School of Natural Resources Gund Institute of Ecological Economics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NPDES Phase II in Wake County: Forging A Collaborative Approach to Stormwater Management APWA Conference September 19, 2005.
Advertisements

Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
By: Carrie Turner Prepared for: New Jersey Association of Environmental Authorities Annual Conference March 12, 2013 Watershed Management Planning Provides.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
ENSC 202 – 2004 Impervious Cover Impacts of Impervious Cover Lecture 6 – ENSC 202.
Watershed and Rapid Geomorphic Assessment of Bay Brook and Centennial Brook in Vermont By: Abby Boak, Sarah Booker, Kate Connelly, Cara Massameno, and.
Ecosystems Climate and Land-Use Change Water Natural Hazards Core Science Systems Energy and Minerals, and Environmental Health U.S. Geological Survey.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Integration Of Stormwater Master Plans with Watershed Plans The Link between Flooding and Development September 23, 2008 Bob Murdock, P.E., CFM.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
A Plan to Get Savvy About Urban Watersheds Dan Cloak, Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting Beau Goldie, Santa Clara Valley Water District Lorrie Gervin,
Public Participation and the Advisory Committee Process A Collaborative Partnership For Water Resources Toni M. Johnson, Chief Water Information Coordination.
Stream Ecology (NR 280) Topic 13 – Human Impacts Threats to rivers Impacts of Urbanization Consequences for Lake Champlain.
TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research Douglas J. Norton USEPA Office of Water October 2005 Douglas J.
Hallstead Borough and the Northern Susquehanna River Watershed Association presents Hallstead Borough and the Northern Susquehanna River Watershed Association.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
IMLA New England Regional Land Use Seminar June 21, 2012 Work Session 2. Storm Water Management James N. Katsiaficas, Esq. P.O. BOX 426 PORTLAND, MAINE.
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Redesigning the American Neighborhood Developing an Ecological & Socioeconomic Framework for Effective Stormwater Management School of Natural Resources.
Quantifying Stream Ecosystem Responses to Smart Growth: How to Design an Assessment Allison Roy Cross-ORD Postdoctoral Researcher US Environmental Protection.
Noelle Patterson and Charlow Arzadon State Water Resources Control Board.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
1 Smart Growth and Brownfields Smart Growth: A Boon for Brownfields Redevelopment Brownfields 2006 Boston Convention & Exhibition Center November 15, 2006.
Module 5: Solutions – Sustainable Urban Communities MPP 655: Policy Making for Sustainable Urban Communities 1MPP Module 5.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
ENPARD I Pilot Rural Development Projects
Todd Petty, Mike Strager, and Michael Hasenmyer
* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *
DESTINATION PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 1
Economic Joint Venture model: summary of progress
Module 17: MIXING ZONES A limited area or volume of water where initial dilution of a discharge takes place and where numeric water quality criteria.
Environmental Intelligence Platform – Monitoring Nutrients Pollution with Earth Observation Data for Sustainable Agriculture and Clean Waters Blue.
Clayton Cox, AAAS Science & Technology Policy US EPA
Stakeholder Perspectives Field Visit
WAgriCo An NFU Perspective
Land Use Challenges In Maryland Today
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Introduction to Program Evaluation
Advocacy and CampaiGning
Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy - NLRS
Assessing the Los Angeles River Watershed
Climate and Green Plan Town Hall Toolkit
Liana Prudencio and Sarah E. Null
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Mapping Displacement Pressure in Chicago Neighborhoods
Association of State Drinking Water Administrators (ASDWA)
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Stormwater Management Tools
Estimation of Loadings for Nonpoint Sources and Stormwater
Strategies Achieving our Goals
The Possibility of Resilience
Strategies to Reduce P Loading and Sedimentation on Forestry Operations in Vermont First few slides will provide some background information on what we.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
Defining and Targeting High Flows
COMMUNITY BASED PLANNING
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Abby By: Abby Boak, Sarah Booker, Kate Connelly,
* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *
BRD The Development Bank of Rwanda Plc (BRD) is Rwanda’s only national Development Finance Institution Public limited company incorporated in 1967 and.
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Andrea Tilche Unit Head of the Water Key Action
Presentation transcript:

School of Natural Resources Gund Institute of Ecological Economics Redesigning the American Neighborhood Developing an Ecological & Socioeconomic Framework for Effective Stormwater Management School of Natural Resources - UVM School of Natural Resources Gund Institute of Ecological Economics Alan McIntosh, Breck Bowden, Alexey Voinov, John Todd Alex Hackman, and Tim White

The National Geographic Society (2001) The US at Night (1993 vs 2001) The National Geographic Society (2001)

Urban Sprawl in New England Burlington growth fragmentation corridors The National Geographic Society (2001)

Urban Sprawl Sprawl is dispersed, automobile-dependent development outside of compact urban and village centers along highways and in rural countryside.

