July 2010 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [UTC Presentation to IEEE802] Date Submitted:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEEE g Sub missi on July 2010 Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council Sli de 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Advertisements

Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2015
Name - WirelessHD doc.: IEEE g July 2010
March 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Call for THz Contributions Date Submitted:
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Add name of submission] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [MC EventsList] Date Submitted: [11Jul00]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> March 2004
May 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
July 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [FCC-UWB-certifications-below-1-GHz] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Project: IEEE Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Toumaz response to TG6 Call for Applications]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
<month year> doc.: IEEE sru November, 2010
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE <xyz> January 2001
Doc.: IEEE g May 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Ballot motions]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Text Proposal for FCC NPRM Response Date.
Submission Title: [Proposal to split the TG3a into two]
Submission Title: [Proposal to split the TG3a into two]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE <xyz> November 2000
<month year> November, 2004
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:[SG-PSC Closing Report] Date Submitted: [May.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Frame and packet structure in ]
November 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Simplified geometry for the usage model.
October 2011 doc.: IEEE ptc August 2012
<month year>20 Jan 2006
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> January 2004
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2016
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DF6 Radio-burst length over PSDU size] Date.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
November 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Text Proposal for FCC NPRM Response Date.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: SRU IG Closing Report for Dallas November.
Submission Title: [WG-RR TAG Liaison Report January08]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
July 2010 <month year> doc.: IEEE g Doc.: IEEE g
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> <March 2003>
January 2000 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Study Group Summary and Motion for .15WG.
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
September 2009doc.: IEEE wng0
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
May 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: THz Closing Report – May 2008 Date Submitted:
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Doc.: IEEE Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
Jan 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Call for THz Contributions Date Submitted: January.
July 2003 doc.: IEEE <03/242> July 2003
Jul 12, /12/10 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Dependable Interest Group Closing.
Submission Title: TG9ma Agenda for September Meeting
doc.: IEEE <doc#3>
Jan 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TeraHertz Closing Report Date Submitted: January.
Presentation transcript:

July 2010 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [UTC Presentation to IEEE802] Date Submitted: [12 July, 2010] Source: [Klaus Bender] Company [Utilities Telecom Council] Address [1901 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 500, Washington DC 20006] Voice:[202-833-6803], FAX: [202-833-6803], E-Mail:[klaus.bender@utc.org] Re: [Licensed channels for smart grid applications] Abstract: [UTC recently surveyed utility members regarding use of radio frequencies for the smart grid and the perception of licensed versus unlicensed channels] Purpose: [UTC supports the efforts of IEEE 802.15.4g but feels the inclusion of licensed channels in the standard will enable additional options for utilities to deploy the smart grid] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council

Utilities Telecom Council July 2010 Utilities Telecom Council Presentation to IEEE802 Plenary Meeting Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council

Utilities Telecom Council July 2010 Utilities Telecom Council UTC is an international trade association representing the information and communications technology (ICT) interests of electric, gas and water utilities. Energy and water utilities face both challenges and change, during which ICT will play a critical role. In this context, UTC’s mission is to ensure success for utility ICT professionals and their employers, technology partners, regulators, and customers. 3 Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council

Importance of Open Standards July 2010 Importance of Open Standards UTC and its members acknowledge the need for open standards to smart grid deployment. Communications standards are critical in this effort. UTC supports IEEE’s efforts to assist in the development of smart grid standards thru the NIST Smart Grid Interoperability Roadmap process. Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council

July 2010 Recent Member Survey Utilities Telecom Council (UTC) conducted a survey of its core utility members, posing a series of questions related to certain technological issues and experiences that are relevant to the 802.15.4G standards-setting process. 111 valid (i.e. clearly identified respondents who completed more than just one or two questions) The 111 respondents represented 82 distinct utility companies – our method allowed for individual, not corporate responses. Among the titles of the respondents offered are: Senior Engineer, Senior Engineering Supervisor, Senior Technology Specialist, Communications Engineer, Vice President of Engineering, GM of Engineering and so forth. Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council

Characteristics of Respondents' Utilities July 2010 Characteristics of Respondents' Utilities Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> July 2010 We asked the respondents to agree or disagree with the following statement: End-to-end IP connectivity is critical for future smart grid deployment. Approximately 83% of the respondents said they strongly agree or agree with this statement, while less than 5% disagree or strongly disagree.   Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council 7 <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> July 2010 The survey asked respondents whether they agree or disagree with the following statement: Demand response, including load shed, is a critical component for our future energy strategy. Approximately 88% of the respondents either strongly agree or agree with this statement, while only about 2% disagree with the statement. Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council 8 <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> July 2010 The survey asked respondents to agree or disagree with the following statement: We operate a radio-based system for AMR, AMI, DA or another utility-centric activity. Around 74% of the respondents either strongly agree or agree with this statement, while 11% either disagree or strongly disagree with this statement. Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council 9 <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> July 2010 The survey asked respondents whether they agree or disagree with the following statement: We have experienced interference/jamming on an unlicensed radio system. Approximately 55% of the respondents strongly agree or agree with this statement, while 17% either strongly disagree or disagree with this statement. Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council 10 <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> July 2010 The survey asked respondents to agree or disagree with the following statement: We have experienced interference/jamming on a licensed radio system. Approximately 37% of the respondents either strongly agree or agree with this statement, while an almost equal percentage of respondents, 36%, either strongly disagree or disagree with this statement. Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council 11 <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> July 2010 The survey asked respondents whether they agree or disagree with the following statements: We have experienced radio penetration issues that might include radio access into vaults, high-rise buildings, basements and other situations. Around 57% of the respondents said they strongly agree or agree with this statement, while about 13% said they strongly disagree or disagree with this statement. Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council 12 <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> July 2010 The survey asked respondents whether they agree or disagree with the following statement: Both FCC unlicensed and licensed spectrum should be allowed as utility options in future NIST-approved (National Institutes of Standards and Technology) standards supporting smart grid applications such as IEEE802.15.4G, which specifies interoperable RF communications, PHY/MAC, for the WAN/LAN. Approximately 87% of the respondents either strongly agree or agree with this statement, while only around 5% disagree with this statement. Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council 13 <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> July 2010 The survey asked respondents whether they agree or disagree with the following statement: It is important to support standards that allow connection (without specialized repeaters) to hard-to-reach endpoints, such as meters in vaults, meters below grade or in high-rises, rural infrastructure and similar situations. Approximately 86% of the respondents either strongly agreed or agreed with this statement, while no respondents disagreed with this statement. Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council 14 <author>, <company>

UTC Approach to Standards July 2010 UTC Approach to Standards Concentrate on comms & IT issues Coordinate with UTC SNC Education and Standards Committee Webinars on standards topics Working conference calls on issues of interest to members Membership in SNC is free to UTC members Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council

Information Sources from UTC July 2010 Information Sources from UTC Short messaging Twitter – UTC Linked In list – Facebook Retweeting other posts as appropriate Summary messages UTC Intelligence weekly emails UTC Insight blog (http://utcinsight.org) Detailed reports Reports and analysis documents posted Member only area of UTC web site Klaus Bender, PE, Utilities Telecom Council