A comparison of revision using distal inflow and distal revascularization-interval ligation for the management of severe access-related hand ischemia Jonathan Misskey, MD, Cathevine Yang, BSc, Shaun MacDonald, MD, FRCSC, Keith Baxter, MD, MSc, FRCS(C), York Hsiang, MBChB, MHSc, FRCS(C) Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages 1574-1581 (June 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.100 Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Overall primary patency of the revision using distal inflow (RUDI) and distal revascularization-interval ligation (DRIL) revisions during follow-up. The dotted lines indicate standard error of the mean >10%. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2016 63, 1574-1581DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.100) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Overall secondary patency of the revision using distal inflow (RUDI) and distal revascularization-interval ligation (DRIL) revisions during follow-up. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2016 63, 1574-1581DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.100) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions