Jonathan P Staley, Christine Guthrie  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nonsense Mutations Inhibit RNA Splicing in a Cell-Free System: Recognition of Mutant Codon Is Independent of Protein Synthesis  Said Aoufouchi, José Yélamos,
Advertisements

Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Finn Werner, Robert O.J Weinzierl  Molecular Cell 
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Identification of a Regulated Pathway for Nuclear Pre-mRNA Turnover
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Laura Lancaster, Harry F. Noller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Carmela Sidrauski, Jeffery S Cox, Peter Walter  Cell 
Rhonda Perriman, Manuel Ares  Molecular Cell 
Commitment to Splice Site Pairing Coincides with A Complex Formation
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
The Transmembrane Kinase Ire1p Is a Site-Specific Endonuclease That Initiates mRNA Splicing in the Unfolded Protein Response  Carmela Sidrauski, Peter.
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
ClpX-Mediated Remodeling of Mu Transpososomes
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
John F Ross, Xuan Liu, Brian David Dynlacht  Molecular Cell 
Trans-Splicing to Spliceosomal U2 snRNA Suggests Disruption of Branch Site-U2 Pairing during Pre-mRNA Splicing  Duncan J. Smith, Charles C. Query, Maria.
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages (October 2000)
RRNA Modifications in an Intersubunit Bridge of the Ribosome Strongly Affect Both Ribosome Biogenesis and Activity  Xue-hai Liang, Qing Liu, Maurille.
Rosemary C Dietrich, Robert Incorvaia, Richard A Padgett 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Sabine Mohr, John M. Stryker, Alan M. Lambowitz  Cell 
Girish C Shukla, Richard A Padgett  Molecular Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
PP1/PP2A Phosphatases Are Required for the Second Step of Pre-mRNA Splicing and Target Specific snRNP Proteins  Yongsheng Shi, Bharat Reddy, James L.
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Maria M. Konarska, Josep Vilardell, Charles C. Query  Molecular Cell 
Marc Spingola, Manuel Ares  Molecular Cell 
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Aberrant Nuclear Trafficking of La Protein Leads to Disordered Processing of Associated Precursor tRNAs  Robert V Intine, Miroslav Dundr, Tom Misteli,
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Michael Kruppa, Robyn D Moir, David Kolodrubetz, Ian M Willis 
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein Blocks the 5′ Splice Site-Dependent Assembly of U2AF and the Prespliceosomal E Complex  Shalini Sharma, Arnold M.
A Biochemical Function for the Sm Complex
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Amanda Solem, Nora Zingler, Anna Marie Pyle  Molecular Cell 
Exon Identity Established through Differential Antagonism between Exonic Splicing Silencer-Bound hnRNP A1 and Enhancer-Bound SR Proteins  Jun Zhu, Akila.
Insights into Branch Nucleophile Positioning and Activation from an Orthogonal Pre- mRNA Splicing System in Yeast  Duncan J. Smith, Maria M. Konarska,
Suppression of Multiple Substrate Mutations by Spliceosomal prp8 Alleles Suggests Functional Correlations with Ribosomal Ambiguity Mutants  Charles C.
Rita Das, Zhaolan Zhou, Robin Reed  Molecular Cell 
Jodi L. Vogel, Dawn A. Parsell, Susan Lindquist  Current Biology 
Functional Recognition of the 5′ Splice Site by U4/U6
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
RNase III-Mediated Silencing of a Glucose-Dependent Repressor in Yeast
Andreas N Kuhn, Zairong Li, David A Brow  Molecular Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Competition between the ATPase Prp5 and Branch Region-U2 snRNA Pairing Modulates the Fidelity of Spliceosome Assembly  Yong-Zhen Xu, Charles C. Query 
Presentation transcript:

An RNA Switch at the 5′ Splice Site Requires ATP and the DEAD Box Protein Prp28p  Jonathan P Staley, Christine Guthrie  Molecular Cell  Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 55-64 (January 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80174-4

Figure 1 A Strategy for Impeding the Switch of U1 for U6: Hyperstabilization of the U1:5′ Splice Site Interaction (A) The switch of U1 for U6 at the 5′ splice site. U1 forms six base pairs with the actin 5′ splice site of S. cerevisiae. Exons are depicted as shaded rectangles and the intron, as a line. (B) Extension of the U1:5′ splice site interaction to ten base pairs through 5′ splice site mutations. The boxed base pair was mutated to test for base pairing (Figure 2A). (C) Extension of the U1:5′ splice site interaction to 12 base pairs through a combination of U1 and 5′ splice site mutations. Boxed bases show the compensatory analyses used to test for base pairing between the 5′ splice site and U1 or U6 (Figures 2B, 4A, 5A, 6). Molecular Cell 1999 3, 55-64DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80174-4)

Figure 2 Extension of the U1:5′ Splice Site Interaction In Vivo Confers a Defect in 5′ Splice Site Cleavage (A) Extension confers a defect that is relieved by high temperature (30°C) or the destabilizing mutation U1-5A. Primer extension of an actin reporter containing a wild-type (lanes 2 and 4) or mutated (lanes 3 and 5) 5′ splice site (Figure 1A and Figure 1B) is shown for cells grown at 16°C or 30°C. Primer extension of the actin reporter containing a wild-type (lanes 6 and 8) or mutated (lanes 7 and 9) 5′ splice site is shown for a U1 wild-type or U1-5A mutant strain (Figure 1B) grown at 16°C. Splicing defects were quantitated in triplicate. Unmarked bands reflect transcription pausing. Lanes 1 and 10: MspI digest of pBR322. (B) Extending the U6:5′ splice site interaction suppresses the splicing defect conferred by hyperstabilizing the U1:5′ splice site interaction. Growth at various copper concentrations is shown for the indicated U1, U6, and actin 5′ splice site residues (Figure 1C, boxed bases); growth at higher copper reflects higher splicing efficiency. Molecular Cell 1999 3, 55-64DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80174-4)

Figure 4 Hyperstabilization of the U1: 5′ Splice Site Interaction In Vitro Traps a Functional Intermediate at Low Temperature (A) Hyperstabilization in vitro confers a cold-sensitive defect to 5′ splice site cleavage. Actin pre-mRNA containing a wild-type (lanes 1 and 4) or mutated (lanes 2, 3, 5, and 6) 5′ splice site was spliced at 23°C in lengthened U1 mutant extracts (Figure 1C). (B) Hyperstabilization traps a functional intermediate. A mutated 5′ splice site (lanes 1 and 3), versus a wild-type 5′ splice site (lanes 2 and 4), conferred a defect to 5′ splice site cleavage at 15°C but not at 35°C. An intermediate trapped by hyperstabilizing the U1:5′ splice site interaction at 15°C was converted into an active spliceosome after shifting to 35°C (lane 6) but not while maintaining at 15°C (lane 5); addition of unlabeled competitor before the shift prevented de novo splicing (data not shown). (C) prp28-1 extracts were also defective in 5′ splice site cleavage at 15°C (cf., lanes 1 and 3); this defect was rescued by rPrp28p (lanes 3–6). Molecular Cell 1999 3, 55-64DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80174-4)

Figure 5 Hyperstabilization of the U1:5′ Splice Site Interaction Blocks the Dissociation of U1 and U4 (A) Affinity purification of a spliceosomal intermediate trapped by hyperstabilization. Biotinylated pre-mRNA was incubated with splicing extract at 15°C in the absence (lanes 1–5) or presence (lanes 6–10) of ATP and quenched with nonbiotinylated competitor. Intermediates were affinity purified using streptavidin-agarose beads; snRNAs were detected by primer extension. As a control (ctrl) for the quench, competitor was added with the biotinylated pre-mRNA (lanes 5 and 10). Boxed bases correspond to those in Figure 1C. (B) Affinity purification of a spliceosomal intermediate trapped by prp28-1. Spliceosomes were assembled at 15°C on biotinylated pre-mRNA with a wild-type 5′ splice site in PRP28 (WT) or prp28-1 (-1) extracts in the absence (lanes 1–3) or presence (lanes 4–6) of ATP. Procedures and controls (lanes 1 and 4), as in (A). (C) U4 and U6 are base paired in both trapped intermediates. RNA from the affinity-purified intermediates was extracted under native conditions, separated on a native gel, and probed for U4 and U6 by Northern analysis; as a control, half of the sample was heat denatured (lanes 2 and 4). Molecular Cell 1999 3, 55-64DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80174-4)

Figure 6 By Native Gels, Hyperstabilization of the U1:5′ Splice Site Interaction Traps the Prespliceosome, as Does prp28-1 Spliceosomal intermediates were assembled at 15°C on 32P-labeled actin pre-mRNA containing a wild-type 5′ splice site (lane 2) or a mutated 5′ splice site (lane 1; Figure 1C). Intermediates were also assembled at 15°C on pre-mRNA in wild-type extract (lanes 3 and 4) or prp28-1 mutant extract (lanes 5 and 6); rPrp28p was added at 1 μM (lanes 4 and 6). The intermediates were treated with heparin and separated on native gels. By Northern, the poorly resolved complexes U1·U2 and U2·U4/U6·U5 (lanes 1 and 2) were clearly distinguished; the intermediate trapped in prp28-1 extract (lane 5) contained only U2 (data not shown). Molecular Cell 1999 3, 55-64DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80174-4)

Figure 3 Hyperstabilizing the U1:5′ Splice Site Interaction Exacerbates prp28-1, Weakening the Interaction Suppresses prp28-1 (A) Exacerbation of the prp28-1 splicing defect. Primer extension of the actin reporter containing a wild-type (lanes 1 and 3) or mutated (lanes 2 and 4) 5′ splice site (Figure 1B) in a wild-type (lanes 1 and 2) or mutant (lanes 3 and 4) strain at 30°C. (B) Suppression of the prp28-1 cold-sensitive growth defect. Growth is shown for the wild-type or mutant strain containing wild-type U1, the mutant 4U, or the mutant 2A,10A (in addition to the chromosomal copy of U1). The schematic shows disruption of actin U1:5′ splice site base pairing by the mutant 4U, which suppresses prp28-1 at 18°C, and extension of base pairing by the mutant 2A,10A, which is synthetically lethal with prp28-1 at 22°C. Molecular Cell 1999 3, 55-64DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80174-4)

Figure 7 The Switch of U1 for U6 Requires Prp28p and ATP (A) The Prp28 requirement. An intermediate with a hyperstabilized U1:5′ splice site interaction was trapped at 15°C and shifted to 35°C, as in Figure 4B. Spliceosome assembly was monitored by affinity purification of intermediates and primer extension of bound snRNAs, as in Figure 5A. The levels of U1, U4, and U6 bound to pre-mRNA were quantitated relative to U5 and normalized to the levels before the shift. Bars 1–3 show levels before the shift for extract immunodepleted of Prp28p; the data for mock-depleted extract before the shift are equivalent (data not shown). The snRNA levels after the shift are depicted for mock-depleted extract (bars 4–6) and immunodepleted extract (bars 7–9). Wild-type rPrp28p (bars 10–12), or the ATPase mutant K227E (bars 13–15), were added before the shift. Error bars reflect variation in duplicate experiments. (B) The ATP requirement. After trapping an intermediate with a hyperstabilized U1:5′ splice site interaction at 15°C (bars 1–3), the splicing reaction was incubated with 1.5 mM glucose to deplete ATP and then shifted to 35°C to test for formation of active spliceosomes (bars 4–9; see schematic). ATP was added before the shift to test for rescue (bars 7–9). Molecular Cell 1999 3, 55-64DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80174-4)

Figure 8 Prp28p and ATP Exchange U1 for U6 at the 5′ Splice Site In the simplest model, Prp28p utilizes ATP to unwind the U1:5′ splice site interaction. Alternatively, Prp28p could destabilize this interaction by displacing a stabilizing protein, such as yU1C (Tang et al. 1997). Finally, since U6 appears to play an active role in displacing U1 (Figure 2B), Prp28p could act to facilitate this role for U6. Molecular Cell 1999 3, 55-64DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80174-4)