GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_ PPT

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Minority Achievement and Achievement Gap.

Advertisements

Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.

1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.

Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden

10/17/2007GZHANG GCSNC C:\Presentation\2008\GEA_ Tough Accountability Situation Great GCS Achievement P resentation for Guilford Education.

Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.

NCLB and MSIP Accountability for End-of-Course Assessments DRAFT – October 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Becky Odneal.

School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.

NHCS READY Report December Presentation Format Curriculum Change Rationale and Timeline Proficiency for Grades 3-8 School Growth Proficiency for.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.

2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.

Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.

4 Principles of ESEA Flexibility 1 January College-and-Career-Ready Expectations for All Students ( ) 2.State-Developed Differentiated Recognition,

2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 Superintendents’ Quarterly Meeting: October 16, 2003 Testing,

School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.

New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:

KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.

Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results

Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.

MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) – Initial Designation.

1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Accelerating All Schools Toward Greatness The New Rhode Island Accountability System.

School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.

Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September

State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.

ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.

ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.

What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 2 of 8 1.

ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.

2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Board of Education October 11, 2011.

Accreditation and AMO I.ACCREDITATION (Virginia’s Accountability System) – ACCREDITATION is Virginia’s Accountability System – No membership groups, no.

Welcome to the AHS PCF! September 12, :00 a.m. Room 92 TOPIC: New State Report Card.

1 1 Next Generation School Assessment and Accountability Thursday, November 17, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.

: ABCs and AMO Accountability Results WS/FCS Board of Education August 21, 2012.

ESEA Flexibility: Achievement Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 4 of 8.

NHCS READY Report October READY Annual Report Contents Growth Proficiency: Detail for Grades 3- 8 and High School Progress: Annual Measurable Objectives.

Testing Updates Updates New assessments in all areas Grades 3 – 8 ELA/Math Alternate Assessments - Online New Accountability Model Status,

Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.

1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.

1 School Improvement & Accountability Update for P.S. Jones Middle Presented by: Tracey Nixon Principal.

University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.

WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.

PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS For African-American Students and White/African-American Achievement Gap.

Goal: Institute an accountability model that… improves student achievement increases graduation rates closes achievement gaps Globally Competitive Students.

Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.

Globalization. Innovation. Graduation.  Transition to Five Achievement Levels  School Performance Grades (A–F)  EVAAS as a Tool NC READY ACCOUNTABILITY.

Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.

NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.

Kentucky Board of Education OCTOBER 9, 2012 College/Career Readiness, Proficiency and Achievement Gap Update.

1 1 Assessment and Accountability Tuesday, November 1, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.

February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations

Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP

A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement

Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report Including Challenge Index August, 2017.

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

Edenton-Chowan Schools

2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS

Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010

2015 Data and AMO Presentation

Wade Hayashida Local District 8

GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_ PPT

2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results

Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services

Presentation transcript:

GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT Update Preliminary Result 2006 AYP Presentation for the Board of Education Gongshu Zhang, Ed.D. Executive Accountability and Research Officer Division of Accountability and Research August 8th, 2006 August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

Part I: AYP Performance in 2005-06 Our school-groups and schools have made progress. Especially, our high schools have made great progress. August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

Percentage of Schools Made AYP: 2004-05 to 2005-06 August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

Percentage of High Schools Made AYP: 2002-03 to 2005-06 August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

Part II: Closing Gaps in Terms of Percentage School-Groups of AYP The gaps have been greatly reduced in high schools. The gaps have been reduced in elementary and middle schools except SWD group. August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

When we work on closing the achievement gaps, we must clearly define: (1) which indicator: Percentage Proficiency (2) which target: Variable and fixed (3) which method: Horizontal (4) which groups: NCLB groups (5) which time/period: 2004-05 to 2005-06 August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

High School EOC Reading (English + Writing) AYP by Group August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

High School EOC Math (Algebra I) AYP by Group August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

Elementary and Middle School EOG Reading AYP by Group August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT Part III: Comparison among NC Five Largest LEAs: Cumberland, Forsyth, Guilford, Mecklenburg, & Wake Our high schools reached the first position in 2006. The difference in percentage of schools AYP decreased between Guilford and the highest performing LEA from 2005 to 2006. The difference in percentage of schools AYP increased between Guilford and the lowest performing LEA from 2005 to 2006. August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT Disadvantage Index August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

Percentage of All Schools Made AYP: 2005 to 2006 August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT Difference in Percentage of All Schools Making AYP Between Guilford and Highest/Lowest Percentage Schools AYP of Five largest LEAs August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

Percentage of High Schools Made AYP: 2005 to 2006 August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT Difference in Percentage of High Schools Making AYP Between Guilford and Highest/Lowest Percentage Schools AYP of Five largest LEAs August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

Percentage of Middle Schools Made AYP: 2005 to 2006 August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT Difference in Percentage of Middle Schools Making AYP Between Guilford and Highest/Lowest Percentage Schools AYP of Five largest LEAs August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

Percentage of Elementary Schools Made AYP: 2005 to 2006 August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT

GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT Difference in Percentage of Elementary Schools Making AYP Between Guilford and Highest/Lowest Percentage Schools AYP of Five largest LEAs August 8, 2006 GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_08082006.PPT