steam +Air is Cheaper, More Reliable and Simpler than POx FLEXIGAS is Suitable as a Cheap Refinery Fuel No Limitations in Using FLEXIGAS for Power Generation Power generation Payout is More Attractive than Delayed Coking Route Power Generation Schemes are Commercially Proven FLEXIGAS is suitable for ammonia/urea production or for production of H2, N2 and CO2 24

Coking and Integrated Steam / Air Gasification FLEXICOKING Coking and Integrated Steam / Air Gasification Questions Sunset at TOA Oil, Keihin Refinery ( Mizue )

FLEXIGAS + GTCC Gives Higher Cash Flow 120+M$ Higher Annual Cash Flow than Delayed Coking + IGCC Power Generation

FLEXICOKING Advantages Versus Other Options Milder Conditions and Significantly Lower Capital Cost than POx No issues such as Disposal of Slag, UCO No Air Separation Unit Needed Fluid Bed Coke Gasification FLEXICOKING CO / H2 / N2 Fuel Gas Coking Conversion Step Gasification Step FULLY INTEGRATED Steam/Air Competing Options Delayed Coking Ebullating Bed SDA Conversion Step Partial Oxidation Gasification Gasification Step CO / H2 SynGas Air Separation Oxygen SEPARATE PROCESS