Financing Climate Resilient Water Infrastructure Sanjiv K. Sinha, P. E

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I-4 Ultimate with Lanes Project Central Florida 1 May 21, 2013.
Advertisements

June 27, Speakers Julie Ufner, Associate Legislative Director, National Association of Counties (NACo) Carolyn Berndt, Principal Associate, National.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
1 U.S. EPA State Revolving Fund: Providing Affordable Financing George Ames U.S. EPA IADF Conference on Financing Municipalities and Sub-National Governments,
Clean Air Partnership Environmental NGO with a complicated relationship to the City of Toronto Environmental NGO with a complicated relationship to the.
Federal, state and local government entities working together to meet the health, welfare and public safety needs of Wyoming’s citizens. January 11, 2011.
P3 Connect Introduction to WIFIA Denver, CO July 29, 2014.
Tools for Redevelopment Courtney Knight Managing Director, Redevelopment Revitalizing Atlanta 1.
2 1)Familiarize State agency staff with Water Plan Update 2013 information, tools and resources 2)Identify opportunities for State agencies to derive.
Bridging the Finance Gap Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
America’s Water Upmanu Lall water.columbia.edu.
NRCS Watershed Rehabilitation
What’s New with the STATE REVOLVING FUND
Funding Green Infrastructure Solutions: Stormwater Management in Pennsylvania Liz Garland American Rivers ABSTRACT Across the nation, American Rivers is.
NALCAB Conference September 2009 Robert A. Rapoza Rapoza Associates Phone (202)
1 The Rise of Regionalism in Water Resources John K. Woodling California Department of Water Resources North Bay Watershed Association Conference April.
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world 1 © COPYRIGHT 2010 ERM.
Governor’s Strategic Growth Plan Flood Protection and Clean, Safe, Reliable Water Supply Bond and Financing Acts of 2006 and 2010 Southern California Water.
NC Water Resources Congress Annual Meeting Raleigh, NC October 30, 2014 State Water Infrastructure Update: The State of NC and Water, Wastewater and Stormwater.
Public-Public Partnerships February 27, ADC WINTER FORUM | PAGE 2 Public – Public Partnerships Boot camp for Defense Communities Craig Zgabay.
Texas Water Development Board Financing Programs Presentation by Ignacio Madera, Jr. Office of Project Finance & Construction Assistance December 2, 2003.
Why Every American Should Care About the Future of Rural Water Challenges and Opportunities Agricultural Outlook Forum 2012 U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Department of Environmental Quality Water Infrastructure November 17, 2015 Water Infrastructure Funding to Financing.
Sustainability Elements of the ARRA, and Getting the Most out of Stimulus Funding Jeannie Renne-Malone, LEED AP National Director – Climate Change & GHG.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
GEFA Loan Programs CDBG Applicants Workshop Michael Roberts Program Manager Water Resources Division December 4, 2015.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
WELCOME to the Stormwater Funding Strategies February 3, 2016.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Provincial & Local Government Branch: Free Basic Services and Infrastructure Mr Yusuf Patel 19 ~ 20 February.
Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Project Financing 1.
Funding Great Lakes Sewage Infrastructure: Why It’s Critical to Improving Water Quality July 25, 2012 Adam Krantz Managing Director, Government & Public.
Financing Water Infrastructure: The State and Federal Outlook Sarah Pillsbury, Administrator Drinking Water Ground Bureau NH Department of Environmental.
State Revolving Funds 2016 WARWS Licensing and Funding Update April 19, 2016 Casper, Wyoming Brian Mark Wyoming DEQ
Slide 1 American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) Dan Beckley Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Tennessee.
UTILITY PARTNERSHIP CITY OF STOCKTON & OMI / THAMES WATER SERVICE CONTRACT.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
Dr. Andrew Sawyers, Director Office of Wastewater Management
Affordable housing, energy efficiency, and the role of utilities
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center Budget Overview
What is OneWater? “One Water is an integrated planning and implementation approach to managing finite water resources for long-term resiliency and reliability,
Creating Resilient Cities: Strategies and Solutions
Sustainable Water Infrastructure through Innovative Financing
Financial Needs for Water and Wastewater Infrastructure (2015)
Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer
Why Marketing & Outreach for New Hampshire?
Changes and Benefits brought from Modern Procurement to Bridge the Infrastructure Gap Remo Bucci, P.Eng Infrastructure and Capital Projects October 27,
American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Funding for Rural Communities
The Road to Economic Recovery
Streamlining Integrated Infrastructure Implementation: Workshop Report
Global Best Practice Examples for Integrated Water
INAC Water and Wastewater: Discussion on Current Policies and Processes Presented at: Circuit Rider Trainer Professional Association’s Annual General Meeting.
Minnesota Housing Responds to Growing Housing Needs
Finance Options: Funding Water Infrastructure Projects George Bryan South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control State Revolving Fund.
Enhanced Mitigation Actions by Utilizing Green Bonds
Department of Environmental Quality
The Oregon Approach to Innovation in Infrastructure
Integrated Bilateral Agreement (IBA) 2018 to 2028
GCF business model.
1: ASCE 2018 MN Report Card Legislative Water Commission
[OUR CITY NAME]’S OLD SEWERS
Washington State Infrastructure Financing
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Revolutionize USACE Civil Works
Capital Improvement Plans
Fixing Our City’s Old Sewers
The Role of Private Sector in Capital Budgeting
EFC FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
NARC 53rd Annual Conference
‘Regional Policy contributing to Sustainable Growth in EU 2020’
Water Infrastructure Funding
Presentation transcript:

Financing Climate Resilient Water Infrastructure Sanjiv K. Sinha, P. E Financing Climate Resilient Water Infrastructure Sanjiv K. Sinha, P.E., Ph.D. Webinar – Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative & Mayors Innovation Project Greeting. Thank Yous. Intro to individuals The assignment requested by Pittsburgh requires a diverse set of skills, and experienced professionals that can look beyond traditional public works financing and delivery. The ECT Team bring those skills to Pittsburgh by: Experience in identical assignments Agnostic to financing methods but able to evaluate various financing set ups for least cost Recognition of the “municipal view” of the challenge Unbiased - Unencumbered by expectations of being the ultimate delivery contractor. February 21, 2019

P3GreatLakes: A Team Focused on Alternative Delivery/Financing Frameworks www.P3GreatLakes.Org

Outline Status and needs Alternative financing frameworks Status of water infrastructure Past funding levels Needs Resilience impacts Federal programs: SRF and WIFIA Alternative financing frameworks Rating agencies, Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) criteria, resilience, and the future The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset

Water Infrastructure: Diversity and Needs

Water Sector Diversity Water Resources Sector Challenges and Considerations Funding sources Affordability issues Aging infrastructure/deferred maintenance Resiliency Operational efficiency Regulatory requirements Life-cycle asset management New technologies and green infrastructure Financing and delivery constraints

ASCE’s Infrastructure Report Card Estimated needs at over $3.6 Trillion by 2020 ($4.7T by 2025) just to keep pace with GDP (OECD/WEF). Every dollar of deferred maintenance costs taxpayers $4-5 in future capital expenditures. The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset Source: ASCE Infrastructure Report Card,2017

Clear Need for Investment in Resilient Water Infrastructure $472.6 billion 20-year capital need for drinking water EPA’s 2015 Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment (2015$) $271.0 billion 20-year capital need for wastewater EPA’s 2012 Clean Watersheds Needs Survey (2012$) $448 - $994 billion needed to prepare water infrastructure for the impacts of climate change 2009 estimate from the National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) and the Association of the Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA)

Infrastructure Investment Gap is Growing Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, by Level of Government, 1956 to 2014

And the Challenges Go Beyond Funding . . . Infrastructure delivery system is flawed Limited life-cycle asset considerations Lack of incentivized performance Taxpayers and ratepayers deserve a better deal Alternative finance and delivery options Pay for performance Community co-benefits Of all of the world’s megaprojects, 9 out of 10: Overrun their budget Are delayed Don’t deliver the expected benefits The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset Source: Bent Flyvbjerg, University of Oxford Said Business School

Climate Resilient Water Infrastructure

Climate Reality The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset Source: “The Midwest Is Getting Drenched, And It’s Causing Big Problems” by Ella Koeze, fivethirtyeight.com

Design Challenge National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Atlas 14 Provides widely used precipitation estimates for most of the country How much rain qualifies a storm as a “10-year,” “50-year” or “hundred-year” rainstorm in each area — that is, storms that might be expected to occur only once in each of those timespans Water infrastructure in Minnesota Atlas 14 was updated in and released for Minnesota in 2013 Until then the most recent estimates available for Minnesota had been last updated in the ’70s => Problem The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset

Water Infrastructure Funding/Finance: State Revolving Loan Funds

Drinking Water & Clean Water State Revolving Funds: Eligible Projects Drinking Water SRF Drinking water treatment Transmission & distribution Source water Finished water storage System consolidation or creation Water security Water infrastructure energy & water efficiency Clean Water SRF Wastewater treatment Stormwater management Agricultural best management practices Watershed management Pollution prevention Wastewater infrastructure energy & water conservation Aquifer recharge Desalination

Cumulative SRF Assistance Agreements $126B cumulative CWSRF assistance $35B cumulative DWSRF Source: Natural Resources Defense Council, 2018 Presentation at Great Lakes Adaptation Forum.

Cumulative SRF Assistance Agreements DWSRF CWSRF $473B drinking water need $271B wastewater need Source: Natural Resources Defense Council, 2018 Presentation at Great Lakes Adaptation Forum.

Water Infrastructure Finance: WIFIA

The Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act (WIFIA) Operation since 2017 Provides long-term, low-cost, supplemental credit assistance to creditworthy water and wastewater projects Can lend money to corporations, trusts, partnerships, joint ventures, Clean Water SRF and Drinking Water SRF programs, and local, state, tribal, and federal government entities, Limits support to 49% of project cost, with exemptions for certain projects, such as those built in Indian tribal communities The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset

Authorized & Appropriated Funding Each Fiscal Year Appropriated Total Expenses (million $) Total Amount of Credit Assistance 2015 2016 2017 30 2,300 2018 63 5,500 2019 68a 7,000a The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset Source: “What we have learned in the two years of WIFIA’s existence” by Vedachalam & Lindquist, March 2018, Journal AWWA

WIFIA’s Strategic Objectives as Identified by U.S. EPA Are Evolving FY2017 FY2018 Extreme weather and climate change infrastructure Included Not listed Enhanced energy efficiency Green infrastructure Clean and safe drinking water Repair and rehabilitate old infrastructure The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset Source: “What we have learned in the two years of WIFIA’s existence” by Vedachalam & Lindquist, March 2018, Journal AWWA

Distribution of WIFIA Criteria Weights Are Also Evolving 15% 5% 32% 34% 80% The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset 34% Source: “What we have learned in the two years of WIFIA’s existence” by Vedachalam & Lindquist, March 2018, Journal AWWA

WIFIA 12 projects selected in first year of program Some examples: Median cost for large community project = $253 Million Only one small community project Some examples: City of Baltimore planned to receive $200 Mil in WIFIA funds for wastewater treatment upgrade/repairs, and stormwater management systems Indiana Finance Authority used use SRF balance of $453 Mil, and was able to issue $890 Mil in projects across the state The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset

2019 Omnibus Appropriations Bill

Appropriations for U. S. Department of Interior & U. S Appropriations for U.S. Department of Interior & U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Clean Water State Revolving Fund — $1.7 billion Equal to the 2018 enacted level and $300 million above the President’s budget request Direct 10% of funds to be used for green infrastructure, water & energy efficiency improvements, or other environmentally innovative activities Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund — $1.2 billion The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset Source: Feb 14-2019 Stormwater Newsletter, Water Environment Federation.

Appropriations for the U. S. Department of Interior & the U. S Appropriations for the U.S. Department of Interior & the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) Grants — $68 million $5 million above the FY 2018 enacted level and $48 million above the President’s budget request Forecasts total potential loan capacity at greater than $7 billion in water infrastructure projects Directs the EPA to prioritize funding to address lead and emerging contaminants, including PFOA and PFAS The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset Source: Feb 14-2019 Stormwater Newsletter, Water Environment Federation.

Conclusions There is a massive funding gap Funding gap is only part of the problem Climate change is exacerbating the challenge of the funding gap SRF and WIFIA can be further enhanced to address climate resiliency needs Rating agencies will have a say in how it all plays out Alternative sources of finance are needed, and are rapidly emerging The assets of the city remain with the city The goals for the program are clearly understood and articulated by the city The program is established with goals that are aligned between the city and the private partner through incentives associated with attaining various goals, and could include workforce development and other social goals, as well as the performance of stormwater control systems The management of the partnership is controlled by the city, and The financial benefit to both the city and the private entity is well defined at the onset

Water Infrastructure Finance: 2.0

ssinha@ectinc. com 734-272-0859 www. P3GreatLakes. Org www. twitter ssinha@ectinc.com 734-272-0859 www.P3GreatLakes.Org www.twitter.com/P3GreatLakes