Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Advertisements

Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Shuhei Yoshida, Masako Kaido, Tomoya S. Kitajima  Developmental Cell 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Alexandra M. Penkner, Susanne Prinz, Stefan Ferscha, Franz Klein  Cell 
Spindle Position Is Coordinated with Cell-Cycle Progression through Establishment of Mitotic Exit-Activating and -Inhibitory Zones  Leon Y. Chan, Angelika.
Evolution of Ime2 Phosphorylation Sites on Cdk1 Substrates Provides a Mechanism to Limit the Effects of the Phosphatase Cdc14 in Meiosis  Liam J. Holt,
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Control of Shugoshin Function during Fission-Yeast Meiosis
Vladic Mogila, Fan Xia, Willis X. Li  Developmental Cell 
Casein Kinase 1 Promotes Initiation of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
The Telomere Bouquet Controls the Meiotic Spindle
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Separase, Polo Kinase, the Kinetochore Protein Slk19, and Spo12 Function in a Network that Controls Cdc14 Localization during Early Anaphase  Frank Stegmeier,
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Mus81/Mms4 Endonuclease and Sgs1 Helicase Collaborate to Ensure Proper Recombination Intermediate Metabolism during Meiosis  Lea Jessop, Michael Lichten 
Volume 27, Issue 21, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
S. pombe Aurora Kinase/Survivin Is Required for Chromosome Condensation and the Spindle Checkpoint Attachment Response  Janni Petersen, Iain M. Hagan 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Allison J Bardin, Rosella Visintin, Angelika Amon  Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages (October 2016)
Christine Michaelis, Rafal Ciosk, Kim Nasmyth  Cell 
Kan Cao, Reiko Nakajima, Hemmo H. Meyer, Yixian Zheng  Cell 
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
The Telomere Bouquet Controls the Meiotic Spindle
Regulation of Sister Chromatid Cohesion between Chromosome Arms
Functional Comparison of H1 Histones in Xenopus Reveals Isoform-Specific Regulation by Cdk1 and RanGTP  Benjamin S. Freedman, Rebecca Heald  Current Biology 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 20, Pages (October 2012)
Norihisa Shindo, Kazuki Kumada, Toru Hirota  Developmental Cell 
Gislene Pereira, Elmar Schiebel  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Sara Cuylen, Jutta Metz, Andrea Hruby, Christian H. Haering 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Telomeric Noncoding RNA TERRA Is Induced by Telomere Shortening to Nucleate Telomerase Molecules at Short Telomeres  Emilio Cusanelli, Carmina Angelica Perez.
Vincent Vanoosthuyse, Kevin G. Hardwick  Current Biology 
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Hong-Guo Yu, Douglas Koshland  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Polo-like Kinase 1 Triggers the Initiation of Cytokinesis in Human Cells by Promoting Recruitment of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the Central Spindle  Mark Petronczki,
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
Mariola R. Chacón, Petrina Delivani, Iva M. Tolić  Cell Reports 
Fission Yeast Apc15 Stabilizes MCC-Cdc20-APC/C Complexes, Ensuring Efficient Cdc20 Ubiquitination and Checkpoint Arrest  Karen M. May, Flora Paldi, Kevin.
Control of Lte1 Localization by Cell Polarity Determinants and Cdc14
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages (October 2000)
Nitobe London, Steven Ceto, Jeffrey A. Ranish, Sue Biggins 
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
Jean-François Maure, Etsushi Kitamura, Tomoyuki U. Tanaka 
Rsp1p, a J Domain Protein Required for Disassembly and Assembly of Microtubule Organizing Centers during the Fission Yeast Cell Cycle  Sabina Zimmerman,
Benjamin A. Pinsky, Christian R. Nelson, Sue Biggins  Current Biology 
Transcriptional and Developmental Functions of the H3
Casein Kinase 1 Promotes Initiation of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Brian H. Lee, Brendan M. Kiburz, Angelika Amon  Current Biology 
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 37-52 (January 2017) Casein Kinase 1 Coordinates Cohesin Cleavage, Gametogenesis, and Exit from M Phase in Meiosis II  Orlando Argüello-Miranda, Ievgeniia Zagoriy, Valentina Mengoli, Julie Rojas, Katarzyna Jonak, Tugce Oz, Peter Graf, Wolfgang Zachariae  Developmental Cell  Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 37-52 (January 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.11.021 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2017 40, 37-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.11.021) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Key Events of Meiosis II Require Hrr25 Activity after Anaphase I (A) Inhibition of Hrr25 at prophase. Spindles (GFP-tubulin), nucleolar release of Cdc14-GFP, and nuclei (histone H2B-RFP) were imaged in HRR25 and hrr25-as cells treated with 1NM-PP1 (5 μM) at 2 hr in SPM. Top: time-lapse series. Bottom: scoring of cellular features. Results were similar with 20 μM 1NM-PP1. (B–D) Inhibition of Hrr25 at anaphase I. CDC20-mAR control and hrr25-as cells were cultured in SPM for 8 hr, released from metaphase I with CuSO4 (t = 0), and treated with 1NM-PP1 at t = 40 min. (B) IF microscopy of DNA, tubulin, Pds1-myc18, and Cdc14. (C) Quantification of meiotic progression. The average yield is 78% ± 4% tetranucleates (HRR25) or 69% ± 6% binucleates (hrr25-as, n = 6 experiments). (D) Immunoblot detection of proteins. See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2017 40, 37-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.11.021) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Removal of Centromeric Cohesin Requires Hrr25 and Separase Activity in Meiosis II (A) Analysis of centromeric cohesin in CDC20-mAR control and hrr25-as cells treated with 1NM-PP1 at anaphase I (t = 40 min). Top: chromatin spreads stained for DNA, SPBs (γ-tubulin), kinetochores (Mtw1-myc9), and Rec8-ha3. Bottom: percentages of spreads with two SPBs (meiosis I) or four SPBs (meiosis II) and Rec8 on the whole chromatin or at centromeres. (B) Imaging of Rec8-GFP and SPBs (Cnm67-RFP) in CDC20-mAR control and mutant cells treated to inactivate Hrr25-as, Esp1-2, or Cdc5-as at anaphase I (t = 40 min). Top: representative time-lapse series. Bottom: persistence of centromeric Rec8-GFP signals in control (gray) and mutant (red) cells. Blue lines denote mean values. Control and mutant distributions differ at p < 0.001 or p < 0.01 (CDC5/cdc5-as). See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2017 40, 37-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.11.021) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cleavage of Rec8 Expressed in Meiosis II Depends on Hrr25 Activity Immunoblot analysis of Ha3-Scc1 and Ha3-Rec8 expressed from the PEST promoter at metaphase II in CDC20-mAR cells. EST was added at t = 50 min. Dbf4 is degraded at anaphase I and Cdc5 at anaphase II, which requires Hrr25 activity. Cleavage products were quantified relative to the total lane signal. (A) Ha3-Scc1 is cleaved in HRR25 and hrr25-as cells treated with 1NM-PP1 at anaphase I (arrows). (B) Ha3-Rec8 is cleaved in HRR25 cells, while Ha3-Rec8-18D but not Ha3-Rec8 is cleaved in hrr25-as cells treated with 1NM-PP1 at anaphase I (arrows). (C) Ha3-Rec8 but not Ha3-Rec8-24A is cleaved in HRR25 cells. (D) Ha3-Rec8 is present in α-Myc immunoprecipitates from HRR25-myc9 but not from HRR25 cells. See also Figure S3. Developmental Cell 2017 40, 37-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.11.021) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Rec8 Phosphorylation and PP2A Removal from Centromeres Are Required for the Meiosis II Division and Depend on Hrr25 (A and B) Detection of Sgo1-myc9 and Rts1-ha3 in CDC20-mAR control and hrr25-as cells treated with 1NM-PP1 at anaphase I. (A) Immunoblotting of protein extracts. (B) Percentages of chromatin spreads with two SPBs (γ-tubulin, meiosis I) or four SPBs (meiosis II) and foci of Sgo1 or Rts1. (C) Anchor-away of Sgo1 before and after inhibition of Hrr25-as at anaphase I. CDC20-mAR hrr25-as cells carrying SGO1-FRB and ribosomal RPL13-FKBP12 were released from metaphase I (t = 0) and treated with 1NM-PP1 at t = 40 min. Rapamycin was omitted (left) or added either 180 min before release (middle) or 50 min after release (right). Shown are time-lapse series and scoring of nuclei (H2B-RFP) and Rts1-GFP foci. (D) Anchoring Rts1 to centromeric Rec8 blocks the meiosis II division. Rapamycin was added at anaphase I to CDC20-mAR REC8-FKBP12 cells with RTS1 (control) or RTS1-FRB (anchoring to Rec8). Shown are time-lapse series and scoring of SPBs (Spc42-GFP) and nuclei (H2B-RFP). See also Figure S4. Developmental Cell 2017 40, 37-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.11.021) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Sgo1 Degradation at Anaphase II Is Required for Proper Nuclear Division at Meiosis II Analysis of CDC20-mAR SGO1-myc9 cells expressing Myc9-tagged Sgo1 proteins from the PEST promoter at metaphase II. EST was added at t = 15 min. Data with different green letters differ at p < 0.001. (A) Top: immunoblot detection of proteins. Bottom: kinetics of cells with one division (two nuclei), two divisions (more than two nuclei), cells in meiosis I (two SPBs), cells with meiosis I or II spindles, and spreads with Sgo1 foci. (B) Percentages of chromatin spreads from anaphase II (four SPBs, two stretched DNA masses; n ≥ 72) showing Sgo1 foci. (C) Percentages of anaphase II cells (two spindles, Cdc14 released; n = 200) having completed (four nuclei) or not completed (two nuclei) the meiosis II division. (D) Percentages of post-anaphase II cells (t = 140 min, n ≥ 150) with two nuclei, four nuclei, or three to four nuclei of unequal size. (E) Live-imaging analysis of the time from the meiosis I division (H2B-RFP) to the removal of centromeric Rts1-GFP foci. Red box, time from the meiosis I division (H2B-RFP) to meiosis II spindle disassembly (GFP-tubulin) in CDC20-mAR cells. (F) Lifetimes of centromeric Rec8-GFP signals quantified from the imaging of Rec8-GFP and SPBs (Cnm67-RFP). See also Figure S5. Developmental Cell 2017 40, 37-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.11.021) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Mps1 Degradation Contributes to Removal of Sgo1-PP2A from Centromeres (A and B) Detection of Ha3-Mps1 and Bub1-myc18 in CDC20-mAR control and hrr25-as cells treated with 1NM-PP1 at anaphase I (arrows). (A) Immunoblotting of protein extracts. (B) Percentages of spreads with Bub1 foci at different stages of meiosis (n ≥ 128, p > 0.5). (C–E) Analysis of CDC20-mAR SGO1-myc9 Ha3-MPS1 cells expressing Mps1-mD and Sgo1-mD or Sgo1-mD-3A from the PEST promoter at metaphase II. EST was added at t = 15 min. (C) Top: immunoblot detection of proteins. Bottom: kinetics of cells with one division (two nuclei), two divisions (more than two nuclei), cells in meiosis I (two SPBs), cells with meiosis I or II spindles, and spreads with Sgo1 foci. (D) Live-imaging analysis of the time from the meiosis I division (H2B-RFP) to the removal of centromeric Rts1-GFP foci. Data with different green letters differ at p < 0.05 (a versus c) or p < 0.001 (a, c versus b). Red box, time from the meiosis I division (H2B-RFP) to meiosis II spindle disassembly (GFP-tubulin) in CDC20-mAR cells. (E) Lifetimes of centromeric Rec8-GFP signals quantified from the imaging of Rec8-GFP and SPBs (Cnm67-RFP). Data with different green letters differ at p < 0.001. See also Figure S6. Developmental Cell 2017 40, 37-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.11.021) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Analysis of Spindle Disassembly at Exit from Meiosis II (A) Live-imaging analysis of the times from the onset of metaphase II to nuclear division (H2-RFP) or spindle disassembly (GFP-tubulin). CDC20-mAR strains were released from metaphase I at 23°C (t = 0), treated with EST (t = 10 min, to induce PEST-CLB1-mDK), and shifted to 34°C at metaphase II (t = 50 min, to inactivate Cdc14-3). Top: representative time-lapse series. Bottom: times to nuclear division (red) do not differ significantly (p = 0.13). Times to spindle disassembly (gray) with different green letters differ at p < 0.05 (a versus b) or p < 0.001 (a, b versus c). (B) Protein levels in extracts from CDC20-mAR control cells and cells expressing non-degradable Clb1 at metaphase II (PEST-CLB1-mDK) and/or low amounts of Ama1 (PDMC1-AMA1). (C) Disassembly of anaphase II spindles upon inhibition of Cdc5. CDC20-mAR PDMC1-AMA1 PEST-CLB1-mDK cells carrying CDC5 or cdc5-as were released from metaphase I (t = 0) and treated with CMK at anaphase II (t = 100 min). Meiotic events were quantified in fixed cells. See also Figure S7. Developmental Cell 2017 40, 37-52DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.11.021) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions