Drum –Buffer-Rope Based on : R. Holt, Ph.D., PE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THEORY OF CONSTRAINTS & DRUM – BUFFER - ROPE
Advertisements

Short-term Capacity Optimization
Why we’re doing this together… We are here to focus on the packaging and delivery of the astonishing things that you do.
Engineering Management Tidbits! © Washington State University James R. Holt, Ph.D., PE Professor Engineering.
© 2007 Pearson Education Constraint Management Chapter 7.
Drum –Buffer-Rope Skorkovský Based on : R. Holt, Ph.D., PE.
7 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Constraint Management (Short-term Capacity Planning) 7.
Theory of Constraints Scheduling APICS PDM January 14, 2009.
Theory of Constraints Part II: TOC Concepts
Critical Chain Project Management
Homework Assignment EM 530 Applications in Constraints Management © Washington State University James R. Holt,
23–1. 23–2 Chapter Twenty-Three Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 18 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints
James R. Holt, Ph.D., PE. Constraints Management Washington State University’s Engineering Management Program
Lecture of © Washington State University Introduction to TOC Topics DBR, Critical Chain, Replenishment Overview EM 530 Applications in Constraints.
7 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Constraint Management 7 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
Fundamental Exam Review
© Washington State University Intro to the Theory of Constraints (A lecture introducing a portion of the Physical side of the Theory of Constraints)
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints.
Little´s law Skorkovský ,KPH,ESF.MU
Inventory System Inventory system: the set of policies and controls that monitor levels of inventory and determines: –what levels should be maintained.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Manufacturing Planning and Control MPC 6 th Edition Chapter.
1 Slides used in class may be different from slides in student pack Chapter 18 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints  Goldratt’s Rules.
Supply Chain Management: The Game Developed for the Engineering Management Program James R. Holt, Ph.D., PE.
Dependent Events and Statistical Fluctuations
THEORY OF CONSTRAINTS (TOC) BY AMAR P. NARKHEDE. INTRODUCTION The theory of constraints is an overall management philosophy that aims at continually achieving.
CHAPTER Inventory Management.
Operations and Production Management
TOC in Supply Chain Management Dr. James R. Holt, PE (Jonah-Jonah) Washington State University NE Salmon Creek Avenue.
Introduction to the Theory of Constraints (TOC) & Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Major Mark McNabb.
Managing Processes and Capabilities CHAPTER THREE.
L EAN F LIGHT I NITIATIVE C ONFERENCE ©2012 M. Srinivasan 1 Focusing on Throughput Systems Thinking and the Theory of Constraints Mandyam (“Srini”) Srinivasan.
File:CCPGS05 CC present Page: 1 ETXPGS
 Copyright, Ansari, Bell, Klammer and Lawrence, Management Accounting: A Strategic Focus, Irwin-McGraw-Hill, THE THEORY OF CONSTRAINTS AND THROUGHPUT.
TOC 1 Theory Of Constraints. TOC 2 Theory of Constraints How does TOC differ from the conventional shop control theory? Throughput definition * Emphasis.
Drum –Buffer-Rope Based on : R. Holt, Ph.D., PE
Theory of constraints Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1.
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 17 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints.
1 Session 18 Implementation of TOC at Tosoh, SMD Laura Blum Production and Inventory Control Manager.
1 Theory of Constraints Short-term Capacity Optimization.
Drum –Buffer-Rope Skorkovský Based on : R. Holt, Ph.D., PE.
Drum –Buffer-Rope Based on : R. Holt, Ph.D., PE. Traditional Approach: Divide and Conquer Division of Labor breaks down linkages complex systems into.
Drum –Buffer-Rope Based on : R. Holt, Ph.D., PE. Traditional Approach: Divide and Conquer Division of Labor breaks down linkages complex systems into.
The Goal A Process of Ongoing Improvement Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox.
Purposes of Inventory 1. To maintain independence of operations. 2. To meet variation in product demand. 3. To allow flexibility in production scheduling.
Constraint Management Chapter 7 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Manufacturing Planning and Control
Introduction to the Theory of Constraints (TOC) & Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Major Mark McNabb.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved
MODULE 3 Manufacturing Methodologies
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
Drum –Buffer-Rope Skorkovský Based on : R. Holt, Ph.D., PE.
Inventory System Inventory system: the set of policies and controls that monitor levels of inventory and determines: what levels should be maintained when.
Chapter 4 Inventory Management.
Stock Control.
Value Stream Costing Mahmoud Al-Odeh, PhD Bemidji State University.
Synchronous Manufacturing
Constraint Management
Herbie – An Introduction to WiP Limits
Chapter 2:Theory of Constraints & ERP
Outline Introduction to Constraints
Drum –Buffer-Rope Skorkovský Based on : R. Holt, Ph.D., PE.
SE503 Advanced Project Management
Goldratt's Theory of Constraints (TOC)
TIME BASED COMPETITION
Theory of Constraints Part II: TOC Concepts
Theory of Constraint.
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
Presentation transcript:

Drum –Buffer-Rope Based on : R. Holt, Ph.D., PE

Traditional Approach: Divide and Conquer Division of Labor breaks down linkages complex systems into manageable chunks. Which is harder to manage? Left or Right? Left Right

We Measure Operational Efficiency Work flows from left to right through processes with capacity shown. Market Request 11 Process A B C D E RM FG Capability Parts/Day 7 9 5 8 6 Excellent Efficiency--Near 100% Chronic Complainer Too Much Overtime RM = raw material FG = finished goods

Reward Based on Efficiency Work flows from left to right. Process A B C D E RM FG Capability Parts/Day 7 9 5 8 6 Both found ways to look busy and appear to have a capacity of 5 parts/day.

In reality... Processes A and B won’t produce more than Process C for long. Process A B C D E RM FG Potential P/D 7 9 5 8 6 Reality 5 5 5 5 5 P/D=parts/day

Then Variability Sets In Processing times are just AVERAGE Estimates Process A B C D E 7 9 5 8 6 RM FG Reality 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2

Over all: 0,5*0,5*0,5*0,5*0,5=0,03125=3% Chance of 5 per day !!! What’s an Average? 50% Half the time there are 5 or more per day at each process--Half the time less Process A B C D E 7 9 5 8 6 RM FG Reality 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 Probability 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.25 Two at a time: 0.25 Over all: 0,5*0,5*0,5*0,5*0,5=0,03125=3% Chance of 5 per day !!!

Previous Solution: Inventory Put a day of inventory (WIP) at each process! WIP 5 5 5 5 5 Total 25 Process A B C D E 7 9 5 8 6 RM FG Variable 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 Process

System Variability Takes Over--Chaos Inventory (WIP) quickly shifts position. Inventory manager/expediter tries to smooth it out. Distribution problems result. Costs go up !!! WIP 3 0 10 8 4 Total 25 RM FG Process A B C D E 7 9 5 8 6 Variable 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 Process

System Variability Takes Over--Chaos An Average of 5 means sometimes 3 and some times 7 Process A B C D E WIP 3 0 10 8 4 Total 25 7 9 5 8 6 RM FG Variable 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 Process Shifting work-in-process creates large queues at some locations. This makes work wait longer to be processed.

System Variability Takes Over--Chaos Process A B C D E WIP 3 0 10 8 4 Total 25 7 9 5 8 6 RM FG Variable 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 Process Shifting work-in-process creates large queues at some locations. This makes work wait longer to be processed. Other workstations are starving for work (B) The work they could do is delayed because they have no input material. They can’t take advantage of their extra capability. So....... ?

System Variability Takes Over--Chaos Process A B C D E ->X 30 WIP 3 5 10 8 4 Total 25 7 9 5 8 6 RM FG Variable 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 5±2 Process So… Management Helps! Management puts in more work (Inventory) (rate of RM) to give everyone something to do! Result: It takes longer and longer from time of release until final shipping. More and more delay!!!!!!!!!!!

TOC Steps to Continuous Improvement Step 1. Identify the system’s constraint. Step 2. Exploit the system’s constraint. Step 3. Subordinate everything else to the above decision. Step 4. Elevate the system’s constraint. Step 5. If a constraint is broken (that is, relieved or improved), go back to Step 1. But don’t allow inertia to become a constraint.

Five Steps Applied to Flow Operations Step 3. Subordinate Everything Else (Rope) Step 2. Exploit the Constraint (Buffer the Drum) 12 WIP Total A B C D E Step 1. Identify the Constraint (The Drum) RM FG Step 4. Elevate the Constraint ($?) 7 9 5 8 6 Five Focusing Steps Step 5. If the Constraint Moves, Start Over

Understanding Buffers WIP Total 12parts/5parts per day=2.5 Days A B C D E FG RM 7 9 5 8 6 The “Buffer” is Time! In general, the buffer is the total time from work release until the work arrives at the constraint. Contents of the buffer ebb and flow within the buffer If different items spend different time at the constraint, then number of items in the buffer changes but Time in the buffer remains constant.

We need more than one Buffer There is variability in our suppliers. We need to protect ourselves from unreliable delivery. Raw Material Buffer There is variability in the Constraint. To protect our delivery to our customer we need a finished goods buffer. Finished Goods Buffer A B C D E RM FG 7 9 5 8 6

Buffer Time is Constant-Predictable Raw Material Buffer Finished Goods Buffer A B C D E RM FG 7 9 5 8 6 Raw Material Buffer 2 Days=10/5 Constraint Buffer 2.5 Days Finished Goods Buffer 1 Day Processing Lead Time is Constant

Buffer Management FG Constraint Buffer WIP Total 12/5=2.5 Days A B C D E FG RM 7 9 5 8 6 WO21 WO17 WO13 The Constraint is scheduled very carefully Buffer Managed by location Individual activities in the buffer are not scheduled WO20 WO16 WO12 WO19 WO15 WO11 WO18 WO14 WO10 2.5 Days Time until Scheduled at Constraint

Problem Identification RM Watch WO14 (Yellow) A B C D E Constraint schedule is in jeopardy! (Red Zone Hole) WO19 OK (Green) FG RM 7 9 5 8 6 WO19 Delayed Parts WO21 WO17 WO13 WO20 WO16 WO12 WO19 WO15 WO11 WO18 WO14 WO10 2.5 Days Time until Scheduled at Constraint

Additional Buffers Constraint Buffer (as we discussed) Protects the Constraint from running out of work Finished Goods Buffer Protects customer delivery from Constraint variation Raw Material Buffer Protects the Release of material from suppliers Assembly Buffer Facilitates speedy flow of products