Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Advertisements

Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Jianbin Wang, Julianne Garrey, Richard E. Davis  Current Biology 
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Highly Transcribed RNA Polymerase II Genes Are Impediments to Replication Fork Progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Anna Azvolinsky, Paul G. Giresi,
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Protein Occupancy Landscape of a Bacterial Genome
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages e5 (October 2017)
SAGA Is a General Cofactor for RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Suzanne Komili, Natalie G. Farny, Frederick P. Roth, Pamela A. Silver 
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Genomic Run-On Evaluates Transcription Rates for All Yeast Genes and Identifies Gene Regulatory Mechanisms  José Garcı́a-Martı́nez, Agustı́n Aranda, José.
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Andrew D. Bosson, Jesse R. Zamudio, Phillip A. Sharp  Molecular Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
John T. Arigo, Daniel E. Eyler, Kristina L. Carroll, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Andrew D Basehoar, Sara J Zanton, B.Franklin Pugh  Cell 
Cell-Type-Specific Control of Enhancer Activity by H3K9 Trimethylation
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
NanoRNAs Prime Transcription Initiation In Vivo
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Stefan Bresson, Alex Tuck, Desislava Staneva, David Tollervey 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Jong-Eun Park, Hyerim Yi, Yoosik Kim, Hyeshik Chang, V. Narry Kim 
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Predicting Gene Expression from Sequence
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Polycomb Protein Ezh1 Promotes RNA Polymerase II Elongation
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Global Position and Recruitment of HATs and HDACs in the Yeast Genome
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Stefan Bresson, Alex Tuck, Desislava Staneva, David Tollervey 
Epigenetic Silencing Mediates Mitochondria Stress-Induced Longevity
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Systematic Study of Nucleosome-Displacing Factors in Budding Yeast
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 171-183 (April 2005) Genome-Wide Analyses Reveal RNA Polymerase II Located Upstream of Genes Poised for Rapid Response upon S. cerevisiae Stationary Phase Exit  Marijana Radonjic, Jean-Christophe Andrau, Philip Lijnzaad, Patrick Kemmeren, Thessa T.J.P. Kockelkorn, Dik van Leenen, Nynke L. van Berkum, Frank C.P. Holstege  Molecular Cell  Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 171-183 (April 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.010 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Global Changes during Quiescence Exit and Entry (A) Schematic representation of a glucose starvation experiment, with circles representing the 39 samples analyzed. The single filled circle in the rapid exponential growth phase represents the common reference sample used in the microarray experiments. The open circle, left of the horizontal axis, represents the aliquot of the SP culture (day 9) that was used to start the experiment. See Experimental Procedures for a complete list of time points. (B) Cell count per OD600 throughout the culture (left) and for the first 40 hr (right). The colored bar represents the various culture periods, with abbreviations according to (A). (C) Number of cells/ml throughout the culture (left) and for the first 40 hr (right). (D) Total RNA per 108 cells. (E) Average poly(A) dot blot 32P radioactive signal per 108 cells as determined by analysis of two dot-blot experiments, one of which is depicted in (G). (F) poly(A) signal per 108 cells (open circles) and total RNA per 108 cells (filled circles) for the first 3 hr. (G) poly(A) dot blot for determination of mRNA levels throughout the experiment. The first dot (left upper corner) represents the 9-day SP culture from which the experiment was started. The 20th and 21st spot (counting from left to right) are duplicates of the 6.5 hr time point. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 171-183DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.010) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Genome-Wide Changes in Transcript Levels during Quiescence Exit and Entry (A) Standard, all genes normalized scatter-plot of average background-subtracted microarray gene spot intensities, comparing ML samples with SP samples (9 days). The three lines represent 2-fold up, no change, and 2-fold down boundaries, from top to bottom, respectively. Colored in red and green are genes that were determined to show statistically significant changes in mRNA expression in the analysis of the eight SP versus ML replicate measurements. (B) External control normalized result of the experiment shown in (A), with the same genes colored red and green as in (A). (C) External control-normalized result of a same versus same, ML replicate microarray hybridization. (D) Standard, all genes normalized, hierarchical clustering diagram for the entire time course (left to right) of all 6357 yeast genes represented on the microarrays. The colored bar on top represents the various culture periods, with abbreviations according to Figure 1A. Clustering was by average linkage analysis (UPGMA) with a standard (cosine) correlation. Table S1 contains a fully annotated version of the cluster diagram. (E) Hierarchical clustering diagram of the external control-normalized microarray data. (F) Expression ratios of 123 ribosomal protein genes throughout the time course when the data are normalized by the standard, all genes approach. The collective expression ratio of all genes is artificially set at 1 (no change) in each individual time point by this approach. The RPGs appear only to fluctuate once during the time course, at 20 hr. This actually represents the time point when these transcripts deviate most from the behavior of all the genes, with which the data are normalized here. (G) Expression ratios of 123 ribosomal protein genes when data are normalized with external controls. This results in ratios for each individual transcript, relative to the level of that transcript in the reference sample. The reference sample was ML, which is why all transcripts show a ratio of 1 at this time point. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 171-183DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.010) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Many Distinct Patterns of Gene Expression during Quiescence Exit and Entry (A) The average expression ratio of all genes across the time course. (B) Genes that most closely follow the average transcript behavior. (C) Rapid SP exit genes, transiently induced prior to both periods of proliferation. (D) Rapid SP exit genes, transiently induced only prior to proliferation on glucose. (E) Rapid SP exit genes, induced prior to proliferation and maintained at high levels during exponential growth. (F) Transcripts that fluctuate several times during the time course. These are mainly genes with uncharacterized molecular function and/or biological processes. (G) A group of uncharacterized/hypothetical ORFs induced at the end of lag phase. (H) Genes that escape the general DS repression and that are induced very early in DS, at 10–11 hr. (I) Similar to (H), but with less prominent induction. (J) Transcripts that peak at the end of rapid exponential growth and late in the DS. (K) Transposon TyB Gag-Pol genes. The tight coregulation is likely due to their overall identity. (L) Transposon TyA Gag genes. (M) Subtelomeric Y′ helicases and homologs. (N) A cluster of various functionally related genes induced late in lag-phase and including negative regulators of the Swe1p kinase, SPT6 and SPT16, genes involved in bud site selection and replication. (O) Transcripts that show two transient peaks, late in lag phase and very early during DS. Half of these genes are involved in mating. (P) SP enriched transcripts, induced late in DS and remaining high thereafter. This includes many of the stress and aerobic respiratory genes enriched in SP. (Q) SP enriched transcripts, more transiently induced late in DS, but still remaining elevated in SP compared to ML. This also includes many of the stress and aerobic respiratory genes enriched in SP. (R) SP enriched transcripts, as in (Q), but with an additional induction early in lag phase, although not immediately upon exit. This suggests that these genes may be required for transitions to any new carbon source. (S) SP enriched transcripts as in (Q) and (R) but that show a second induction upon SP entry after the postdiauxic growth phase. (T) SP enriched transcripts that start to rise late in lag phase and continue to do so into SP. This group includes previously characterized SP genes such as SNO1, SNZ1, and SNZ2. (U) SP enriched transcripts showing induction upon the transition between slow postdiauxic growth and SP. Groups (B)–(O) were obtained by clustering across the entire time course. Groups (P)–(U) were clustered based on their behavior only in the latter part of the time course. The genes depicted in each cluster are listed in Table S2. More genes with similar behavior can be found in Table S1. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 171-183DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.010) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The General Transcription Machinery Is Maintained during Quiescence (A) Rapid and broad transcription activation upon exit from stationary phase (SP). The expression ratios throughout the time course for the 769 genes induced more than 2-fold within the first 3 min of SP exit are depicted. The genes are listed in Table S3. (B) Western blot analysis of mid-log (ML) and stationary phase (SP) protein extracts for RNA polymerase II subunits Rpb1p, its C-terminal domain (CTD), and Rpb3p. Ser2-P and Ser5-P refer to specific phosphorylation sites within the heptapeptide repeat of the CTD. TBP refers to TATA binding protein and Srb4p is a subunit of the Mediator complex. Extracts from equivalent amounts of cells were loaded and this was verified using an antibody specific for the invariant part of Histone H3 (H3). Molecular Cell 2005 18, 171-183DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.010) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Genome-Wide Location Analysis of RNA Polymerase II Histograms of Pol II binding ratios of all genomic sequences for ML (A) and SP (B). Each histogram is the result of a single microarray hybridization. The vertical axis represents the normalized binding ratios. In red are genomic features selected as significantly enriched in each collection of four hybridizations. Conventional ChIP analysis of PUT4 (C) and SUT1 (D), analyzed by PCR in the linear range of amplification, loaded on a 7% polyacrylamide gel and quantified using a phosphoimager as described in Experimental Procedures. Relative positions of the PCR products are indicated below the graphs. The asterisk represents the position of the internal normalization control for PCR. The binding ratios depicted on the graphs are from the microarray (dashed lines) and conventional ChIP (solid lines), for ML (blue) and SP (red), respectively. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 171-183DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.010) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions