Vascular access survival and incidence of revisions: A comparison of prosthetic grafts, simple autogenous fistulas, and venous transposition fistulas from the United States Renal Data System Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study Kathleen D. Gibson, MDa, Daniel L. Gillen, BSb, Michael T. Caps, MD, MPHc, Ted R. Kohler, MDa, Donald J. Sherrard, MDd, Catherine O. Stehman-Breen, MD, MSd Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 694-700 (October 2001) DOI: 10.1067/mva.2001.117890 Copyright © 2001 Society for Vascular Surgery and The American Association for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Subgroup estimates comparing prosthetic grafts with simple fistulas regarding (A) the risk of primary access failure and (B) the rate of access revision. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2001 34, 694-700DOI: (10.1067/mva.2001.117890) Copyright © 2001 Society for Vascular Surgery and The American Association for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Subgroup estimates comparing venous transposition fistulas with simple fistulas regarding (A) the risk of primary access failure and (B) the rate of access revision. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2001 34, 694-700DOI: (10.1067/mva.2001.117890) Copyright © 2001 Society for Vascular Surgery and The American Association for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Subgroup estimates comparing prosthetic grafts with venous transposition fistulas regarding (A) the risk of primary access failure and (B) the rate of access revision. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2001 34, 694-700DOI: (10.1067/mva.2001.117890) Copyright © 2001 Society for Vascular Surgery and The American Association for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions