The 3D Structure of Villin as an Unusual F-Actin Crosslinker

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Thor Seneca Thorsen, Rachel Matt, William I. Weis, Brian K. Kobilka 
Sudha Chakrapani, Luis G. Cuello, D. Marien Cortes, Eduardo Perozo 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Expanding the PP2A Interactome by Defining a B56-Specific SLiM
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Structural Characterization of the Boca/Mesd Maturation Factors for LDL-Receptor-Type β Propeller Domains  Mark N. Collins, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Solution Structures of Engineered Vault Particles
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Structural Insights into the COP9 Signalosome and Its Common Architecture with the 26S Proteasome Lid and eIF3  Radoslav I. Enchev, Anne Schreiber, Fabienne.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Each Actin Subunit Has Three Nebulin Binding Sites
Structure of an RNA Silencing Complex of the CRISPR-Cas Immune System
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
The Talin Dimer Structure Orientation Is Mechanically Regulated
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Clemens C. Heikaus, Jayvardhan Pandit, Rachel E. Klevit  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Qing Yao, Sara J. Weaver, Jee-Young Mock, Grant J. Jensen  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

The 3D Structure of Villin as an Unusual F-Actin Crosslinker Cheri M. Hampton, Jun Liu, Dianne W. Taylor, David J. DeRosier, Kenneth A. Taylor  Structure  Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 1882-1891 (December 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.09.015 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Electron Micrographs of F-Actin:Villin Crosslinks (A) Electron micrograph of a well-ordered segment from tomogram 1 (Table 1). Protein is white. (B) Fourier transform of the raft shown in (A). The meridional and equatorial axes are shown in black dashed lines; layer lines and row lines are in gray. (C) Projection image of the 3D global average of ∼6500 aligned villin crosslink repeats. (D) Averaged 2D projection image of ice-embedded specimens, for comparison. Structure 2008 16, 1882-1891DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.09.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Class Averages Based on the Variance within the Villin Crosslink Labels across the top are in order of relatedness from the classification. Numbers at the bottom are the number of class members. (A) Projection images. Class average 1 shows incomplete “half-villin” density. Average 0 has no villin crosslink. Class average 2 illustrates a fraction of crosslinks that are highly variable at one end. (B) Same averages as above, but shown as volumes. All averages in (B) are contoured to the same threshold. Structure 2008 16, 1882-1891DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.09.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Model of Villin Crosslinking F-Actin (A) Placement of the villin homology model atomic coordinates within the averaged villin density. (B) Schematic of villin domain topology with the approximate location of linkers shown. Structure 2008 16, 1882-1891DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.09.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Close-Up of Villin-Actin Interactions (A) A top-down view of the model in Figure 3. The N terminus of the long V2 helix, residues 151–158, points between two actin subunits. On the left-hand filament, which is interacting with villin domain V2 (red), the actin subdomain 1 (S.D. 1) helices, residues 112–126 and 358–365 of one subunit and on the next subunit up, actin subdomain 4 (S.D. 4) helix residues 222–236, all of which are involved in villin interaction, are shown in red. Likewise, V1 (blue) is positioned between the same regions of actin on the right-hand filament. (B) Position of the villin head piece. The head piece helix residues 62–76, which include the “crown of positive charge,” are positioned toward actin and in the vicinity of helix residues 308–320 on actin subdomain 3 (S.D. 3). The disordered linker can be readily accommodated within the linker density. (C) Replacement of V2 by the head piece. The head piece is too small for the V2 density. (D) Replacement of the head piece by V1. The gelsolin-like domain is too large for this density. Thus, the head piece placement determines the overall orientation of the villin crosslink model. Structure 2008 16, 1882-1891DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.09.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Villin and Gelsolin Binding Sites Do Not Overlap Villin density map and atomic model are shown next to gelsolin crystal structures (colored copper) bound to actin. (A) N terminus of gelsolin bound to actin as in the crystal structure. G2 binds via its long α helix, the “actin binding helix,” between actin subdomains 1 and 3; G3 does not make contact with actin. G1 bound in this manner effectively caps the barbed end of the filament (PDB ID code 1RGI). (B) C terminus of gelsolin bound to actin. G4 makes contact with actin subdomain 3. G5 and G6 are not bound to actin; however, the long α helix of G6 is in close proximity to helices of actin subdomains 3 and 4 (PDB ID code 1H1V). Structure 2008 16, 1882-1891DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.09.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Fimbrin and the F-Actin:Villin Crosslink Model To demonstrate compatibility between these two co-crosslinkers, we placed the atomic coordinates of fimbrin ABD2 (orange) on the left-hand actin filament and ABD1 and the calmodulin-like domain (violet) on the closest right-hand actin monomer. It is not known exactly how these domains interact with one another in a crosslink, but all are accommodated within the context of our model without a steric clash. (A) Model built with the two actin filaments offset by 17 Å. (B) Model built with the two actin filaments in axial register. In this model, the interaction between V2 and actin must be broken and the head piece linker rebuilt. Structure 2008 16, 1882-1891DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.09.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions