R. Lattanzi, C. Petchprapa, D. Ascani, J. S. Babb, D. Chu, R. I

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Novel optical imaging technique to determine the 3-D orientation of collagen fibers in cartilage: variable-incidence angle polarization-sensitive optical.
Advertisements

Increased acetabular subchondral bone density is associated with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement  A.D. Speirs, P.E. Beaulé, K.S. Rakhra, M.E. Schweitzer,
A. Williams, Y. Qian, S. Golla, C.R. Chu  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
In vivo comparison of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage and delayed quantitative CT arthrography in imaging of articular cartilage  J. Hirvasniemi,
A. Guermazi, H. Alizai, M. D. Crema, S. Trattnig, R. R. Regatte, F. W
Prevalence of labral tears and cartilage loss in patients with mechanical symptoms of the hip: evaluation using MR arthrography  G. Neumann, M.D., A.D.
A. Watanabe, C. Boesch, S.E. Anderson, W. Brehm, P. Mainil Varlet 
Change in knee osteoarthritis cartilage detected by delayed gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging following treatment with collagen hydrolysate:
Radial dGEMRIC in developmental dysplasia of the hip and in femoroacetabular impingement: preliminary results  S.E. Domayer, T.C. Mamisch, I. Kress, J.
Considerations in measuring cartilage thickness using MRI: factors influencing reproducibility and accuracy  S. Koo, M.S., G.E. Gold, M.D., T.P. Andriacchi,
Cartilage damage in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): preliminary results on comparison of standard diagnostic vs delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic.
Long-term periarticular bone adaptation in a feline knee injury model for post-traumatic experimental osteoarthritis  S.K. Boyd, Ph.D., R. Müller, Ph.D.,
A. Williams, Y. Qian, D. Bear, C.R. Chu  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
Hisham A. Alhadlaq, M.S., Yang Xia, Ph.D.  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
An MRI derived articular cartilage visualization framework
C. D. Jordan, E. J. McWalter, U. D. Monu, R. D. Watkins, W. Chen, N. K
Contrast-enhanced CT facilitates rapid, non-destructive assessment of cartilage and bone properties of the human metacarpal  B.A. Lakin, D.J. Ellis, J.S.
Evaluation of cartilage matrix disorders by T2 relaxation time in patients with hip dysplasia  T. Nishii, M.D., H. Tanaka, M.D., N. Sugano, M.D., T. Sakai,
MRI of articular cartilage in OA: novel pulse sequences and compositional/functional markers  Garry E. Gold, Deborah Burstein, Bernard Dardzinski, Phillip.
Imaging of non-osteochondral tissues in osteoarthritis
Three-dimensional hip cartilage quality assessment of morphology and dGEMRIC by planar maps and automated segmentation  C. Siversson, A. Akhondi-Asl,
Early Effects of HIP Arthroscopy on Articular Cartilage Composition in Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients  M.A. Samaan, A.L. Zhang, M.C. Gallo, T.M.
Initial application of EPIC-μCT to assess mouse articular cartilage morphology and composition: effects of aging and treadmill running  N. Kotwal, J.
B.J. Ahern, J. Parvizi, R. Boston, T.P. Schaer 
Intraoperative validation of quantitative T2 mapping in patients with articular cartilage lesions of the knee  S.T. Soellner, A. Goldmann, D. Muelheims,
Patient-specific chondrolabral contact mechanics in patients with acetabular dysplasia following treatment with peri-acetabular osteotomy  C.L. Abraham,
B.J. Ahern, J. Parvizi, R. Boston, T.P. Schaer 
H.T. Kokkonen, J.S. Jurvelin, V. Tiitu, J. Töyräs 
Statistical evaluation of biomedical studies
Disorders of acetabular labrum and articular cartilage in hip dysplasia: evaluation using isotropic high-resolutional CT arthrography with sequential.
Quantitative assessment of articular cartilage morphology via EPIC-μCT
Evaluation of translation in the normal and dysplastic hip using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and voxel-based registration  K. Akiyama,
Measurement accuracy of focal cartilage defects from MRI and correlation of MRI graded lesions with histology: a preliminary study  Chris A McGibbon,
Differences between X-ray and MRI-determined knee cartilage thickness in weight- bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions  M. Marsh, R.B. Souza, B.T.
Volumetric and semiquantitative assessment of MRI-detected subchondral bone marrow lesions in knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of contrast-enhanced and.
Three-dimensional distribution of articular cartilage thickness in the elderly cadaveric acetabulum: a new method using three-dimensional digitizer and.
B. Bittersohl, F. R. Miese, H. S. Hosalkar, M. Herten, G. Antoch, R
A. Williams, Y. Qian, C.R. Chu  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
A clinically realistic large animal model of intra-articular fracture that progresses to post- traumatic osteoarthritis  J.E. Goetz, D. Fredericks, E.
Vastus lateralis/vastus medialis cross-sectional area ratio impacts presence and degree of knee joint abnormalities and cartilage T2 determined with 3T.
Estimation of mechanical properties of articular cartilage with MRI – dGEMRIC, T2 and T1 imaging in different species with variable stages of maturation 
P. Julkunen, J. Iivarinen, P. A. Brama, J. Arokoski, J. S. Jurvelin, H
Nondestructive assessment of sGAG content and distribution in normal and degraded rat articular cartilage via EPIC-μCT  L. Xie, A.S.P. Lin, R.E. Guldberg,
B. C. Fleming, H. L. Oksendahl, W. A. Mehan, R. Portnoy, P. D
Residual hip dysplasia at 1 year after treatment for neonatal hip instability is not related to degenerative joint disease in young adulthood: a 21-year.
MRI morphological and quantitative evaluation of knee allograft repair at 3, 6 and 9 months post-op: early surveillance demonstrates nascent physiological.
DGEMRIC as a tool for measuring changes in cartilage quality following high tibial osteotomy: a feasibility study  M. Rutgers, L.W. Bartels, A.I. Tsuchida,
Morphological and compositional monitoring of a new cell-free cartilage repair hydrogel technology – GelrinC by MR using semi-quantitative MOCART scoring.
The OARSI histopathology initiative – recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the dog  J.L. Cook, K. Kuroki, D. Visco, J.-P.
Patterns of joint damage seen on MRI in early hip osteoarthritis due to structural hip deformities  D. Stelzeneder, T.C. Mamisch, I. Kress, S.E. Domayer,
N. Männicke, M. Schöne, M. Oelze, K. Raum  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
Dr J. H. Naish, Ph. D. , Dr E. Xanthopoulos, Ph. D. , Dr C. E
Degeneration of patellar cartilage in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation following conservative treatment: evaluation with delayed gadolinium-enhanced.
Three-dimensional patterns of early acetabular cartilage damage in hip dysplasia; a high-resolutional CT arthrography study  S. Tamura, T. Nishii, T.
Meniscectomy alters the dynamic deformational behavior and cumulative strain of tibial articular cartilage in knee joints subjected to cyclic loads  Y.
Comparison of BLOKS and WORMS scoring systems part I
Three dimensional distribution of hip cartilage t2 mapping assessed by radial mr imaging: comparison between healthy volunteers and patients with hip.
T1ρ Radial heterogeneity is a distinctive feature of cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular impingement patients  M.A. Samaan, V. Pedoia, A.L. Zhang,
MRI-derived T2 relaxation times and cartilage morphometry of the tibio-femoral joint in subjects with and without osteoarthritis during a 1-year follow-up 
X. Li, Ph. D. , C. Benjamin Ma, M. D. , T. M. Link, M. D. , D. -D
T2 assessment and clinical outcome following autologous matrix-assisted chondrocyte and osteochondral autograft transplantation  G.M. Salzmann, J. Paul,
Surface roughness and thickness analysis of contrast-enhanced articular cartilage using mesh parameterization  T. Maerz, M.D. Newton, H.W.T. Matthew,
A new method to analyze dGEMRIC measurements in femoroacetabular impingement: preliminary validation against arthroscopic findings  R. Lattanzi, C. Petchprapa,
In vivo structural analysis of subchondral trabecular bone in osteoarthritis of the hip using multi-detector row CT  K. Chiba, M. Ito, M. Osaki, M. Uetani,
3D modelling of the hip joint from clinical imaging data
Longitudinal evaluation of T1ρ and T2 spatial distribution in osteoarthritic and healthy medial knee cartilage  J. Schooler, D. Kumar, L. Nardo, C. McCulloch,
C. R. Henak, E. D. Carruth, A. E. Anderson, M. D. Harris, B. J
B. C. Fleming, H. L. Oksendahl, W. A. Mehan, R. Portnoy, P. D
M. E. Bowers, B. S. , N. Trinh, M. S. , G. A. Tung, M. D. , F. A. C. R
Three-dimensional distribution of acetabular cartilage thickness in patients with hip dysplasia: a fully automated computational analysis of MR imaging 
Presentation transcript:

Detection of cartilage damage in femoroacetabular impingement with standardized dGEMRIC at 3 T  R. Lattanzi, C. Petchprapa, D. Ascani, J.S. Babb, D. Chu, R.I. Davidovitch, T. Youm, R.J. Meislin, M.P. Recht  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage  Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 447-456 (March 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.12.022 Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of the procedure for generating Standardized dGEMRIC maps. First, an ROI is defined over the central portion of the femoral cartilage, assumed to be healthy (bottom row, left). The mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of the T1 values in such ROI are used to transform the dGEMRIC T1 map (top row, left) into a parametric map (top row, center), where each pixel represents a z value, calculated from a corresponding T1 value (x) as z = (x − μ)/σ. A second ROI is then defined over the weight-bearing portion of the hip articular cartilage (bottom row, right) and used to segment the parametric map. Finally, the color scale is adjusted to highlight regions of abnormal cartilage (z < 0) and the resulting Standardized dGEMRIC map is superimposed to the corresponding morphologic image (top row, right), which frames it within the hip anatomy. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2014 22, 447-456DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2013.12.022) Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Post-operative descriptive hip form used by the surgeons to document the type and location of acetabular cartilage injuries found during arthroscopy. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2014 22, 447-456DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2013.12.022) Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Average, among all radial sections of each patient, of the mean T1 (μ) in the femoral ROI. In each case, values are shown for the dGEMRIC analysis of Observer 1 and for the two sessions of Observer 2. The age at the time of the MRI scan is reported in the x-axis for the 20 patients. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2014 22, 447-456DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2013.12.022) Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Standardized dGEMRIC maps for two representative radial sections in the AS region. The anatomic position of each section is specified by the black line on the schematic illustrations in the left column. The central column shows the PD-weighted radial images and the right column shows the corresponding Standardized dGEMRIC maps, where the spatial distribution of the z values in the weight-bearing portion of the hip articular cartilage is superimposed to an MR image of the hip. Values smaller than zero indicate GAG concentration lower than normal. The map in the top row indicates normal cartilage (i.e., z ≥ −2), and that was confirmed by morphologic and arthroscopic assessment. For the case in the bottom row, cartilage was found to be injured during arthroscopy and it is clearly damaged (i.e., z < −2) for the Standardized dGEMRIC map, whereas it was ruled as normal based on the PD-weighted image. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2014 22, 447-456DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2013.12.022) Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Standardized dGEMRIC maps for two representative radial sections in the PS region. The black line on the schematic illustrations in the left column specifies the anatomic position of each section. PD-weighted radial images are shown in the central column and the corresponding Standardized dGEMRIC maps are shown in the right column. The spatial distribution of the z values is shown for the weight-bearing portion of the hip articular cartilage and superimposed to an MR image. Values lower than zero indicate that GAG concentration is lower than normal and the threshold for damaged cartilage was defined as z < −2. Cartilage was normal on arthroscopic evaluation for the case in the top row and was read as normal on the PD-weighted image. The Standardized dGEMRIC map shows focal areas of low z, but they do not extend over the full thickness of the cartilage, which was therefore correctly ruled as normal. The map in the bottom row shows damaged cartilage in the peripheral region and that was confirmed by arthroscopic assessment, whereas no morphologic changes were found on the PD-weighted image. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2014 22, 447-456DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2013.12.022) Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Standardized dGEMRIC maps of a representative hip with the color scaling adjusted for different threshold values. For each map, the color orange represents the transition between normal and abnormal cartilage. In this case, a chondral defect was found on arthroscopic evaluation and it is shown on the Standardized dGEMRIC map only when the z < −2 or z < −2.5 (top row) are used as threshold values. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2014 22, 447-456DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2013.12.022) Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 7 Average T1 in the acetabular cartilage ROI used for the ROC analysis. Average T1 values are reported for each of the 84 radial sections and the median point (i.e., 791 ms) is indicated by the horizontal gray line. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2014 22, 447-456DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2013.12.022) Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions