Greedy Algorithms Comp 122, Spring 2004

Overview Like dynamic programming, used to solve optimization problems. Problems exhibit optimal substructure (like DP). Problems also exhibit the greedy-choice property. When we have a choice to make, make the one that looks best right now. Make a locally optimal choice in hope of getting a globally optimal solution. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Greedy Strategy The choice that seems best at the moment is the one we go with. Prove that when there is a choice to make, one of the optimal choices is the greedy choice. Therefore, it’s always safe to make the greedy choice. Show that all but one of the subproblems resulting from the greedy choice are empty. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Activity-selection Problem Input: Set S of n activities, a1, a2, …, an. si = start time of activity i. fi = finish time of activity i. Output: Subset A of maximum number of compatible activities. Two activities are compatible, if their intervals don’t overlap. Example: Activities in each line are compatible. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Optimal Substructure Assume activities are sorted by finishing times. f1  f2  …  fn. Suppose an optimal solution includes activity ak. This generates two subproblems. Selecting from a1, …, ak-1, activities compatible with one another, and that finish before ak starts (compatible with ak). Selecting from ak+1, …, an, activities compatible with one another, and that start after ak finishes. The solutions to the two subproblems must be optimal. Prove using the cut-and-paste approach. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Recursive Solution Let Sij = subset of activities in S that start after ai finishes and finish before aj starts. Subproblems: Selecting maximum number of mutually compatible activities from Sij. Let c[i, j] = size of maximum-size subset of mutually compatible activities in Sij. Recursive Solution: Comp 122, Fall 2003

Greedy-choice Property The problem also exhibits the greedy-choice property. There is an optimal solution to the subproblem Sij, that includes the activity with the smallest finish time in set Sij. Can be proved easily. Hence, there is an optimal solution to S that includes a1. Therefore, make this greedy choice without solving subproblems first and evaluating them. Solve the subproblem that ensues as a result of making this greedy choice. Combine the greedy choice and the solution to the subproblem. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Recursive Algorithm Recursive-Activity-Selector (s, f, i, j) m  i+1 while m < j and sm < fi do m  m+1 if m < j then return {am}  Recursive-Activity-Selector(s, f, m, j) else return  Initial Call: Recursive-Activity-Selector (s, f, 0, n+1) Complexity: (n) Straightforward to convert the algorithm to an iterative one. See the text. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Typical Steps Cast the optimization problem as one in which we make a choice and are left with one subproblem to solve. Prove that there’s always an optimal solution that makes the greedy choice, so that the greedy choice is always safe. Show that greedy choice and optimal solution to subproblem  optimal solution to the problem. Make the greedy choice and solve top-down. May have to preprocess input to put it into greedy order. Example: Sorting activities by finish time. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Elements of Greedy Algorithms Greedy-choice Property. A globally optimal solution can be arrived at by making a locally optimal (greedy) choice. Optimal Substructure. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Minimum Spanning Trees Comp 122, Spring 2004

Minimum Spanning Trees Given: Connected, undirected, weighted graph, G Find: Minimum - weight spanning tree, T Example: 7 b c 5 Acyclic subset of edges(E) that connects all vertices of G. a 1 3 -3 11 d e f 2 b c 5 a 1 3 -3 d e f Comp 122, Fall 2003

Generic Algorithm “Grows” a set A. A is subset of some MST. Edge is “safe” if it can be added to A without destroying this invariant. A := ; while A not complete tree do find a safe edge (u, v); A := A  {(u, v)} od Comp 122, Fall 2003

Definitions no edge in the set crosses the cut cut respects the edge set {(a, b), (b, c)} a light edge crossing cut (could be more than one) 5 7 a b c 1 -3 11 3 cut partitions vertices into disjoint sets, S and V – S. d e f 2 this edge crosses the cut one endpoint is in S and the other is in V – S. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Theorem 23.1 Theorem 23.1: Let (S, V-S) be any cut that respects A, and let (u, v) be a light edge crossing (S, V-S). Then, (u, v) is safe for A. Proof: Let T be a MST that includes A. Case: (u, v) in T. We’re done. Case: (u, v) not in T. We have the following: edge in A (x, y) crosses cut. Let T´ = T - {(x, y)}  {(u, v)}. Because (u, v) is light for cut, w(u, v)  w(x, y). Thus, w(T´) = w(T) - w(x, y) + w(u, v)  w(T). Hence, T´ is also a MST. So, (u, v) is safe for A. x cut y u shows edges in T v Comp 122, Fall 2003

Corollary In general, A will consist of several connected components. Corollary: If (u, v) is a light edge connecting one CC in (V, A) to another CC in (V, A), then (u, v) is safe for A. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Kruskal’s Algorithm Starts with each vertex in its own component. Repeatedly merges two components into one by choosing a light edge that connects them (i.e., a light edge crossing the cut between them). Scans the set of edges in monotonically increasing order by weight. Uses a disjoint-set data structure to determine whether an edge connects vertices in different components. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Prim’s Algorithm Builds one tree, so A is always a tree. Starts from an arbitrary “root” r . At each step, adds a light edge crossing cut (VA, V - VA) to A. VA = vertices that A is incident on. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Prim’s Algorithm Uses a priority queue Q to find a light edge quickly. Each object in Q is a vertex in V - VA. Key of v is minimum weight of any edge (u, v), where u  VA. Then the vertex returned by Extract-Min is v such that there exists u  VA and (u, v) is light edge crossing (VA, V - VA). Key of v is  if v is not adjacent to any vertex in VA. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Prim’s Algorithm Complexity:  decrease-key operation Q := V[G]; for each u  Q do key[u] :=  od; key[r] := 0; [r] := NIL; while Q   do u := Extract - Min(Q); for each v  Adj[u] do if v  Q  w(u, v) < key[v] then [v] := u; key[v] := w(u, v) fi od Complexity: Using binary heaps: O(E lg V). Initialization – O(V). Building initial queue – O(V). V Extract-Min’s – O(V lgV). E Decrease-Key’s – O(E lg V). Using Fibonacci heaps: O(E + V lg V). (see book)  decrease-key operation Note: A = {(v, [v]) : v  v - {r} - Q}. Comp 122, Fall 2003

Example of Prim’s Algorithm Not in tree 5 7 a/0 b/ c/ 1 Q = a b c d e f 0   -3 11 3 d/ e/ f/ 2 Comp 122, Fall 2003

Example of Prim’s Algorithm 5 7 a/0 b/5 c/ 1 Q = b d c e f 5 11   -3 11 3 d/11 e/ f/ 2 Comp 122, Fall 2003

Example of Prim’s Algorithm 5 7 a/0 b/5 c/7 1 Q = e c d f 3 7 11  -3 11 3 d/11 e/3 f/ 2 Comp 122, Fall 2003

Example of Prim’s Algorithm 5 7 a/0 b/5 c/1 1 Q = d c f 0 1 2 -3 11 3 d/0 e/3 f/2 2 Comp 122, Fall 2003

Example of Prim’s Algorithm 5 7 a/0 b/5 c/1 1 Q = c f 1 2 -3 11 3 d/0 e/3 f/2 2 Comp 122, Fall 2003

Example of Prim’s Algorithm 5 7 a/0 b/5 c/1 1 Q = f -3 -3 11 3 d/0 e/3 f/-3 2 Comp 122, Fall 2003

Example of Prim’s Algorithm 5 7 a/0 b/5 c/1 1 Q =  -3 11 3 d/0 e/3 f/-3 2 Comp 122, Fall 2003

Example of Prim’s Algorithm 5 a/0 b/5 c/1 1 3 -3 d/0 e/3 f/-3 Comp 122, Fall 2003