1st Community Partnership Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI)
Advertisements

Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Common Solutions & Success to Reduce DMC Heidi Hsia, OJJDP Please visit often:
Marion County History and Future Presiding Judge, Marilyn A. Moores Chief Magistrate Gary Chavers Deputy Chief Probation Officer Christina Ball Juvenile.
NC DJJDP--Putting Families First North Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Staying Focused on Youth Putting Families First.
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Risk Assessment Instrument And the Development of Detention Alternatives Primary.
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
The Dangers of Detention Sue Burrell, Staff Attorney Youth Law Center San Francisco, California.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Juvenile Justice History Review New York House of Refuge – First juvenile detention center – Became a place to put delinquent youth Included kids without.
Children’s System of Care Collaborating to Serve the Children and Families of New Jersey.
ENCIRCLE: A COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP FOR OUR YOUTH Led by Center for Learning & Development thanks to a grant from the Office of the Governor Criminal.
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.
Community Engagement Strategies Building Authentic System-Community Partnerships through CCFY’s 3-Day Alternative-to-Incarceration (ATI) Training Institute.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
Slide 1 Promoting and Supporting Status Offense System Reform Presentation to National Conference of State Legislators June 23, 2014 Allie Meyer Vera Institute.
Association on American Indian Affairs Juvenile Justice Reform and the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) Prepared by Jack F. Trope, Executive.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
The Annie E. Casey Foundation Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative JDAI Council of State Governments May 17, 2009 Rand Young, WA State JDAI Coordinator.
1 The New Jersey Experience: The Stationhouse Adjustment Program Part II Presented by: Raymond Massi, Jr., Law Enforcement Coordinator, US Attorney’s Office.
Early Intervention Juvenile Justice Request for Responses.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
DYS and Arkansas’ Juvenile Justice System Entrance Children age who are proven to have broken the law and are under the authority of a juvenile.
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
Understanding Disproportionate Minority Contact in Onondaga County A project to reduce racial disparities in Onondaga County’s Juvenile Justice System.
Educational and Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Justice Youth What’s Wrong When We Know What’s Right? Ralph B. Thomas December 17, 2007.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
System of Care-Overview Principles and Values. Coordinated System of Care Team An initiative of Governor Bobby Jindal Office of Juvenile Justice Department.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Fort Worth City Council May 12, 2009 Presenter: Randy Turner Chief Juvenile Probation Officer Tarrant County Juvenile Services Scott D. Moore Juvenile.
THE HUDSON PARTNERSHIP: COMMUNITY FOR YOUTH CRIME PREVENTION AND EDUCATIONAL PARTNERSHIP 1 st Community Partnership Meeting.
The New Jersey Department of Children and Families Children’s System of Care.
Juvenile Justice. Certification Certification – the proceeding in juvenile court in which the court determines if a juvenile will stand trial as an adult.
Accessing Services for Youth with Developmental Disabilities through the Children’s System of Care Clarence Whittaker Manager, Community Services Children’s.
1 Juvenile Detention Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative: Detention & Equity Reform San Francisco Juvenile Probation Commission October 12, 2016.
Full community collaboration in support of system- involved youth
Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Justice System: Detention
Children’s System of Care
Lesson 6: Juvenile Justice (Chapter 15 Section 4)
Children’s System of Care
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
Children's System of Care
Session Outcomes Overview of Project STAY OUT
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Children’s System of Care
Children’s System of Care
AJS101 (40384) Monday, October 3, 2016 Time Keeper.
Children’s System of Care
(County Inter-Agency Coordinating Council)
Criminal Law and Young People
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1
7. Develop a plan to strengthen employer relationships
JUVENILE COURT 2016 Empowering Youth Strengthening Families
Family Preservation Services
Community Justice Services a Division of the
Youth Advocacy Project
AspireMN Member Meeting
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FRAMEWORK CONCEPT: AN OVERVIEW
Chapter 16 Section 3 Juvenile Crime.
Hennepin/Ramsey County Juvenile Treatment Program
Chapter 10.
Comprehensive Youth Services
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
Presentation transcript:

1st Community Partnership Meeting The Hudson Partnership: Community for Youth Crime Prevention and Educational Partnership 1st Community Partnership Meeting

Vision To create a wrap-around community partnership that will collaborate to address the needs of at risk/court involved youth ages 13-21 from the highest crime areas in Jersey City The goal will be to reduce involvement with the juvenile justice system by increasing community and educational bonds

Breakdown What is the Children’s System of Care What does the CMO do? What is JDAI? Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative Let’s talk about our Jersey City youth How do we prevent youth involvement in the Juvenile Justice System? By working Together!

Children’s System of Care Collaborating to Serve the Children and Families of New Jersey

At Home In School In the Community Children’s System of Care Objectives We want to keep kids… At Home (with their families and not in out-of-home treatment settings) In School (in their regular school in their school district) In the Community (and not involved with the Juvenile Justice System or at risk of detention or incarceration) 5 5 5

CSA CMO FSO Key Components MRSS PerformCare is the Contracted Systems Administrator for CSOC - Single portal for access to care CMO A care management organization that serves children, youth, young adults and their families/caregivers with high and moderate level of care coordination needs FSO Family-led support for CMO involved families, community education, warm lines, advocacy MRSS Crisis planning for youth with behavioral/emotional needs, available 24/7/365 6 6 6

PerformCare is Contracted Systems Administrator (CSA) for CSOC PerformCare functions as the single point of access for youth into the Children’s System of Care. CSA authorizes services, based on the most recent clinical information that is submitted to them. CSA does not provide direct services. Anyone helping children and families may contact PerformCare on behalf of a youth in need of a referral. However, the parent/legal guardian of the youth must give consent for services. 1-877-652-7624 CSA responsibilities include: Providing 24-hour/day, 7 days/week availability. Coordinating access to services for all eligible youth. Helping youth obtain any necessary specialized behavioral health services and / or services for the intellectually / developmental disabled. Supporting the CSOC goals of promoting best practices and assisting the state in assuring compliance with state and federal guidelines. Offering complaint, reconsideration, and appeal processes. 7

The Wraparound Process is as simple as people helping people Wraparound IS . . . not a program or a service . . . a process and an approach. The Wraparound Process is as simple as people helping people 8

Family Centered Families having access, voice and choice at every stage of the planning process

Formal Services Local Mental Heath Providers Behavioral Assistance In Community Services Family Centered Culturally Competent Coordinated Services Out Patient Services

Natural / Informal Supports and Community Resources Friends, Family, Peers Place of Worship Civic & Ethnic Organizations Community Support Groups Neighborhood Resources i.e.; Boys/Girls clubs, YMCA, Big Brothers/Big Sisters

Family Support Organization (FSO) Non-Profit Parent-Peer Support Support Groups Warm Line Education Training Advocacy Youth Partnership Website: www.njalliance-fso.org 201-915-5140

Contact Us Perform Care 1-877-652-7624 Mobile Response Hudson Partnership CMO - 201 537 1429 Steven Campos Hudsonservicenetwork.org or scampos@hudsoncmo.org Family Partners Hudson County FSO& Youth Partnership of Hudson County Gloria Rivera 201-915-5140

New jersey juvenile justice reform JDAI Emily Fox ■ JJC Research & Reform Specialist ■ May 29, 2014 ■ Jersey City Community Partnership Meeting

Presentation overview Genesis of JDAI in NJ. JDAI objectives and 8 core strategies. Status of JDAI in Hudson County. Community Outreach Subcommittee. Why Greenville and Bergen-Lafayette? Q&A discussion.

Genesis of jdai in new jersey Juvenile Arrests Detention ADP 1993 – 2002 1996 2002 37.7% 24.7% Overcrowded facilities operated at 122% - 223% capacity.

What is the purpose of detention? The “objective of detention is to provide secure custody for those juveniles who are deemed a threat to the physical safety of the community and/or whose confinement is necessary to insure their presence at the next court hearing” (N.J.A.C. 13:92-1.3). The purpose of secure detention is to ensure alleged delinquents appear at scheduled court hearings and to minimize the risk of serious reoffending while youth await the disposition of their cases. And so the appropriate and necessary use of detention would be for these purposes only. This is especially important because research has shown to us that detention is the last place we want to put a kid unless we really have to.

What are the dangers of detention? Detention doesn’t work as a deterrent (the greatest predictor of recidivism is prior incarceration) Congregating delinquent youth together negatively affects their behavior and increases their chances of reoffending Detained youth are more likely to get deeper involved in the justice system There is little relationship between detention and community crime rates Detention can slow or disrupt the natural process of “aging out of delinquency” Detention makes mentally ill children worse Detained special needs children often don’t return to school Detention is expensive and not cost-effective It is worth noting that 100% of kids will be released from detention and so the effects of detention on these children will play out not only in their lives but in ours and our community’s as well. So what are the dangers of detention? Number one, detention doesn’t work as a deterrent. In fact, the greatest predictor of recidivism in prior incarceration, a better predictor than gang involvement, poor parental relationships, or the carrying of a weapon. 2) Getting a whole bunch of delinquent youth together in a place where they can never leave negatively affects their behavior and increases their chances of reoffending. This is especially troubling if you consider that we were (and often still are) housing youth charged with serious, violent offenses alongside kids who have low-level theft or drug offenses. 3) Detained youth are more likely to adjudicated delinquent and have a formal record and detained are three time more likely to be sentenced to a term of incarceration than youth charged with similar offenses who have not been detained. 4) There is little relationship between detention rates and community crime rates, locking up kids doesn’t seem to make us any safer 5) Most kids, as you know because you’ve been one, age out of a lot stupid and delinquent behavior. Most kids stop offending on their own between the ages of 16 and 20 with no intervention. Detaining them can disrupt or slow this process. 6) Detention is often an unhealthy, unstable environment and kids with mental health needs suffer in those environments. One study even suggested that the transition into incarceration itself may be responsible for some of the observed depression of kids in detention. 7) On average, across the country, 43% of children receiving remedial education in detention, never returned to school. 8) Detention costs money. A lot of it. Usually, about 10 to 15 times what it costs to run an alternative supervision program based in the community. And the return? Pretty awful, if detention is the best predictor of recidivism. So we know who should be in detention, the most serious offenders who threaten our community and the kids who have a history of not appearing for court. We also know what our kids face when they are put into secure detention. This lays the foundation for JDAI.

Jdai – what is the objective? The purpose of JDAI is to demonstrate that sites can safely reduce reliance on secure detention, with the objective to: Eliminate the inappropriate or unnecessary use of secure detention; Minimize re-arrest and failure-to-appear rates pending adjudication; Ensure appropriate conditions of confinement in secure facilities; Redirect public finances to sustain successful reforms; and Reduce racial and ethnic disparities.

Jdai 8 core strategies Local sites/counties pursue eight interrelated core strategies to accomplish the JDAI objectives. Collaboration and leadership; Use of accurate data; Objective admissions criteria and instruments; New or enhanced non-secure alternatives to detention; Case processing reforms; Special detention cases; Reducing racial disparities; and Improving conditions of confinement.

New jersey as a “model state” As of 2013, 16 counties were actively participating in JDAI. Atlantic Camden Essex Hudson Monmouth Bergen Burlington Mercer Ocean Union Passaic Somerset Middlesex Cumberland Warren Gloucester

Hudson county jdai work In 2013 there were: 778 fewer youth admitted to detention than in the year prior to JDAI implementation More than 56 fewer youth in detention on any given day when compared to the year prior to JDAI

Hudson county jdai structure Hudson County Council on Juvenile Justice System Improvement Probation Subcommittee Case Processing Subcommittee Conditions of Confinement Subcommittee Community Outreach Subcommittee Representation from: NJ Juvenile Justice Commission Hudson County Dept. of Corrections Juvenile Judges Public Defenders Hudson Partnership (CMO) Dept. of Children & Families Prosecutors Probation Family Court Staff Detention center Staff

Community outreach subcommittee Formed Community Outreach Subcommittee because we know doing this work means building relationships with community partners… WHO?

But make up over 60% of Hudson’s admissions to detention Why Jersey city? Jersey City kids make up about 37% of the youth population in Hudson County But make up over 60% of Hudson’s admissions to detention

Why Greenville and bergen-lafayette? In 2013, kids from Greenville and Bergen-Lafayette made up 71% of the Jersey City youth admitted to detention and made up 43% of all Hudson County admissions to detention

Hudson Partnership Youth Total Court involved Youth from Greenville and Bergen Lafayette: 54 Total Youth in Detention: 7 out of 20 Total Youth in residential placement: 8

Vision To create a wrap-around community partnership that will collaborate to address the needs of at risk/court involved youth ages 13-21 from the highest crime areas in Jersey City The goal will be to reduce involvement with the juvenile justice system by increasing community and educational bonds

The needs and Wrap-around Areas of Need: Education Exposure to violence Perception of safety in the community More….. Wraparound/Care Managers Strength based Builds Teams that speaks to needs Collaboration Support System for the youth and family Community!! Creates one comprehensive plan that involves/community and partners Youth accountability

We need the Community We need a network of supporting partners and informal supports that can speak to the needs of our youth We need to connect families to providers, community programs and positive supportive people ( more team members) Families will be provided information and education Train and work together Child and Family Team meetings with increased attendance

The Details, the how Identify, cultivate community partnerships (meetings, events, education, interventions) Identify youth (target Population) Referral forms ( Care Managers) HIPPA forms ( confidentiality and release of information) Connect families to providers, community programs and positive supportive people ( more team members) Families will be provided information, education and support Train and work together Child and Family Team meetings AWARNESS! Policy!

Q & A got questions? Courtnie Thomas Juvenile Justice Commission JDAI Research and Reform Specialist Steven Campos Hudson Partnership CMO Community Resource Director scampos@hudsoncmo.org got questions?