What we learned system performance az balance of state coc

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Retooling Transitional Housing
Advertisements

SSVF Program Launch: Establishing Services in Compliance with Goals and Regulations Practice Area 1: Outreach, Engagement and Admission.
March 6, 2013 Suzanne Wagner, Housing Innovations 1.
Impact of the HEARTH Act on Metro Denver Homeless Planning John Parvensky President Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.
HEARTH Act: Planning for Impact Julie Dixon The Planning Council.
A SYSTEM IN TRANSITION: Shifting our priorities and programs to end homelessness Denise Neunaber North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness securing.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKGROUP Reallocate $ for more community based housing Need rapid rehousing dollars Adjust current grant to allow for more.
WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS Indiana HPRP Training 1. TRAINERS: ANDREA WHITE & HOWARD BURCHMAN IHCDA STAFF: RODNEY STOCKMENT, KIRK WHEELER, KELLI BARKER &
Countywide Homeless System Performance Winston-Salem/Forsyth County CoC prepared for North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness Megan Kurteff Schatz.
Setting a Path to Ending Family Homelessness Presentation to the Early Childhood Cabinet July 30, 2015 Lisa Tepper Bates, CCEH Executive Director Think.
Orientation to the Continuum of Care (CoC) July 29, 2014.
Changes to the Federal Approach to Homelessness Kentucky Balance of State Frankfort, KY June 21, 2011 ( Slides adapted from presentations at the September.
Housing cures homelessness A summary of lessons learned from the National Conference on Ending Homelessness July 29-31, 2014.
REGIONAL CONFERENCE NORFOLK, VA MARCH 16, 2009 CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES 1 South Hampton Roads Regional Housing Needs Assessment.
System Performance Measures WIBOSCOC Data Committee: CoC Workgroup August 2015.
ORGANIZING THE FRONT DOOR: COORDINATED ASSESSMENT Emily Carmody & Corey Root NCCEH Rebecca Pfeiffer City of Charlotte.
FY 2015 Continuum of Care Application Priorities and Process Presentation to the Lake County Coalition for the Homeless April 7, 2015.
The HEARTH Academy System Assessment and Design October 2010.
NCDA WINTER CONFERENCE JANUARY 2016 MICHAEL ROANHOUSE OFFICE OF SPECIAL NEEDS ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS The Role of HUD’s Homeless and Mainstream Housing Programs.
STRATEGIC PLANNING KICKOFF MEETING LOCAL HOMELESS COORDINATING BOARD HomeBase Advancing Solutions to Homelessness MONDAY, FEB. 4 TH, 2013.
All Home Stakeholder Meeting July 20, Agenda Welcome General Updates Measuring System Performance in King County Role of System Performance and.
Reallocation and Prioritization
2017 Housing Inventory Count Webinar
System Performance Measurement Webinar
Strategies to Prevent and End Homelessness
Virginia Balance of State
2016 Coc visioning session December 20, 2016.
Emergency Shelter & Housing Assistance Program (ESHAP)
What is the Continuum of Care?
Ventura County Continuum of Care
Appalachian Regional Coalition on Homelessness August 1, 2017
Emergency Solutions Grant Consolidated Plan
Systems Transformation In focus: Rapid Rehousing
Building an Effective Homeless Response System
Measuring an End to Veteran and Chronic Homelessness
Restructure & Repurpose 2017
2017 Point in time & HIC.
5.14 Ending Long Stays in Shelter
Lake County Homeless Needs Assessment
Allocation Plan 2016 Continuum of Care NOFA.
Midland County Continuum of Care
Session 1.02: Understanding your System: Using Program and System-Level Performance Measures Selina Toy Lee Director of Collaborative Community Outcomes,
2018 Point in time & HIC.
2018 Point in time (PIT) & Housing Inventory Count (HIC)
Maine CoC Coordinated Entry
Systems Performance Measures: The Fundamentals Session 1
Ending Homelessness & Data
Systems Design For an Effective Crisis Response System to End Homelessness Kay Moshier McDivitt SENIOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SPECIALIST Florida Institute.
Annual Homeless Point-in-Time & Housing Inventory Count
Why we are doing this – RRH – reduce shelter length of stay
Recipes for Coordinated Entry: Assessment and Prioritization in Connecticut NAEH Conference July 2017 Mary Ann Haley, Deputy Director Connecticut.
System Performance Measure Reports
Homeless Veteran Gap analysis
Advanced Approaches to System Modeling
Emergency Shelter & Housing Assistance Program (ESHAP)
System Performance Measures: Goal
System Performance Measures (SPMs) and Longitudinal System Analysis (LSA) Data Quality 2018.
Ending Homelessness & Coordinated Entry
Lessons Learned and Work to Do
Arizona’s 3 CoCs What is a CoC and why should you care?
Capital Area Coalition on Homelessness
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Introduction This report provides an overview of homelessness in Monroe County for the time period: 10/1/2107 – 09/30/2018. The time period selected is.
3.02 Assessing Shelter Capacity
Turning the Curve: Length of Time Homeless
TPCH Sheltered & Unsheltered PIT 5 Year Review
Ending Homelessness & Coordinated Entry
CoC Competition FY19 Overview
2019 Data Standards September 4, Data Standards September 4, 2019.
2018 Annual Point-in-Time Report
Presentation transcript:

What we learned system performance az balance of state coc Arizona Housing Coalition Conference November 14, 2018

AZBOSCOC MISSION To end homelessness within the communities it represents and serves. It will do this through a seamless and collaborative network, by assisting eligible entities in obtaining necessary funding need to help vulnerable, low-income individuals and families attain and maintain self-sufficiency. It will do this in alignment with HUD’s Strategic Goals and the Federal Plan. Key Strategies Create a participant focused housing and service system Increase housing access Increase participation of mainstream resources Continued performance improvements based on data

Continuum of care vision “home, together” END HOMELESS FOR ALL PERSONS/POPULATIONS AND COMMUNITIES Should resolve homeless crisis and divert from homeless system; and If cannot resolve or divert, then homelessness should be: Rare Short One Time

When data is important COMPLEXITY TRYING TO CHANGE OBJECTIVITY/AGREEMENT

PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IDENTIFY BRAINSTROM IMPLEMENT EVALUATE

Making decisions without data reality How we think it works

2015-2018 AZBOSCOC PIT RESULTS -4% SINGLES -16% SHELTERED -1% UNSHELTER -19% FAMILIES Looking at any two years is difficult Methodology change last year had impact Look at longer window 2015 is first year we did both sheltered and unsheltered count in same year and time Good Overall trend is going right Families making progress (RRH?) Unsheltered down (about 50/50 sheltered to unsheltered) Singles down slightly Bad Unsheltered is flatline Chronic is up (and it’s a priority) Veterans (wait until HIC) Youth – small number no movement +13% CHRONIC -48% VETS (+5%) +10% YOUTH

2018 AZBOSCOC HOUSING INVENTORY YEAR TOTALS 2014 2,567 2015 2,601 2016 EMERGENCY SHELTER Year TOTAL OF DV Veteran General 2014 1,276 79 482 95 620 2015 926 - 354 572 2016 910 130 321 589 2017 1,019 158 381 638 2018 944 367 577 % Δ -26.0% -100.0% -23.9% -6.9% PERMANENT HOUSING Year TOTAL DV Veteran General 2014 870 - 299 571 2015 1,039 377 662 2016 1,220 559 661 2017 1,179 553 626 2018 1,134 565 569 % Δ 30.3% N/A 89.0% -0.4% 2018 AZBOSCOC HOUSING INVENTORY RAPID REHOUSING Year TOTAL DV Veteran General 2014 34 - 25 9 2015 380 215 165 2016 486 254 232 2017 147 63 84 2018 562 101 461 % Δ 1552.9% N/A 304.0% 5022.2% TRANSITIONAL HOUSING Year TOTAL DV Veteran General 2014 387 70 56 261 2015 256 30 54 172 2016 278 34 190 2017 191 8 53 130 2018 305 119 132 % Δ -21.2% 70.0% -3.6% -49.4% YEAR TOTALS 2014 2,567 2015 2,601 2016 2,894 2017 2,536 2018 2,945 % Δ 14.7% Housing Inventory (in use – not capacity) Emergency Shelter Lost or level emergency shelter resources Significant Beds in DV Permanent No addition of general PH resources via CoC All increase in vets (VASH) Rapid Re-Housing ADOH, ESG, CoC all prioritized RRH in last few cycles (this is point in time and these beds are turning more frequently than PSH Again – huge SSVF investment in RRH Transitional – Lost general beds due to re-allocation to RRH in CoC

People Remain Homeless (short) Metric 1 - Length of Time People Remain Homeless (short) HEARTH STANDARD: The mean length of episode of homelessness in the CoC is either fewer than 20 days, or B) was reduced by at least 10% from the preceding year. 2018 NOFA: Demonstrate a reduction in the LOT homeless of at least 5% as reported in SPM Total Persons Avg. LOT Homeless Median LOT Homeless HMIS ONLY 2015 2016 2017 2018 Persons in ES 3,089 3,108 3,607 3,837 74 55 49 54 22 17 18 20 Persons in ES & TH 3,529 3,482 3,948 4,086 106 79 69 68 29

Metric 2 - EXTENT TO WHICH PERSONS WHO EXIT HOMELESSNESS TO PH RETURN TO HOMELESSNESS (rare & one time) Hearth act – reduced recidivism OF individuals and families who leave homelessness, less than 5% become homeless again at any time within the next 2 years, or the percentage who become homeless again w/in 2 year was decreased at least 20%from the preceding year. 2018 nofa Demonstrate a reduction in in the rate at which persons that exited to PH experienced additional spells of homelessness of at least 5% over a 6 and 12 month period per SPM

Metric 3: number of homeless persons (rare) Hearth act – n/a 2018 NOFA Demonstrate (compared to 2017): A decrease of at least 5% in the number of sheltered individuals and families A Decrease of at least 5% in the number of unsheltered individuals and families A decrease in the number of sheltered and unsheltered individuals and families

METRIC 4: CHANGE AND GROWTH IN INCOME (CoC Projects Only) Hearth act – n/a 2018 nofa Demonstrate an increase in income from employment and non-employment cash sources for persons in Coc projects. STAYERS LEAVERS Change in Earned Income (Stayers) 2015 2016 2017 2018 Change in Earned Income (Leavers) # of adult stayers 339 331 320 N/A # of adult leavers 243 292 319 409 # of adults w/ increased earned income 23 20 28 52 74 72 64 % of adults w/ increased earned income 6.8% 6.0% 8.8% 21.4% 25.3% 22.6% 15.7% Chance in Non-Earned Income (Stayers) Change in Non-Earned Income (Leavers) # of adults w/ increased non-employment income 91 45 84 # of adults w/ increased non employment income 46 47 65 80 % of adults w/ increased non-employment income 26.8% 13.6% 26.3% % of adults w/ increased non employment income 18.9% 16.1% 20.4% 19.6% Change in Total Income (Stayers) Change in Total Income (Leavers) # of adults w/ increased total income 112 63 107 92 119 124 134 % of adults w/ increased total income 33.0% 19.0% 33.4% 37.9% 40.8% 38.9% 32.8%

METRIC 5: NUMBER OF PERSONS WHO BECOME HOMELESS FOR THE FIRST TIME (rare) Hearth act – N/A 2018 nofa Demonstrate a reduction in number of first time homeless as reported in spm NEW CLIENTS (# entering ES/TH w/ no prior HMIS in 24 mos. prior) 2015 2016 2017 2018 TOTAL # persons w/ entries into ES, SH, TH 3,038 3,213 3,688 3,871 # of REPEAT (w/ entries into ES, TH w/in 24 months) 711 869 1,007 1,146 % REPEAT 23.4% 27.1% 27.3% 29.6% # of above w/o entries into ES/TH w/in 24 months 2,327 2,344 2,681 2,725 % NEW 76.6% 72.9% 72.7% 70.4% NEW CLIENTS (# entering ES/TH/PH w/ no prior HMIS in 24 mos. prior) TOTAL # persons w/ entries into ES, TH, PH 4,277 4,530 5,593 # of REPEAT (w/ entries into ES, TH, PH w/in 24 months 853 1,088 1,309 1,412 19.9% 24.0% 25.2% # of NEW (w/o entries into ES/TH/PH w/in 24 months) 3,424 3,442 4,284 4,181 80.1% 76.0% 74.6%

METRIC 7: CHANGE IN EXITS TO PERMANENT HOUSING DESTINATIONS (one time) Hearth act – N/A 2018 nofa Demonstrate an increase in rate person exit to PH destinations (or retain housing if already in PH) of at least 5% as shown in sPm 2015 2016 2017 2018 Outreach Exits 85 485 893 651 to Temp/Institutional 9 131 106 to PH Destination 25 71 102 86 % of Positive Exits 40.0% 32.2% 26.1% 29.5% ES, TH & RRH Exits 3,819 4,194 4,192 4,907 1,491 1,710 1,776 2,250 39.0% 40.8% 42. 4% 45.9% PH/PSH Exits (Does not Include RRH) 825 1,051 1,149 1,587 Remain PH or exit to PH 773 978 1,084 1,487 % Retention or Exit to PH 93.7% 93.1% 94.3%

WHAT DATA TELLS US IS HOMELESSNESS RARER NO ARE HOMELESS EPISODES SHORTER NO IS HOMELESSNESS ONE TIME EXPERIENCE ISH ARE WE ADDRESSING OUR PRIORITIES FAMILIES/RRH YES CHRONIC NO VETERANS NO HAS SYSTEM IMPROVED NO

AZBOSCOC DATA INFORMED ACTIVITIES/STRATEGIES AGENCY/PROVIDERS CONTRACT/MONITORING INCOME STRATEGIES (METRIC 4) POSITIVE EXITS (METRIC 2 & 7) CREATE PERFORMANCE MONITORING PLAN/REPORTING Employment Positive Exit/Retention https://public.tableau.com/profile/mattschnars#!/vizhome/SPM CoCStateNationalComparorator/KPIs CREATE ACTIONABLE DATA LOCAL BY NAME LISTS SPM BY GEOGRAPHY/AGENCY NOFA PERFORMANCE SCORING YEAR-ROUND – APR/SPM FOCUSED CONTINUUM/SYSTEM CHANGES PRIORITIZATION VETERANS RE-LAUNCH – IMPLEMENT FEDERAL BENCHMARKS PSH/CHRONIC FOCUS COORDINATED ENTRY PRIORITIZATION INCREASE CURRENT RESOURCE CAPACITY RRH/PSH TURNOVER STRATEGIES LONG TERM SHELTER STAYERS (METRIC 1) DIVERSION/FIRST TIME HOMELESS (METRIC 5) FILL GAPS (EX: OUTREACH) What Learned What measured is what gets done – set transparent expectations 1) DQ/Positive Exits SPM Reflect our priorities . . . Or lack (Intentionality) TA – Reviewed SPM data/made recommendations that would impact Actionable Data - Data/SPM Opposite of Ending Homelessness Frequent/Long Term – Trends/Repeated (Evaluation) Review the information above