M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 01 / 05 / 2009.
Advertisements

EEG-MEG source reconstruction
Dynamic causal Modelling for evoked responses Stefan Kiebel Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging UCL.
EEG/MEG Source Localisation
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION
Bayesian models for fMRI data
Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs Valentina Doria Georg Kaegi Methods for Dummies 19/03/2008.
M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium.
MEG/EEG Inverse problem and solutions In a Bayesian Framework EEG/MEG SPM course, Bruxelles, 2011 Jérémie Mattout Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre ? ?
OverviewOverview Motion correction Smoothing kernel Spatial normalisation Standard template fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map General Linear.
Topological Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, May 2014 Many thanks to Justin.
Overview Contrast in fMRI v contrast in MEG 2D interpolation 1 st level 2 nd level Which buttons? Other clever things with SPM for MEG Things to bear in.
The M/EEG inverse problem
J. Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich, Switzerland Bayesian inference.
Preprocessing II: Between Subjects John Ashburner Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.
Source Localization for EEG/MEG Stavroula Kousta Martin Chadwick Methods for Dummies 2007.
General Linear Model & Classical Inference
The M/EEG inverse problem and solutions Gareth R. Barnes.
General Linear Model & Classical Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM M/EEGCourse London, May.
Source localization for EEG and MEG Methods for Dummies 2006 FIL Bahador Bahrami.
Source localization MfD 2010, 17th Feb 2010
Statistical Analysis of M/EEG Sensor- and Source-Level Data Jason Taylor MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (CBU) Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience.
SENSOR LEVEL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION in M/EEG METHODS FOR DUMMIES Mrudul Bhatt & Wenjun Bai.
Generative Models of M/EEG: Group inversion and MEG+EEG+fMRI multimodal integration Rik Henson (with much input from Karl Friston)
SPM Course Zurich, February 2015 Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to.
Multimodal Brain Imaging Will D. Penny FIL, London Guillaume Flandin, CEA, Paris Nelson Trujillo-Barreto, CNC, Havana.
DCM for ERPs/EFPs Clare Palmer & Elina Jacobs Expert: Dimitris Pinotsis.
Multiple comparisons in M/EEG analysis Gareth Barnes Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM M/EEG Course London, May 2013.
EEG/MEG Source Localisation SPM Course – Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging – Oct ? ? Jérémie Mattout, Christophe Phillips Jean Daunizeau Guillaume.
EEG/MEG source reconstruction
Contrasts & Inference - EEG & MEG Himn Sabir 1. Topics 1 st level analysis 2 nd level analysis Space-Time SPMs Time-frequency analysis Conclusion 2.
Dynamic Causal Modelling for EEG and MEG
Methods for Dummies Overview and Introduction
EEG/MEG source reconstruction
Spatial Smoothing and Multiple Comparisons Correction for Dummies Alexa Morcom, Matthew Brett Acknowledgements.
Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston 18.
Methods for Dummies Second level Analysis (for fMRI) Chris Hardy, Alex Fellows Expert: Guillaume Flandin.
Dynamic Causal Model for evoked responses in MEG/EEG Rosalyn Moran.
Multiple comparisons problem and solutions James M. Kilner
Multimodal Brain Imaging Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College, London Guillaume Flandin, CEA, Paris Nelson Trujillo-Barreto, CNC,
Topological Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, May 2015 With thanks to Justin.
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 23 / 10 / 2009.
M/EEG: Statistical analysis and source localisation Expert: Vladimir Litvak Mathilde De Kerangal & Anne Löffler Methods for Dummies, March 2, 2016.
MEG Analysis in SPM Rik Henson (MRC CBU, Cambridge) Jeremie Mattout, Christophe Phillips, Stefan Kiebel, Olivier David, Vladimir Litvak,... & Karl Friston.
Bayesian Inference in SPM2 Will Penny K. Friston, J. Ashburner, J.-B. Poline, R. Henson, S. Kiebel, D. Glaser Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience,
General Linear Model & Classical Inference London, SPM-M/EEG course May 2016 Sven Bestmann, Sobell Department, Institute of Neurology, UCL
1 Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 23 / 10 / 2009 EEG-MEG source reconstruction.
Methods for Dummies M/EEG Analysis: Contrasts, Inferences and Source Localisation Diana Omigie Stjepana Kovac.
Imaging Source Reconstruction in the Bayesian Framework
Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin SPM Course London, October 2016
Topological Inference
Statistical Analysis of M/EEG Sensor- and Source-Level Data
General Linear Model & Classical Inference
SPM for M/EEG - introduction
M/EEG Analysis in SPM Rik Henson (MRC CBU, Cambridge)
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Dynamic Causal Model for evoked responses in M/EEG Rosalyn Moran.
Topological Inference
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Statistical Analysis of M/EEG Sensor- and Source-Level Data
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
SPM2: Modelling and Inference
Dynamic Causal Modelling for M/EEG
Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Bayesian Inference in SPM2
Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors
Dynamic Causal Modelling for evoked responses
DCM Demo – Model Specification, Inversion and 2nd Level Inference
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Presentation transcript:

M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization 2018-2019 Alisa Loosen & Matthew Nour Expert: dr Tim Tierney Methods for Dummies 2018/19

Review: What have we done with ERP? Stage 1 EEG Signal Capture Stage 2 Pre-processing Stage 3 Statistical Analysis

SENSOR SPACE ANALYSIS

Statistical analysis in sensor space 2D Time-Frequency (within-subject) Faces > Scrambled Faces Scrambled Kilner et al., 2005, Neuroscience Letters; Taylor, 2012

Statistical analysis in sensor space Contrast over subjects EEG MEG (Mag) frequency frequency -500 +1000 -500 +1000 Taylor, 2012 Time (ms) Time (ms)

3D topography x-time image volume Statistical analysis in sensor space 3D Topography by time (between-subjects) 3D topography x-time image volume time mm mm Kilner et al., 2005, Neuroscience Letters; Taylor, 2012

Multiple comparison problem Comparisons = Type I errors (false positives) Must consider Familywise Error Rate

Statistical corrections Bonferroni Correction Too conservative Random Field Theory is a method to correct for multiple statistical comparisons with N-dimensional spaces Takes smoothness in the image into account Implemented in SPM

SOURCE SPACE ANALYSIS

Source-space Analysis Forward Problem Inverse Problem

Analogy (Forward Model)

Analogy (Inverse Model)

Source-Space Analysis Inverse Problem Also known as ill-posed problem Too many possible solutions to explain measured current distributions Source-Space Analysis

General procedure for source-space analysis (distributed source imaging) Load pre-processed sensor-level data into SPM Define Forward Model (sources->data) Source space modelling (in MNI space) Define cortical mesh , using individual subject T1 MRI or SPMs head template model. Defines locations of possible sources (dipoles) in the skull (orientations are Normal to mesh surface) Dipole

General procedure for source-space analysis (distributed source imaging) Load pre-processed sensor-level data into SPM Define Forward Model (sources->data) Source space modelling (in MNI space) Define cortical mesh , using individual subject T1 MRI or SPMs head template model. Defines locations of possible sources (dipoles) in the skull (orientations are Normal to mesh surface) Data co-registration (maps sensors to MNI coordinates)

General procedure for source-space analysis (distributed source imaging) Load pre-processed sensor-level data into SPM Define Forward Model (sources->data) Source space modelling (in MNI space) Define cortical mesh , using individual subject T1 MRI or SPMs head template model. Defines locations of possible sources (dipoles) in the skull (orientations are Normal to mesh surface) Data co-registration (maps sensors to MNI coordinates) Forward computation Computes the gain matrix, describing the effect of activity at each cortical dipole (n = no. mesh vertices) on each MEG sensor. Computed using Maxwell’s equations, making assumptions about properties of the head. The lead field is the projection from dipole each source to scalp sensors (columns of gain matrix)

General procedure for source-space analysis (distributed source imaging) Inverse reconstruction – solves the inverse problem Uses empirical Bayesian approach (standard inversion uses ‘multiple sparse priors’ algorithm). Can add anatomical prior knowledge from literature or other imaging modalities to further constrain inversion. NB. Option of ‘group inversion’ also exists in SPM – adds a prior that the same cortical sources are engaged by all subjects. Time course of source with maximal activity Maximum intensity projection at time of maximal activity

General procedure for source-space analysis (distributed source imaging) Results visualisation Generate 3D NIfTI file of summary statistic images in terms of contrasts (mixtures of parameter or activity estimates to address experimental hypotheses) Proceed to GLM-based 2nd level statistical analysis in usual way (involves specifying time-frequency window of interest for each contrast image)

Equivalent Current Dipole (ECD) ‘Distributed’ reconstruction methods consider all possible source locations (vertices) on the cortical mesh simultaneously to generate the sensor data, allowing for distributed sources. An alternative is the ‘equivalent current dipole’ (ECD) approach, which assumes a small number (e.g. <5) of focal sources are active simultaneously to generate the sensor data. Number dipoles defined a priori (based on empirical knowledge). May be optimised – model comparison. Number of dipoles should be << no. channels/6 Parameterisation of model (location, orientation and signal amplitude at each dipole) optimised with nonlinear Variational Bayes

ECD vs. Distributed Dipoles

Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) Augments the forward model measured data are explained by a network of a few sources, which are dynamically coupled model inversion optimises model parameters Combines the spatial forward model (discussed previously) with a neurobiologically- informed temporal forward model. Allows inference about connectivity architectures As M/EEG data is highly time-resolved one can make inferences about e.g. synaptic time constants and receptor densities (impossible with DCM for fMRI).

References Kilner, J. and Friston, K. (2010). Topological inference for EEG and MEG. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 4(3), pp.1272-1290. J. Kilner, S.J. Kiebel, and K.J. Friston. Applications of random field theory to electrophysiology. Neuroscience Letters, 374:174-178, 2005. Litvak, V., Mattout, J., Kiebel, S., Phillips, C., Henson, R., Kilner, J., ... & Penny, W. (2011). EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2011. MfD presentations from previous years Lecture Slides from PSYCGC11 Neuroimaging by Dr Leun Otten Taylor, J. (2012). Statistical Analysis of M/EEG Sensor- and Source-Level Data.