Sprawl & Impervious Cover Center for Watershed Protection 2003

Center for Watershed Protection (2003) Flow as a ‘pollutant’ Higher highs/lower lows Intensification/flashiness Center for Watershed Protection (2003)

Runoff as a function of Imperviousness Center for Watershed Protection (2003) after Schueler (1987)

Northern Virginia Streams 0 10 20 30 40 50 Percent watershed impervious cover Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) 100 80 60 40 20 Fairfax County (2001) in CWP (2003)

Variation among subwatersheds Total watershed impervious cover Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) Horner and May (1999) in CWP (2003)

Typical Pollutant Concentration Ranges State of Maine (1995)

Are sediments the only concern? Comparison to selected VT Water Quality Standards No TSS causing impairment 0.010 – 0.054 mg/L total phosphorus 2 and 5 mg/l nitrate for Class A and B waters 10 ug/L acute, 8 ug/L chronic* 23 ug/L acute, <1 ug/L chronic* 57 ug/L acute, 52 ug/L chronic* <<1 mg/L as pesticides and PCB’s No oil or grease causing impairment 18 E. coli cfu/100ml 3x in 30days (A1 and A2) 33 E. coli cfu/100ml once (A1 and A2) 77 E. coli cfu/100 ml (B) at hardness of 50 mg/L Be sure to point out that the panel on the left is for the raw stormwater, while the panel on the left is the condition of the diluted receiving water. Nevertheless, any stormwater contribution will affect (and can impair) the receiving water. VT Stormwater Manual, Vol 2 VT Water Quality Standards

Impacts of Impervious Area Center for Watershed Protection (2003) as noted.

Sprawl, impervious area, & impairment Center for Watershed Protection 2003

Burton and Pitt (2002) Stormwater Effects Handbook Impaired Rivers Burton and Pitt (2002) Stormwater Effects Handbook

Burton and Pitt (2002) Stormwater Effects Handbook Impaired Lakes Burton and Pitt (2002) Stormwater Effects Handbook

Redesigning the American Neighborhood Developing an Ecological & Socioeconomic Framework for Effective Stormwater Management Purpose: To develop tools that will allow stakeholders, regulators, and researchers to visualize alternative future environmental states that they imagine collectively and then to optimize the mix of interventions at various scales, that will best balance environmental and social, as well as economic, criteria. Supported by US/EPA

Why focus on scale? Effectiveness: unknown Orientation: source control Cost: uncertain – low? Risk: unknown – medium/high Effectiveness: uncertain Orientation: local protection Cost: known - medium Risk: uncertain - medium Effectiveness: known – depends Orientation: downstream protection Cost: known - high Risk: known - low

Why focus on scale? Clearly, a mix of interventions is desirable. But what mix? For what purpose? Located where?

Primary Goal Quantify the balances among environmental, economic, and social costs and benefits for storm water management at whole-watershed, neighborhood, and individual house scales in a typical New England landscape and climate.

Key Objectives Assessment: What are the opportunities for intervention? Evaluation: What are the comparative cost/benefits of these interventions? Participation: How can we better involve community stakeholders to devise successful solutions? Implementation: Can we demonstrate the these approaches work?

Project Focus Area

Butler Farm Subdivision

Key Collaborations US-EPA/SNR-UVM (McIntosh, Bowden, Todd, Voinov) Partnership with South Burlington (JB Hoover) Collaboration with key consultants (PEC, J Nelson) Advice from key stakeholders (Project Working Groups) EPA Demonstration grant (JB Hoover) NRCD implementation grant (A. Willard, B. Gabos)

Stormwater management matters

Fortuitous Timing Vermont ANR ‘Watershed Improvement Permits’ Vermont Water Resources Board ‘Investigative Docket’: What is the technical basis for stormwater management in Vermont?

Key Questions in the WRB Investigation Is it feasible to use ‘source control’ as a primary option? Can improvements be achieved in 5 years? Can we separate and deal with natural vs man-made sources of pollutants? Is a TMDL approach the best way to address clean up streams impaired by stormwater? Are stormwater ‘offsets’ a reasonable approach to stormwater management? Can we predict how ‘indicators’ of impairment will respond to stormwater treatment strategies? What is the best way to evaluate progress toward desired goals? What are the best ‘targets’ to judge when we have attained desirable goals? If we can’t attain the standards we want, what should we do?

What can science do to help solve complex problems? The “perspectives” of science: basic - applied The “limits” of science: unpredictability - precaution The “fallibility” of science: reductionist - wholistic What are the indicators of good RS&T?

Opportunities Vermont (and Potash Brook) have become ‘ground zero’ for stormwater issues regionally as well as nationally Several partners have come together to form the RAN collaboration. The RAN collaboration is in a position to contribute significantly to this debate.

Thank you!

National Event Mean Concentrations Center for Watershed Protection (2003)

Impacts of Deposited Sediments Center for Watershed Protection (2003)

Impacts of Suspended Sediments Center for Watershed Protection (2003)

Potential pollutants other than sediments A measure of variance in the data. National EMC background Burton and Pitt (2002) Stormwater Effects Handbook

University Mall

Williston Road/Burlington Airport

I-189/Shelburne Road

Some immediate responses to the October 2003 SNR Board Meeting Seminar in Urban Watershed Management (Bowden) Panel Discussion on Urban Sprawl (Bowden) Seminar in Stormwater Modeling (Bowden) Seminar in EcoVillage Design (Costanza et al.) Ecological Design & Living Technologies (Todd) Urban planning and policy development (Troy) Ecological Economics (Erikson)