Kevin Lum, Helgi I. Ingólfsson, Roger E. Koeppe, Olaf S. Andersen 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Advertisements

Hydrophobic Surfactant Proteins Strongly Induce Negative Curvature
Single-Molecule TPM Studies on the Conversion of Human Telomeric DNA
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 96, Issue 11, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Physical Properties of Escherichia coli Spheroplast Membranes
Composition Fluctuations in Lipid Bilayers
Vilmos Zsolnay, Michael Fill, Dirk Gillespie  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Alcohol's Effects on Lipid Bilayer Properties
Reversible Liposome Association Induced by LAH4: A Peptide with Potent Antimicrobial and Nucleic Acid Transfection Activities  Arnaud Marquette, Bernard.
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 98, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Taylor Fuselier, William C. Wimley  Biophysical Journal 
Enlargement and Contracture of C2-Ceramide Channels
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages (September 2017)
Homodimeric Kinesin-2 KIF3CC Promotes Microtubule Dynamics
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Agata Witkowska, Reinhard Jahn  Biophysical Journal 
David J. Niedzwiecki, Mohammad M. Mohammad, Liviu Movileanu 
Fiber-Dependent and -Independent Toxicity of Islet Amyloid Polypeptide
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Sofia Yu. Khaitlina, Hanna Strzelecka-Gołaszewska  Biophysical Journal 
Thermodynamic Profiling of Peptide Membrane Interactions by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: A Search for Pores and Micelles  J.R. Henriksen, T.L. Andresen 
Stationary Gating of GluN1/GluN2B Receptors in Intact Membrane Patches
Volume 112, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
V.P. Ivanova, I.M. Makarov, T.E. Schäffer, T. Heimburg 
Lipid Headgroups Modulate Membrane Insertion of pHLIP Peptide
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 96, Issue 11, Pages (June 2009)
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
A Large-Conductance Anion Channel of the Golgi Complex
Puroindolines Form Ion Channels in Biological Membranes
Lipid Raft Composition Modulates Sphingomyelinase Activity and Ceramide-Induced Membrane Physical Alterations  Liana C. Silva, Anthony H. Futerman, Manuel.
The Effect of Dye-Dye Interactions on the Spatial Resolution of Single-Molecule FRET Measurements in Nucleic Acids  Nicolas Di Fiori, Amit Meller  Biophysical.
Kinetics of Surface-Driven Self-Assembly and Fatigue-Induced Disassembly of a Virus- Based Nanocoating  Alejandro Valbuena, Mauricio G. Mateu  Biophysical.
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages (October 2009)
Biophysical Characterization of Styryl Dye-Membrane Interactions
Effects of Temperature on Heteromeric Kv11.1a/1b and Kv11.3 Channels
Fredrik Elinder, Michael Madeja, Hugo Zeberg, Peter Århem 
Volume 106, Issue 10, Pages (May 2014)
Blocking of Single α-Hemolysin Pore by Rhodamine Derivatives
Ion-Induced Defect Permeation of Lipid Membranes
Philip J. Robinson, Teresa J.T. Pinheiro  Biophysical Journal 
Elementary Functional Properties of Single HCN2 Channels
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Vilmos Zsolnay, Michael Fill, Dirk Gillespie  Biophysical Journal 
Ining Jou, Murugappan Muthukumar  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
Jose L. Alejo, Scott C. Blanchard, Olaf S. Andersen 
New Cationic Lipids Form Channel-Like Pores in Phospholipid Bilayers
Use of Cyclodextrins to Monitor Transbilayer Movement and Differential Lipid Affinities of Cholesterol  Rania Leventis, John R. Silvius  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 104, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Use Dependence of Heat Sensitivity of Vanilloid Receptor TRPV2
Probing the Dynamics of Clot-Bound Thrombin at Venous Shear Rates
Molecular Structure of Membrane Tethers
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Enlargement and Contracture of C2-Ceramide Channels
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 101, Issue 9, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Exchange of Gramicidin between Lipid Bilayers: Implications for the Mechanism of Channel Formation  Kevin Lum, Helgi I. Ingólfsson, Roger E. Koeppe, Olaf S. Andersen  Biophysical Journal  Volume 113, Issue 8, Pages 1757-1767 (October 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.049 Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Two different proposals for gA channel formation. (A) Given here is the canonical model in which gA channels form by reversible transmembrane dimerization of two nonconducting subunits, one from each bilayer leaflet (as emphasized by the subunit coloring). (B) Given here is the model of Jones et al. (12), in which gA channels exist as dimers that can switch between nonconducting (gray) and conducting (colored) bilayer-spanning states. (In model B, the gA subunits do not dissociate, or dissociate very slowly, once two monomers join together.) To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1757-1767DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.049) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The four vesicle types used in this study. Types A and B are not loaded with ANTS, and therefore are invisible in the fluorescence quench experiments; types C and D are loaded with ANTS, and therefore are visible in the fluorescence quench experiments. Types A and C lack gA in the membrane; types B and D have gA incorporated into the membrane. The gramicidin-free type-A LUVs serve as sinks for the removal of gA from the ANTS-loaded gA-containing type-D LUVs. The gramicidin-containing type-B LUVs serve as donors for transfer of channels to the gA-free type-C LUVs. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1757-1767DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.049) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 gA exchange between DC22:1PC LUVs, as monitored by changes in the time course of Tl+-induced fluorescence quenching. Four different LUV mixtures were tested; each LUV type or mixture was incubated at 25°C for the indicated period, and the fluorescence quench rates were determined using stopped-flow spectrofluorometry. The quench rates were normalized to the rates determined for the standard (type-D) LUVs after 10 min incubation; the type-C and -D LUVs served as control for membrane integrity. To monitor the removal of gA subunits, type-D (+ANTS, +gA) LUVs were incubated with type-A (−ANTS, −gA) or type-B (−ANTS, +gA) LUVs at a 1:4 ratio of D to A or B; after 10 min, there is a twofold reduction in the quench rate for the D+4A mixture, with little further change (see also Fig. 4). (The mixture of types D and B served as positive control because any exchange of gA should not affect the average number of gA subunits in type-D.) To monitor the insertion of gA subunits (and formation of gA channels), type-C (+ANTS, −gA) LUVs were incubated with type-A (−ANTS, −gA) or -B (−ANTS, +gA) LUVs at a 4:1 ratio of types C to A or B; after 16 h, there was a 25% increase in the quench rate for the C+4B mixture (see also Fig. 4). (The mixture of types A and C served as negative control, as there was no gA that could partition into type-C.) To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1757-1767DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.049) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Summary of results on gA exchange between DC22:1PC vesicles. The fluorescence quench rates, determined in experiments like those in Fig. 3, were normalized to the rates determined for the standard vesicle (type-D) after 10 min incubation, where the average quench rate was 37 ± 10 s–1, mean ± SD (n = 5). For the experiments in the top row, the D+4A mixture monitors the removal of gA subunits (bilayer-spanning channels) from type-D LUVs. The D+4B mixture served as positive control, and type-D by itself serves as control for membrane integrity. For the experiments in the bottom row, the C+4B mixture monitors the insertion of bilayer-spanning gA channels into type-C LUVs, and the C+4A mixture served as a negative control. Mean ± SD (n = 3–5) except 40 h D+4B, which is mean ± range/2 (n = 2). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1757-1767DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.049) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Summary of results on gA exchange between DC18:1PC vesicles. The fluorescence quench rates, determined in experiments similar to those in Fig. 3 but with DC18:1PC LUVs, were normalized to the rates determined for the standard vesicle (type-D) after 10 min incubation, where the average quench rate was 89 ± 15 s–1, mean ± SD (n = 8). For the experiments in the top row, the D+4A mixture monitors the removal of gA subunits (bilayer-spanning channels) from type-D LUVs. The D+4B mixture served as positive control, and type-D by itself serves as control for membrane integrity. For the experiments in the bottom row, the C+4B mixture monitors the insertion of bilayer-spanning gA channels into type-C LUVs, and the C+4A mixture served as a negative control. Mean ≥ SD (n = 3–6) except for the 2 h experiments, which is mean ± range/2 (n = 2). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1757-1767DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.049) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Extraction of gA subunits from planar lipid bilayers using gA-free vesicles. Current traces were recorded from a planar DC18:1PC/n-decane bilayer that had been doped with 100 fM gA, added through the aqueous phase, which had been stirred for 60 s, and gA channel activity was monitored. Over the first 15 min (after gA addition), channel activity increased to reach an apparent equilibrium, where the average number of conducting channels was 2.4. The aqueous phases then were stirred for one min, which caused some membrane instability (periods of membrane instability are denoted by the gray box; they were not included in the analysis) but no further increase in channel activity. After 25 min, 40 μL 1.0 M CsCl was added to both aqueous phases, as control for the later addition of lipid vesicles, and the solutions were stirred for 60 s (indicated by solid box), which led to minimal change in channel activity; the average number of conducting channels after 5 min was 2.2. Then 40 μL of gA-free DC22:1PC lipid vesicles (type-A) were added to both sides of the bilayer, to a final lipid concentration of 80 μM in the aqueous phases, which were stirred for 60 s (again indicated by solid box), and channel activity was monitored over the next 70 min (only the first 30 min was used for analysis). The current trace fragments below the trace show segments at higher time resolution, sampled at the locations indicated by (∗) below the time axis for the main trace. 1.0 M CsCl, 100 mV. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1757-1767DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.049) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 gA single-channel activity in planar DC18:1PC/n-decane bilayers before and after addition of gA-free DC22:1PC vesicles. The average number of conducting channels over consecutive observation periods was determined from single-channel current traces, like Fig. 6. Each data point denotes the average number of conducting gA channels observed over 3 min, normalized to the maximum number (nmax) observed in the particular current trace (10–15 min after gA addition). The three stages in the experiments were: Control, after gA addition but before any manipulation; Salt Control, where first the aqueous phases were stirred for 60 s to test whether the system had reached apparent equilibrium, followed by the addition of 40 μL electrolyte to the aqueous phase on each side of the bilayer, then stirred for 60 s and channel activity was determined; and Vesicle Addition, where gA-free DC22:1PC vesicles were added to both sides of the bilayer to a final lipid concentration (in the aqueous phases) of 80 μM and the solutions were stirred for 60 s and channel activity was monitored. 1.0 M CsCl, 100 mV. Mean ± SD (n = 3). Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1757-1767DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.049) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Insertion of gA subunits into planar lipid bilayers from gA-containing DC22:1PC vesicles. In the first half of the trace, lasting 27 min, DC22:1PC vesicles (80 μM lipid, 40 nM gA) were added only to the cis chamber, the aqueous phases were stirred for 60 s (indicated by a solid box), and channel activity was recorded. There is only one identifiable channel event (marked by (∗) below the time axis for the main trace) after 24 min of recording, which is shown at higher resolution in the first of the three currents in the bottom of the figure. Then the same amount of gA-containing DC22:1PC vesicles were added to the trans chamber, the solutions were stirred for 60 s (again indicated by a solid box), and gA channel activity was observed. The second and third current trace fragments below the trace show segments at higher time resolution, sampled at the locations indicated by (∗) below the time axis for the main trace. 1.0 M CsCl, 100 mV. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1757-1767DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.049) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Evaluating models of gA channel formation using Poisson and binomial distribution fits to the data. The three panels denote the results from three different experiments where we were able to observe single-channel activity for >50 min (the current trace in Fig. 6 is from Experiment 2). For each experiment, the average number of conducting channels (〈n〉) and the maximal number of conducting channels (nmax) were determined from the current traces (e.g., Fig. 6), and the distribution of the number of conducting channels (0, 1, 2, … nmax) in each 3-min test period (the different conditions are defined in the legend to Fig. 7) was compared to predictions based on the Poisson and binomial distributions. For the binomial fits, the number of gA dimers (conducting and nonconducting) was estimated as the maximal number of observed channels, nmax and as 1.5⋅nmax (∗) or 2⋅nmax (∗∗), to account for a possible underestimate of nmax. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1757-1767DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.049) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions