Wales & West Utilities Mod 0671 User Commitment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NTS Exit Capacity - Amending the DN Adjustment Window Transmission Workstream, 1 April 2010.
Advertisements

NTS Exit Capacity - Amending the DN Adjustment Window Transmission Workstream, 1 July 2010.
Exit Reform Review Transmission Workstream 07 January 2010.
UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.
Enduring Offtake Arrangements including an Off-Peak Interruptible Service Peter Bolitho.
The Treatment of “Spare / Sterilised” Capacity – follow up Draft for discussion purposes only.
Capacity Release Processes and Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Incremental Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement Review 2005 Transmission Workstream - 15th June 2005.
Mod 214 – Reservation of firm NTS Exit Capacity at new NTS Exit Points in the transitional period Steve Rose.
Review Group Modification Proposal Introduction of Enduring NTS Exit Capacity Arrangements.
Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.
Mod 166 Review Group Incremental Exit Capacity at New and Existing Exit Points.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Capacity Methodology Statements Transmission Workstream 5 th July 2007.
11 User Pays User Committee 14th September Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th March 2009.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th Feb 2009.
Transfers and Trades Special Transmission Workstream
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Mod 376: Increased Choice when Applying for Enduring NTS Exit Capacity Jeff Chandler - 5 th May 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon 1.
NTS Exit Regime Transmission Workstream – 6 th July 2005.
Transitional Exit Capacity Proposals -Update Transmission Workstream, 1 Dec Nov 05.
Transitional offtake arrangements – Ofgem Initial Proposals on transitional incentives 6 October 2005.
SGN Modification Proposal Amendments to UNC TPD OCS Process Long Term Allocation of Capacity for the Transitional Period.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement
Offtake Workstream : 8th September 2010
Exit Capacity User Commitment – Transmission Workstream update
Transmission Workgroup 4th October 2012
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
Transmission Workstream, 6 August
Removal of a Users ability to allow Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity to lapse Chris Shanley.
Transmission Workgroup – 1st December 2011
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Capacity Methodology Statements: Impact of Mod 452
MOD0166 – Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Shipper Perspective
Exit Overruns in the Enduring Regime - draft MOD principles
Capacity Methodology Statements
Background Exit Reform Modification expected to be implemented 01 April 2009 But, decision has not yet been received Number of procedures/documents need.
Annual Review - Methodology Statements
PARCA Security and Termination Amounts
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
7th July 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon
COR1360 NTS Exit Reform (Mod 0195AV) UK-Link Committee 11th June 2009
Enduring Offtake Arrangements (Including an alternative daily interruptible capacity release mechanism to facilitate use of spare capacity) Peter Bolitho.
Update on Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Development of Entry Capacity Substitution
MOD0166 – Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Storage Perspective
MOD National Grid NTS Initiated Flow Swaps
Simon Trivella –5th May 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon
QSEC auction timetable
DN Interruption & Charging
MOD Deemed applications – User pays initial thoughts.
Interruptible to Firm – NTS Supply Point Transition
Transmission Workstream – Partial Assignment
UNC Transmission Workstream 7th December 2006
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Mark Freeman 29th January 2007
Reinstatement of NTS Interruption
Review Group 0334 User Pays update – Modifications 288, 289, 290.
Transmission Workstream – 6th July 2005
Flat, flex, assured pressures Network Development Statement
Information Provision for Transitional Exit Capacity
Transmission Workstream 1st February 2007
Review Group 221: Review of Questions from Session 2
Incremental Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement
Exit Overruns in the Enduring Regime
Revised Tender Timescale for DN Interruption Arrangements
Transmission Workstream 05 November 2009
Off-peak interruptible service to compliment universal firm/buy-back regime Peter Bolitho.
Presentation transcript:

Wales & West Utilities Mod 0671 User Commitment 1st November 2018 Wales & West Utilities Mod 0671 User Commitment

Background The current process allows a User to request additional Firm Exit Capacity It also allows a User to reduce its Exit Capacity When an increase is request that would result in NTS having to release additional Incremental Obligated Exit Capacity then NTS can consider substitution (Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Methodology Statement paragraph 32) Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Methodology Statement will need amending post mod 0621 as paragraph 35 will need amending.

The problem There are two problems A User cannot suggest a flow exchange between two offtakes it has to request an increase and decrease separately, the process doesn’t really allow for Users who want to optimise for commercial or operational reasons. These may will be between two adjacent offtakes on the same leg of the NTS. User commitment remains at an offtake even if the capacity has moved to another offtake These mean that it is both risky and probably not commercially viable to try and move Firm Exit Capacity between offtakes The first problem could be solved by a new process The second problem could be solved by changes to the User Commitment regime for flow exchanges We are not proposing a fundamental review of User Commitment

New process The User would be able to propose a capacity exchange between two offtakes during July to September window NTS would analyze this to see if it was possible without additional NTS investment If so then any existing User Commitment would move with the capacity exchange

User commitment If Incremental Obligated Exit Capacity is provided then the User Commitment applies to the whole of the Firm Exit Capacity at that offtake. This can rapidly build up into a big User Commitment that means a User gets no benefit from offering Firm Exit Capacity reductions because they still have to pay the User Commitment. This potentially leads to inefficient hoarding of capacity meaning other Users cannot make use of it.

User commitment an example 2018 BASELINE: Application Year Offtake A B C D Total 2018 Required UC Capacity charged for Annual Y+1 18/19 10 40 Y+2 19/20 Y+3 20/21 Enduring Y+4 21/22 Y+5 22/23 Y+6 23/24 Y+7 24/25

User commitment an example 2019 REQUIREMENT TO MOVE FLOWS FROM B TO A from 2021 Application Year Offtake A B C D Total 2019 Required UC Capacity charged for Annual Y+1 19/20 10 40 Y+2 20/21 Y+3 21/22 11 9 Enduring Y+4 22/23 Y+5 23/24 Y+6 24/25 Y+7 25/26

User commitment an example 2020 and beyond REQUIREMENT TO MOVE FLOWS FROM A TO B and D from 2023, slight increase in C Application Year Offtake A B C D Total 2020 Required UC Capacity charged for Annual Y+1 20/21 10 40 Y+2 21/22 Y+3 22/23 11 9 10.1 40.1 Enduring Y+4 23/24 9.5 10.5 41.1 Y+5 24/25 Y+6 25/26 Y+7 26/27 2021 User Commitments exist at all offtakes and no benefit of releasing any capacity until 2026