Robert B. Rutherford, MD, J. Dennis Baker, MD, Calvin Ernst, MD, K

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Endothelial cell seeding reduces thrombogenicity of Dacron grafts in humans Per Örtenwall, MD, PhD *, Hans Wadenvik, MD, PhD **, Jack Kutti, MD, PhD **,

Advertisements

Suggested standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia

Popliteal artery stenosis caused by a Baker's cyst

J. Dennis Baker, M. D. , Herbert I. Machleder, M. D

Is long vein bypass from groin to ankle a durable procedure

Richard M. Green, MD, William M

Axillary-to-carotid artery bypass grafting for symptomatic severe common carotid artery occlusive disease Joseph P. Archie, PhD, MD Journal of Vascular.

Tibiotibial vein bypass grafts: A new operation for limb salvage

Result of bypass grafting for upper limb ischemia

Lloyd M. Taylor, M.D., Edward S. Phinney, M.D., John M. Porter, M.D.

Effect of a femoral arteriovenous fistula on lower extremity venous hemodynamics after femorocaval reconstruction Sunil S. Menawat, MD, Peter Gloviczki,

Thermal laser-assisted balloon angioplasty of the superficial femoral artery: A multicenter review of 602 cases David Rosenthal, MD, Felix A. Pesa, MD,

Superficial femoral popliteal vein: An anatomic study

Descending thoracic aorta to iliofemoral artery bypass grafting: A role for primary revascularization for aortoiliac occlusive disease? Marc A. Passman,

A new valvulotome for in situ bypass grafts

Axillofemoral bypass: A tool with a limited role

Malcolm O. Perry, MD, Richard Kempczinski, MD

Use of magnetic resonance angiography for the preoperative evaluation of patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease John R. Hoch, MD, Michael.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of limb threatening ischemia: Do the results justify an attempt before bypass grafting? Richard.

Carotid-subclavian bypass grafting with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for symptomatic subclavian artery stenosis or occlusion: A 20-year experience

Interposition grafting for reoperation on the common femoral artery

Axillopopliteal bypass for limb salvage

Edmond J. Prendiville, MB, FRCSI, Anson Yeager, MD, Thomas F

Walter J. McCarthy, MD, William H. Pearce, MD, William R

In vivo femoropopliteal arterial wall compliance in subjects with and without lower limb vascular disease Nigel R.M. Tai, FRCS, Alberto Giudiceandrea,

Endovascular aortoiliac grafts in combination with standard infrainguinal arterial bypasses in the management of limb-threatening ischemia: Preliminary.

Vascular disease, matrix abnormalities, and neuropathy: Implications for limb salvage in diabetes mellitus Frank W. LoGerfo, M.D. Journal of Vascular.

Joseph L. Mills, MD, Spence M. Taylor, MD, Roy M. Fujitani, MD

Interruption of critical aortoiliac collateral circulation during nonvascular operations: A cause of acute limb-threatening ischemia Alan M. Dietzek,

Suggested standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia

Tibial bypass grafting for limb salvage with ringed polytetrafluoroethylene prostheses: Results of primary and secondary procedures Hans Schweiger, MD,

Balloon angioplasty for revision of failing lower extremity bypass grafts Haitham Ali, MD, Ahmed Elbadawy, MD, Mahmoud Saleh, MD, Ayman Hasaballah, MD

Philip S. K. Paty, MD, Dhiraj M. Shah, MD, Javid Saifi, MD, Benjamin B

Calvin B. Ernst, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery

Long-term assessment of cryopreserved vein bypass grafting success

Anthony D. Whittemore, MD, Magruder C. Donaldson, MD, John A

Differential management of acute peripheral arterial ischemia

Cardiovascular surgery—The rocket and its stars: Presidential address

Complications of iliac artery stent deployment

Joseph R. Schneider, MD, PhD, Martha D. McDaniel, MD, Daniel B

Bradford M. Blakeman, M. D. , Fred N. Littooy, M. D. , William H

Composite sequential bypasses to the ankle and beyond for limb salvage

Research and research funding in vascular surgery

J.Dennis Baker, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery

Robert W. Harris, MD, Peter A

Surgical treatment of threatened reversed infrainguinal vein grafts

James E. Edwards, MD, Lloyd M. Taylor, MD, John M. Porter, MD

Surgical management of severe acute lower extremity ischemia

Stanley Ziomek, M. D. , William J. Quiñones-Baldrich, M. D. , Ronald W

Seizures following subclavian-carotid bypass

High incidence of restenosis/reocclusion of stents in the percutaneous treatment of long-segment superficial femoral artery disease after suboptimal angioplasty

Carotid biaxillary bypass: A new operation

Peter G. Kalman, M. D. , Marilyn Hosang, R. N. , Claudio Cina, M. D

The effects of endothelial injury on smooth muscle cell proliferation

Ronald L. Dalman, MD, Lloyd M. Taylor, MD, Gregory L

Exposure of femoral vessels by a suprainguinal incision

Homologous veins as an arterial substitute: Long-term results

The effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of critical limb ischemia: A 10-year experience Toshifumi Kudo, MD, PhD,

James A. DeWeese, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery

Axillary-to-carotid artery bypass grafting for symptomatic severe common carotid artery occlusive disease Joseph P. Archie, PhD, MD Journal of Vascular.

Samuel S. Ahn, MD, Robert B. Rutherford, MD, K

Innominate artery trauma: A thirty-year experience

Popliteal entrapment syndrome: A report of tibial nerve entrapment

Benjamin B. Chang, MD, R. Clement Darling, MD, Devon E. M

Proximal vein thrombosis secondary to hemodialysis catheterization complicated by arteriovenous fistula Joseph J. Piotrowski, M.D., Robert B. Rutherford,

Thigh claudication due to profunda femoris artery occlusion

Lessons learned in adopting the in situ saphenous vein bypass

Optimal proximal anastomosis/tunnel for axillofemoral grafts

The posterior approach to popliteal-crural bypass

Superficial femoral artery eversion endarterectomy: A useful adjunct for infrainguinal bypass in the presence of limited autogenous vein Spence M. Taylor,

Presentation transcript:

Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: Revised version Robert B. Rutherford, MD, J.Dennis Baker, MD, Calvin Ernst, MD, K.Wayne Johnston, MD, John M. Porter, MD, Sam Ahn, MD, Darrell N. Jones, PhD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 517-538 (September 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70045-4 Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Patency curve by life table method (data in Table IV). Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997 26, 517-538DOI: (10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70045-4) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Kaplan-Meier patency curve (data in Table V). Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997 26, 517-538DOI: (10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70045-4) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 A, Bolder numbers indicate value, out of possible total of 3, assigned to each vessel; numbers in finer print indicate values assigned to varying degrees of occlusion (Table IV). B, Runoff resistance values are calculated as follows for grafts that enter the three levels indicated: Level A, superficial femoral = 2 × 3; profunda femoris = 1 × 0; total = 6 + 0 + 1 = 7. Level B, distal popliteal blind segment = 3 × 3 + 1 = 10. Level C, anterior tibial = 2 × 0; arch = 1 × 0; total = 0 + 0 + 1 = 1. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997 26, 517-538DOI: (10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70045-4) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 In each of three graft configurations (A to C), individual runoff values for right and left limbs are 7 and 4, respectively. Values for aortobifemoral stem (A), entire right axillofemoral graft (B), and proximal axillofemoral stem (C) are all 2.5 (1/R = 1/4 + 1/7 = 11/28 = 1/2.5). However, distal axillofemoral limb (C) has runoff resistance value of 7. D shows a sequential bypass graft where resistance values of proximal and distal limbs are 10 and 1, respectively. Combined they give a resistance value for proximal stem of 0.9 (1/R = 10/10 + 1/10 = 11/10 = 1/0.9). Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997 26, 517-538DOI: (10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70045-4) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 In each of three graft configurations (A to C), individual runoff values for right and left limbs are 7 and 4, respectively. Values for aortobifemoral stem (A), entire right axillofemoral graft (B), and proximal axillofemoral stem (C) are all 2.5 (1/R = 1/4 + 1/7 = 11/28 = 1/2.5). However, distal axillofemoral limb (C) has runoff resistance value of 7. D shows a sequential bypass graft where resistance values of proximal and distal limbs are 10 and 1, respectively. Combined they give a resistance value for proximal stem of 0.9 (1/R = 10/10 + 1/10 = 11/10 = 1/0.9). Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997 26, 517-538DOI: (10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70045-4) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 In each of three graft configurations (A to C), individual runoff values for right and left limbs are 7 and 4, respectively. Values for aortobifemoral stem (A), entire right axillofemoral graft (B), and proximal axillofemoral stem (C) are all 2.5 (1/R = 1/4 + 1/7 = 11/28 = 1/2.5). However, distal axillofemoral limb (C) has runoff resistance value of 7. D shows a sequential bypass graft where resistance values of proximal and distal limbs are 10 and 1, respectively. Combined they give a resistance value for proximal stem of 0.9 (1/R = 10/10 + 1/10 = 11/10 = 1/0.9). Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997 26, 517-538DOI: (10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70045-4) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 In each of three graft configurations (A to C), individual runoff values for right and left limbs are 7 and 4, respectively. Values for aortobifemoral stem (A), entire right axillofemoral graft (B), and proximal axillofemoral stem (C) are all 2.5 (1/R = 1/4 + 1/7 = 11/28 = 1/2.5). However, distal axillofemoral limb (C) has runoff resistance value of 7. D shows a sequential bypass graft where resistance values of proximal and distal limbs are 10 and 1, respectively. Combined they give a resistance value for proximal stem of 0.9 (1/R = 10/10 + 1/10 = 11/10 = 1/0.9). Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997 26, 517-538DOI: (10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70045-4) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions