Metrics Simplification Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Still Going On: Hot Topics Continued from Fall  The Education Technology Initiatives  Online Education  Common Assessment  Educational Planning 
Advertisements

 Student Success: What Is It, and How Can We Measure It? Kim Harrell, Folsom Lake College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College David Morse, ASCCC Executive.
The New Mission Frontier: The Community College Baccalaureate Degree Pilot John Stanskas, ASCCC Executive Committee Jolena Grande, Cypress College Jackie.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Update of Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative (IEPI) Indicators and Goal Setting John Stanskas, ASCCC Executive Committee Barry Gribbons,
2016 AIR Pre-Conference Workshop
C-ID and CTE and Best Practices for ADTs
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
Strong Workforce Program: Update
Local Plans and Curriculum Design
Strong Workforce Program Funding
Program Review and Integrated Planning: A Conversation About Data
Strong Workforce Program Funding
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
The Guided Pathway Approach
Low-Unit Certificates: making them “count”
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Contra Costa Community College District
Regional Coordination
Breakout B: The Science of Program Mapping and DNA of Meta-Majors
Download this presentation: bit.ly/gfsf-gp
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
#StrongWorkforce Version as of 7/22/16
Strong Workforce Program Incentive Funding Overview
SOCCCD Board of Trustees’ Meeting
Strong Workforce Program: Demystifying the $200M
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
$200M Strong Workforce Program
Providing Economic and Social Mobility for Californians
Low-Unit Certificates: making them “count”
Strong Workforce Program Getting Ready for the Regional Share
Strong Workforce Program Implementation
$164 million K12 Strong Workforce Program and Funding Overview
Data Tools to Support the Strong Workforce Program
#StrongWorkforce Version as of 7/22/16
Data Tools to Support the Strong Workforce Program
Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative: Indicators Workshop
Fostering Data Conversations that Support Guided Pathways Planning
Goal Setting and Metrics
Guided Pathways: Looking Forward, Looking Back
#StrongWorkforce Version as of 9/22/16
Guided Pathways: Focusing on the Part-time Faculty Perspective
in Basic Skills and Noncredit
2018 Guided Pathways Regional Meeting
Student Success Metrics
Faculty Leadership and the Role of the ASCCC
STATE OF THE SENATE ASCCC Leadership Institute 2015
#StrongWorkforce Version as of 9/22/16
Strong Workforce Program Funding Implementation
Strong Workforce Program: What Senate Leaders Need to Know
Moving in a New Direction
Student Success Metrics
Simplified Metrics Work Group
Research and Data: Driving Dialog and Decisions
Student Success Metrics
Planning and Goal-Setting
VISION FOR SUCCESS GOALS
Impact of AB 705 and Guided Pathways on Part-Time Faculty
CUNY ASAP National Replication Institute April 15th, 2019
Process for Local District Goal Setting
Balanced scorecard slide 1
Local Goal Setting & SEA Plan Introduction & Overview
Student Equity Plan Process Skyline College
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting April 2019.
Strong Workforce Program Funding Implementation
What’s New… and What Do You Need to Know?
AB 705 Data Revision Project
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting Part 1
Presentation transcript:

Metrics Simplification Project Barry Gribbons, Deputy Chancellor, College of the Canyons Kate Williams Browne, Skyline College John Stanskas, ASCCC Vice President Rebecca Eikey, ASCCC Executive Committee

Overview Why Simplify and the IEPI Indicators Recommendations Metrics Simplification Workgroup – Charge and Scope Metrics Simplification Workgroup – Meetings 1 and 2 Future of Metrics Simplification Effort Total of 86 metrics colleges are expected to use to guide planning

Why Simplify? Current Reporting and Planning Metrics: Scorecard Strong Workforce IEPI Indicators Student Equity Plans Basic Skills Plans SSSP Total of 86 metrics colleges are expected to use to guide planning

IEPI Indicators Recommendation Develop a core, limited set of metrics used for various initiative and institutional planning Reduce differences and inconsistencies in indicator systems to the greatest extent possible Utilize existing talent in the field to develop a plan Widely vet the plan to seek input from a variety of constituent groups

Chancellor’s Office Response Creation of the Metrics Simplification Project 3 meetings with a representative group Finished recommendation by May 1

Metrics Simplification Charge Focus is strictly on students and their educational journey Outcome should be simplified set of metrics drillable for detail This set of metrics should displace all others

Metrics Simplification Charge Metrics broken into three categories: Access Practices Student Outcomes Align with Guided Pathways and Completion by Design if possible Equity not viewed as a separate activity but across all metrics

Metrics Simplification Progress Further refined ways to view student journey Connection Entry Progress Completion Ongoing Education Employment Considered 20 possible metrics

Metrics Simplification Progress Connection Equitable Access Applicants who enrolled in college Alignment of course schedule with student pathways Entry Completed comprehensive education plan Successfully completed Transfer-level English and math Recommended move to Progress

Metrics Simplification Progress Course taking milestones Second year persistence Progress in pathway Transfer-ready Support Services/Student Engagement

Metrics Simplification Progress Completion Completed and/or Transferred Completed and/or Transferred in 3 years Average Units for Associate Degree Earners Ongoing Education Earned Multiple Credentials Completed Next Segment within Six Years

Metrics Simplification Progress Employment Employed after one year Employed in Job Related to CTE Field of Study Change in Earnings Median Annual Earnings Attained Living Wage

Summary of Recommended Metrics Connection Equitable Access Entry Progress Successfully Completed Transfer-Level English and math in 1-year Student Services/Engagement Completion Completed or Transferred Ongoing Education Employment Change in Earnings

Additional Possible Ideas Core set of indicators with additional indicators that can be drilled into Disaggregations Fall 2015 Plenary Local Senates Irvine, California

Future Metrics Simplification April 23 – Final meeting of the Statewide Workgroup April 30 - 3rd Statewide Webinar (10AM) Concern about how metrics may be used with Funding Formula discussion in progress – no definitive answer at this time

Fall 2015 Plenary Local Senates Irvine, California Questions? Comments Fall 2015 Plenary Local Senates Irvine, California

Thank You Barry Gribbons barry.gribbons@canyons.edu John Stanskas jstanskas@valleycollege.edu Kate Williams Browne brownek@smccd.edu Rebecca Eikey rebecca.eikey@canyons.edu