Current situation The submission of AQ Appeals and AQ Amendments using two alternative dates and reads that provide a more realistic indication of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presenters:- Steve Nunnington xoserve & Sallyann Blackett E.on Sallyann Blackett E.on Rolling AQ – A Straw Man.
Advertisements

12/10/20141 Project Nexus Workgroup Settlement Issues 15 th May 2012.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic) Meeting 3, 18 th July 2011.
Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
1 Project Smart Metering Portfolio Foundation Updates June 2013.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
AQ Amendment: Relevant UNC obligations and additional Validations Applied 27 May 2010.
AQ Overview.  Annual Quantity (AQ) is a value held for each meter point that reflects the expectation as to the volume of gas that a meter point will.
Project Nexus Workgroup AQ Backstop Date Options 7 th October 2014.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Project Nexus Workgroup Read Validation following Transfer of Ownership 13 th October
CSEPs Reconciliation “Read Window” proposal. 2 Background  I&C CSEPs (supply point AQ >73,200) are subject to reconciliation  IGTs are obliged to provide.
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
PN UNC Workgroup iGT Services 7 th February 2012.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 25 October 2010.
Project Nexus Workgroup Extension of Modification 0434 to permit retrospective updates pre-dating Project Nexus Go Live Date 9 th September 2014.
PN UNC Workgroup Read Validation 4 th October 2011.
1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.
Version PNUNC AQ Principles Workgroup Mod 0209 – Rolling AQ Presenter: Steve Nunnington 23 rd March 2010.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 24 th October Objectives of the Workgroups To determine detailed business requirements Consider/review comments made.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement Issues 1 st November 2011.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
CONFIDENTIAL - Mod Initial Business Rules © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Project Nexus Workgroup (Settlement)
Must Read Process Guide For Shippers
Incentives 26 September 2018.
Reduction of Exit Capacity at DM Supply Points
Project Nexus Workgroup
Project Nexus Workgroup
RAASP – Solution Options Scenario Comparison
CSEPs Reconciliation Proposals
Chris Warner Network Code Manager
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
UNC Modification Proposal 0362
Industry Shipperless & Unregistered Working Group
CSS Consequential Change CoS Shell Record Submission for Discussion at 630R 27th April 2018.
Project Nexus Workgroup
AQ Review and Revision Processes & Development of the Current Regime
CONFIDENTIAL - Review Group 272 © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc
Transporter Initiated SPA Confirmations on behalf of User Potential Impact Discussion with UK Link Committee.
UK Link Replacement Programme additional supporting UNC modifications
SPA Processes for DM Sites
SSP – PROVISIONAL LSP – SSP AMENDMENT RULES
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
Nexus Workgroup Winter Consumption and the influence on Winter Annual Ratio (WAR) Bands 8th January 2014.
Lessons Learnt UKLC - November 2015
Project Nexus Workgroup
MOD 640 INVOICING VALIDATION RULES
DN Interruption Phase II
Project Nexus Workgroup
Development Work Group 0209 Straw Man Update
UNC Modification 0634 (Urgent) – Post Implementation Assessment
Implementation Approach Distribution Workgroup – June 2014
Modification Proposal 136
Meter Read Rejections ..
Meter Reads.
Project Nexus Workgroup
COR3007: UNC MOD 450B – Monthly revision of erroneous SSP AQs outside the User AQ Review Period Implementation UK Link Committee – May 2014.
Project Nexus Workgroup
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Annual Quantity (AQ) 45.
Further Considerations
Presentation transcript:

UNC Modification Proposal 0248 Meter Reading Replacement for AQs Chris Warner

Current situation The submission of AQ Appeals and AQ Amendments using two alternative dates and reads that provide a more realistic indication of the site’s consumption. There is an AQ Appeal/Amendment process which will allow the use of Meter Readings not currently registered within the Sites and Meters Database. There is the existing functionality to utilise a Meter Reading prior to Transfer of Ownership when challenging an AQ through the AQ Amendments process. The ability to replace the latest read; this functionality remains available up until a subsequent read has successfully loaded onto Sites and Meters database. Shipper Agreed Read process used to replace any opening transfer read whether estimated or provided by the incoming User.

Points for consideration Supply Points could fluctuate between the Domestic (SSP) and I&C (LSP) sectors failing to calculate a reflective AQ Value. The AQ Amendments process would be discontinued in the event that Modification Proposal 0209 were implemented. The aspiration of Modification Proposal 0209 is to deliver a more timely AQ calculation. This would potentially create more accurate consumption information. However, more recent reads are required to calculate an AQ value rather than historic reads. Only reads submitted after the previous year’s AQ calculation would be considered for future AQ calculations.

Points for consideration Replacement of Meter Readings prior to the UNC backstop date would offer no value as any reads prior to this date are not considered for AQ calculation (UNC TPD H3.2.3). Backstop date is currently 30th September 2002 (Changes to 30th Sept 2007 from 2010). Allowing the replacement of any read may have the effect of appearing to disincentivising diligence in validating Meter Readings prior to submission by the shipper/supplier. Effective User read validation routines may reduce the requirement to replace historic reads.

Points for consideration Modification Proposal 0242, is seeking to increase the current read window. Should this be implemented the aspiration is an increased number of accepted accurate/validated reads loaded to Sites and Meters database. There is an existing process for replacing Opening Meter Readings. Any such read should be managed through the inter-Shipper dispute process. The expectation is that transfer reads are not subject to Modification Proposal 0248. Effective and timely management of asset data would see an improvement on accepted read data.

Other process impacts Query process may need to introduced to facilitate Transporters ability to check replacement reads? (No USRV produced). User Pays considerations? As per current process Transfer reads can only be replaced as a ‘Shipper Agreed Read’.

Potential system changes required Ability to accept a read previous to last read held on Sites & Meters. Requirement to create additional ‘read type’ and/or read source that allows read to be loaded to S&M but does not generate reconciliation/filter failures. However, there would be a requirement to consider for AQ process. Remove Registered System User validations (if requirement to replace reads regardless of RSU). Generation of file to the RSU (at the time of original read) supplying read replacement details.